Re: reply all with selected text?

2003-02-08 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Kenneth, On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 16:07:43 -0500GMT (7-2-03, 22:07 +0100, where I live), you wrote: KSR Is there a similar command (or trick) for reply to all? Almost. Create a quick template called F4 (that's to stay in line with the F4 command g) Put this in it: ,- [ F4 ] | Hi All, |

Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Csaba Kiss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], ~john [j] wrote:' j How do I join the BetaBat list ? You can use the following URL: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=subscribe - -- -=] allie_M [=- {List Moderator} MUA: TB! v1.63

Re: Looks like html makes to the BAT

2003-02-08 Thread Paul Wilson
Saturday, 2/8/2003, 12:31 AM Hi Douglas, On Sat, 08 Feb 2003, at 00:13:25 [GMT -0600] (which was 10:13 PM where I live) you wrote about: 'Looks like html makes to the BAT' DH The last version of TB! to exclude html creation may well become a classic. And most likely the only one used in this

Re:Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Jurgen Haug
Szia Csaba, Saturday, February 8, 2003, 9:10:57 AM, you wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], ~john [j] wrote:' j How do I join the BetaBat list ? You can use the following URL: mailto:[EMAIL

Re: Looks like html makes to the BAT

2003-02-08 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Douglas, On Sat, 08 Feb 2003 at 00:13:25[GMT -0600](which was 06:13 where I live) you wrote: That is not true. Here's how I do it (it's very simple): 1).- The Mail Dispatcher will pull down as many lines as you set it for (I download 25). 2).- Selective Download will look for the

Re[2]: Looks like html makes to the BAT

2003-02-08 Thread Douglas Hinds
Hello Richard, Saturday, February 8, 2003, 2:46 AM, you continued this thread on html, TB! my suggestion: That is not true. Here's how I do it (it's very simple): 1).- The Mail Dispatcher will pull down as many lines as you set it for (I download 25). 2).- Selective Download will look

Re: Selective Download .txt file of spammers

2003-02-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Christophe, On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 03:55:46 +0100 GMT (08/02/03, 09:55 +0700 GMT), Christophe wrote: Yes but the problem is I don't use the dispatcher on server ; I have a first antispam filter based on a hundred keywords on alternatives strings that send suspicious mail in a spam folder

Re[2]: reply all with selected text?

2003-02-08 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Roelof, Saturday, February 8, 2003, 3:08:10 AM, you wrote: RO Next time you want to reply to all with selected text only do this: RO Select the text RO Ctrl-C RO Reply to all RO Call your quick template (type 'F4'followed by Ctrl-space) RO My quick template is very limited, you could

Re: Address book entries not working after converting from Eudora

2003-02-08 Thread Julian Beach (Lists)
On Saturday, February 8, 2003, 3:15:33 AM, Jim Kilgannon wrote: I've just converted from Eudora and I can't seem to get any of the groups of email address to work in the Bat. All I seem to get is the first email address which was in the list. I've gone in and put commas after all of the

Re: Mail Synchronisation ?

2003-02-08 Thread Julian Beach (Lists)
On Friday, February 7, 2003, 11:35:07 PM, telepro wrote: I've tried backup (on desktop) then restore (on laptop) and I noted that all is imported on laptop but there is not a clone between both, that's to say datas that already were stored on laptop are still here and the restoration brought

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Csaba Kiss [CK] wrote:' CK The above message contained two lines of useful information. And one quoted line of text. CK Yet look at how big it is with all the unnecessary crap. Are you referring

Re: Mail Synchronisation ?

