Glyphs file folder

A friend has installed TB! v2.01.3 on both a desktop and a notebook. However, the buttons (toolbars) look different on these computers. I think a "glyphs.bmp" file is to blame, but I cannot find it in TB! instalation folder. Any suggestion? Curre

TheBat! Visual Interface

When Ritlabs announced v3.0 they said: > Amongst all the improvements the most visually outstanding is the new > look user interface. The opportunity to replace the default interface > glyphs with those of your own preference has been expanded: you can > now use transparent images and new formats

Re:PC-cillin and TB!

P.Johnson, Thursday, November 4, 2004, 6:03:59 PM, you wrote: PJ> Hello, PJ> I'm getting a new computer and want to get the best firewall and virus PJ> protection I can, and have been looking at Trend Micro PC-cillin PJ> Internet Security. I am wondering if any TB! users have tried this PJ> suite

Re: Reply Filtering

Hi On Friday, 5 November, 2004, at 1:05:38 AM, Dan Grunberg wrote: >>> In the Outgoing filters, filter on this header. >> Can he do this without having a filter for each folder? That'll be a "no" then... > Create a Quick Template, let's call it "ComFold" > %Rem="=== BEGIN QT ComFold==="%- >

Re: PC-cillin and TB!

Hello Pat! On Thursday, November 04, 2004, 5:03 PM, you wrote: PJ> I'm getting a new computer and want to get the best firewall and PJ> virus protection I can, Pat, I have had no problems with F-Secure. http://www.f-secure.com/ I am using only its AV (it now offers a suite, new this year, with

Re[2]: PC-cillin and TB!

You might want to try a server based spam/virus filter. At our company we use Sentinare PostGuard www.sentinare.com so that spam/viruses are trapped on the server level, so that they don't waste time/resources downloading and scanning garbage emails. They have a easy web-based quarantine interfa

Re: Reply Filtering

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 22:05:21 + (5:05 PM EST here) MFPA wrote: > Hi > On Thursday, 4 November, 2004, at 3:56:43 PM, Thomas Fernandez > wrote: >> Hello Paul, >> On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 14:48:55 + GMT (02/11/2004, 21:48 +0700 >> GMT), Paul Jansen wrote: PJ>>> Is it possible to have a reply to an

Re: Total Commander

Hello z5worg, I'll start by the end of your message. > I appreciate your kind note of caution. But I resent Miguel's tone > (and people like him) who jumps to conclusion and thinks he knows it > all when he couldn't possibly have. Sorry if I offended you in some way. It was not my intention. And

Re[2]: PC-cillin and TB!

LL> I have a Trend Micro Office Suite mandatory at work, including the laptop LL> which runs The Bat (1.x) for my private mail. I receive a lot of spam, and LL> some of it is virus-infected. The problem is, that when the Bat stores LL> this virus attachment on disk, the OfficeScan pops up sayi

Re: PC-cillin and TB!

On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, P.Johnson wrote: > Hello, > > I'm getting a new computer and want to get the best firewall and virus > protection I can, and have been looking at Trend Micro PC-cillin > Internet Security. I am wondering if any TB! users have tried this > suite; and more generally, if there h

Re: Message attachments incomplete or missing bytes??

Hallo Jason, On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 15:47:50 -0800GMT (5-11-2004, 0:47 +0100, where I live), you wrote: JG> Hello, I'm new to the group. Welcome. JG> I've been using The Bat! 3.0 for a few months and have been JG> experiencing problems with file attachments on incoming emails. Though I won't promi

Message attachments incomplete or missing bytes??

Hello, I'm new to the group. I've been using The Bat! 3.0 for a few months and have been experiencing problems with file attachments on incoming emails. In the Message List area, the Size column displays the correct number of bytes. But in the preview pane the size of the attachment is much smal

PC-cillin and TB!

