Re: 4.4.0 Interactive routing subsystem is not enabled

2002-06-06 Thread Roelof Otten
Hello Scott, On Wed, 5 Jun 2002 21:19:21 -0600GMT (6-6-02, 5:19 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: SA After troubleshooting more I am confused. On my old machine with SA version 1.60c I can send from those accounts without trouble. On the SA new machine with version 1.60m I can not. Can you

Re[2]: Showing Flagged messages on Account tree

2002-06-06 Thread Ben Kennish
Hi Dierk, On Thursday, June 6, 2002, 7:10:34 AM, you wrote: Dierk Hello Jonathan! Dierk On Thursday, June 6, 2002 at 12:19:44 AM you wrote: I personally have no idea... I'll leave that one up to the experts to answer. Dierk Sadly no. It's a long-standing wish to implement a small Flag

Re: Discretionary auto-reply

2002-06-06 Thread Gerard
ON Thursday, June 6, 2002, 9:20:08 AM, you wrote: RO Consider a filter that's triggered by a hotkey. (In the options tab of RO the filter) In that way you can forget about dragging it to your RO folder. Hi Roelof, I had a look at this option but don't have a clue how this would work.

Re: Discretionary auto-reply

2002-06-06 Thread Roelof Otten
Hello Gerard, On Thu, 6 Jun 2002 10:03:31 +0200GMT (6-6-02, 10:03 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: RO Consider a filter that's triggered by a hotkey. (In the options tab of GI had a look at this option but don't have a clue how this would Gwork. Can you explain the mechanics of this

Re: SpamCop encountered errors

2002-06-06 Thread Paul Cartwright
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Marck, I'm adding in tbudl to this, so we can move the thread to the right group... SA SpamCop encountered errors while saving spam for processing: SA SpamCop could not find your spam message in this email: MDP Okay - next question - Do you

Re: SpamCop encountered errors

2002-06-06 Thread Paul Cartwright
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 SA SpamCop encountered errors while saving spam for processing: SA SpamCop could not find your spam message in this email: MDP Okay - next question - Do you have a C:\temp folder on your c drive? MDP If not, that may be the problem... yup it's

Re: Discretionary auto-reply

2002-06-06 Thread Gerard
ON Thursday, June 6, 2002, 1:15:22 PM, you wrote: RO Hello Gerard, RO Consider a filter that's triggered by a hotkey. (In the options tab of GI had a look at this option but don't have a clue how this would Gwork. Can you explain the mechanics of this filter including the Goption

Customising toolbar

2002-06-06 Thread Jon Lawrance
Can you customise the toolbar? Ideally, I would like to right mouse click on a message and have a Quick Template choice, instead of having to click the Reply icon and navigate to the list of templates. However, since this is not a feature (hopefully a future one) is there anyway I can use an

Re: Customising toolbar

2002-06-06 Thread Deborah W
Thursday, June 6, 2002, 4:46:26 PM, you wrote: JL Can you customise the toolbar? No - but it's a feature that I ( quite a few others, I think) would like to see, there has been talk on this list previously of this being introduced in vers 2. You can, however, customize the function keys, I

Re: Showing Flagged messages on Account tree

2002-06-06 Thread Adam
Hello Ben, Wednesday, June 5, 2002, 7:30:57 PM, you wrote: BK Is there a way to show folders that have flagged messages BK automatically? BK Perhaps you could make the folders in the tree that have flagged BK messages in appear red? Various of my folders have a little red checkmark on them.

Re: Showing Flagged messages on Account tree

2002-06-06 Thread Nick Andriash
Hello Adam, On Thursday, June 6, 2002, at 09:54:50 AM (-0700), you wrote: Various of my folders have a little red checkmark on them. I wonder what it is. Those little red check marks indicate unread messages in the Parent Folder. -- Nick Andriash Courtenay, B.C. Canada

Re[2]: OT: NOD32 query (was Re: NOD32 Plugin)

2002-06-06 Thread Joseph N.
I could be mistaken, but I think that Allie's point was that scanning on execution is fundamental to a real-time scanner, so since there's an option to enable or disable the program, why have an additional option for execute. -- JN On Thursday, June 06, 2002, Thomas F wrote in [EMAIL

Re: First 2 lines of message does not display

2002-06-06 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Thursday, June 06, 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... I installed it. Still can't see the first paragraph -- unless I turn on the RCF-822 headers. I find that if I mime-formard the original message to myself, save the attachment, then import it, I can see the first paragraph. Does

Re: First 2 lines of message does not display

2002-06-06 Thread Julian Beach (Lists)
On Thursday, June 6, 2002, 8:52:19 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I find that if I mime-formard the original message to myself, save the attachment, then import it, I can see the first paragraph. Does anyone have any idea why I am not seeing the first paragraph in the ORIGINAL message with

