Is it possible to have a reply to an e-mail automatically filtered to
the same folder as the original message without having to set up a
filter for each folder? I have quite a lot of folders!
Anyone have any comments on this?
Thanks
PJ
Hello Paul,
Thursday, November 4, 2004, 10:01:35 AM, you wrote:
Is it possible to have a reply to an e-mail automatically filtered to
the same folder as the original message without having to set up a
filter for each folder? I have quite a lot of folders!
Anyone have any comments on this?
Hallo Paul,
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 14:48:55 +GMT (2-11-2004, 15:48 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
PJ Is it possible to have a reply to an e-mail automatically filtered to
PJ the same folder as the original message without having to set up a
PJ filter for each folder? I have quite a lot of
Hallo Paul,
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 09:01:35 +GMT (4-11-2004, 10:01 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
PJ Anyone have any comments on this?
PJ Thanks
PJ PJ
PJ
PJ Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
PJ
Hello Ian,
Here are three filters that you might want to try.
I'll take a look tonight (my time). Too busy right now.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.4 Rush
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using
ON Tuesday, November 2, 2004, 3:48:55 PM, you wrote:
PJ Dear All,
PJ Is it possible to have a reply to an e-mail automatically filtered to
PJ the same folder as the original message without having to set up a
PJ filter for each folder? I have quite a lot of folders!
Hi Paul,
What I do is
Gerard,
You wrote:
What I do is filter on Address book. All sent and received mail gets send to the
same folder using the same filter.
Thanks for your contribution, can you expand on how you do this?
--
PJ
Using TB! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1
Hi,
Currently I am filtering my mails based on conditions like
if sender belogns to gruop1 and doesn't belong to group2
i would like to know if it is possible that instead of using group, i can check again
set of email addresses from a plain text file.
if sender is found in file1.txt and is
Hello speedguy
On 4.November.2004, 7:05 AM (Now: 4.November.2004, 7:26 AM),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
s Hi,
s Currently I am filtering my mails based on conditions like
s if sender belogns to gruop1 and doesn't belong to group2
s i would like to know if it is possible that instead of using group,
ON Thursday, November 4, 2004, 12:47:01 PM, you wrote:
PJ Gerard,
PJ You wrote:
What I do is filter on Address book. All sent and received mail gets send to the
same folder using the same filter.
PJ Thanks for your contribution, can you expand on how you do this?
This filter is on my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 3 Nov 2004,
@ @ at 18:53:03 -0500, when [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As Martin said, it depends on OS settings: if on the OS level is set
that system files are hidden, then TC will
Hello Mica,
Thursday, November 4, 2004, 1:44:37 PM, you wrote:
Do I need some specific settings in WinXP? [I am the only user on
that computer; so I don't have to log in or anything.]
Yes, you'd need. You may set this up in Windows Explorer (I think it
is somewhere under View menu)
I don't
Hello Gerard,
Thursday, November 4, 2004, 12:26:20 PM, you wrote:
Their is no filter action that looks in which folder the original
mail was and therefore it is not possible to do what you want. You
can only get the reply to the same folder if you send the original
to a specific folder with
ON Thursday, November 4, 2004, 2:26:29 PM, you wrote:
ASK (but I think user param's are static - its worth a wish, though...
ASK maybe... ?)
Hi Alexander,
I think the idea of filtering replies into the same folder as the original mail,
is worth a whish regards less of how it is implemented.
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Thu, 4 Nov 2004,
@ @ at 14:23:51 +0100, when Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Hello Mica,
Thursday, November 4, 2004, 1:44:37 PM, you wrote:
Do I need some specific settings in WinXP? [I
Hello list,
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 01:09:23 +0700 GMT (31/10/2004, 01:09 +0700 GMT),
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF I ended up setting up Outlook Expess for him, and it works.
This is OT, but I thought I'd share this with you. He called me
yesterday, complaining that his email doesn't work at all. A
Tue, 2 Nov 2004 14:48:55 + (9:48 AM EST here) Paul Jansen wrote:
Dear All,
Is it possible to have a reply to an e-mail automatically filtered
to the same folder as the original message without having to set up
a filter for each folder? I have quite a lot of folders!
I haven't tried
Hello Group
On Thursday, November 4, 2004, 2:44:47 PM, Mica wrote:
MM Yes, that might be very handy when we share our machine. g On my
MM machine, Windows is even not visible at all. You firstly have to
MM boot in DOS, then in (command line/terminal) Linux, then to
MM decrypt some sensitive
Hello Paul,
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 14:48:55 + GMT (02/11/2004, 21:48 +0700 GMT),
Paul Jansen wrote:
PJ Is it possible to have a reply to an e-mail automatically filtered to
PJ the same folder as the original message without having to set up a
PJ filter for each folder? I have quite a lot of
Hello Gerard everyone else
04-Nov-2004 15:09, you wrote:
I would prefer just a simple tick mark dialog saying place replies in
same folder a original somewhere under preferences, but I guess the
regexp boys and girls will prefer the %originating_folder macro :-)
A tickbox, tsetsetse... you
ON Thursday, November 4, 2004, 5:21:32 PM, you wrote:
ASK A tickbox, tsetsetse... you are so... so... modern! ;-)
ASK Just kidding, I'd vote for the tickbox solution, too...