2003-02-08 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Saturday, February 8, 2003, 8:37 AM, you wrote: JBL My way of dealing with this is to use synchronisation most of the time, JBL but every month or two, delete all of the laptop /mail folders and JBL replace them with a backup from the PC. This means that synchronisation JBL will work well

Re: Address book entries not working after converting from Eudora

2003-02-08 Thread Jim Kilgannon
I'm trying to send to a list of addressees. Something like addr1, addr2, addr3, etc. by using what I'm thinking are the converted groups from Eudora. When I enter the group name, all I see is the first address in the group list and not the entire list of addresses. Is this normal? When I view the

Re: Looks like html makes to the BAT

2003-02-08 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Friday, February 7, 2003, 11:17 AM, you wrote: Looks like html editing has finally made it to the BAT. I'm sure it will be greeted with delight or scorn depending on your preference. JA It's also very beta, and being worked on ;) So unless you love cutting JA edge code, I'd suggest

Re: Looks like html makes to the BAT

2003-02-08 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Friday, February 7, 2003, 12:32 PM, you wrote: RW I have my background as light grey so your message looks like a lot of RW white rectangles with different coloured text. Another reason against RW it :-) I must have missed that. I tried changing the colors, but it only changed the EDITOR

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Allie, on Sat, 8 Feb 2003 08:42:45 -0500GMT (08.02.03, 14:42 +0100GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : CK ...bitching about HTML being bloat. AM That would count as a derogatory remark. This is not allowed on the AM list and worse, you direct it at a

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Walt Newcomb
Hello Peter Re your message: Hype over html text! On Saturday, February 08, 2003 at 08:57:45, Peter Meyns said, more or less, the following: PM Hi Allie, PM on Sat, 8 Feb 2003 08:42:45 -0500GMT (08.02.03, 14:42 +0100GMT here), PM you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : CK

Re:Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Csaba Kiss
Hello, This message was created on Saturday, February 8, 2003. Saturday, February 8, 2003, 2:42:45 PM, you wrote: AM That would count as a derogatory remark. This is not allowed on the AM list and worse, you direct it at a moderator. I agree that the style of my remarks was over the

Binding The Bat! to Answer,Forward,Send Hotkeys on the MicrosoftMultiMedia Keyboard

2003-02-08 Thread Jeffrey Lebowski
Hello , i need help binding the bat to these hot keys on the MS multi media keyboard. i know how i can bind them as shortcuts using the software shipped with the keyboard.. but i was unable to find any commandline parameters that would do the job.. maybe someone could help me with

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Meyns [PM] wrote:' PM Excuse me, Allie. I agree that derogatory remarks are not allowed, and PM I'd like to keep the friendly atmosphere TBUDL is known for, but why is PM it worse to direct it to a

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Walt Newcomb [WN] wrote:' WN Furthermore, derogatory means, ...tending to lesson the reputation WN of a person or thing. WN It seems to me that the _remark_ of CK was not, in fact, derogatory. WN It

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Csaba Kiss [CK] wrote:' CK I agree that the style of my remarks was over the limit, I will be CK careful in the future or if I can't stand the pretentious atmosphere CK I will leave. However, I don't

Re: Address book entries not working after converting from Eudora

2003-02-08 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Jim, On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 09:34:52 -0500GMT (8-2-03, 15:34 +0100, where I live), you wrote: JK I'm trying to send to a list of addressees. Something like addr1, JK addr2, addr3, etc. by using what I'm thinking are the converted JK groups from Eudora. When I enter the group name, all I see is

Re:Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Jurgen Haug
Hello Walt, Saturday, February 8, 2003, 5:19:59 PM, you wrote a lot of things, but what I would like to know is: What is an 'Invalid Signature'? -- Gruß, Jurgenmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition on Win.XP.5.1.2600.SP1

Re: reply all with selected text?

2003-02-08 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Kenneth, On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 07:51:11 -0500GMT (8-2-03, 13:51 +0100, where I live), you wrote: KSR Hey Thanks. It worked flawlessly. Of course it did. I tested it. g,dr KSR Now I have a quick way to do reply all. Now you only need a reason to do so. Can't remember the last time I did a

Re[2]: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Alexander Williams
Peter Meyns: Saturday, February 8, 2003, 10:57:45 AM, you wrote: PM Excuse me, Allie. I agree that derogatory remarks are not allowed, and I'd PM like to keep the friendly atmosphere TBUDL is known for, but why is it PM worse to direct it to a moderator than to any other member? ;-) Well,

Re: Binding The Bat! to Answer,Forward,Send Hotkeys on the MicrosoftMultiMedia Keyboard