Hello, I'm getting a new computer and want to get the best firewall and virus protection I can, and have been looking at Trend Micro PC-cillin Internet Security. I am wondering if any TB! users have tried this suite; and more generally, if there has to be specific compatibility between email progr

Re: One filter in a group triggering

Hello Ian, > Here are three filters that you might want to try. As promised this morning, I've been doing some thorough testing and I believe I found bug in the behaviour of Common sub-filters. If you are subscribed to TBBeta, please see my: or the bug report I've

Re: Reply Filtering

Hallo Gerard, On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 20:29:17 +0100GMT (4-11-2004, 20:29 +0100, where I live), you wrote: ASK>> A tickbox, tsetsetse... you are so... so... modern! ;-) ASK>> Just kidding, I'd vote for the tickbox solution, too... Z> I will (tick) mark that as support ;-) Anybody added it to the wish

Re[2]: Total Commander

Thursday, November 04, 2004, Mica Mijatovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > . >> Do I need some specific settings in WinXP? [I am the only user on that >> computer; so I don't have to "log in" or anything.] > Yes, you'd need. You may set this up in Windows Explorer (I think it is > somewhere un

Microsoft keyboard configurator

Have just tried the above but it doesn't work with TB. Is that because of the Bat's missing Unicode support? -- Regards, G. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! Version 3.0.1.33 Windows XP Version 5 Build 2600 Curre

Re: Reply Filtering

Hi On Thursday, 4 November, 2004, at 3:56:43 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote: > Hello Paul, > On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 14:48:55 + GMT (02/11/2004, 21:48 +0700 GMT), > Paul Jansen wrote: PJ>> Is it possible to have a reply to an e-mail automatically filtered to PJ>> the same folder as the original mes

Re: Reply Filtering

ON Thursday, November 4, 2004, 5:21:32 PM, you wrote: ASK> A tickbox, tsetsetse... you are so... so... modern! ;-) ASK> Just kidding, I'd vote for the tickbox solution, too... I will (tick) mark that as support ;-) -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: Reply Filtering

Hello Gerard & everyone else 04-Nov-2004 15:09, you wrote: > I would prefer just a simple tick mark dialog saying "place replies in > same folder a original" somewhere under preferences, but I guess the > regexp boys and girls will prefer the %originating_folder macro :-) A tickbox, tsetsetse...

Re: Reply Filtering

Hello Paul, On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 14:48:55 + GMT (02/11/2004, 21:48 +0700 GMT), Paul Jansen wrote: PJ> Is it possible to have a reply to an e-mail automatically filtered to PJ> the same folder as the original message without having to set up a PJ> filter for each folder? I have quite a lot of f

Re[2]: Total Commander

Hello Group On Thursday, November 4, 2004, 2:44:47 PM, Mica wrote: MM> Yes, that might be very handy when we share our machine. On my MM> machine, Windows is even not visible at all. You firstly have to MM> boot in DOS, then in (command line/"terminal") Linux, then to MM> decrypt some "sensitiv

Re: Reply Filtering

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 14:48:55 + (9:48 AM EST here) Paul Jansen wrote: > Dear All, > Is it possible to have a reply to an e-mail automatically filtered > to the same folder as the original message without having to set up > a filter for each folder? I have quite a lot of folders! I haven't tried

Re: Install problem

Hello list, On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 01:09:23 +0700 GMT (31/10/2004, 01:09 +0700 GMT), Thomas Fernandez wrote: TF> I ended up setting up Outlook Expess for him, and it works. This is OT, but I thought I'd share this with you. He called me yesterday, complaining that his email doesn't work at all. A c

Re: Total Commander

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ."_)~~ ~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Thu, 4 Nov 2004, @ @ at 14:23:51 +0100, when Alexander S. Kunz wrote: > Hello Mica, > Thursday, November 4, 2004, 1:44:37 PM, you wrote: >>> Do I need some specific settings in Win

Re: Reply Filtering

ON Thursday, November 4, 2004, 2:26:29 PM, you wrote: ASK> (but I think user param's are static - its worth a "wish", though... ASK> maybe... ?) Hi Alexander, I think the idea of filtering replies into the same folder as the original mail, is worth a whish regards less of how it is implemented.

