Re: Reply Filtering
Is it possible to have a reply to an e-mail automatically filtered to the same folder as the original message without having to set up a filter for each folder? I have quite a lot of folders! Anyone have any comments on this? Thanks PJ Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Reply Filtering
Hello Paul, Thursday, November 4, 2004, 10:01:35 AM, you wrote: Is it possible to have a reply to an e-mail automatically filtered to the same folder as the original message without having to set up a filter for each folder? I have quite a lot of folders! Anyone have any comments on this? If there's no reply, my guess would be no one has... -- Best regards, Alexandermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Reply Filtering
Hallo Paul, On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 14:48:55 +GMT (2-11-2004, 15:48 +0100, where I live), you wrote: PJ Is it possible to have a reply to an e-mail automatically filtered to PJ the same folder as the original message without having to set up a PJ filter for each folder? I have quite a lot of folders! It isn't possible to do this without creating a filter for each folder. -- Groetjes, Roelof Postscript: The only thing of interest in some letters. The Bat! 3.0.2.4 Rush Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN pgp2TxTMTVE8K.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Mod: Cut mark (was: Reply Filtering)
Hallo Paul, On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 09:01:35 +GMT (4-11-2004, 10:01 +0100, where I live), you wrote: PJ Anyone have any comments on this? PJ Thanks PJ PJ PJ PJ Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: PJ http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html moderator Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Paul. ' Please include a signature delimiter in your messages. This consists of a dashdashspacereturn, i.e., a '-- ' by itself on a line. This allows your readers, when replying, to quote your text without the signature and list footers since everything below and including the sig delimiter is excluded when quoting. You can easily automate this process by including the sig delimiter in your templates. Even if you barely have a signature to speak of, that doesn't make any difference to whether or not you need a cut mark. You are being courteous to other readers since at least three lines of text is added to your signature by the list server. To find out why these MOD messages are posted to the list instead of private mail, please read the welcome message you received when you subscribed. Thank you. /moderator -- Groetjes, Roelof Windws is ine for bckgroun comunicaions- Bll Gats, 192 The Bat! 3.0.2.4 Rush Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN pgpYYkeMfP6ID.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: One filter in a group triggering
Hello Ian, Here are three filters that you might want to try. I'll take a look tonight (my time). Too busy right now. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.0.2.4 Rush Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Reply Filtering
ON Tuesday, November 2, 2004, 3:48:55 PM, you wrote: PJ Dear All, PJ Is it possible to have a reply to an e-mail automatically filtered to PJ the same folder as the original message without having to set up a PJ filter for each folder? I have quite a lot of folders! Hi Paul, What I do is filter on Address book. All sent and received mail gets send to the same folder using the same filter. Their is no filter action that looks in which folder the original mail was and therefore it is not possible to do what you want. You can only get the reply to the same folder if you send the original to a specific folder with a filter action. -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Backswing - The part of the swing that takes place after the ball has been improperly addressed but before it has been sent to the wrong destination. Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Reply Filtering
Gerard, You wrote: What I do is filter on Address book. All sent and received mail gets send to the same folder using the same filter. Thanks for your contribution, can you expand on how you do this? -- PJ Using TB! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Filtering based on search from TXT file.
Hi, Currently I am filtering my mails based on conditions like if sender belogns to gruop1 and doesn't belong to group2 i would like to know if it is possible that instead of using group, i can check again set of email addresses from a plain text file. if sender is found in file1.txt and is not found in file2.txt Thanks. -- Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filtering based on search from TXT file.
