[tbudl] Test

2001-08-28 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED], Testing -- Best regards, - Syafril - Name : Syafril Hermansyah |Company: Duta Integrasi Pratama Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Voice : (62) (21) 385-1600 FAXto : (62)(21)351-9241

[tbudl] Re: Test

2001-08-28 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hello Syafril, Tuesday,August28,2001, 11:15:32 PM, you wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: SH Testing Test #2 -- Best regards, Syafrilmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives :

[tbudl] Re: Test

2001-08-28 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hello Syafril, Tuesday, August 28, 2001, 11:22:26 PM, you wrote to Syafril Hermansyah: SH Testing SH Test #2 Test #3 -- Best regards, Syafrilmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives :

[tbudl] Re: Test

2001-08-28 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hi All, On Tue, 28 Aug 2001 at 18:28:01 GMT +0200 (8/28/2001 11:28 PM GMT +0700 where you think I live) Peter Palmreuther=[PP]typed the following : SH Testing the 'new'/'other' lists daemon (the one that prepends [tbudl]) misses the 'X-MDMailing-List:' Header therefore my

[tbudl] Re: Test

2001-08-28 Thread Timothy J. Luoma
Why does a mailing list for a mail program that can sort on any header need to have a Subject tag for each message? Now I have to write another procmail script for the server to yank it out. We now have Re: [tbudl] Re: Test for a Subject line (at least that's how it appears before I hit send)

[tbudl] Re: Test

2001-08-28 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Tuesday, August 28, 2001, 11:54:50 AM, Timothy J. Luoma wrote: Why does a mailing list for a mail program that can sort on any header need to have a Subject tag for each message? I'll second that protest. Please advise what message we have to send the server to turn off that feature. --

[tbudl] Re: Test

2001-08-28 Thread Thomas F
Hello Timothy, On Tue, 28 Aug 2001 12:54:50 -0400 GMT (29/08/2001, 00:54 +0800 GMT), Timothy J. Luoma wrote: TJL TjL, who dislikes list-tags that can't be turned off I agree to every word you said. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Und heisst Du nicht

Re: [tbudl] Re: Test

2001-08-28 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hello Dwight, Tuesday, August 28, 2001, 11:58:20 PM, you wrote to Timothy J. Luoma: Why does a mailing list for a mail program that can sort on any header need to have a Subject tag for each message? DAC I'll second that protest. Please advise what message we have to send DAC the server to

Re: [tbudl] Re: Test

2001-08-28 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Syafril, On Tuesday, August 28, 2001, at 10:12:55 AM -0700, you wrote: Others opinion ? I've found that adding Subject tags such as tbudl tag is redundant, and only adds length to the Subject line. In my PGP-Basics List, I removed the

Re: [tbudl] Re: Test

2001-08-28 Thread Marek Mikus
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Nick Andriash wrote: Others opinion ? I've found that adding Subject tags such as tbudl tag is redundant, and only adds length to the Subject line. In my PGP-Basics List, I removed the Subject tag much to the delight of the Members, even though some had to change

No SUbject Tag [ was Re: [tbudl] Re: Test]

2001-08-28 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hi All, On Tue, 28 Aug 2001 at 10:41:46 GMT -0700 (8/29/2001 12:41 AM GMT +0700 where you think I live) Nick Andriash=[NA]typed the following : Others opinion ? I've found that adding Subject tags such as tbudl tag is redundant, and only adds length to the Subject line. In my

Re: [tbudl] Re: Test

2001-08-28 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hi All, On Tue, 28 Aug 2001 at 19:51:24 GMT +0200 (CEST) (8/29/2001 12:51 AM GMT +0700 where you think I live) Marek Mikus=[MM]typed the following : Others opinion ? I've found that adding Subject tags such as tbudl tag is redundant, and only adds length to the Subject line.

Re: [tbudl] Re: Test

2001-08-28 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hi All, On Wed, 29 Aug 2001 at 01:23:00 GMT +0700 (8/29/2001 1:23 AM GMT +0700 where you think I live) Syafril Hermansyah=[SH]typed the following : I haven't this additional string in my lists too, there is no reason to have them in subject line. Okay ! Hmm...the blank space should be

Test - Ignore

2001-08-28 Thread Darren D . Wall
Hello Fellow Bat Cavers, Trying to get my corporate email sender working, please ignore -- Best regards, Darren D . Wall mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators :

Re: Filter on 'Sender'

2001-08-28 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Nick, On 28 August 2001 at 10:18:04 -0700 (which was 18:18 where I live) Nick Andriash wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these points: TJL Does Recipient check To or CC or both? Both. NA Hmmm? I'm not so sure that Recipient checks both the

Re: Quoting first 5 lines

2001-08-28 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hi Raj, Historians believe that Tuesday, August 28, 2001 at 10:52 GMT +0530 was when, Raj [R] typed the following: R When I use %Text=5, I do not get the text quoted like in ('R' R Text Here) Try %QUOTES=%TEXT='5' -- Thanks for writing, Januk Aggarwal Using The Bat! 1.54 Beta/7 under

Re[3]: Quoting first 5 lines

2001-08-28 Thread -=ToÑo.!=-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Sorry... Confirm, both don´t work test in 1.53d, 1.53o and 1.54b7 - -- -=ToÑo.!=- El más difícil no es el primer beso, sino el último. Paul Géraldy ,,, (^;^) ,,,__ -=ToÑo.!=- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ-UIN:50036143 Llave PGP

Re: What's efficient Preview?

2001-08-28 Thread Thomas F
Hi Avenarius, On Wed, 29 Aug 2001 03:06:11 +0200GMT (29/08/2001, 09:06 +0800GMT), Avenarius wrote: We have tried to make preview mode as fast and powerful as we can: [...]: use the + and - keys to move through the messages in the currently-selected folder, and the space bar to page through