Re: Reply Filtering

Hello Gerard, Thursday, November 4, 2004, 12:26:20 PM, you wrote: > Their is no filter action that looks in which folder the original > mail was and therefore it is not possible to do what you want. You > can only get the reply to the same folder if you send the original > to a specific folder w

Re: Total Commander

Hello Mica, Thursday, November 4, 2004, 1:44:37 PM, you wrote: >> Do I need some specific settings in WinXP? [I am the only user on >> that computer; so I don't have to "log in" or anything.] > Yes, you'd need. You may set this up in Windows Explorer (I think it > is somewhere under "View" menu)

Re: Total Commander

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ."_)~~ ~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 3 Nov 2004, @ @ at 18:53:03 -0500, when [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> As Martin said, it depends on OS settings: if on the OS level is set >> that system files are "hidden", then

Re: Reply Filtering

ON Thursday, November 4, 2004, 12:47:01 PM, you wrote: PJ> Gerard, PJ> You wrote: >> What I do is filter on Address book. All sent and received mail gets send to the >> same folder using the same filter. PJ> Thanks for your contribution, can you expand on how you do this? This filter is on my

Re: Filtering based on search from TXT file.

Hello speedguy On 4.November.2004, 7:05 AM (Now: 4.November.2004, 7:26 AM), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: s> Hi, s> Currently I am filtering my mails based on conditions like s> "if sender belogns to gruop1 and doesn't belong to group2" s> i would like to know if it is possible that instead of using g

Filtering based on search from TXT file.

Hi, Currently I am filtering my mails based on conditions like "if sender belogns to gruop1 and doesn't belong to group2" i would like to know if it is possible that instead of using group, i can check again set of email addresses from a plain text file. "if sender is found in file1.txt and is

Re[2]: Reply Filtering

Gerard, You wrote: > What I do is filter on Address book. All sent and received mail gets send to the > same folder using the same filter. Thanks for your contribution, can you expand on how you do this? -- PJ Using TB! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 ___

Re: Reply Filtering

ON Tuesday, November 2, 2004, 3:48:55 PM, you wrote: PJ> Dear All, PJ> Is it possible to have a reply to an e-mail automatically filtered to PJ> the same folder as the original message without having to set up a PJ> filter for each folder? I have quite a lot of folders! Hi Paul, What I do is f

Re: One filter in a group triggering

Hello Ian, > Here are three filters that you might want to try. I'll take a look tonight (my time). Too busy right now. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.0.2.4 Rush Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using

Mod: Cut mark (was: Reply Filtering)

Hallo Paul, On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 09:01:35 +GMT (4-11-2004, 10:01 +0100, where I live), you wrote: PJ> Anyone have any comments on this? PJ> Thanks PJ> PJ PJ> PJ> Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: PJ> http://www.silver

Re: Reply Filtering

Hallo Paul, On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 14:48:55 +GMT (2-11-2004, 15:48 +0100, where I live), you wrote: PJ> Is it possible to have a reply to an e-mail automatically filtered to PJ> the same folder as the original message without having to set up a PJ> filter for each folder? I have quite a lot of f

Re: Reply Filtering

Hello Paul, Thursday, November 4, 2004, 10:01:35 AM, you wrote: >> Is it possible to have a reply to an e-mail automatically filtered to >> the same folder as the original message without having to set up a >> filter for each folder? I have quite a lot of folders! > Anyone have any comments on

Re: Reply Filtering

> Is it possible to have a reply to an e-mail automatically filtered to > the same folder as the original message without having to set up a > filter for each folder? I have quite a lot of folders! Anyone have any comments on this? Thanks PJ ___