Re: question - how can email be sent from me that I didn't send
Hello Lynn, On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 21:00:08 -0700 GMT (24/06/02, 11:00 +0700 GMT), Lynn Turriff wrote: LT Is there any way, apart from intuitive deduction, to LT identify which information is forged, and which genuine? Yes, and sorry for my typo in the previous mail. It should have been: TF In order to find that injection point, YOU have to compare a TF few mails' headers. ^^^ -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Planet: A body of Earth surrounded by sky. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.60q under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
MD5 sum for 1.60q *.exe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello tbudl, On Saturday, my computer crashed for some reasons. Shortly before the crash, I got the message from Kerio Firewall that the file thebat.exe has been replaced with another file of the same name. Today, after I reinstalled everything, including The Bat!, I again received the same warning. I mean, for the first couple of hours everything was OK, but then this warning... Has any of you experienced something similar? Can somebody perhaps send me the MD5 sum of his thebat.exe file for the 1.60q version? What I have now is this: 7fbf3470708874e539621680a539a509 Thanks in advance for your help. - -- Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -=Robert Golovniov | Lviv, Ukraine=- ~ PGP public key: 0x633F6D07 (link 1 - embedded, link 2 - attached) Fingerprint: 1A1C 29F1 2A0C 4C4E 0BDA C8EE 5A1D 9F03 633F 6D07 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=PGP%20KeyBody=Please%20send%20key mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=GPG%20KeyBody=Please%20send%20key ~ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (Win32) - GPGshell v2.30.31 Comment: PGP-signed for authentication. iD8DBQE9FvKyWh2fA2M/bQcRAiZAAKDewdIzk4PNB/QqDikX23WelBIH1ACgjXe/ MH9rOIRU+Qy5hzMKr9XhXi4= =1sdX -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: MD5 sum for 1.60q *.exe
On Monday, June 24, 2002, 12:21, Robert Golovniov wrote: Can somebody perhaps send me the MD5 sum of his thebat.exe file for the 1.60q version? What I have now is this: 7fbf3470708874e539621680a539a509 Same here and everything works fine. -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: MD5 sum for 1.60q *.exe
Hello! On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 13:21:49 +0300 Robert Golovniov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: RG Has any of you experienced something similar? No. RG Can somebody perhaps send me the MD5 sum of his thebat.exe file for the RG 1.60q version? RG What I have now is this: 7fbf3470708874e539621680a539a509 This value is identical to what I have got on my sustem. -- Yours sincerely, Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) http://www.andris.msk.ru/ Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: filter to delete HTML attachments
Hey Zachary, My MUA believes you used The Bat! (v1.60q) Personal to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Saturday, June 22, 2002 at 11:57:28 PM. ZR I subscribe to a mailing list where almost all of the members send ZR messages with HTML formatting. If you ask me, HTML in email is a ZR waste and an epidemic. A number of people on this list agree with (me included). ZR But this mailing list is not computer related ... ZR I have a folder made for all the messages to this list, but I'm ZR wondering if there's a way to set a filter to delete the 'attachment' ZR - that is the HTML formatting - from each message to the list. Not easily, but you can look in the archives to see if there is something usefull for you. ,- [ From the archive (I searched with 'delete HTML attachment' ] | http://www.mail-archive.com/tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com/msg40416.html `- Note, it would be nice if you used a 'dash dash space cr' cut mark/sig delimiter, as that will allow automatic trimming of your sig and the message footers. Here is a cut from part of the FAQ at http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/samples.html ,- [ Cut Mark description ] | Now comes the sign off. It starts with a cut mark: | -- | | This is a special sequence that starts on a new line and consists of | two dashes (minus signs) and a space followed by another new line. | | NewLinedashdashspaceNewLine | | This cut mark is recognised by many email programs and is used as a | cut off point for signatures. That way, when someone replies to one of | your messages, your signature (anything below the cut mark) is | removed. Likewise, when you reply to a message from someone that | includes cut mark, The Bat! will remove anything below the cut mark | from the text you quote. `- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! eMail v1.60q Windows 2000 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 2) CATS: The Other White Meat. Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: MD5 sum for 1.60q *.exe
Hello Marcus, Monday, June 24, 2002, 2:07:48 PM, you wrote: MO Same here and everything works fine. What, then, can be the reasons of such a strange behaviour of my firewall? -- Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -=Robert Golovniov | Lviv, Ukraine=- ~ PGP public key: 0x633F6D07 (link 1 - embedded, link 2 - attached) Fingerprint: 1A1C 29F1 2A0C 4C4E 0BDA C8EE 5A1D 9F03 633F 6D07 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=PGP%20KeyBody=Please%20send%20key mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=GPG%20KeyBody=Please%20send%20key ~ Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Not have subject auto-complete
Bat List, The auto-complete for the subject seems to complete too quickly and is a bit annoying. The problem is I like having the auto-complete for the addresses. Is there anyway to have The Bat set up to not auto-complete the subject line, but to just auto-complete the address field. In Preferences it looks like you have options about how you want the address to auto-complete but you can't seem to turn off the subject auto-complete without also turning off the address auto-complete. Thank for any help, -- Rick mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] If you go to a party, and you want to be the popular one at the party, do this: Wait until no one is looking, then kick a burning log out of the fireplace onto the carpet. Then jump on top of it with your body and yell, Log o' fire! Log o' fire! I've never done this, but I think it'd work. -Jack Handey Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: MD5 sum for 1.60q *.exe
On Monday, June 24, 2002, 1:58:54 PM, Robert Golovniov wrote: What, then, can be the reasons of such a strange behaviour of my firewall? Does the firewall keep track of applications to monitor for Trojans? What it might be warning you is that the checksum of the original version of TB is not the same as the current one. I get similar behaviour from BlackICE after installing a new TB EXE file - BlackICE will not let it run or communicate with the internal until I give it permission, and will keep doing so until I update the application checksum database that BlackICE maintains. Julian -- Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
OT testing. please ignore. sorry.
-- Rick Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: MD5 sum for 1.60q *.exe
On Monday, June 24, 2002, Robert Golovniov wrote... Has any of you experienced something similar? Can somebody perhaps send me the MD5 sum of his thebat.exe file for the 1.60q version? What I have now is this: 7fbf3470708874e539621680a539a509 Is 1.60q a full install? Or just an over-write of the exe? Could it be that your firewall is seeing the MD5 for the old program if you just replaced it? Thanks in advance for your help. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Questions
Spake [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 6/21/2002, at 17:12:42 -0700: i-dle, adj., idler, idlest, v. idled, idling --adj. 1. unemployed, or doing nothing 2. unoccupied 3. not kept busy or in use or operation 4. habitually doing nothing or avoiding work 5. of no real worth, importance, or significance 6. baseless or groundless 7. frivolous or vain 8. futile 9. useless Syn. indolent, lazy, slothful Random House American College Dictionary Hey, Windows may be slow, but slothful? Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Questions
Spake Thomas F on 6/21/2002, at 08:17:47 +0700: And why would Windows care about the actual definition? MS could just have redefined it... ;-) And just for informational purposes... I left my computer all weekend, but apparently, since I check my mail every 60 seconds, my computer is not 'idle'. So I have to either re-define idle, or take out the idle check. :( Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
MAIL DOWNLOADING PROBLEMS
Hello everybody, I sincerely hope one of you can help me with this riddle. I've just installed TB and, after it performed perfectly well immediately following the installation, I set it aside AS IS because I wanted to try another software before deciding. A week later - that is today - I came back to TB and suddenly I have a very strange problem that prevents me from downloading my mail. It recognizes the server and even tells me how many messages it's going to download. Then during the actual process, it tells me: "Received message from X, subject Y, etc. etc." "Could notstore message (file name: C:\Windows\temp\bat123.temp)" Where X Y are precise details of the message (i.e. it reads the message properties), and 123 is a serial number for the message. Furthermore - whether because of that or not - it does not actually download the mail, although the proper box has been checked to delete from the server once downloaded. I can't understand at all what's missing here! Can anyone help me please? Thanks in advance Joyce ===Location:Tel Aviv - IsraelPhone :972 - 3 - 649 1806Fax : 972 - 3 - 644 4510Primary E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Alternative E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]** When the term "Global Village" will be a FEELING,** The world throughout will finally really be at PEACE.