Re[3]: Showing Flagged messages on Account tree

2002-06-06 Thread Ben Kennish
Hi Robert, On Thursday, June 6, 2002, 8:06:10 PM, you wrote: Robert I think the following would be an appropriate way to handle this Robert A Folders/Tree with unread messages in BOLD Robert B Folders/Tree with parked or Flagged messages with special folder icon Robert C Folders/Tree with items

Re: OT: NOD32 query (was Re: NOD32 Plugin)

2002-06-06 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Joseph N. [JN] wrote: ... JN I could be mistaken, but I think that Allie's point was that JN scanning on execution is fundamental to a real-time scanner, so JN since there's an option to enable or

Watch tread

2002-06-06 Thread Peter Kerekes
There is a very useful feature missing from BAT: A way to mark a message so that it would automatically flag any new follow up messages in that tread, like a WATCH for. Sometimes a message is interesting and would like to see the follow-ups, replies, suggestions, but with so many

Problems with TB default mail prog

2002-06-06 Thread Blarp
Has anyone else had to fight with TB and OE over which is the default? Seems TB tries to unset OE from being the default every time it runs even though I have all of those options unchecked in TB. Tom TB v1.60h Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ

Re: Problems with TB default mail prog

2002-06-06 Thread Carren Stuart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, 7 June 2002 at 1:51 p.m. Blarp wrote: B Has anyone else had to fight with TB and OE over which is the B default? Seems TB tries to unset OE from being the default every B time it runs even though I have all of those options unchecked in

Re: Watch tread

2002-06-06 Thread Joseph N.
Although TB! doesn't exactly have that watch feature, it does have features which do the same thing, only slightly differently. First, you could view your messages by thread, so that messages with the same subject or reference or sender, or whatever you choose, are grouped together. Then,

Re: Problems with TB default mail prog

2002-06-06 Thread ETM
When I was very unsure of myself and TB, I did simultaneously download into OE (which had the right to remove from server) and TB (mail left on server). I did it for several months, not giving up OE until I was very very comfortable. However, I had no problems keeping them separated, did not

Re[2]: 4.4.0 Interactive routing subsystem is not enabled

2002-06-06 Thread Scott Ames
Hi; I tried sending with Outlook Express and yes.. I can send using the same account information from Outlook. I went back to The Bat to see if it would now work because you never know with ISPs. Unfortunately I get the same error from The Bat...4.4.0 Interactive routing subsystem is not enabled

Re: Showing Flagged messages on Account tree

2002-06-06 Thread Thomas F
Hello Robert, On Thu, 6 Jun 2002 21:06:10 +0200 GMT (07/06/02, 02:06 +0700 GMT), Robert van der Hulst wrote: RvdH I think the following would be an appropriate way to handle this RvdH A Folders/Tree with unread messages in BOLD RvdH B Folders/Tree with parked or Flagged messages with special

Re: OT: NOD32 query (was Re: NOD32 Plugin)

2002-06-06 Thread Thomas F
Hello Allie, On Thu, 6 Jun 2002 16:38:37 -0500 GMT (07/06/02, 04:38 +0700 GMT), Allie C Martin wrote: JN I could be mistaken, but I think that Allie's point was that JN scanning on execution is fundamental to a real-time scanner, so JN since there's an option to enable or disable the program,

Re: 4.4.0 Interactive routing subsystem is not enabled

2002-06-06 Thread Thomas F
Hello Scott, On Thu, 6 Jun 2002 22:24:49 -0600 GMT (07/06/02, 11:24 +0700 GMT), Scott Ames wrote: SA I tried sending with Outlook Express and yes.. I can send using the SA same account information from Outlook. I went back to The Bat to see SA if it would now work because you never know with

Re[2]: Problems with TB default mail prog

2002-06-06 Thread Carren Stuart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, 7 June 2002 at 2:26 p.m. ETM wrote: E When I was very unsure of myself and TB, I did simultaneously E download into OE (which had the right to remove from server) and TB E (mail left on server). I did it for several months, not giving up

Re[2]: 4.4.0 Interactive routing subsystem is not enabled

2002-06-06 Thread Scott Ames
Hi; It's not a LAN, it's just a DSL dialup from home. Outlook Express can send from the same machine to that SMTP, but the Bat 1.60m can not. The older version of The Bat can on the other machine. ( haven't tried the older version on the new machine or the other way around ) Simply a mystery.

Re: Problems with TB default mail prog

2002-06-06 Thread Blarp
Hi Carren, CS I am sorry, can't help with your question BUT, why would you even want CS to use OE if you have TB!? :-) OE plays with Lotus Organizer better (aka MAPI). There are a couple of other very minor reasons I still use it. Tom

DSL and the Bat!

2002-06-06 Thread Lynn
I hope no one will think this is a stupid question but, we recently installed DSL and I can't seem to figure out how to connect to my email using The Bat. I keep getting a window that says that no dial-up connection was made. Call me brainless but does this software work on a DSL connection