Hello speedguy On 4.November.2004, 7:05 AM (Now: 4.November.2004, 7:26 AM), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: s Hi, s Currently I am filtering my mails based on conditions like s if sender belogns to gruop1 and doesn't belong to group2 s i would like to know if it is possible that instead of using group, i can s check again set of email addresses from a plain text file. s if sender is found in file1.txt and is not found in file2.txt s Thanks. s -- Hmm interesting idea. This way that would be easier to delete from pop3 mail spam from a list text.. -- The Final Cut [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thebat: 3.0.2.4 Rush BayesIt! 0.7.3 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Reply Filtering
ON Thursday, November 4, 2004, 12:47:01 PM, you wrote: PJ Gerard, PJ You wrote: What I do is filter on Address book. All sent and received mail gets send to the same folder using the same filter. PJ Thanks for your contribution, can you expand on how you do this? This filter is on my Incoming mail filter list and in my Outgoing mail filter list. TB! Message Filter beginFilter UID: [D848937E.01C4A58A.76A85703.7647C313] Name: Zakelijk\20in\20adresboek Filter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MoveMessage folder \5C\5CCPR\5CInbox\5CKlanten IsActive IsSendQueue endFilter The Incoming mail filter, filters all my business contacts, who are all in my address book folder zakelijk to a specific folder. I have the same for friends, private, golf, etc. The same filter in my Outgoing filter list filters all mails sent to my business contact to the same folder. I use addressbooks to do my filtering but you can also do this for each specific emailaddress. I just find it easier to group my contact this way. I use my mail as you can see for Business and Pleasure :-) Hope this helps. -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Backswing - The part of the swing that takes place after the ball has been improperly addressed but before it has been sent to the wrong destination. Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Total Commander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 3 Nov 2004,
@ @ at 18:53:03 -0500, when [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As Martin said, it depends on OS settings: if on the OS level is set
that system files are hidden, then TC will obey to this rule (will not
see them, although it will display them with an exclamation mark in
the icon). So you would just have to change this OS setting to show
system (or all) files and TC will be able to apply all actions on them
it can, including copying.
If by OS settings you mean TC's settings, it was sett to show
hidden/system files and I can see them.
No, OS stands for Operative System, and in your case it is the XP.
.
Do I need some specific settings in WinXP? [I am the only user on that
computer; so I don't have to log in or anything.]
Yes, you'd need. You may set this up in Windows Explorer (I think it is
somewhere under View menu), but as Miguel said, it is a sensitive
thing: if we do not know exactly what we are doing we can screw our
system up very easily, which is not a big tragedy since Windows does it
to itself by definition and on a regular basis, but the only problem is
then that you'd need to reinstall it again and most of if not all the
programs as well, somewhere along the way loosing perhaps few of your
important or even precious documents - and all of this needs some TIME,
some for work and some for mourning, which may be done simultaneously or
separately, depending on attitude we grow in such moments, or on our
specific habits, dictated by our particular culture, being it our
personal one, or of some wider nature we as individuals accept and obey
to, preferably willingly.
OPTIONAL READING: I never saw a manual giving MORE informations than
needed; perhaps this is a model of the first one, in hist{o|e}ry of
computing. I'll try to cultivate this style. ... To see what will
happen.
- --
Mica
PGP key uploaded at: http://pgp.mit.edu/ once just before breakfast
o
[Earth LOG: 64 day(s) since v3.0 unleashing]
OS: Windows 98 SE Micro Lite Professional IVa Enterprise Millennium
with nestled ZipSlack(tm) 9.1 UMSDOS Linux;
and, for TB sometimes Libranet (Linux) 2.8.1, via Cross Over Office
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iD8DBQFBiiQ09q62QPd3XuIRAkdDAJsF1biSjaDDK00GAgn1AK5qmVJHiwCgmDoB
VRBvS9NeeKfja1xdTFGIRpE=
=HUMP
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Total Commander
Hello Mica, Thursday, November 4, 2004, 1:44:37 PM, you wrote: Do I need some specific settings in WinXP? [I am the only user on that computer; so I don't have to log in or anything.] Yes, you'd need. You may set this up in Windows Explorer (I think it is somewhere under View menu) I don't think that information is correct. I have TC configured to show hidden system files while Explorer hides them. No problem. The Explorer setting does not affect the TC setting. (Actually, I've come to appreciate this very much, since my girlfriend - who is using my computer @ home sometimes - is the Explorer kinda person that doesn't want to see *.ini and *.dll and *.whatnot files, while I'm the geeky-nerdish kinda guy who does want to have control over every file *gg*). -- Best regards, Alexandermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Reply Filtering
Hello Gerard, Thursday, November 4, 2004, 12:26:20 PM, you wrote: Their is no filter action that looks in which folder the original mail was and therefore it is not possible to do what you want. You can only get the reply to the same folder if you send the original to a specific folder with a filter action. H... thinking about that... is it possible to pass variables as user param's in the NFS? I mean... we have a source folder option to filter against, now if we could use the source folder in the user parameters of the NFS (action set user param) we could auto-sort sent mail to the correct source folder with one single filter... (but I think user param's are static - its worth a wish, though... maybe... ?) -- Best regards, Alexandermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Reply Filtering