Re: MAIL DOWNLOADING PROBLEMS
On Monday, June 24, 2002, 17:20, Joyce Sala wrote: A week later - that is today - I came back to TB and suddenly I have a very strange problem that prevents me from downloading my mail. It recognizes the server and even tells me how many messages it's going to download. Then during the actual process, it tells me: Received message from X, subject Y, etc. etc. Could not store message (file name: C:\Windows\temp\bat123.temp) Does C:\Windows\temp\ still exist? Do you have write priviliges to that directory? Is there space available on the C: drive? -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Not have subject auto-complete
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Rick, @24 June 2002, 09:48:52 -0400 (14:48 UK time) Rick Reumann wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ... Is there anyway to have The Bat set up to not auto-complete the subject line, but to just auto-complete the address field. Why not just ignore it and keep typing? The auto-complete will let you carry on typing from where you left off and override the suggestion. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr2b1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE9FyrrOeQkq5KdzaARAktUAKDCMEisQHZLDShA8KFZ6l8kYmircACcDvdB bP/nI4u1GwuXeS9R8SFaH+g= =SQ1n -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: MAIL DOWNLOADING PROBLEMS
Hi Joyce, On Monday, June 24, 2002 at 17:20:47 [GMT +0200], you wrote: It recognizes the server and even tells me how many messages it's going to download. Then during the actual process, it tells me: Received message from X, subject Y, etc. etc. Could not store message (file name: C:\Windows\temp\bat123.temp) Where X Y are precise details of the message (i.e. it reads the message properties), and 123 is a serial number for the message. TB! stores downloaded messages in a temporary file before actually importing it into its message base. This is the C:\Windows\temp\bat123.temp file you are referring to. It seems that something prevents TB! from creating this file. One common reason for such behaviour is that one message in your mailbox is infected with a virus and a virus scanner prevents TB! from creating the temporary file. That way, the infected mail is never deleted from the server (because the deletion takes only place after successfully importing a message to the message base) and is downloaded again every time you check your mail. Try the mail dispatcher (Account - Dispatch messages on server - All messages) to have a look at your messages on the server. BTW, the users on this list are usually very kind and help each other without shouting in the subject or setting messages to high priority. :-) -- Regards, Lars The Bat! 1.60q on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 |Lars Geiger | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: Not have subject auto-complete
On Monday, June 24, 2002, 10:21:28 AM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: MDP Why not just ignore it and keep typing? The auto-complete will let you MDP carry on typing from where you left off and override the suggestion. Well, it seems to auto-complete pretty quick. Not a big deal though you are right as long as I don't pause when typing the subject. THanks for the feedback. -- Rick mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] If I ever get real rich, I hope I'm not real mean to poor people, like I am now. -Jack Handey Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Not have subject auto-complete
Hello Marck, Why not just ignore it and keep typing? The auto-complete will let you carry on typing from where you left off and override the suggestion. The problem comes when you want to type a shorter subject. For example, if I send a message with subject Test number 2 and later I want to send one with subject Test, it is quite likely the it will go out with Test number 2 also. It's happened to me several times. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.60c Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Not have subject auto-complete
On Monday, June 24, 2002, 16:39, Miguel A. Urech wrote: The problem comes when you want to type a shorter subject. For example, if I send a message with subject Test number 2 and later I want to send one with subject Test, it is quite likely the it will go out with Test number 2 also. It's happened to me several times. I agree that it can be annoying but you know you can hit the delete button, don't you? Maybe not a solution but at least a workaround. -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Not have subject auto-complete
Subject: Not Have Subject Auto-Complete From: Marcus Ohlström ~~ Hello Marcus, The problem comes when you want to type a shorter subject. For example, if I send a message with subject Test number 2 and later I want to send one with subject Test, it is quite likely the it will go out with Test number 2 also. It's happened to me several times. I agree that it can be annoying but you know you can hit the delete button, don't you? Maybe not a solution but at least a workaround. One spot where that won't even work is with letter case. Say I shoot off a quick note to my home address and put reminder as the subject. Later I'm sending a note to my boss and want to type Reminder. Auto correct changes it to reminder and it a PITA to override. -- ò¸ó Nick Danger Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Mail downloading problems
Hi Marcus, Does C:\Windows\temp\ still exist? Yes, with all the temp files it made from TB. Do you have write priviliges to that directory? Nope. Is there space available on the C: drive? Yep! 15GB free... Any ideas? Joyce === Location: Tel Aviv - Israel Phone : 972 - 3 - 649 1806 Fax : 972 - 3 - 644 4510 Primary E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alternative E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** When the term Global Village will be a FEELING, ** The world throughout will finally really be at PEACE. - Original Message - From: Marcus Ohlström [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: June 24, 2002 4:18 PM Subject: Re: MAIL DOWNLOADING PROBLEMS On Monday, June 24, 2002, 17:20, Joyce Sala wrote: A week later - that is today - I came back to TB and suddenly I have a very strange problem that prevents me from downloading my mail. It recognizes the server and even tells me how many messages it's going to download. Then during the actual process, it tells me: Received message from X, subject Y, etc. etc. Could not store message (file name: C:\Windows\temp\bat123.temp) Does C:\Windows\temp\ still exist? Do you have write priviliges to that directory? Is there space available on the C: drive? -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/ Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
RE: Mail downloading problems
Does C:\Windows\temp\ still exist? Yes, with all the temp files it made from TB. Do you have write priviliges to that directory? Nope. Looks like you'll be needing write access to that directory, as it needs to create the temp file. Is there space available on the C: drive? Yep! 15GB free... Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Mail downloading problems
On Monday, June 24, 2002, Joyce Sala wrote... Do you have write priviliges to that directory? Nope. Then find out how to get write privileges to it... Then hopefully this should go away. Is there space available on the C: drive? Yep! 15GB free... Any ideas? Also when quoting, you appear not to put in any form of identification to show the difference between your quote, and your reply. This gets a little confusing. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Mail downloading problems
On Monday, June 24, 2002, 18:10, Joyce Sala wrote: Do you have write priviliges to that directory? Nope. Any ideas? Yes. If you do not have write privileges to your temp directory then TB! can't write anything there which prevents it from processing your mails (as Lars Geiger pointed out TB! always writes the message to your temp directory before importing it to your message base). Try giving yourself write privileges to that directory and see if it works better. I'm however a bit suspicious, C:\Windows\Temp is normally only found on Windows 9x systems and if I remember correctly you can not restrict access privileges on those systems. I might be wrong here, it's been a while since I last used Windows 9x. Maybe someone else could straiten this out. And it would of course help if you told us which Windows version you are using. -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Mail downloading problems