2003-02-08 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Jeffrey, On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 17:36:18 +0100GMT (8-2-03, 17:36 +0100, where I live), you wrote: JL i need help binding the bat to these hot keys on the MS multi JL media keyboard. i know how i can bind them as shortcuts using JL the software shipped with the keyboard.. but i was

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Walt Newcomb
Hello Allie Re your message: Hype over html text! On Saturday, February 08, 2003 at 09:35:48, Allie Martin said, more or less, the following: AM -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- AM Hash: SHA1 AM In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], AM Walt Newcomb [WN] wrote:' WN Furthermore,

Re[2]: Binding The Bat! to Answer,Forward,Send Hotkeys on theMicrosoft MultiMedia Keyboard

2003-02-08 Thread Jeffrey Lebowski
Hello Roelof, Saturday, February 8, 2003, 5:54:33 PM, you wrote: RO Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RO X-Flags: RO Delivered-To: GMX delivery to [EMAIL PROTECTED] RO Received: (qmail 17119 invoked by uid 0); 8 Feb 2003 16:56:34 - RO Received: from stromgrade.its-toasted.org (62.80.28.28)

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Allie, on Sat, 8 Feb 2003 11:36:20 -0500GMT (08.02.03, 17:36 +0100GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : PM why is it worse to direct it to a moderator than to any other PM member? ;-) AM I don't know what the smiley is supposed to mean. Are you seriously AM

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Alexander, on Sat, 8 Feb 2003 11:52:03 -0500GMT (08.02.03, 17:52 +0100GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : PM why is it worse to direct it to a moderator than to any other PM member? ;-) AW Well, from the PoV of an outsider-but-Internet-familliar, its much

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Meyns [PM] wrote:' PM Yes, I'm seriously asking. Sorry for the confusion. It's not that I'm in any way more special and above reproach than any other member which is the impression that many

Re[3]: was: Hype over html text! now: PGP question

2003-02-08 Thread alists
Hello Allie, L Saturday, February 8, 2003, 5:42:45 AM, you wrote: AM Are you referring to the PGP signature? I and the other moderators AM here agreed that we should PGP sign all our messages to the list. In AM this way, our messages can be easily verified, especially one like AM

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Alexander Williams [AW] wrote:' AW Well, from the PoV of an outsider-but-Internet-familliar, its AW much like antangoizing the fellow with a large caliber assault AW rifle pointed at your head.

Re: Looks like html makes to the BAT

2003-02-08 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Douglas, On Sat, 08 Feb 2003 at 05:23:49[GMT -0600](which was 11:23 where I live) you wrote: Not exactly. What happens is: All messages containing the string html in the first 25 lines will be de-selected for downloading by the Mail Dispatcher. That is, if you want, you can let them be

HTML or Not -to- HTML is not the question

2003-02-08 Thread ~John
I personally would like to see everything in theBat that it can possibly hold (and still load quickly!) Including the ability to deal with spam and the ability to bounce mail. TheBat is the ultimate E-Mail Client and I think it should be able to fit all peoples taste's (with the exception of the

HTML sectarianism :-)

2003-02-08 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello all, Gosh, this HTML thing really is dividing up what was a happy mailing list. It's worse than Catholics against Protestants (or any other religious factions squabbling). I personally hate HTML but PC novices (and a lot of regular users) don't seem understand the difference between that

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Jurgen Haug [JH] wrote:' JH What is an 'Invalid Signature'? If the signature shows up as invalid it means that the message has not been altered since being signed by the sender. However, there's

Re:HTML sectarianism :-)

2003-02-08 Thread Csaba Kiss
Hello, Saturday, February 8, 2003, 6:47:09 PM, you wrote: RW Gosh, this HTML thing really is dividing up what was a happy mailing RW list. It's worse than Catholics against Protestants (or any other RW religious factions squabbling). I personally hate HTML but PC novices RW (and a lot of

Re[2]: reply all with selected text?

