Re: Happy New Year Moldova
Bill- Cool. 99% literacy rate !!! -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Make it STOP!!
Scott wrote: Yep, 30 or so, since I do webwork, I get to monitor a number of webmaster email boxes Why wouldn't you just forward those to one account? I manage a number of websites and do this. Since the To: field is retained (ex: message sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] forwards to my address shows the message addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) it's pretty easy to sort to specific folders and know what domain/account/address the message was sent to. -- Ken Green Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Losing place when new mail arrives
Hello Stuart, On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:28:25 -0600 GMT (01/01/2004, 04:28 +0700 GMT), Stuart Cuddy wrote: KC When reading unread messages in a folder, my place gets lost when new KC mail arrives in that folder if automatic downloading is configured. KC Its quite time consuming to try and find the message I was reading as KC it is flagged as read and lost from view. Not over here. While the message list jumps, the message body still remains in view. KC Ideally it would be nice if the message being viewed stayed in the KC preview pane when new messages arrive. It does, here. I have reported this as a bug to bugtrack. See: http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0002208 You have set display to unread only. I don't see that in the OPs setting. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Why do people give each other flowers? To celebrate various important occasions, they're killing living creatures? Why restrict it to plants? Sweetheart, let's make up. Have this deceased squirrel. Message reply created with The Bat! 2.02.3 CE under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 256MB RAM Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Copying Quick templates across accounts
Hello Allie, On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 19:10:17 -0500 GMT (01/01/2004, 07:10 +0700 GMT), Allie Martin wrote: I need to copy my quick templates from one account to another. Which file is it that I copy across? account.qtn -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. I tested this program in the presence of a certified child labourer, and she went crazy over it. - Wanda Sloan in a software review for an icon-generating program. Message reply created with The Bat! 2.02.3 CE under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 256MB RAM Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Losing place when new mail arrives
Hello Thomas, You have set display to unread only. I don't see that in the OPs setting. View/Display/Only Unread. Or Alt+LeftClick on an Unread envelope. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.01.3 Winamp OFF: Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Losing place when new mail arrives
Hello MAU, On Thu, 1 Jan 2004 10:20:29 +0100 GMT (01/01/2004, 16:20 +0700 GMT), MAU wrote: You have set display to unread only. I don't see that in the OPs setting. View/Display/Only Unread. Or Alt+LeftClick on an Unread envelope. Yeah. What I mean is I wasn't aware that the Original Poster (OP) used this setting. Sorry for mixunderstanding. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. The next time you feel like complaining, remember: Your garbage disposal probably eats better than thirty percent of the people in this world. Message reply created with The Bat! 2.03 Beta/25 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 256MB RAM Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Losing place when new mail arrives
Hello Thomas, Yeah. What I mean is I wasn't aware that the Original Poster (OP) used this setting. Sorry for mixunderstanding. Ah, sorry. I misunderstood what you meant by OP. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.01.3 Winamp OFF: Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Losing place when new mail arrives
Hello MAU, On Thu, 1 Jan 2004 11:15:42 +0100 GMT (01/01/2004, 17:15 +0700 GMT), MAU wrote: Ah, sorry. I misunderstood what you meant by OP. Beer! ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Travel is very educational. I can now say Kaopectate in seven different languages. Message reply created with The Bat! 2.03 Beta/25 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 256MB RAM Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Problem with Kaspersky anti-virus.
Bonjour , I have a problem with Kaspersky anti-virus. This is the message: C:_Program Files\TheBat!\Mail\Marie-Thérèse Site\inbox\MESSAGES.TBB/[Fromifman.deumer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue,23 Dec I have deleted the message in folders Inbox and Trash. But Kaspersky don't understand and is going to tell Virus alert for the same message! What's wrong? Kapersky don't works with The Bat! ? (I have a network with 2 PC) -- Avec mes remerciements Cordialement Jean mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problem with Kaspersky anti-virus.