Hi Lars, Sorry for the caps I was just too tired fighting TB to notice. One common reason for such behaviour is that one message in your mailbox is infected with a virus and a virus scanner prevents TB! from creating the temporary file. That way, the infected mail is never deleted from the server (because the deletion takes only place after successfully importing a message to the message base) and is downloaded again every time you check your mail. I think that's quite unlikely, as I have Norton updated *daily*, and when ther is a virus (such as our *beloved* klez) it quarantines it on my PC. Or are you saying it's a virus attacking my ISP server?? For Two Weeks?? (msgs are since Jun 14), hardly: this ISP is the biggest in the country! Try the mail dispatcher (Account - Dispatch messages on server - All messages) to have a look at your messages on the server. I did that now: but other than being able to read the contents, I cannot save nor can I see any virus notification. What was I supposed to glean from that? Excuse me for my ignorance... Joyce === Location: Tel Aviv - Israel Phone : 972 - 3 - 649 1806 Fax : 972 - 3 - 644 4510 Primary E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alternative E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** When the term Global Village will be a FEELING, ** The world throughout will finally really be at PEACE. - Original Message - From: Lars Geiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: June 24, 2002 4:24 PM Subject: Re: MAIL DOWNLOADING PROBLEMS Hi Joyce, On Monday, June 24, 2002 at 17:20:47 [GMT +0200], you wrote: It recognizes the server and even tells me how many messages it's going to download. Then during the actual process, it tells me: Received message from X, subject Y, etc. etc. Could not store message (file name: C:\Windows\temp\bat123.temp) Where X Y are precise details of the message (i.e. it reads the message properties), and 123 is a serial number for the message. TB! stores downloaded messages in a temporary file before actually importing it into its message base. This is the C:\Windows\temp\bat123.temp file you are referring to. It seems that something prevents TB! from creating this file. One common reason for such behaviour is that one message in your mailbox is infected with a virus and a virus scanner prevents TB! from creating the temporary file. That way, the infected mail is never deleted from the server (because the deletion takes only place after successfully importing a message to the message base) and is downloaded again every time you check your mail. Try the mail dispatcher (Account - Dispatch messages on server - All messages) to have a look at your messages on the server. BTW, the users on this list are usually very kind and help each other without shouting in the subject or setting messages to high priority. :-) -- Regards, Lars The Bat! 1.60q on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 |Lars Geiger | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/ Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Mail downloading problems
Hi Weaven, You are the 2nd person telling me that but I don't have ANY access limitation on ANY of my directories! So how can that be? Frankly I'm groping in the dark. Help! Joyce === Location: Tel Aviv - Israel Phone : 972 - 3 - 649 1806 Fax : 972 - 3 - 644 4510 Primary E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alternative E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** When the term Global Village will be a FEELING, ** The world throughout will finally really be at PEACE. - Original Message - From: Weaven, ChristopherX [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: June 24, 2002 5:02 PM Subject: RE: Mail downloading problems Does C:\Windows\temp\ still exist? Yes, with all the temp files it made from TB. Do you have write priviliges to that directory? Nope. Looks like you'll be needing write access to that directory, as it needs to create the temp file. Is there space available on the C: drive? Yep! 15GB free... Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/ Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Mail downloading problems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Joyce, @24 June 2002, 18:10:00 +0200 (17:10 UK time) Joyce Sala wrote in 003501c21b99$98513400$920e08d5@joycesala">mid:003501c21b99$98513400$920e08d5@joycesala Does C:\Windows\temp\ still exist? Yes, with all the temp files it made from TB. Do you have write priviliges to that directory? Nope. You don't? Isn't that a problem in itself? Please read Lars' reply carefully. I think it may also have a bearing on the issue. moderator Please do not quote signatures and footers when replying to the list. Please use quote marks on text to which you are replying. stock lecture You're using the Outlook standard reply format, one that I find awful (but I'm feeling more like Canute by the day on that score). It is called top quoting and means that you let the quotes appear at the bottom and type your reply at the top. I have many reasons to *not* prefer the top quoting method... snipped for brevity /stock lecture All I'll say is don't do that here! The Delete key is your friend. Use it wisely. /moderator - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr2b1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE9FzkcOeQkq5KdzaARAp4SAJ9jx3Lhvi95AAt665vD9MXGskcUjACZASkh YZiOBYoyh7XEV1R83fBcd6c= =g18t -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: MD5 sum for 1.60q *.exe
Hello Robert, On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 13:21:49 +0300 GMT (24/06/02, 17:21 +0700 GMT), Robert Golovniov wrote: RG Today, after I reinstalled everything, including The Bat!, I again RG received the same warning. I mean, for the first couple of hours RG everything was OK, but then this warning... After having read the other replies, I have another theory. This is based on TPF (predecessor of Kerio) reporting that Kernel32.DLL wanted to connect out. I checked the file with PCC6, who reported no error, so I sent the file to the Virus Doctors over at Trend. They replied that what I had sent them was the unaltered file distributed with Chinese Windows (I hadn't told them about Chinese). Anyway, it turned out I had a trojan on my HD that claimed to be the kernel file. You may have a trojan that claims to be TB. Now checking for trojans is tricky, as several anti-trojan tools are good, but none of them came over the 90% detection rate that I read in tests at that time (over a year ago). So it is best to run several, one after the other. Some are freeware, some give you an eval period of 30 days. (BTW PC-Cillin, known as an anti-virus tool, also scored relatively high in the anti-trojan test.) In my case, the problem only disappeared after a Windows reinstall (after an unrelated HD crash). -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Finally 21, and Legally Able to Do Everything I've Been Doing Since 15. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.60q under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Questions
Hello Damian, On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 10:08:47 -0400 GMT (24/06/02, 21:08 +0700 GMT), Damian Gerow wrote: DG I left my computer all weekend, but apparently, since I check my mail every DG 60 seconds, my computer is not 'idle'. So I have to either re-define idle, DG or take out the idle check. I believe idle in compu-speak is measured in nanoseconds. Again, it might have been redefined in Redmond. But then, checking every 60 seconds is rather often... if I did get mail every 60 seconds, I would probably not be able to read that fast. ;-) Over here, every 5 minutes is the fastest I've ever used. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Vacation Special: have your home exterminated. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.60q under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: MAIL DOWNLOADING PROBLEMS
Hello Joyce, On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 17:20:47 +0200 GMT (24/06/02, 22:20 +0700 GMT), Joyce Sala wrote: JS It recognizes the server and even tells me how many messages it's JS going to download. Then during the actual process, it tells me: JS Received message from X, subject Y, etc. etc. Could not store JS message (file name: C:\Windows\temp\bat123.temp) Where X Y are JS precise details of the message (i.e. it reads the message JS properties), and 123 is a serial number for the message. Do you have an antivirus software running? I suspect that mail contains a virus. The mail gets downloaded into the C:\Windows\temp directory and will be quarantined right away. TB cannot import it, of course. In that case, you have to use the mail despatcher and delete the message without downloading it. Unless you want to download the cirus, in which case you have to disable your AV software instead. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. If work is so terrific, how come they have to pay you to do it? Message reply created with The Bat! 1.60q under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Not have subject auto-complete
Hello Rick, On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 09:48:52 -0400 GMT (24/06/02, 20:48 +0700 GMT), Rick Reumann wrote: RR The problem is I like having the auto-complete for the addresses. RR Is there anyway to have The Bat set up to not auto-complete the RR subject line, but to just auto-complete the address field. The way I see it, you have to use an autocomplete option that does not include history. I don't history anyway; if you type an address, the history option will sometimes autocomplete a whole line of addresses, even if you only want that one address. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. IF THERE IS NO GOD, WHO POPS UP THE NEXT KLEENEX? Message reply created with The Bat! 1.60q under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[4]: question - how can email be sent from me that I didn't send