2003-02-08 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Roelof, Saturday, February 8, 2003, 11:47:23 AM, you wrote: RO Now you only need a reason to do so. Can't remember the last time I RO did a reply-to-all for non testing purposes. Usually it's not required. However, I belong to a few listservers that if I don't do reply all, the e-mail

Re[2]: Selective Download .txt file of spammers

2003-02-08 Thread Christophe
Hello Thomas, PMFJI but if you are so keen on spam filtering, why don't you use a software that is specialised in it? I hear SpammAssassin with Bayesian Filter is a way to go. Why not OTOH, if 17 spam messages are much compared to your daily intake of spam, then I wonder why you use spam

Re:HTML sectarianism :-)

2003-02-08 Thread Jurgen Haug
HTML sectarianism LOL in some ways that reminds me of the good old times in the FIDO net when the Amiga Users and the Atari ST Users were at each others throats *sigh* -- Gruß, Jurgenmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition on

Re: Looks like html makes to the BAT

2003-02-08 Thread marek jedlinski
On Saturday, February 8, 2003, 12:15:03 AM, Tim ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I am really happy about it. I am not one of those purists. MB One does not have to be a purist to have difficulty reading html MB messages in an e-mail client. :) True. But that's the fault of the person writing the

Re: HTML or Not -to- HTML is not the question

2003-02-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello ~John, On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 11:40:40 -0600 GMT (09/02/03, 00:40 +0700 GMT), ~John wrote: I would like to see TheBat! become the all-things-to-everyone E-Mail client, the Ultimate or Complete E-Mail Solution! Why should a person have to look elsewhere for features, or use *more* software

Re: HTML sectarianism :-)

2003-02-08 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Csaba, On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 at 18:59:56[GMT +0100](which was 17:59 where I live) you wrote: I think you just further detriorate the situation by calling those who like HTML mail PC novices. Was it really necessary? Does it make you feel that you belong to the experts now? I personally

Re: reply all with selected text?

2003-02-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Roelof, On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 17:47:23 +0100 GMT (08/02/03, 23:47 +0700 GMT), Roelof Otten wrote: KSR Now I have a quick way to do reply all. Now you only need a reason to do so. Can't remember the last time I did a reply-to-all for non testing purposes. I do that often. Small groups,

Re: Selective Download .txt file of spammers

2003-02-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Christophe, On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 19:00:34 +0100 GMT (09/02/03, 01:00 +0700 GMT), Christophe wrote: Ok but I receive more than two hundred spams per day, it is not posssible not to filter ;-) That's a lot. Also, regarding your list of hundreds of email addresses from which you have

Re: reply all with selected text?

2003-02-08 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Kenneth, On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 13:00:33 -0500GMT (8-2-03, 19:00 +0100, where I live), you wrote: RO Now you only need a reason to do so. Can't remember the last time RO I did a reply-to-all for non testing purposes. KSR Usually it's not required. However, I belong to a few KSR listservers

Re[2]: HTML sectarianism :-)

2003-02-08 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Jurgen, Saturday, February 8, 2003, 1:11:13 PM, you wrote: JH LOL in some ways that reminds me of the good old times in the FIDO net JH when the Amiga Users and the Atari ST Users were at each others JH throats *sigh* Why does it have to be either or. I vote for peaceful coexistence.

Re: reply all with selected text?

2003-02-08 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Thomas, On Sun, 9 Feb 2003 01:25:12 +0700GMT (8-2-03, 19:25 +0100, where I live), you wrote: Now you only need a reason to do so. Can't remember the last time I did a reply-to-all for non testing purposes. TF I do that often. Small groups, such as a four- or five-person TF teams for

Re:HTML sectarianism :-)

2003-02-08 Thread Jurgen Haug
Hello Kenneth, Saturday, February 8, 2003, 7:39:41 PM, you wrote: Why does it have to be either or. I vote for peaceful coexistence. Whether I or we like it or not, as long as MS creates OL and OE, and everyone seems to be enamored with rich text, multimedia e-mails, this will not go away.

Re: reply all with selected text?