ON Thursday, November 4, 2004, 2:26:29 PM, you wrote: ASK (but I think user param's are static - its worth a wish, though... ASK maybe... ?) Hi Alexander, I think the idea of filtering replies into the same folder as the original mail, is worth a whish regards less of how it is implemented. I would prefer just a simple tick mark dialog saying place replies in same folder a original somewhere under preferences, but I guess the regexp boys and girls will prefer the %originating_folder macro :-) -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Golf is an easy game... it's just hard to play. Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Total Commander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Thu, 4 Nov 2004, @ @ at 14:23:51 +0100, when Alexander S. Kunz wrote: Hello Mica, Thursday, November 4, 2004, 1:44:37 PM, you wrote: Do I need some specific settings in WinXP? [I am the only user on that computer; so I don't have to log in or anything.] Yes, you'd need. You may set this up in Windows Explorer (I think it is somewhere under View menu) I don't think that information is correct. I have TC configured to show hidden system files while Explorer hides them. No problem. The Explorer setting does not affect the TC setting. Seems that in XP is (or can be) a bit different. I had TC configured to show all files, and the files were shown, but no action I could apply on them. So I had to change settings on OS level. Then it worked. It was a default XP Home, with no a service pack. (Actually, I've come to appreciate this very much, since my girlfriend - who is using my computer @ home sometimes - is the Explorer kinda person that doesn't want to see *.ini and *.dll and *.whatnot files, while I'm the geeky-nerdish kinda guy who does want to have control over every file *gg*). Yes, that might be very handy when we share our machine. g On my machine, Windows is even not visible at all. You firstly have to boot in DOS, then in (command line/terminal) Linux, then to decrypt some sensitive WinOS files, and reboot to DOS, and proceed to Windows. Then, if you want to get/send a mail, you have to mount a container with Mail and The Bat, and before you get connection you have to decrypt Dial-up Networking. THAT's a :grin: . :banana: Of course I don't do that just because I am such a selfish freak; I am just experimenting with possibilities. :eyes: - -- Mica PGP key uploaded at: http://pgp.mit.edu/ once just before breakfast o [Earth LOG: 64 day(s) since v3.0 unleashing] OS: Windows 98 SE Micro Lite Professional IVa Enterprise Millennium with nestled ZipSlack(tm) 9.1 UMSDOS Linux; and, for TB sometimes Libranet (Linux) 2.8.1, via Cross Over Office -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQFBikBe9q62QPd3XuIRAs6sAJ9Sk5L1z8I4jkYTX60FNixZFDgNTgCdH6ov Cfn/DjE+w5YoASYi0Pdvod0= =6GJK -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Install problem
Hello list, On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 01:09:23 +0700 GMT (31/10/2004, 01:09 +0700 GMT), Thomas Fernandez wrote: TF I ended up setting up Outlook Expess for him, and it works. This is OT, but I thought I'd share this with you. He called me yesterday, complaining that his email doesn't work at all. A customer had sent him a message, but he couldn't receive it. He had opened OE, connected to the internet, but nothing. He had stared at the screen for half an hour before calling me. I suggested he click on check mail. And hoppla, three mails came in. No further comments. -- Cheers, Thomas. When they broke open molecules, they found they were only stuffed with atoms. But when they broke open atoms, they found them stuffed with explosions. Message reply created with The Bat! 3.0.2.4 Rush under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Reply Filtering
Tue, 2 Nov 2004 14:48:55 + (9:48 AM EST here) Paul Jansen wrote: Dear All, Is it possible to have a reply to an e-mail automatically filtered to the same folder as the original message without having to set up a filter for each folder? I have quite a lot of folders! I haven't tried this, but I think this will work with version 2. Perhaps it will work with version 3. 1. Tag the reply's From: address. Change each folder's reply template, so the name field in a reply's From: will be tagged uniquely, to indicate which folder was being read when the reply was initiate. For example, if John Smith's folders were named Whiskey, November, and Tango, he might add the following lines to their reply templates (respectively): %FROM=%FROM=John (Whk) Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]%- %FROM=%FROM=John (Nov) Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]%- %FROM=%FROM=John (Tgo) Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]%- 2. Filter the sent messages. Set up an outgoing mail filters, one for each folder. For example, the Whiskey filter: String: [(Whk)], Location: [Sender], Presence: [Yes] Move messages to folder: [Whiskey] Using: The Bat! v2.12.00, BayesIt! 0.5.9, MyMacros 1.11, gMacrosPlugin 0.80 Windows 2000 v5.0 - Build 2195 - Service Pack 4 -- Daniel A. Grunberg Kensington, Maryland, USA homepage: www.nyx.net/~dgrunber/ Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Total Commander
Hello Group On Thursday, November 4, 2004, 2:44:47 PM, Mica wrote: MM Yes, that might be very handy when we share our machine. g On my MM machine, Windows is even not visible at all. You firstly have to MM boot in DOS, then in (command line/terminal) Linux, then to MM decrypt some sensitive WinOS files, and reboot to DOS, and MM proceed to Windows. Then, if you want to get/send a mail, you have MM to mount a container with Mail and The Bat, and before you get MM connection you have to decrypt Dial-up Networking. Is that what we can all look forward to in the next version of Windows :-) -- Jeff Gaines Damerham Hampshire UK :Jeff_Gaines: Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Reply Filtering