Hi Jean, @1-Jan-2004, 11:37 +0100 (01-Jan 10:37 UK time) Jean Site [JS] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to tbudl: JS I have deleted the message in folders Inbox and Trash. JS But Kaspersky don't understand and is going to tell JS Virus alert for the same message! JS What's wrong? Kapersky don't works with The Bat! ? 1) When you delete a message, it still exists in the TBB file 2) Compress the folder to remove the message completely. 3) Now delete the message from trash 4) Delete trash 5) If you are using the Pro version of Kaspersky, enable the built-in mail scanning Ant-Virus for it and stop Kaspersky from scanning your mail folders. Kaspersky and TB work in perfect harmony :-). -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v2.03 Beta/25 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 ' pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Problem with Kaspersky anti-virus.
Hello Marck, Thursday, January 1, 2004, 11:44:23 AM, you wrote: MDP Hi Jean, MDP @1-Jan-2004, 11:37 +0100 (01-Jan 10:37 UK time) Jean Site [JS] in MDP mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to tbudl: JS I have deleted the message in folders Inbox and Trash. JS But Kaspersky don't understand and is going to tell JS Virus alert for the same message! JS What's wrong? Kapersky don't works with The Bat! ? MDP 1) When you delete a message, it still exists in the TBB file MDP 2) Compress the folder to remove the message completely. MDP 3) Now delete the message from trash MDP 4) Delete trash MDP 5) If you are using the Pro version of Kaspersky, enable the MDPbuilt-in mail scanning Ant-Virus for it and stop Kaspersky from MDPscanning your mail folders. MDP Kaspersky and TB work in perfect harmony :-). Thanks for the help Marck, You gave me the solution. Kaspersky and TB work in perfect harmony -- Best regards, Jeanmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Backing up
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thursday, January 01, 2004 7:10:16 AM Hi, Im using a trial version of Back up now 3 from www.ntius.com. What files in TB! would I want to back up so that everything is backed up the same way as it is by doing the backup within the TB! program itself Thanks - -- Darrin The Bat 2.02.3 CE - --PGP Key Request-- http://www.speakeasy.org/~drich/pgp.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.3 Comment: iQA/AwUBP/Q46KjEhiEqmMp2EQKQKgCgo0Jee8/bi9VqkeSvoMPHR2cHnt8AoM9v In1HmnctLy5uS4icbjQUTZeb =laOQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Bayesit Needs A Whitelist Feature
Hello The_Bat! Users, I hate to make any requests, especially with an already free plugin... but, Bayesit really needs to have a Whitelist, it has done very well so far, but I decided to look through my junk folder today instead of just deleting it like I normally do, and low and behold there was an important message from a friend. Is this possible? or are you already working on it? Thanks again for Bayesit, I hope you can consider adding this feature. -- John Morse The_Bat! 2.03 Beta/25 Windows 2000 (2195) No Virus Protection Bayesit 0.4gm Spam Plugin Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Your New Years Resolution (ref: TBUDL)
Wed, 31 Dec 2003 17:32:11 [GMT -0500] (5:32 PM EST here) you wrote: My New Year's Resolution is to install the new version :-) Two days ago, I became one of the upgraded. My $0.02: Do it. Do it quickly, while the inexpensive (US$10 student, US$14 everybody else) Christmas upgrade discount is only in effect until January 10, 2004. I ordered the upgrade on line at http://www.ritlabs.com/en/buy_ny.php An email containing my registration arrived overnight. I copied the email to my desktop so could copy and paste the code into the upgraded Version, later. (It also might be a good idea to copy the email to a removable disk of some kind.) I backed up TheBat! (Version 1.62r) to my desktop. I copied some extra folders (and their contents), that I had added to Version 1's folder structure, to my desktop. I already had saved a copy of 1.62r's, .exe installation file, so I figured that if worse came to worst, I could recreate the 1.62r installation if I found it necessary. I downloaded TheBat! 2.02.3 Christmas Edition from Ritlabs http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/download.php . I ran the downloaded .exe file. TheBat! Version 2 installed itself over Version 1. Using TheBat! == Help == Registration , I copied and pasted the Key and the Key Checksum from the email I'd saved for the purpose. The upgrade was simple and quick. All of my settings were there. All of my filters and Quick Templates worked. Even my two extra folders and their contents were intact. No problem at all. Subjective impression #1: Version 2 runs faster than Version 1 did. Subjective impression #2: Version 2 is more pleasant to use. Happy New Year, Bill. Using The Bat! v2.02.3 CE on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195Service Pack 4 -- Daniel A. Grunberg Kensington, Maryland, USA homepage: www.nyx.net/~dgrunber/ Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
My $0.02 about upgrading (was Re: Happy New Year Moldova)