2003-02-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Roelof, On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 19:45:47 +0100 GMT (09/02/03, 01:45 +0700 GMT), Roelof Otten wrote: TF I do that often. Small groups, such as a four- or five-person TF teams for university projects, will not create a mailing list (on TF Y!G or elsewhere), but all members of the group/team will

Re: HTML sectarianism :-)

2003-02-08 Thread marek jedlinski
Why does it have to be either or. I vote for peaceful coexistence. It's difficult for coexistence to be peaceful, when one side does not make life annoying for the other (text messages are equally readable to everyone), but the other side is not willing to reciprocate (html messages are not

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Allie! On Saturday, February 08, 2003, 11:35 AM, you wrote: AW This leaves aside the issue of just being polite to the folks who AW are volunteering their time and effort for your benefit and little AW if any gain, of course ... A This *is* one of my points, come to think of it. I did

Re: Address book entries not working after converting from Eudora

2003-02-08 Thread Jim Kilgannon
Thanks. The examples helped point me in the right direction. And then Julian's answer gave me another clue I needed. If what I'm reading makes sense, what you are both suggesting is that I need to create a single address entry for anyone whose email address I might want, and then create a

Re[2]: Selective Download .txt file of spammers

2003-02-08 Thread Christophe
Hello Allie, C a simple space could break my conditions ? Yes. Especially if you inadvertently added a new lines at the end of the list. Ok, must be carefull so :-) C not good ! and the second option all strings must match, would have C which effect in my case ? It means that all

Re[2]: Mail Synchronisation ?

2003-02-08 Thread Christophe
Hello Julian, Saturday, February 8, 2003, 2:37:51 PM, you wrote: Yes, if you use backup it adds anything new from the PC, but leaves or duplicates everything that was on the laptop. Ok, thanks for this confirmation Therefore I conclude only synchronisation can bring a clone, No ? Yes. If

Re: HTML or Not -to- HTML is not the question

2003-02-08 Thread ~John
Not Hardly! Thanks for the insult. -- Best Regards, ~John - - - Thomas Fernandez wrote - - - I believe the software you are looking for already exists: check out www.incredimail.com - - - End of Thomas Fernandez's message - - - Current

Re: HTML sectarianism :-)

2003-02-08 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Csaba! On Saturday, February 08, 2003, 11:59 AM, you wrote: C Hello, C Saturday, February 8, 2003, 6:47:09 PM, you wrote: RW Gosh, this HTML thing really is dividing up what was a happy mailing RW list. It's worse than Catholics against Protestants (or any other RW religious factions

Re[2]: HTML sectarianism :-)

2003-02-08 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello marek, Saturday, February 8, 2003, 2:25:47 PM, you wrote: mj Allow me to respectfully disagree. I believe that before we move on, mj we all should make independent, informed decisions about whether the mj proposed direction is beneficial. Ah! Therein lies the problem I see. I have not

Re: HTML sectarianism :-)

2003-02-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello marek, On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 20:25:47 +0100 GMT (09/02/03, 02:25 +0700 GMT), marek jedlinski wrote: I guess we all have to move on sometimes. Allow me to respectfully disagree. I believe that before we move on, we all should make independent, informed decisions about whether the proposed

Re: HTML or Not -to- HTML is not the question

2003-02-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello ~John, On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 13:38:55 -0600 GMT (09/02/03, 02:38 +0700 GMT), ~John wrote: I believe the software you are looking for already exists: check out www.incredimail.com Not Hardly! Thanks for the insult. Anytime! ;-) Seriously, you know this was a joke I couldn't resist

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Allie Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Mary Bull [MB] wrote:' MB To me, you are My Hero (one of a few) and a Perfect Man!! blush Why thanks for the words of encouragement and support. /blush PS// Poor me ... far from perfect. ;) - -- -=]

Restoring messages after HD crash, perhaps slightly OT

2003-02-08 Thread Martina Moravcov
Hi! Help! S.O.S.! I used to have Win98 on my computer. Last week I bought an 80GB harddrive which my old BIOS couldn't handle. During the course of my battle with the BIOS all three of my HDs got done in, their FATs being mysteriously overwritten and changed. Now that was all my fault. I tried