Hello Paul, On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 14:48:55 + GMT (02/11/2004, 21:48 +0700 GMT), Paul Jansen wrote: PJ Is it possible to have a reply to an e-mail automatically filtered to PJ the same folder as the original message without having to set up a PJ filter for each folder? I have quite a lot of folders! Use %Comment=%Folder in the Reply template. In the Outgoing filters, filter on this header. -- Cheers, Thomas. What to not say to the nice policeman: I was trying to keep up with traffic. Yes, I know there is no other car around--that's how far ahead of me they are. Message reply created with The Bat! 3.0.2.4 Rush under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Reply Filtering
Hello Gerard everyone else 04-Nov-2004 15:09, you wrote: I would prefer just a simple tick mark dialog saying place replies in same folder a original somewhere under preferences, but I guess the regexp boys and girls will prefer the %originating_folder macro :-) A tickbox, tsetsetse... you are so... so... modern! ;-) Just kidding, I'd vote for the tickbox solution, too... -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) using TB! v3.0.2.4 Rush on Windows XP Pro Service Pack 2 Fantasy is revealing; it is a method of cognition: everything that is imagined must be true; nothing is true if it is not imagined. -- Eugene Ionesco Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Reply Filtering
ON Thursday, November 4, 2004, 5:21:32 PM, you wrote: ASK A tickbox, tsetsetse... you are so... so... modern! ;-) ASK Just kidding, I'd vote for the tickbox solution, too... I will (tick) mark that as support ;-) -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Golf and sex are the only things you can enjoy without being good at it. Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Reply Filtering
Hi On Thursday, 4 November, 2004, at 3:56:43 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote: Hello Paul, On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 14:48:55 + GMT (02/11/2004, 21:48 +0700 GMT), Paul Jansen wrote: PJ Is it possible to have a reply to an e-mail automatically filtered to PJ the same folder as the original message without having to set up a PJ filter for each folder? I have quite a lot of folders! Use %Comment=%Folder in the Reply template. %SetHeader(Comments,%FolderName) ? In the Outgoing filters, filter on this header. Can he do this without having a filter for each folder? -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Microsoft keyboard configurator
Have just tried the above but it doesn't work with TB. Is that because of the Bat's missing Unicode support? -- Regards, G. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! Version 3.0.1.33 Windows XP Version 5 Build 2600 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Total Commander
Thursday, November 04, 2004, Mica Mijatovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: . Do I need some specific settings in WinXP? [I am the only user on that computer; so I don't have to log in or anything.] Yes, you'd need. You may set this up in Windows Explorer (I think it is somewhere under View menu), The WinXP in Windows Explorer is already set to Show hidden files and folders and Hide protected operating system files is also unchecked. But I still cannot open the System Volume Information folder. Have you open that folder and copied any files from that folder? If not, would you try and let me know? I am simply trying to use TC to make a full backup copy of my C: drive (a new installation of WinXP); so that if I need to reinstall a clean copy of WinXP, I can simply do a copy from this backup and it would be mostly all configured. but as Miguel said, it is a sensitive thing: if we do not know exactly what we are doing we can screw our system up very easily, which is not a big tragedy since Windows does it to itself by definition and on a regular basis, but the only problem is then that you'd need to reinstall it again and most of if not all the programs as well, somewhere along the way loosing perhaps few of your important or even precious documents - and all of this needs some TIME, some for work and some for mourning, which may be done simultaneously or separately, depending on attitude we grow in such moments, or on our specific habits, dictated by our particular culture, being it our personal one, or of some wider nature we as individuals accept and obey to, preferably willingly. I appreciate your kind note of caution. But I resent Miguel's tone (and people like him) who jumps to conclusion and thinks he knows it all when he couldn't possibly have. -- Thanks in advance JM Using The Bat! 1.62r Under Windows 98 4.10 Build A Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Reply Filtering
Hallo Gerard, On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 20:29:17 +0100GMT (4-11-2004, 20:29 +0100, where I live), you wrote: ASK A tickbox, tsetsetse... you are so... so... modern! ;-) ASK Just kidding, I'd vote for the tickbox solution, too... Z I will (tick) mark that as support ;-) Anybody added it to the wishlist yet? -- Groetjes, Roelof The usual reward for saving the world is the chance to do it again. The Bat! 3.0.2.4 Rush Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN pgpVnwlX8FWKH.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: One filter in a group triggering
Hello Ian, Here are three filters that you might want to try. As promised this morning, I've been doing some thorough testing and I believe I found bug in the behaviour of Common sub-filters. If you are subscribed to TBBeta, please see my: mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] or the bug report I've just opened at: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4021 Once the bug is fixed, you will not feel the need for an exit action. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.0.2.4 Rush Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
PC-cillin and TB!