Wed, 31 Dec 2003 17:32:11 [GMT -0500] (5:32 PM EST here) Bill McCarthy wrote: My New Year's Resolution is to install the new version :-) Two days ago, I became one of the upgraded. My $0.02: Do it. Do it quickly, while the inexpensive (US$10 student, US$14 everybody else) Christmas upgrade discount is only in effect until January 10, 2004. I ordered the upgrade on line at http://www.ritlabs.com/en/buy_ny.php An email containing my registration arrived overnight. I copied the email to my desktop so could copy and paste the code into the upgraded Version, later. (Ritlab's email suggested that a copy the of the email should be saved on a removable disk, so I did that too.) I backed up TheBat! (Version 1.62r) to my desktop. I copied some extra folders (and their contents), that I had added to Version 1's folder structure, to my desktop. I already had saved a copy of 1.62r's .exe installation file, so I figured that if worse came to worst, I could recreate the 1.62r installation if I found it necessary. I downloaded TheBat! 2.02.3 Christmas Edition from Ritlabs http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/download.php . I ran the downloaded .exe file. TheBat! Version 2 installed itself over Version 1. Using TheBat! == Help == Registration , I copied and pasted the Key and the Key Checksum from the email I'd saved for the purpose. The upgrade was simple and quick. All of my settings were there. All of my filters and Quick Templates worked. Even my two extra folders and their contents were intact. No problem at all. All that backing up was for naught, but so what. big grin Subjective impression #1: Version 2 runs faster than Version 1 did. Subjective impression #2: Version 2 is more pleasant to use. Happy New Year. Using The Bat! v2.02.3 CE (now) on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195Service Pack 4 -- Daniel A. Grunberg Kensington, Maryland, USA homepage: www.nyx.net/~dgrunber/ Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Address Book Hiding
Happy New Year to regulars, newcomers, and visitors! I have an account which is part of a group. When I log on TB! to just that one account, a full address book is available when I click the icon on the toolbar. When, however, I log on TB! to the group and go into that account, there is no address book available. (a) How can this be possible? (b) What can I do to fix it? All help will be much appreciated. -- JN Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Status Line Lost
The status line at the bottom of my TB! screen has gone missing! Any idea how to return it to its rightful place?? -- JN Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Status Line Lost
Never mind. Figured it out. -- JN Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Status Line Lost
On Thursday, January 1, 2004 @ 11:30:34 AM [-0700], Joseph N. wrote: The status line at the bottom of my TB! screen has gone missing! Any idea how to return it to its rightful place?? View/Log Panel? -- Matt Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Status Line Lost
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Joseph, On Thu, 1 Jan 2004 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The status line at the bottom of my TB! screen has gone missing! Any idea how to return it to its rightful place?? View/log panel or CTRL+SHFT+L - -- Best regards, Richard | Using The Bat! 2.03 Beta/25 SpamPal | Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 4 | and the best browser: Opera 7.23 PGP public key: http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCA93B5BE -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.3 Comment: iQA/AwUBP/R+5xqZtcDKk7W+EQLm1QCg0aHGLq5JgfltNqyjePP/ZAjpnzoAoNVT Y5XE4M23ZsoREF95lTmkfdH9 =AA4B -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
PGP (or GnuPG) signing hidden on authentication?
Hello TBUDL, In order to get the PGP signatures hidden do I have to use the commercial product, or is it possible to configure with GnuPG? Sorry to ask such a stupid question, but I have been away from TB mailing lists, and historically have used GPG (i.e. GnuPG) with GPGshell due to free availability and active development. ,- [ What's new in version 2 per help ] | Improved PGP support. | | Version 2 introduces enhanced PGP/MIME support, so now it is possible to | send PGP signed/encrypted files without hassle. Also, built-in support | for PGP v6-8 is included. The interface for handling signed/encrypted | messages is universal no matter which system (PGP or S/MIME) is used, | you can verify or decrypt messages just by pressing one button. `- Maybe I missed something in help, but when I use the index or find I don't find much help on configuration issues which relate to PGP or GnuPG options available. I see the Tools | OpenPGP menu. Under Tools | OpenPGP | Choose OpenPGP version I have GNU Privacy Guard (GPG) chosen. So unless I missed something I would imagine I need to have the commercial product to get the hidden signatures? Correct? The hidden signatures is referred to as PGP/MIME? Correct? Thanks! -- Best regards, Greg Strong Using The Bat! v2.03 Beta/25 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP (or GnuPG) signing hidden on authentication?