Re: HTML or Not -to- HTML is not the question

2003-02-08 Thread ~John
H let me think about it Okay. LOL -- Best Regards, ~John - - - Thomas Fernandez wrote - - - Anytime! ;-) Seriously, you know this was a joke I couldn't resist making. And I appreciate your rejecting even the idea of trying IncrediMail. Friends again? - - - End of Thomas

Re: HTML or Not -to- HTML is not the question

2003-02-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello ~John, On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 14:14:55 -0600 GMT (09/02/03, 03:14 +0700 GMT), ~John wrote: Friends again? H let me think about it Okay. LOL Pheewww... relieved ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Wrinkled Was Not One of the Things I

Re: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Allie! On Saturday, February 08, 2003, 2:10 PM, you wrote: MB To me, you are My Hero (one of a few) and a Perfect Man!! A blush Why thanks for the words of encouragement and support. /blush A PS// Poor me ... far from perfect. ;) Just say it is my feminine, southern use of language

Setup Error

2003-02-08 Thread Nick Danger
Hello, I'm trying to setup TB! on my wife's computer (Win98) and get the following error: The THEBAT.EXE file is linked to missing export OLEAUT32.DLL:VarNot. Anyone have any ideas what I need to do to correct this? TIA, -- ò.ó Nick Danger

Re: reply all with selected text?

2003-02-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Roelof, @8-Feb-2003, 19:37 +0100 (18:37 UK time) Roelof Otten [RO] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: KSR Usually it's not required. However, I belong to a few KSR listservers that if I don't do reply all, the e-mail only goes KSR

DEAD HORSE (was Hype over html text!)

2003-02-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Csaba, @8-Feb-2003, 17:16 +0100 (16:16 UK time) Csaba Kiss [CK] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: AM That would count as a derogatory remark. This is not AM allowed on the list and worse, you direct it at a AM

Re: reply all with selected text?

2003-02-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Marck, On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 19:45:29 + GMT (09/02/03, 02:45 +0700 GMT), Marck D Pearlstone wrote: RO I think I would be tempted very strongly (Marck, please look the RO other way) to use a folder reply template for such a list. No need - I use folder templates in these circumstances.

Re: Restoring messages after HD crash, perhaps slightly OT

2003-02-08 Thread Joseph N.
Martina, On Saturday, February 08, 2003, Martina Moravcov wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: MM But I also wonder if You out there know about some bug in TB or MM some secret, mysterious method that I could try to regain my MM mails. I would be happy to send anyone some of the

Re: reply all with selected text?

2003-02-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Thomas, @9-Feb-2003, 04:34 +0700 (21:34 UK time) Thomas Fernandez [TF] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: No need - I use folder templates in these circumstances. There's no other way to do it. Mind you, that's the *only* time I

Re: Selective Download .txt file of spammers

2003-02-08 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Saturday, February 8, 2003, 1:00 PM, you wrote: Whenever I receive spam, I will report it to SpamCop, and they will contact the appropriate ISP who will shut down the email account. Before I knew SpamCop, I did the tracking and ISP informing by hand, and often enough, within a few minutes

Re[2]: Selective Download .txt file of spammers

2003-02-08 Thread Christophe
Hello Thomas, Saturday, February 8, 2003, 7:29:14 PM, you wrote: Check it out: www.spamcop.net Thanks, i'm going to visit it :-) There are also fitlers in the TBUDL library (follow the link in the footer of each posting) that send the spam message in the format required by spamcop.

Re: HTML sectarianism :-)

2003-02-08 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Saturday, February 8, 2003, 1:11 PM, you wrote: JH LOL in some ways that reminds me of the good old times in the FIDO net JH when the Amiga Users and the Atari ST Users were at each others JH throats *sigh* My Atari ST was the greatest thing since sliced bread!! in 1985 it had windows

Re:HTML sectarianism :-)

2003-02-08 Thread Jurgen Haug
Hello Paul, Saturday, February 8, 2003, 11:29:26 PM, you wrote: On Saturday, February 8, 2003, 1:11 PM, you wrote: JH LOL in some ways that reminds me of the good old times in the FIDO net JH when the Amiga Users and the Atari ST Users were at each others JH throats *sigh* My Atari ST

Apology!