Hello, I'm getting a new computer and want to get the best firewall and virus protection I can, and have been looking at Trend Micro PC-cillin Internet Security. I am wondering if any TB! users have tried this suite; and more generally, if there has to be specific compatibility between email programs and virus software. On the Trend site, under System Requirements, email, The Bat! is not listed. I asked whether PC-cillin would scan my TB! mail, and got this reply: We have no answer to this question for now but you may try using your software but please enable the webmail scan feature. If you experience any problems, please do not hesitate to write us. Hope this helps. Hmmm. Thank you! -- Best wishes, Pat A Canadian in Houston Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Message attachments incomplete or missing bytes??
Hello, I'm new to the group. I've been using The Bat! 3.0 for a few months and have been experiencing problems with file attachments on incoming emails. In the Message List area, the Size column displays the correct number of bytes. But in the preview pane the size of the attachment is much smaller, if I try to save/open the attachment it the file saved to disk matches the smaller file size and is not the complete file, so the file will not open. If I login to the webmail interface for my email I can download the file in it's entirety. So it does not appear to be a server issue. I am using IMAP as a protocol. Any ideas on how to fix this? I've experienced this with Word.Doc, Adobe.Pdf, Excel.xls files to name a few. Thanks. -Jason Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Message attachments incomplete or missing bytes??
Hallo Jason, On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 15:47:50 -0800GMT (5-11-2004, 0:47 +0100, where I live), you wrote: JG Hello, I'm new to the group. Welcome. JG I've been using The Bat! 3.0 for a few months and have been JG experiencing problems with file attachments on incoming emails. Though I won't promise that it cures your problem (I'm not into IMAP myself), did you try to upgrade to TB 3.0.1.33 that's the latest release and it had some serious bugfixes on the IMAP part too. JG Thanks. JG -Jason JG JG Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: JG http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html moderator on Please insert a proper signature delimiter dashdashspace on a line by itself. When you add that to the templates you're using for this list, you've got that fully automated. That will save people replying to your message the trouble of deleting the list footer. moderator off -- Groetjes, Roelof Facts are stubborn things. The Bat! 3.0.2.4 Rush Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN pgp3FuF7N8QE0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PC-cillin and TB!
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, P.Johnson wrote: Hello, I'm getting a new computer and want to get the best firewall and virus protection I can, and have been looking at Trend Micro PC-cillin Internet Security. I am wondering if any TB! users have tried this suite; and more generally, if there has to be specific compatibility between email programs and virus software. I have a Trend Micro Office Suite mandatory at work, including the laptop which runs The Bat (1.x) for my private mail. I receive a lot of spam, and some of it is virus-infected. The problem is, that when the Bat stores this virus attachment on disk, the OfficeScan pops up saying it's a virus. For some reason TheBat cannot continue operation (I guess because OfficeScan takes over the file for quarantine or smth), and the message is not deleted on the server. This means that every 5 minutes (my polling period) I get this message and have to delete the e-mail manually on the server. Plus, all our admins receive a virus warning. Hence, I have been asked to remove The Bat. Just my experience - those problems may be obsolete by now. Leo. Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: PC-cillin and TB!