Sunday, June 23, 2002, 9:05:22 PM, you wrote: JA Try looking at the Full headers for the email... The JA From: header is easily forged, as you can tell, and JA can also be guessed from the recent Klez virus (or 99% JA of spam) ;) Yeah, I see a lot of those too. JA By tracing down the recieved headers, you JA can work out the path it took, and ultimately the JA senders ISP, providing they didn't use some obscure JA proxy server to send through. It sounds reasonable, and I've apparently lost the mail, (I would have sent the header) but there was no path .. no received headers .. it was as though I really had sent the mail directly from myself to myself. The only tipoff that I *hadn't* done that was that I have a very old email address, and originally because of some peculiarity with the server it had to be used as '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' .. I didn't know it still worked in that form, but I haven't used it that way for years. Evidently these lists persist for a very long time, because it has to be at least 6 years old. Maybe that explains my really severe spam problem :-) JA Glad I could help a little :) Yeah, you did, but it's still something of a mystery :-) Lynn -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * *Aun Aprendo I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team OS/2 http://www.sites.onlinemac.com/hawthorne/ Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Mail downloading problems
Hey Joyce, My MUA believes you used Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. to write 004101c21b9c$31751500$920e08d5@joycesala">mid:004101c21b9c$31751500$920e08d5@joycesala on Monday, June 24, 2002 at 12:28:36 PM. One common reason for such behaviour is that one message in your mailbox is infected with a virus and a virus scanner prevents TB! from creating the temporary file. JS Or are you saying it's a virus attacking my ISP server?? Close, he is saying that the first msg TB is trying to DL is possibly infected, so NAV is locking the temp file. Now TB is stuck... JS For Two Weeks?? (msgs are since Jun 14), hardly: this ISP is the JS biggest in the country! yep, the msg will sit there until you remove it... Try using the dispatcher to delete the first msg, or possibly set up another test account at one of the free mail services (for example www.myrealbox.com). Try the mail dispatcher (Account - Dispatch messages on server - All messages) to have a look at your messages on the server. JS I did that now: but other than being able to read the contents, I JS cannot save nor can I see any virus notification. What was I JS supposed to glean from that? JS Excuse me for my ignorance... We are here to help g btw, you said in a previous msg see 003501c21b99$98513400$920e08d5@joycesala">mid:003501c21b99$98513400$920e08d5@joycesala that you did not have access to your c:\windows\temp dir. If this is the case, are you having other problems too? Lots of programs use it... -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! eMail v1.60q Windows 2000 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 2) Bad command or file name! GO stand in the corner. Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: Not have subject auto-complete
On Monday, June 24, 2002, 10:54:07 AM, Nick Danger wrote: N ND One spot where that won't even work is with letter case. EXACTLY! That's where I was having major trouble as well. It one point I typed [ot] and I want to switch it to [OT] and I had to type that pretty darn fast in order to prevent the over-ride. I don't think an option to turn off auto-complete for the subject field would be that big of a deal. -- Rick mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[4]: question - how can email be sent from me that I didn't send
Sunday, June 23, 2002, 9:11:06 PM, you wrote: JA Hi Lynn, JA On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 21:00:08 -0700, you wrote: Thanks .. Is there any way, apart from intuitive deduction, to identify which information is forged, and which genuine? JA Take a quick look at the headers... some (helpful) mail servers put in may be JA forged headers along with the details. [snip] JA Notice the line says it's from caramail.com, then has JA the real host details of a dial up connection in the JA brackets... clearly the spammer attempted to forge the JA header, but the mail server pointed it out. But apart JA from actually sitting there, and processing them, no JA real quick way. I guess you could submit it to JA spamcop, and get spamcop to do all the header JA processing for you, and when you have the details, JA cancel the report... just an idea ;) OK .. if my friend's harassment problem persists, I may do one of those things. It's always nice to have alternatives, and I'm an info junkie anyway. Thanks! Lynn -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * *Aun Aprendo I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team OS/2 http://www.sites.onlinemac.com/hawthorne/ Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Questions
Spake Thomas F on 6/24/2002, at 22:27:50 +0700: I believe idle in compu-speak is measured in nanoseconds. Again, it might have been redefined in Redmond. Yep. I ask it to do it if it's been idle for 3 minutes. But then, checking every 60 seconds is rather often... if I did get mail every 60 seconds, I would probably not be able to read that fast. ;-) Over here, every 5 minutes is the fastest I've ever used. I usually get somewhere between two and ten messages every couple of minutes. On a bad day, it's upwards of forty. On a good day (or a day in which things are severely broken), I get a couple of messages every ten minutes. (I work for an ISP...) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: question - how can email be sent from me that I didn't send
On Monday, June 24, 2002, Lynn Turriff wrote... It sounds reasonable, and I've apparently lost the mail, (I would have sent the header) but there was no path .. no received headers .. it was as though I really had sent the mail directly from myself to myself. I've got one or two emails that are like that, the only received header is the mail server itself, but re-reading shows that although the mail says it is only sent from the mail server to itself, there is an additional IP that isn't mine (I've pretty much memorized our external IP addresses, so I'd spot them ;)) The only tipoff that I *hadn't* done that was that I have a very old email address, and originally because of some peculiarity with the server it had to be used as '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' .. I didn't know it still worked in that form, but I haven't used it that way for years. Evidently these lists persist for a very long time, because it has to be at least 6 years old. Often mail servers are setup with name.domain.tld. The server software is automatically set to accept mail for name.domain.tld. which is why you can often get mail addressed like that. Maybe that explains my really severe spam problem :-) Probably... I got about 70 odd this morning and spent a good hour processing it all. JA Glad I could help a little :) Yeah, you did, but it's still something of a mystery :-) If you'd like, I can contact you off-list, and give you some better examples? -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Mail downloading problems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Joyce, @24 June 2002, 18:31:13 +0200 (17:31 UK time) Joyce Sala wrote in 004e01c21b9c$8f4977c0$920e08d5@joycesala">mid:004e01c21b9c$8f4977c0$920e08d5@joycesala You are the 2nd person telling me that but I don't have ANY access limitation on ANY of my directories! So how can that be? Frankly I'm groping in the dark. 1. Disable your virus checker. 2. Download your mail with TB 3. Re-enable your virus checker. moderator This is the second time of asking. Please change your reply habits. Do not simply hit Reply and start typing. The way OE formats your reply message means that you break the list rules about how quotes should appear. When you reply, scroll down and put your comments within the quoted text. Also change your setup to Quote original text with ''. Delete all signatures and list footers from the original text and only keep the relevant comments. /moderator - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr2b1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE9Fz7vOeQkq5KdzaARAhV/AJ446HtMHz96zMsObNnoMz/EQRud1gCfVas/ 0yupOpiNYiHqKet1Rc81Ysg= =GWj/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Not have subject auto-complete
Subject: Not Have Subject Auto-Complete From: Thomas F ~~ Hello Thomas, The way I see it, you have to use an autocomplete option that does not include history I have mine set for just All Address Books but the subject line still autocompletes from history. That was my first thought when I tried to find a way to stop it also. Alas, not the case. -- ò¸ó Nick Danger Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Not have subject auto-complete
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Rick, @24 June 2002, 11:39:21 -0400 (16:39 UK time) Rick Reumann wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ND One spot where that won't even work is with letter case. EXACTLY! That's where I was having major trouble as well. It one point I typed [ot] and I want to switch it to [OT] and I had to type that pretty darn fast in order to prevent the over-ride. I don't think an option to turn off auto-complete for the subject field would be that big of a deal. Okay, then delete the offending entries from the history list. Use the Alt-Down key to drop down the whole list, cursor down to the entry you don't want to keep and press delete. That'll fix ya! - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr2b1 (Windows 2000) iD4DBQE9Fz9YOeQkq5KdzaARAiygAKDGEDRcirMTd9o/XXEFG5kEm+1e3ACXY4Hz JVNq2CcxWFAN3SOVvwa7nQ== =qg8a -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Questions