2003-02-08 Thread Csaba Kiss
Hello, I just wanted to aplogize for my behaviour. I must have drunk to much coffe in the afternoon. I let too much steam out on other people. Reading back my messages makes me ashamed. Sorry about it again. Back to lurking mode ! -- Best regards, Csaba

Re: Selective Download .txt file of spammers

2003-02-08 Thread ~John
This filter is not as easy to setup as you guys make it sound. For instance, Where in the filter settings is MainSet: 40. And in the Actions tab, there are several settings there, were does this go Actions: faMarkRead,faNewMsg,faExport,faoExportOver,

Re: Selective Download .txt file of spammers

2003-02-08 Thread ~John
well I found the address I'm supposed to submit the email too. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Best Regards, ~John - - - ~John wrote - - - This filter is not as easy to setup as you guys make it sound. For instance, Where in the filter settings is MainSet: 40. And in the Actions tab, there are several

Re: HTML sectarianism :-)

2003-02-08 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Saturday, February 8, 2003, 6:02 PM, you wrote: JH Hey Mr Atari ST, our 68000 machines were better than anything else, JH right? ;-) My Amiga 2000 had a better O/S than what I am using now, JH some 12 years later! I will not disagree with that statement AT ALL!!! Of course UNIX is the BEST

Re: Apology!

2003-02-08 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Saturday, February 8, 2003, 6:14 PM, you wrote: CK I just wanted to aplogize for my behaviour. I must have drunk CK to much coffe in the afternoon. I let too much steam out on other CK people. Reading back my messages makes me ashamed. Sorry about it CK again. CK Back to lurking mode !

Re: Selective Download .txt file of spammers

2003-02-08 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Saturday, February 8, 2003, 6:15 PM, you wrote: ~ well I found the address I'm supposed to submit the email too. ~ [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think the email to get the spamcop is spamcop.NET not .COM. www.spamcop.net and log in to get a free address to send spam back to. the TB ( The Bat!)

Re: HTML sectarianism :-)

2003-02-08 Thread Wolffe
I *WAS* trying to stay out of this .. But some opinion needs inserted here :-) On Saturday, February 08, 2003 Kenneth S. Rhee stated: KSR Hello Jurgen, KSR Why does it have to be either or. I vote for peaceful coexistence. That's what the originator was trying to put across .. Rw OK, I'm

Re: Address book entries not working after converting from Eudora

2003-02-08 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Jim, On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 14:27:53 -0500GMT (8-2-03, 20:27 +0100, where I live), you wrote: JK If what I'm reading makes sense, what you are both suggesting is JK that I need to create a single address entry for anyone whose JK email address I might want, Yes. JK and then create a group,

Re: Looks like html makes to the BAT

2003-02-08 Thread Wolffe
On Friday, February 07, 2003 Kenneth S. Rhee stated: KSR Here is my first message using the html editor. In the infamous words of the housewife upon seeing a mouse .. EK That hurt my eyes big time .. GIMME ASCII! :-) Later \\'olffe

Re: Setup Error

2003-02-08 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Nick, On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 15:20:42 -0600GMT (8-2-03, 22:20 +0100, where I live), you wrote: ND I'm trying to setup TB! on my wife's computer (Win98) and get the ND following error: ND The THEBAT.EXE file is linked to missing export ND OLEAUT32.DLL:VarNot. ND Anyone have any ideas what I

Signature Cut line (was: Re: Looks like html makes to the BAT)

2003-02-08 Thread Wolffe
On Friday, February 07, 2003 Mary Bull stated: JH same here :-) and I think you missed the space after the two dashes? MB The way to be sure one gets this space in, is: MB 1) Hit the enter or return key after one's last line of text. MB 2) Type -- MB 3) Hit the space bar (that will put the

Re: Setup Error

2003-02-08 Thread Nick Danger
Reply to message sent 2/8/2003, @ 01:36:48 (6:36 PM Locally) ~~~ Hello Roelof, The file is supposed to be in the directory c:\windows\system, my version has a date stamp of 12-04-00 (dd-mm-yy), so it isn't part of Win98, it could be