Hi Greg, @1-Jan-2004, 17:32 -0600 (01-Jan 23:32 UK time) Greg Strong [GS] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBUDL: GS In order to get the PGP signatures hidden do I have to use the GS commercial product, or is it possible to configure with GnuPG? I use GnuPG and PGP/MIME signing right here. ... snip GS I see the Tools | OpenPGP menu. Under Tools | OpenPGP | Choose GS OpenPGP version I have GNU Privacy Guard (GPG) chosen. Good start. Then, in the message editor menu you have: Privacy | Sign when complete PGP/MIME Off / On / Auto On will sign with PGP/MIME. Or in templates you can specify: %SIGNCOMPLETE%PGPMIME%- GS So unless I missed something I would imagine I need to have the GS commercial product to get the hidden signatures? Correct? Wrong :-). GS The hidden signatures is referred to as PGP/MIME? Correct? No idea. Never heard it referred to as that before. -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v2.03 Beta/25 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 ' pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP (or GnuPG) signing hidden on authentication?
Hello Marck, Thursday, January 1, 2004, 6:05:11 PM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: MDP I use GnuPG and PGP/MIME signing right here. Glad to here it. GS I see the Tools | OpenPGP menu. Under Tools | OpenPGP | Choose GS OpenPGP version I have GNU Privacy Guard (GPG) chosen. MDP Good start. Then, in the message editor menu you have: MDP Privacy | MDP Sign when complete MDP PGP/MIME MDP Off / On / Auto MDP On will sign with PGP/MIME. MDP Or in templates you can specify: MDP %SIGNCOMPLETE%PGPMIME%- GS So unless I missed something I would imagine I need to have the GS commercial product to get the hidden signatures? Correct? MDP Wrong :-). Again glad to here it! Now I just have to get kinks worked out on templates for how I want to use signing. GS The hidden signatures is referred to as PGP/MIME? Correct? MDP No idea. Never heard it referred to as that before. So what is the hidden signature of PGP (or GPG) called? -- Best regards, Greg Strong Using The Bat! v2.03 Beta/25 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP (or GnuPG) signing hidden on authentication?
Hi Greg, @1-Jan-2004, 18:48 -0600 (02-Jan 00:48 UK time) Greg Strong [GS] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: GS The hidden signatures is referred to as PGP/MIME? Correct? MDP No idea. Never heard it referred to as that before. GS So what is the hidden signature of PGP (or GPG) called? At the risk of repeating myself, I have never heard of Hidden signatures but PGP/MIME sounds like the thing. Although, as a technical purist, hidden is, perhaps, a misnomer. TB hides them I suppose. But send a PGP/MIME signed message to a non PGP/MIME aware mail client and they'll be complaining about the 'odd' attachment of with this header Content-Type: application/pgp-signature. The attachment is clearly visible and not hidden at all. -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v2.03 Beta/25 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 ' pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Issues With Version 2.02.3 (CE)
Howdy TheBatUsers, Aside from the problem with viewing messages (not seeing them) in the message list already mentioned in previous posts, I'm having a couple of other issues with the Xmas Edition of TB. Quick background: I was running version 1.62R under Win 2000 Pro on my old computer. When I set up my new computer, running Win XP Pro, I also upgraded TB to 2.02.3 (Xmas Edition). I copied all of my mail folders acct info into my new mail directory after installing TB on the new computer, and after some twiddling, was up and running. Everything seemed to be ok, except as noted below. Issue #1: For some odd reason, I invoked the CTRL-SHFT-ALT-L keys to see if any folders were missing. 60 new folders *were* found. I discovered soon thereafter that all of my account folders were displayed in duplicate after that, but there were some odd differences. Using one account as an example, before doing the above, I had these folders listed under my primary acct: Inbox Spam Inbox-Known Outbox Sent Mail Trash Bounced Mail After invoking the folder find keys, I am showing these folders in the new duplicated account: Inbox Spam $KNOWN$ Outbox Sent Trash Bounced Mail Attach The obvious difference is the naming of the Inbox-Known folder (to $KNOWN$) and Sent Mail (to just Sent), plus the addition of the Attach folder. Anyone know what caused the account folders to show up in duplicate with the above noted differences? Issue #2: I ended up recreating my address books (after moving to my new computer). After importing the AB data, I had to set up my groups again. The