Hello Damian, On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 11:44:17 -0400 GMT (24/06/02, 22:44 +0700 GMT), Damian Gerow wrote: DG I usually get somewhere between two and ten messages every couple of DG minutes. On a bad day, it's upwards of forty. On a good day (or a day DG in which things are severely broken), I get a couple of messages every DG ten minutes. You definitely qualify for Emailaholics International. :-) Marck, are the levels somewhere on the web? DG (I work for an ISP...) That explains it, but do you mean it as an excuse? ;-) f'up2tbot. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. It takes money to make money because you have to copy the design exactly. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.60q under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Not have subject auto-complete
On Monday, June 24, 2002, Rick Reumann wrote... I don't think an option to turn off auto-complete for the subject field would be that big of a deal. They have it for the addressing, but not for subjects... and the history for both addressing and subject are stored in the same file :P Rather an odd option to allow you to disable one, but not the other. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Mail downloading problems
Hi Joyce, On Monday, June 24, 2002 at 18:28:36 [GMT +0200], you wrote: One common reason for such behaviour is that one message in your mailbox is infected with a virus and a virus scanner prevents TB! from creating the temporary file. I think that's quite unlikely, as I have Norton updated *daily*, and when ther is a virus (such as our *beloved* klez) it quarantines it on my PC. ^^^ That is exactly where I suspect the problem. As I've written in my first mail, TB! tries to download every message from your ISP into a temporary file on your computer (one for each message) and then imports the messages into its message base from those temporary files. Only if these steps take place without interruption, TB! will delete the corresponding message from the server (to prevent that messages are lost). Now, let's say that one of the messages in your mailbox (at your ISP) is infected with, for example, KLEZ. TB! tries to download this message and stores it in a file $TEMP$\bat456.tmp. This is intercepted by NAV, so TB! has no way of importing this message into its message base. It then leaves the message on the server (not knowing about the virus), so you don't lose an important mail. Or are you saying it's a virus attacking my ISP server?? No, I really don't think so. Try the mail dispatcher (Account - Dispatch messages on server - All messages) to have a look at your messages on the server. I did that now: but other than being able to read the contents, I cannot save nor can I see any virus notification. What was I supposed to glean from that? With the dispatcher, you can have a look at the messages on the server. If you find one containing a virus, you can uncheck the 'Receive' box for this message and then start downloading (and deleting) all messages except the infected one by clicking on the left most button. Another possibility would be to disable NAV's real time scanning and see if this makes it possible for you to download the messages. Don't be afraid, as long as you don't start attachments from the messages, you are safe without NAV. TB! doesn't execute any code from incoming e-mails (but make sure to re-enable it before using Oulook Express again)! -- Regards, Lars The Bat! 1.60q on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 |Lars Geiger | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Mail downloading problems
On Monday, June 24, 2002, Lars Geiger wrote... Now, let's say that one of the messages in your mailbox (at your ISP) is infected with, for example, KLEZ. TB! tries to download this message and stores it in a file $TEMP$\bat456.tmp. This is intercepted by NAV, so TB! has no way of importing this message into its message base. It then leaves the message on the server (not knowing about the virus), so you don't lose an important mail. It depends on which version of NAV she's using. The latest version does a pop/smtp check for you, and replaces infected attachments with a nice warning, so that wouldn't be the problem here. Another possibility would be to disable NAV's real time scanning and see if this makes it possible for you to download the messages. Don't be afraid, as long as you don't start attachments from the messages, you are safe without NAV. TB! doesn't execute any code from incoming e-mails (but make sure to re-enable it before using Oulook Express again)! That would be a good idea, so that you can get an idea of what is causing the issue. Older version of NAV may not work the same way as the latest version. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: MAIL DOWNLOADING PROBLEMS
Hi Lars, on Mon, 24 Jun 2002 16:24:24 +0200GMT (24.06.02, 16:24 +0200GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : ... LG BTW, the users on this list are usually very kind and help each other LG without shouting in the subject or setting messages to high priority. LG :-) Or sending HTML... *sigh* -- Cheers Peter PGP-Key: http://www.meynsweb.com/public-key.txt Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: Not have subject auto-complete
Hi Marck, On Monday, June 24, 2002, 4:48:37 PM, you [MDP] wrote: MDP Okay, then delete the offending entries from the history list. Use the MDP Alt-Down key to drop down the whole list, cursor down to the entry you MDP don't want to keep and press delete. That'll fix ya! Yes it would fix it but it's also just a pain in the bum! I think that there should be an option to disable autocomplete for subjects only and I am sure that it would not be too hard for the developers to implement. How many people find the autocomplete for subject useful? If so, what do you use it for? Regards, -- Ben Kennish [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
no compatible authentication mechanism?
Hello!, SEND warning, there were no compatible authentication mechanism's detected mean in the log? I think the email is going out, but that seems to be in my log all the time. Thanks! Laura -- Best regards, alists mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: MAIL DOWNLOADING PROBLEMS
Hello Thomas, In Reference to your Posting on Monday, June 24 2002 at 08:23 AM PDT, Do you have an antivirus software running? I suspect that mail contains a virus. The mail gets downloaded into the C:\Windows\temp directory and will be quarantined right away. TB cannot import it, of course. Are you suggesting that if NAV detects a virus in one of the messages to be downloaded, that none of the remaining messages will be downloaded by TB? -- Nick Andriash Courtenay, B.C. Canada Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Mail downloading problems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Joyce On 24 June 2002 at 18:10:00 +0200 (which was 17:10 where I live) Joyce Sala thoughtfully wrote the following Does C:\Windows\temp\ still exist? Yes, with all the temp files it made from TB. Do you have write priviliges to that directory? Nope. with out write privileges it can not write. :) Is there space available on the C: drive? Yep! 15GB free... Any ideas? Do you have a Virus checker ? - -- See you in Cyber space, ___ David | SecureBat!1.60q | E-mailaholics | _| Win 2K Server 5.0.2195 SP2 | International | | Greetings Bob Morgan ! | ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt Build 09 Beta 03 iQA/AwUBPRdvM/mK8eZlD0U0EQK5WQCg/sq3xR4ioDfx/e8H4/lTrZhelg4AoOHA iOWhHfJ+qDsQ9tfEBMMGIakl =AXrJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Mail downloading problems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hail Marcus On 24 June 2002 at 17:12:25 +0200 (which was 16:12 where I live) Marcus Ohlström wrote and made these points I'm however a bit suspicious So am I. C:\Windows\Temp is normally only found on Windows 9x systems and if I remember correctly you can not restrict access privileges on those systems. I might be wrong here, it's been a while since I last used Windows 9x. Correct, and your are not wrong. - -- BFN, ___ David | SecureBat!1.60q | E-mailaholics | _| Win 2K Server 5.0.2195 SP2 | International | | If this ever happens again Ivanova will personally rip your lungs out. | ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt Build 09 Beta 03 iQA/AwUBPRdwVPmK8eZlD0U0EQJvxwCgqFxlKslZ2adOyEZbxHJOn03Fg1kAoKMU YAsofz3Dbk5ovcZ9FgRNAgjp =E7Jg -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Mail downloading problems
Hi Jonathan, On Monday, June 24, 2002 at 11:09:11 [GMT -0500], you wrote: JA It depends on which version of NAV she's using. The latest version JA does a pop/smtp check for you, and replaces infected attachments JA with a nice warning, so that wouldn't be the problem here. I silently assumed that it wasn't the latest version of NAV, because Joyce would surely have realized a virus warning whenever downloading mail, don't you think? And if it was NAV 2002 (with its transparent pop3 checking), the problem could be solved easily, because you are asked how to handle infected attachments. -- Regards, Lars The Bat! 1.60q on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 |Lars Geiger | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Please release BatNews!