Re: Looks like html makes to the BAT

2003-02-08 Thread Wolffe
On Friday, February 07, 2003 Mary Bull stated: MB ... Also, are you going to educate everyone to use MB html tastefully? Once when I was still having to use Outlook Express, MB a newbie on another list sent me a grateful reply privately, three MB pages on OE stationery, shocking pink background,

Re[2]: Looks like html makes to the BAT

2003-02-08 Thread Spike
Hello Paul Wilson, On or about Saturday, February 08, 2003 at 00:33:14GMT -0800 (which was 3:33 AM in the tropics where I live) Paul interjected: DH The last version of TB! to exclude html creation may well DH become a classic. PW And most likely the only one used in this house. If I wanted PW

Re: Signature Cut line (was: Re: Looks like html makes to the BAT)

2003-02-08 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Wolffe! On Saturday, February 08, 2003, 6:45 PM, you wrote: JH ... and I think you missed the space after the two dashes? I addressed this problem because it took me two months to understand what people were telling me about how to do it. I did not get their language. So I thought maybe

Re[2]: Address book entries not working after converting from Eudora

2003-02-08 Thread Spike
Hello Jim Kilgannon, On or about Saturday, February 08, 2003 at 09:34:52GMT -0500 (which was 9:34 AM in the tropics where I live) Jim Kilgannon posted: JK I've just converted from Eudora and I can't seem to get any JK of the groups of email address to work in the Bat. All I JK seem to get is the

Re: Looks like html makes to the BAT

2003-02-08 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Wolffe! On Saturday, February 08, 2003, 6:51 PM, you wrote: MB ... three pages on OE stationery, ... W A perfect example of bloat! Mary, how big was this email? W, I realize you are reading this thread some time after it was written, and I am coming to your reply hours behind that. But I

Re[3]: HTML sectarianism :-)

2003-02-08 Thread Mike Alexander
Hi Kenneth, Saturday, February 8, 2003, 6:39:41 PM, you wrote: KSR Whether I or we like it or not, as long as MS creates OL and OE, and everyone seems to be enamored with rich text, multimedia e-mails, this will not go away. In fact, I predict that in a couple KSR of years, we all be sending

Re[2]: Hype over html text!

2003-02-08 Thread Mike Alexander
Hi Mary, Saturday, February 8, 2003, 7:26:20 PM, you wrote: MB To me, you are My Hero (one of a few) and a Perfect Man!! Mary, I do believe you're flirting. Shame on you! ;-) I agree with what you've said though even though Allie had one occasion (when he was obviously having a bad day g)

Re: DEAD HORSE (was Hype over html text!)

2003-02-08 Thread Mike Alexander
Hi Marck, Saturday, February 8, 2003, 8:31:45 PM, you wrote: MDP For anyone unfamiliar with Dead Horse policy, DEAD means DEAD. NO MDP REPLIES to the list, only off-list or on TBOT. MArck, Sorry if any of my posts have gone past this, but at most I can only check the list once a day at the

Re[2]: Selective Download .txt file of spammers

2003-02-08 Thread Christophe
Hello Paul, try this link: http://www.spamcop.com/ Marck has made some filters for TB that will send the SPAM off to spamcop with little problem- all you do is CTRL-ALT-S and the message is sent! it is free!! Thanks Paul :-) -- Best regards, Christophe

Re[3]: HTML sectarianism :-)

2003-02-08 Thread Spike
Hello Kenneth S. Rhee, On or about Saturday, February 08, 2003 at 13:39:41GMT -0500 (which was 1:39 PM in the tropics where I live) Kenneth pointed out :-): KSR folks used to laugh at Macs when they were first introduced Used to? Still do, 100 times every day!! _*{_SCORN_}*_ Is that enough

Re[2]: HTML sectarianism :-)

2003-02-08 Thread Spike
Hello Roelof Otten, On or about Saturday, February 08, 2003 at 19:55:31GMT +0100 (which was 1:55 PM in the tropics where I live) Roelof Otten postulated: RO OOTC Does anybody know a tool that downloads fidonet mail and RO makes it accessible to TB? Since I've got a local RO mailserver, it may

  1   2   >