Help on adding contacts to Groups says you can either open the Properties of a contact then click on the Group drop-down list and choose the appropriate Group to assign the contact to, or use CTRL-DRAG/DROP to drag a contact and drop it on the Group they should be in. This latter action, selecting and then dragging/dropping doesn't work for me. Has anyone else had this problem? Issue #3: I have a top-level Common Folder (named, appropriately enough, Common Folders) under which I filter everything I want to save from my various accounts (mailing lists, etc.). When viewing the message list for my The Bat! folder, with all threads collapsed, I noted that sometimes arrowing up or down in the message lists causes some of the threads to suddenly disappear, to be replaced by other messages in the list. It's as if a thread is suddenly removed from the list when highlighted. To get the complete list displaying again, I have to select another folder in the tree on the left and the re-select the folder I was viewing. Anyone else noticed that? I've been using TB for about 10 days on this new computer and today is the first time I noticed this behaviour. Thanks. -- Chris Montgomery Airtight Web Services http://www.airtightweb.com Web Development, Web Project Management, Software Sales 210-490-2415 Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP (or GnuPG) signing hidden on authentication?
Hello Marck, Thursday, January 1, 2004, 7:49:15 PM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: MDP I have never heard of Hidden signatures but PGP/MIME sounds like MDP the thing. Ok. Misunderstanding or miscommunication. I thought you were referring to PHP/MIME when you said you never heard of it before which really threw me for a loop. Anyhow! In Privacy Preferences under Tools | OpenPGP | Open PGPPreferences I have caching of passphrase selected for 5 minutes. It is NOT working. Is this a bug or a configuration issue? I have my key rings on a floppy disk and TB pointed to them on the files tab, or is this some other strange configuration issue? Thanks! -- Best regards, Greg Strong Using The Bat! v2.03 Beta/25 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP (or GnuPG) signing hidden on authentication?
Hi Greg, @1-Jan-2004, 20:00 -0600 (02-Jan 02:00 UK time) Greg Strong [GS] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: GS In Privacy Preferences under Tools | OpenPGP | Open GS PGPPreferences I have caching of passphrase selected for 5 GS minutes. It is NOT working. Is this a bug or a configuration GS issue? I have my key rings on a floppy disk and TB pointed to GS them on the files tab, or is this some other strange GS configuration issue? I don't know. I have thought it worked here. Sometimes. I have just configured it for minutes. Let's see how I get on with that. -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v2.03 Beta/25 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 ' pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Address Book Hiding
Hello Joseph, On Thu, 1 Jan 2004 13:29:41 -0600 GMT (02/01/2004, 02:29 +0700 GMT), Joseph N. wrote: I have an account which is part of a group. When I log on TB! to just that one account, a full address book is available when I click the icon on the toolbar. When, however, I log on TB! to the group and go into that account, there is no address book available. Are talking about Workgroups for Windows? Is the address book on your Workstation? -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Top 10 Reasons To Go To Work Naked: 10. Your boss is always yelling, I wanna see your butt in here by 8:00. Message reply created with The Bat! 2.03 Beta/25 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 256MB RAM Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
crtl-shift-alt-L (was: Issues With Version 2.02.3 (CE))
Hello Chris, On Thu, 1 Jan 2004 19:53:04 -0600 GMT (02/01/2004, 08:53 +0700 GMT), Chris Montgomery wrote: Issue #1: For some odd reason, I invoked the CTRL-SHFT-ALT-L keys to see if any folders were missing. 60 new folders *were* found. I discovered soon thereafter that all of my account folders were displayed in duplicate after that, but there were some odd differences. That's not good. The obvious difference is the naming of the Inbox-Known folder (to $KNOWN$) and Sent Mail (to just Sent), plus the addition of the Attach folder. $KNOWN$ is the internal name for Inbox-Known. Delete both the $KNOWN$ folder and the Inbox-Known, and create a new folder which you call $KNOWN$. It will be displayed as Inbox-Known. At least in theory. All system folders (i.e. TB system, i.e. internal standard) have theformat $name$. This is also true for $SENT$, which should be displayed as either Sent or Sent Mail. Anyone know what caused the account folders to show up in duplicate with the above noted differences? I have the feeling that shift-crtl-alt-L looks in another module than where the displayed folders are. This is a hint for bug hunting. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Why do you need a driver's license to buy liquor when you can't drink and drive ? Message reply created with The Bat! 2.03 Beta/25 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 256MB RAM Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Address Book Hiding