Hi all, I would REALLY like to see TB support Newsgroups and the like. Anyone else? -- Ben Kennish [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: no compatible authentication mechanism?
Hello List, On Monday, June 24, 2002 at 9:04:35 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] [awc] wrote (at least in part): awc SEND warning, there were no compatible authentication awc mechanism's detected mean in the log? This means you might have set up The Bat! to use SMTP-Auth but the server did not offer any method The Bat! is capable off. Check 'Account' / 'Properties' / 'Transport' / 'Send mail' - button 'Authentication'. Is 'Perform SMTP Authentication (RFC 2554)' enabled? If so: disable it. Send mail. Check your log file. Check if the mail arrives. -- Regards Peter Palmreuthermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1) War is a series of castrophies resulting in a victory. Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: MAIL DOWNLOADING PROBLEMS
Hello Nick, On Monday, June 24, 2002 at 9:08:13 PM you [NA] wrote (at least in part): NA Are you suggesting that if NAV detects a virus in one of the messages to NA be downloaded, that none of the remaining messages will be downloaded by NA TB? It's not 'NAV' it's The Bat!. If one mail fails to become imported (which is the case if NAV quarantines it) the process of fetching mail is interrupted and The Bat! stops. It does not know WHY the mail can't be imported and therefore assumes there's a serious problem, maybe with disk space or other permissions blocked by the system. -- Regards Peter Palmreuthermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1) What is mind? No matter. What is matter? Never mind. - Thomas Hewitt Key Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Addressing/autocomplete wish wrapped to next line
On the topic of auto-complete one other thing I find a bit of a nuisance. I love being able to start out addressing the to field by starting to type the name and then using CTRL-+ to autocomplete. The problem is as I start to get near the end of the line you can't really see what you are autocompleting as it is hidden off the address field. So I then have to open up the address book icon and make sure I picked the right one and if I didn't I have to go grab the correct one from the address book. It would be nice if I could just keep adding and autocompleting addresses on the TO line without having to physically go up to the line and hit end and make sure I picked the correct one. If it just wrapped onto a new line it would be perfect. Has anyone else run into this issue? or is it just me? Maybe everyone else completes their to field in a quicker way. If so I'd be interested in hearing how to best use the Bat's features for addressing. Thanks, -- Rick mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Children need encouragement. If a kid gets an answer right, tell him it was a lucky guess. That way he develops a good, lucky feeling. -Jack Handey Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: no compatible authentication mechanism?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED], @24 June 2002, 12:04:35 -0700 (20:04 UK time) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SEND warning, there were no compatible authentication mechanism's detected mean in the log? Sounds like you have SMTP authentication set on when your server doesn't use it. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr2b1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE9F3x8OeQkq5KdzaARAobSAJ9a9FNNq1+amGFTPT80JUuXH/4xVwCff3pe bNpkXNVbotv9EsstegN20w4= =+iCK -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Addressing/autocomplete wish wrapped to next line
Monday, June 24, 2002, 3:01:33 PM, Rick Reumann wrote: RR On the topic of auto-complete one other thing I find a bit of a RR nuisance. I love being able to start out addressing the to field by RR starting to type the name and then using CTRL-+ to autocomplete. The RR problem is as I start to get near the end of the line you can't really RR see what you are autocompleting as it is hidden off the address field. RR So I then have to open up the address book icon and make sure I picked RR the right one and if I didn't I have to go grab the correct one from RR the address book. It would be nice if I could just keep adding and RR autocompleting addresses on the TO line without having to physically RR go up to the line and hit end and make sure I picked the correct RR one. If it just wrapped onto a new line it would be perfect. RR Has anyone else run into this issue? or is it just me? Maybe everyone RR else completes their to field in a quicker way. If so I'd be RR interested in hearing how to best use the Bat's features for RR addressing. Yes, I have run into that, and it annoys me as well. Something else that annoys me is that when an address does autocomplete, it stays highlighted, so I have to click to the end of the line and then type my comma separating it from the next address. If I forget to click to the end of the line, my comma overwrites the highlighted address, and I have to start over. Am I missing something obvious about using this feature more efficiently without having to go from keyboard to mouse and back again? Andrea in Kansas | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | using TB! 1.60q Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: MAIL DOWNLOADING PROBLEMS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Daniel Grunberg [DG] wrote: DG 1. I used my browser to go to http://www.e-mailanywhere.com/, a DG Web-based site for accessing an existing pop-based e-mail account DG that I had read about. You do realize don't you, that you could have used TB!'s own message dispatcher to do the same thing. - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.60q | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iEYEARECAAYFAj0XfcgACgkQV8nrYCsHF+L8OwCfaejQkWZumkZhASSfQ6hb1uo4 Re0AoN1+9+iUdjFhxFUVAP7z7jBMruzT =of/E -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
test
Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Addressing/autocomplete wish wrapped to next line
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Andrea Zuercher [AZ] wrote: AZ Yes, I have run into that, and it annoys me as well. Something AZ else that annoys me is that when an address does autocomplete, it AZ stays highlighted, so I have to click to the end of the line and AZ then type my comma separating it from the next address. How is it to know that the auto-completed address is the one you want? AZ If I forget to click to the end of the line, Why not just hit the right arrow key? AZ my comma overwrites the highlighted address, and I have to start AZ over. Am I missing something obvious about using this feature more AZ efficiently without having to go from keyboard to mouse and back AZ again? I think you're missing the fact that you can just hit the right arrow key instead of reaching for the mouse and clicking with it. :-) - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.60q | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iEYEARECAAYFAj0XiPkACgkQV8nrYCsHF+JkLQCeOODZVo6h31HhXBstnSA5wKvQ UqQAn20zgi+8lLImByqx4kiDFjKQ8VnO =BVuO -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: test
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Angel, @24 June 2002, 13:58:19 -0700 (21:58 UK time) Angel wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Oh yes! Looks like you're back with us - you and Rick Reumann both. Good. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr2b1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE9F4k6OeQkq5KdzaARAg6oAKCuz9i99Vej/QANWqrkY/lRajlC2ACfZ/U9 zk2lsbJIzTy50n2C1ZEiHek= =GWwi -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re[2]: no compatible authentication mechanism?
