Re: GMane - here we come

2004-03-09 Thread Carsten Thönges
* Leif Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Just one remark ... http://article.gmane.org/gmane.test/1341 *This* is exactly how a link to an archive should look like. And everyone who compares the current archive's (IMHO close to unusable) web frontend with Gmane's Loom has to admit that Gmane

Re: GMane - here we come

2004-03-09 Thread Carsten Thönges
* Leif Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] *We believe the spam risk through Gmane to be the same or even less than the current list archives already in place.* The current list archive can easily be harvested. I wrote some time earlier (sorry, I have no Message-ID) how that can be done

Re: GMane - here we come

2004-03-09 Thread Carsten Thönges
* Leif Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello Thomas, Monday, March 8, 2004, 11:46:41 AM, you wrote: They are planning to eventually pump these feeds into mainstream usenet. Thomas Oh... Still with encrypted addresses, and I believe they will offer us the option of whether we want that

Re: GMane - here we come

2004-03-09 Thread Johannes Posel
Hi there Leif, Just ONE little clarification. On 23:22 08.03.2004, you [Leif Gregory] wrote... provided your From address is set to that which you have subscribed to the TB list, your message will post to the list and in doing so get posted to Gmane. Please, anyone, do not try to subscribe

Re[2]: GMane - here we come

2004-03-09 Thread Allie Martin
Carsten Thönges wrote: CT The current list archive can easily be harvested. I wrote some time CT earlier (sorry, I have no Message-ID) how that can be done using CT some common tools like wget and sed. CT Gmane's spam protection is much better than mail-archive's. I've examined the source of a

Re: GMane - here we come

2004-03-09 Thread Carsten Thönges
* Allie Martin writes: Carsten Thönges wrote: CT The current list archive can easily be harvested. I wrote some time CT earlier (sorry, I have no Message-ID) how that can be done using CT some common tools like wget and sed. I've examined the source of a couple of those messages that have

Re: GMane - here we come

2004-03-09 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Anne, Monday, March 8, 2004, 8:48:55 PM, you wrote: Anne I'd like to say that, despite being leery as I am about Anne usenet/open newsgroups, I feel this is worth a try. I've had a Anne good look at all the Gmane options and it seems as secure as Anne anything online can be. If we want

Re: GMane - here we come

2004-03-09 Thread Allie Martin
Carsten Thönges wrote: Look at HTML source of that page and you'll see: snip No encryption at all and very easy to grab. I see what you mean. :) -- Cheers, Allie signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature Current version is 2.04.7 |

Spam Filter - Not Spam

2004-03-09 Thread Michael Rudnick
I've been using the BayesIT! Spam filter for over a week, long enough to tag quite a few messages as Spam and several as Not Spam. I'm still having a problem with one set of messages. I support several servers. That includes getting messages from the server notifying that a virus was found. I

Re: GMane - here we come

2004-03-09 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Leif! On Tuesday, March 09, 2004, 8:48 AM, you wrote: Anne ... If we want total security we need to Anne unplug our modems and stay off the internet! :) LG That's what we like to hear!! grin This is my me too message. Except for the extensive check of Gmane which Anne did, I echo her 100

Re: GMane - here we come

2004-03-09 Thread Allie Martin
Carsten Thönges wrote: Look at HTML source of that page and you'll see: snip No encryption at all and very easy to grab. I see what you mean. :) -- -=[ Allie Martin ]=- | List Moderator PGPKeys: http://key.ac-martin.com - Sadly using ThunderBird v0.5 at work on XP Pro ;)

Re: GMane - here we come

2004-03-09 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Allie, On Mon, 8 Mar 2004 21:31:03 -0500 GMT (09/03/2004, 09:31 +0700 GMT), Allie Martin wrote: We first did our research and assessed GMane's security ourselves since we don't exactly enjoy being spammed; neither do we wish to have our membership end up being spammed on account of our

Re: GMane - here we come

2004-03-09 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Thomas, Tuesday, March 9, 2004, 10:38:45 AM, you wrote: Thomas Please tell me you didn't just believe the theory on Gmane's Thomas own (marketing) website but have been subscribed for a while Thomas to a list mirrored via Gmane and talk from experience. Yes, I did. -- Leif (TB list

Re: GMane - here we come

2004-03-09 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Mary, Tuesday, March 9, 2004, 8:00:45 AM, you wrote: Mary I simply put my total trust in you, Leif, and Marck and Allie. That trust wouldn't happen to extend to your bank account would it? ;-) Mary That is completely apparent to even the most casual glance and Mary consideration. And you

OT exchange [was, Re: GMane - here we come]

2004-03-09 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Leif! On Tuesday, March 09, 2004, 5:55 PM, you wrote: Mary I simply put my total trust in you, Leif, and Marck and Allie. LG That trust wouldn't happen to extend to your bank account would it? LG ;-) Now, which one of you is going to trout me for replying to this clearly OT turn of the

Re: GMane - here we come

2004-03-09 Thread tb
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there Leif, Just ONE little clarification. On 23:22 08.03.2004, you [Leif Gregory] wrote... provided your From address is set to that which you have subscribed to the TB list, your message will post to the list and in doing so get posted to Gmane. Please,