Thomas, On Thursday, January 01, 2004, Thomas Fernandez wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have an account which is part of a group. When I log on TB! to just that one account, a full address book is available when I click the icon on the toolbar. When, however, I log on TB! to the group and go into that account, there is no address book available. Are talking about Workgroups for Windows? Is the address book on your Workstation? No, a TB! group (Option/Networking Administration/Groups, IIRC) By way of an update, I have concluded that the AB exists in the proper file in the proper place for the particular account, but that when the account is up as part of a larger set of accounts, whether the group in which it is included or the entire set of users if the Administrator is logged in, then the AB becomes unavailable. -- JN Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP (or GnuPG) signing hidden on authentication?
Hello Marck, Thursday, January 1, 2004, 8:59:44 PM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: MDP I have just configured it for minutes. Let's see how I get on MDP with that. Let me know if it works for you. I'll pass on the minutes though. I don't think it is good security to cache a pass phrase for that long on a broad band connection. I don't think it good security to cache a pass phrase. To each their own I guess. -- Best regards, Greg Strong Using The Bat! v2.03 Beta/25 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Error in InBox Mesage Base
Something apparently happened and I am now getting an error for about 40 messages in my InBox. I managed to move the other viable messages out of the folder but am stuck with these 40. Any access to any of these messages causes an error pop-up asking me if I want to repair the message base. I've tried to repair and and the error remains. I'm looking for suggestions at this point. I can still receive new messages into the InBox folder but its a nuisance since the set of messages causing the error are there as well. I can't get rid of them. Is there a way to create a new folder and have it designated as the de facto InBox? -- Best regards, Lawrence Johnson mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: crtl-shift-alt-L (was: Issues With Version 2.02.3 (CE))
Howdy Thomas, Thursday, January 1, 2004, 9:37:17 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote: $KNOWN$ is the internal name for Inbox-Known. Delete both the $KNOWN$ folder and the Inbox-Known, and create a new folder which you call $KNOWN$. It will be displayed as Inbox-Known. At least in theory. I'm not clear as to how this would help. In one account (call it Main) the known folder is Inbox-Known. In the duplicated account of the same name (Main), it's $KNOWN$. There are not two known folders in one account. The same applies to the other five accounts (and their duplicated listings in the folder tree). All system folders (i.e. TB system, i.e. internal standard) have theformat $name$. This is also true for $SENT$, which should be displayed as either Sent or Sent Mail. Same as above. In the one account it's Sent Mail, in the duplicated account of the same name, it's just Sent. I guess what really troubles me is that all six of my accounts (and their folders) were duplicated (and listed at the top level of the folders tree) with the same names. The only differences are in the two folder names (noted previously) and the addition of the Attach folder at the top level of the tree. Also, the message lists in new/duplicated account folders have different column settings but I'm not so worried about that, all the messages are there, just duplicated across the two (old/new) account folders. If I look in the directory where my TB files are stored using my file manager, the account folders are listed only once. I'm guessing that both the original and duplicated account are pointing at the same message base(s), just with different column settings. Weird. -- Chris Montgomery Airtight Web Services http://www.airtightweb.com Web Development, Web Project Management, Software Sales 210-490-2415 Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