SEND warning, there were no compatible authentication mechanism's detected mean in the log? MDP Sounds like you have SMTP authentication set on when your server MDP doesn't use it. thanks to everyone! that was it. Laura -- Best regards, alistsmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Addressing/autocomplete wish wrapped to next line
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Rick Reumann [RR] wrote: RR On the topic of auto-complete one other thing I find a bit of a RR nuisance. I love being able to start out addressing the to field RR by starting to type the name and then using CTRL-+ to RR autocomplete. The problem is as I start to get near the end of the RR line you can't really see what you are autocompleting as it is RR hidden off the address field. So I then have to open up the RR address book icon and make sure I picked the right one and if I RR didn't I have to go grab the correct one from the address book. It RR would be nice if I could just keep adding and autocompleting RR addresses on the TO line without having to physically go up to the RR line and hit end and make sure I picked the correct one. A pet peeve of mine. I hope they do something about it. I don't see the point of autocompleting if the user cannot see what the autocompletion is. RR If it just wrapped onto a new line it would be perfect. Just scrolling to the end of the entry field so we can see what's happening would be enough. - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.60q | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iEYEARECAAYFAj0XiX8ACgkQV8nrYCsHF+IdbQCcDYeQtW6EXc/Dh6TbEtKqdWGR yaEAnAisRTqPyPNAQLwQZU0+Umobs5AE =T+/C -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
OT: Newsgroups
Hi: Since a newsreader might be integrated in TB 2.0, I have been wondering how many members of this mailing list actively participate in newsgroups and whether or not newsgroups as communication mediums have become obsolete. For the past couple of weeks, I have been following several newsgroups using Agent 1.91 and have mixed feelings about their general usefulness, especially when directly compared to well maintained mailing lists such as TBUDL and TBBETA or helpful forums like the official Windows Commander forum. What I found most annoying on newsgroups was spam which is obviously something subscribers of a closed mailing list or forum hardly ever have to deal with. I understand that there are several thousand newsgroups out there, but I find that bascially no newsgroup I have subscribed to offers such a quality of discussion as TBUDL/TBBETA. Furthermore, as there are several ways of collectively exchanging information (e.g. mailing lists, forums, newsgroups, etc.), it seems to dillute the user base. There are some users who will use newsgroups exclusively, while others stick solely to mailing lists or forums. German users of TB can, for instance, choose between a German TB newsgroup, the official forum of Integrated Services (the German distributor) and several Yahoo mailing lists. Choice is good, but it also takes away from the collective brainpower of all TB users as there seem to be few people who use all of the aforementioned services. So what are your views on newsgroups? Curse, blessing or both? So long, Kai Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: OT: Newsgroups
KG So what are your views on newsgroups? Curse, blessing or both? Well, that depends on the contents :-) For instance, Cerious Software (of the ThumbsPlus image management software) uses newsgroups on their own news server to communicate with their users, and for users to talk to eachother. They have a web based interface too, which I don't use because a dedicated newsreader like Agent (or, hopefully, TB2) is much faster andmore convenient. There are a few more groups that I (try to) follow and that I'd love to integrate into TB. Best, -Daan- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: OT: Newsgroups
Hello Kai, 24. junij 2002, 23:58:08, you wrote: KG So what are your views on KG newsgroups? Curse, blessing or both? It really depends... I'm beta-testing a new newsreader, and I'm regularly following about 20 newsgroups on 4 servers (aside from the beta-version ng, newsgroups on news.jrsoftware.org and forums.talkto.net [both programming-related - certain Delphi components], and Opera's newsgroups on news.opera.no)... -- Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www2.arnes.si/~sopjsimo/ ICQ: 26266467 [The Bat! v1.60d on Windows 2000 5.0.2195.Service Pack 2] What really matters is the name you succeed in imposing on the facts -- not the facts themselves. -- Cohen's Law Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: OT: Newsgroups
Hi Kai, KG annoying on newsgroups was spam which is obviously something KG subscribers of a closed mailing list or forum hardly ever have to KG deal with. I understand that there are several thousand newsgroups KG out there, but I find that bascially no newsgroup I have KG subscribed to offers such a quality of discussion as TBUDL/TBBETA. Keep in mind that USENET is not the only source of newsgroups. Many vendors, including Macromedia, Microsoft and others run their own newsservers since it's very bandwidth efficient and the clients prefer them. Our site (Blarp.com) runs a newsserver although we also provide a web and e-mail interface to the same messagebase. Personally, I like having e-mail and news integrated. It's what kept me hooked to lookOut Express for so long. -- Tom G. http://blarp.com -- Free tech support The Bat 1.60q - Windows 2000 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Please release BatNews!
Hi all, I would REALLY like to see TB support Newsgroups and the like. Anyone else? Me too! -- Jonathan E. Brickmanhttp://joshuacorps.org Live forever. If you don't know how, or aren't sure, please ask, and I will tell you. Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: OT: Newsgroups
So what are your views on newsgroups? Curse, blessing or both? I was a huge fan of USENET in 1986. Now I find it almost useless. But non-USENET NNTP newsgroups are sometimes excellent. The only examples I have right now are through http://www.blarp.com . -- Jonathan E. Brickmanhttp://joshuacorps.org Live forever. If you don't know how, or aren't sure, please ask, and I will tell you. Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Please release BatNews!
Monday, 6/24/02, 6:13 PM Hi Ben, On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, at 20:31:59 [GMT +0100] (which was 12:31 PM where I live) you wrote about: 'Please release BatNews!' BK I would REALLY like to see TB support Newsgroups and the like. BK Anyone else? RANTI shall not rant, I shall not rant! No thank you. I use a browser to surf, a newsreader for newsgroups and The Bat! for mail. Never the twain shall meet!! /RANT Your communication is greatly appreciated, Paul -- Child asks the sick dad: Did you get your virus from the computer? Powered by The Bat! v1.60q under Windows 98 4.10 Build A Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Please release BatNews!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Recently, Paul Wilson squawked: No thank you. I use a browser to surf, a newsreader for newsgroups and The Bat! for mail. Never the twain shall meet!! Same configuration here. Same reasons. No NG in The Bat! please. - -- Bye Now, Robert D. The Bat! ver. 1.60q Windows ME-4.90 Build:3000. PGP 6.5.8ckt 09b2 Kerio FW 2.1.4 Proxomitron 4.3 Public Key located at: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=0x1D14AF5FBody=Please%20send%20keys -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt 09 - b3 iQA/AwUBPRfI0hUUkTAdFK9fEQKX5wCgpz+dlgt8fzLLumTepNW8AWK1Q8sAoLxF dN74Tknkgh9ET7VG4mXICYfS =EW6w -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Filtering Supressed recipient
On Saturday, June 22, 2002, 5:09:10 PM, Allie C Martin wrote: MA I think I saw somewhere in the archive or FAQ how to filter and MA exclude spam whose Recipient field has been suppressed. Any MA pointer appreciated. As your string search, look for a recipient string using the regular expression: ^To:.* I've been filtering everything which doesn't have a @ in the To: header Look in the Kludges And Presence : No. I want to send everything where I am a CC or BCC to a folder where I can inspect it. Most of it is going to be spam, but not all. Filtering on kludges won't work, will it? That will get everything in To too? -- Dwight A. Corrin P O Box 47828 Wichita KS 67201-7828 316.263.9706 fax 316.263.6385 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.60i on Windows XP version 5,1 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: 1.60 broke????
On Friday, June 21, 2002, 4:54:31 AM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: delete the existing history list how? -- Dwight A. Corrin P O Box 47828 Wichita KS 67201-7828 316.263.9706 fax 316.263.6385 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.60i on Windows XP version 5,1 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Please release BatNews!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, June 24, 2002 Robert D. stated: RD Recently, Paul Wilson squawked: No thank you. I use a browser to surf, a newsreader for newsgroups and The Bat! for mail. Never the twain shall meet!! RD Same configuration here. Same reasons. No NG in The Bat! please. Ditto - -- Cheers Yall - -Cricket Running TB! version 1.60q under Windows 2000 5.0 on a 500mhz P-III wtih 512mb Ram -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt http://www.ipgpp.com/ Comment: Cricket's mark Comment: KeyID: 0x1438A23E Comment: Fingerprint: 283F 61F0 EC6F 3FB5 6E4A 14FA 4B21 8DA2 1438 A23E iQA/AwUBPRfTqkshjaIUOKI+EQL2lACgmzFJm9KEl7hwReegw7HPnX0TxAAAoLRC 7z5LmeyP5WtlhVi4Z2lVB0F3 =SgpU -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: 1.60 broke????