I will (tick) mark that as support ;-)
--
Best regards,
Gerard
Hi
On Thursday, 4 November, 2004, at 3:56:43 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Hello Paul,
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 14:48:55 + GMT (02/11/2004, 21:48 +0700 GMT),
Paul Jansen wrote:
PJ Is it possible to have a reply to an e-mail automatically filtered to
PJ the same folder as the original message
Have just tried the above but it doesn't work with TB. Is that because of the Bat's
missing Unicode support?
--
Regards,
G.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! Version 3.0.1.33
Windows XP Version 5 Build 2600
Thursday, November 04, 2004, Mica Mijatovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.
Do I need some specific settings in WinXP? [I am the only user on that
computer; so I don't have to log in or anything.]
Yes, you'd need. You may set this up in Windows Explorer (I think it is
somewhere under View
Hallo Gerard,
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 20:29:17 +0100GMT (4-11-2004, 20:29 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
ASK A tickbox, tsetsetse... you are so... so... modern! ;-)
ASK Just kidding, I'd vote for the tickbox solution, too...
Z I will (tick) mark that as support ;-)
Anybody added it to the wishlist
Hello Ian,
Here are three filters that you might want to try.
As promised this morning, I've been doing some thorough testing and I
believe I found bug in the behaviour of Common sub-filters.
If you are subscribed to TBBeta, please see my:
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or the bug report I've
Hello,
I'm getting a new computer and want to get the best firewall and virus
protection I can, and have been looking at Trend Micro PC-cillin
Internet Security. I am wondering if any TB! users have tried this
suite; and more generally, if there has to be specific compatibility
between email
Hello, I'm new to the group. I've been using The Bat! 3.0 for a few months and have
been experiencing problems with file attachments on incoming emails. In the Message
List area, the Size column displays the correct number of bytes. But in the preview
pane the size of the attachment is much
Hallo Jason,
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 15:47:50 -0800GMT (5-11-2004, 0:47 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
JG Hello, I'm new to the group.
Welcome.
JG I've been using The Bat! 3.0 for a few months and have been
JG experiencing problems with file attachments on incoming emails.
Though I won't promise
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, P.Johnson wrote:
Hello,
I'm getting a new computer and want to get the best firewall and virus
protection I can, and have been looking at Trend Micro PC-cillin
Internet Security. I am wondering if any TB! users have tried this
suite; and more generally, if there has to
LL I have a Trend Micro Office Suite mandatory at work, including the laptop
LL which runs The Bat (1.x) for my private mail. I receive a lot of spam, and
LL some of it is virus-infected. The problem is, that when the Bat stores
LL this virus attachment on disk, the OfficeScan pops up saying
Hello z5worg,
I'll start by the end of your message.
I appreciate your kind note of caution. But I resent Miguel's tone
(and people like him) who jumps to conclusion and thinks he knows it
all when he couldn't possibly have.
Sorry if I offended you in some way. It was not my intention. And
Thu, 4 Nov 2004 22:05:21 + (5:05 PM EST here) MFPA wrote:
Hi
On Thursday, 4 November, 2004, at 3:56:43 PM, Thomas Fernandez
wrote:
Hello Paul,
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 14:48:55 + GMT (02/11/2004, 21:48 +0700
GMT), Paul Jansen wrote:
PJ Is it possible to have a reply to an e-mail
You might want to try a server based spam/virus filter. At our company we use
Sentinare PostGuard www.sentinare.com so that spam/viruses are trapped on the server
level, so that they don't waste time/resources downloading and scanning garbage emails.
They have a easy web-based quarantine
Hello Pat!
On Thursday, November 04, 2004, 5:03 PM, you wrote:
PJ I'm getting a new computer and want to get the best firewall and
PJ virus protection I can,
Pat, I have had no problems with F-Secure.
http://www.f-secure.com/
I am using only its AV (it now offers a suite, new this year, with
Hi
On Friday, 5 November, 2004, at 1:05:38 AM, Dan Grunberg wrote:
In the Outgoing filters, filter on this header.
Can he do this without having a filter for each folder?
That'll be a no then...
Create a Quick Template, let's call it ComFold
%Rem BEGIN QT ComFold===%-
%-
P.Johnson,
Thursday, November 4, 2004, 6:03:59 PM, you wrote:
PJ Hello,
PJ I'm getting a new computer and want to get the best firewall and virus
PJ protection I can, and have been looking at Trend Micro PC-cillin
PJ Internet Security. I am wondering if any TB! users have tried this
PJ suite;
When Ritlabs announced v3.0 they said:
Amongst all the improvements the most visually outstanding is the new
look user interface. The opportunity to replace the default interface
glyphs with those of your own preference has been expanded: you can
now use transparent images and new formats of
A friend has installed TB! v2.01.3 on both a desktop and a notebook.
However, the buttons (toolbars) look different on these computers. I think
a glyphs.bmp file is to blame, but I cannot find it in TB! instalation
folder.
Any suggestion?
39 matches
Mail list logo