On Monday, June 24, 2002, 10:47 PM, you wrote: DAC On Friday, June 21, 2002, 7:01:42 AM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: I'd like someone with a .his file that causes it to file a report on the BugTraq and upload the file as evidence. DAC Done. Assigned id # 895. I forgot to turn back OFF the history part, and it crashed again on me... I already sent a file, so I won't do it again! / Paul Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Please release BatNews!
On Monday, June 24, 2002, Paul Wilson wrote: BK Anyone else? RANTI shall not rant, I shall not rant! No thank you. I use a browser to surf, a newsreader for newsgroups and The Bat! for mail. Never the twain shall meet!! /RANT Why? The world is moving to unified messaging - not just email, newsgroups, instant messaging and other text-based communication - but voice and even video messaging. People get weary of having to track communications in a plethora of different applications and mediums. It seems to me the least TB! needs to keep up is NNTP support. -- PFord The Bat! 1.60h (reg) Windows 98 4.10 Build Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Please release BatNews!
Tuesday, June 25, 2002, 1:02:50 PM, PFord wrote: P On Monday, June 24, 2002, Paul Wilson wrote: BK Anyone else? RANTI shall not rant, I shall not rant! No thank you. I use a browser to surf, a newsreader for newsgroups and The Bat! for mail. Never the twain shall meet!! /RANT P Why? The world is moving to unified messaging - not just email, P newsgroups, instant messaging and other text-based communication - but P voice and even video messaging. People get weary of having to track P communications in a plethora of different applications and mediums. P It seems to me the least TB! needs to keep up is NNTP support. Vehemently disagree. The world is not moving to unified messaging. The world is moving back to a Unix-like concept of small, tight applications doing very specific tasks -- the result, mostly, of seeing the negative consequences of all the bloat that has come of of Redmond, as well as elsewhere. I have Agent for NNTP, and it's gonna stay that way. TB needs NNTP like it needs another bug. g Best, Yuki mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Please release BatNews!
Hi Paul, PW No thank you. I use a browser to surf, a newsreader for newsgroups PW and The Bat! for mail. Never the twain shall meet!! /RANT News readers and mail readers have 90% of the same features built-into them. The only real difference are the transfer protocols and, to a lesser extent, storage considerations. Any good newsreader already has a mail sending client in it. The UI is the same. What's the big leap?? Now keeping browsers and e-mail/news separate, YES!! -- Tom G. http://blarp.com -- Free tech support The Bat 1.60q - Windows 2000 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: test
Many thanks to you, Allie and Syafril for all the hard work...
and patience! :)
*hugs*! to you all...
Blessings and light,
~~~Angel
Monday, June 24, 2002 9:25:05 PM
--
-={+}=-Senza fiduccia niente-={+}=-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TheBat! 1.60q
| http://www.ritlabs.com
| on Windows 2000 5 Service Pack 2 (Win2K Pro)
| 1gHz 40Gb hard disk 512Mb RAM
Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Not have subject auto-complete
On Monday, June 24, 2002, Ben Kennish wrote: How many people find the autocomplete for subject useful? If so, what do you use it for? Good questions. I can't think of any use for it. I'd love to be able to turn it off, too. -- PFord The Bat! 1.60h (reg) Windows 98 4.10 Build Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Please release BatNews!
Hello Yuki Taga, In Reference to your Posting on Monday, June 24 2002 at 09:06 PM PDT, Vehemently disagree. The world is not moving to unified messaging. The world is moving back to a Unix-like concept of small, tight applications doing very specific tasks -- Not that I am in favour of a TB Newsgroup, but I have to strongly disagree with your statement. The world is moving away from single use appliances and going for the 'unified' concept... but without the bloat... as the wary consumer will not stand for that anymore. However... this is OT. As for a TB Newsgroup... why not? The only negative aspect is that it will 'thin' the ranks so to speak. -- Nick Andriash Courtenay, B.C. Canada Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Please release BatNews!
Hello Nick Thank you for your email dated Tuesday, June 25, 2002, 5:49:29 AM, in which you wrote: NA but without the bloat... as the NA wary consumer will not stand for that anymore. Unfortunately 'wary' consumers are few and far between. -- Regards William Flying with The Bat! 1.60q www.ritlabs.com/the_bat Windows 2000 Pro 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
News with TB (was: OT: Newsgroups)
Hello Blarp, On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 17:42:56 -0700 GMT (25/06/02, 07:42 +0700 GMT), Blarp wrote: B Personally, I like having e-mail and news integrated. It's what kept B me hooked to lookOut Express for so long. Some users on the German TB list are reading/writing news with TB and an additional software (news2mail or so it is called). You want me to find out more? -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. If a police officer in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, suspects a couple is having sex inside a vehicle they must honk their horn three times, and wait two minutes before being allowed to approach the scene. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.60q under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Addressing/autocomplete wish wrapped to next line
Hello Rick, On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 16:01:33 -0400 GMT (25/06/02, 03:01 +0700 GMT), Rick Reumann wrote: RR The problem is as I start to get near the end of the line you RR can't really see what you are autocompleting as it is hidden off RR the address field. For me, this problem is not with autocomplete, but with the one-line-only format of all address field, both for composing and for viewing mail. Here is a point where I liked Netscape Mail's way of display better, giving you a box - a bit like the box that opens when you hit the right-most icon in the address field when compsing mail. Only that you could easily change an address from being in one field (TO) to another (BCC), without having to delete and reinsert. Plus, you get this box also when viewing mails, which is very useful when there are many addressees. In TB, I have to hit shft-crtl-K, but that is a bit cluttered if you only want to see the addressees. I keep repeating this wish, as I have done for the past 2 years. Never lose hope... ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Exaggeration is a billion times worse than understatement. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.60q under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Filtering Supressed recipient
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Dwight A Corrin [DAC] wrote: ^To:.* DAC I've been filtering everything which doesn't have a @ in the To: DAC header How? String: '@' Location: 'Recipient' Presence: No ? If so, this doesn't prevent filtering of CC'd messages since recipient doesn't separate To from CC. Look in the Kludges And Presence : No. DAC I want to send everything where I am a CC or BCC to a folder where I DAC can inspect it. Most of it is going to be spam, but not all. Filtering DAC on kludges won't work, will it? That will get everything in To too? Filtering what on Kludges? The '@' string? If so, then yes. Use this filter. Enable regular expressions in the filter options and use the string '^To:.*dcorrin@cox\.net\s*$', Location: Kludges, Presence: No. This filter will look in the headers for a line starting with To: followed by zero of more of any characters followed by your e-mail address. IOW's it's checking if your e-mail address is *specifically* in the To: headers. If it's not there it will not come up with a matching string. I don't know if the '\s$' is really necessary but leaving it there will not affect the expressions functionality if it isn't needed. If TB! doesn't check multiple lines when using the expression then it may be left out. If TB! checks multiple lines then it should be included. - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.60q | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iEYEARECAAYFAj0YBWwACgkQV8nrYCsHF+IU7gCg4KysMF5/A1kqi7zIOOcGwMny YE0AnjvG26zH81kp9Gfhqg6f3vyCdxPb =mNos -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: News with TB (was: OT: Newsgroups)
Hi Thomas, TF Some users on the German TB list are reading/writing news with TB TF and an additional software (news2mail or so it is called). You TF want me to find out more? My guess is they're doing it through Hamster which seems to be the Swiss, er uh German Army Knife of news/mail gateways. :-) -- Tom G. http://blarp.com -- Free tech support The Bat 1.60q - Windows 2000 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