LL I have a Trend Micro Office Suite mandatory at work, including the laptop LL which runs The Bat (1.x) for my private mail. I receive a lot of spam, and LL some of it is virus-infected. The problem is, that when the Bat stores LL this virus attachment on disk, the OfficeScan pops up saying it's a virus. LL For some reason TheBat cannot continue operation (I guess because LL OfficeScan takes over the file for quarantine or smth), and the message is LL not deleted on the server. This means that every 5 minutes (my polling LL period) I get this message and have to delete the e-mail manually on the LL server. LL Plus, all our admins receive a virus warning. LL Hence, I have been asked to remove The Bat. LL Just my experience - those problems may be obsolete by now. Not so obsolete. I had the same problem when testing KAV personal Pro 5 with TB3 ! TB3 froze because KAV blocked some TB databases files. It was very annoying. That why I 've chosen AVG 7. Now viruses are great managed and moved to quarantine without perturbation. And for firewall I use Kerio Personal Firewall 4. It's free and work well with my system (AVG / Ad-Aware 6 / TB3). I feel well protected. :-) Maybe an illusion... -- WilWilWil :flag-france: TB 3.0.1.33 BayesIt! 0.7.3 Windows XP Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Total Commander
Hello z5worg, I'll start by the end of your message. I appreciate your kind note of caution. But I resent Miguel's tone (and people like him) who jumps to conclusion and thinks he knows it all when he couldn't possibly have. Sorry if I offended you in some way. It was not my intention. And no, I know very well that I do not know everything. Much the contrary. But usually, not always, when I talk about something is because I think I know what I'm talking about. And believe me, many of the things I know I learnt by listening to people who know more than me. Now to your other paragraph: The WinXP in Windows Explorer is already set to Show hidden files and folders and Hide protected operating system files is also unchecked. But I still cannot open the System Volume Information folder. Have you open that folder and copied any files from that folder? If not, would you try and let me know? I am simply trying to use TC to make a full backup copy of my C: drive (a new installation of WinXP); so that if I need to reinstall a clean copy of WinXP, I can simply do a copy from this backup and it would be mostly all configured. To be able to open, or view or copy the System Volume Information you would need to change the the access permissions because, as I think I told you in my previous message, it is only accessible to the system. In particular for System Restore. On the other hand, even if you could do so, backing up the System Volume Information would serve you no purpose because if you are going to install XP again, it will create/configure a new System Volume Information for each volume (drive or partition). Anyway, if you are curious and what to see what's inside, take a look at: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;309531 or http://www.theeldergeek.com/system_volume_information_folder1.htm or search Google for more links. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.0.2.4 Rush Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Reply Filtering
Thu, 4 Nov 2004 22:05:21 + (5:05 PM EST here) MFPA wrote: Hi On Thursday, 4 November, 2004, at 3:56:43 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote: Hello Paul, On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 14:48:55 + GMT (02/11/2004, 21:48 +0700 GMT), Paul Jansen wrote: PJ Is it possible to have a reply to an e-mail automatically PJ filtered to the same folder as the original message without PJ having to set up a filter for each folder? I have quite a lot PJ of folders! Use %Comment=%Folder in the Reply template. %SetHeader(Comments,%FolderName) ? In the Outgoing filters, filter on this header. Can he do this without having a filter for each folder? Create a Quick Template, let's call it ComFold %Rem BEGIN QT ComFold===%- %- %SetHeader(Comments,%FolderName)%- %- %Rem END QT ComFold===%- Then add this line to each folder's Reply Template: %QINCLUDE(ComFold) All of the Outgoing Mail filters will be the similar, so 1. Inside TheBat!, create and troubleshoot an Outgoing Mail filter for one of the folders. 2. Copy the Outgoing Mail filter and paste and re-paste it into a word processor document once for each of the remaining folders. 3. Systematically use the word processor to Change the names of the pasted filters. Change the folder names in each copied filter. 4. Copy the whole word processor document and paste it into TheBat!'s Outgoing Mail filters. Certainly this is a pain, but certainly it can be done. Perhaps it can be done in the time it takes to complain about having to do it. |grin| Using: The Bat! v2.12.00, BayesIt! 0.5.9, MyMacros 1.11, gMacrosPlugin 0.80 Windows 2000 v5.0 - Build 2195 - Service Pack 4 -- Daniel A. Grunberg Kensington, Maryland, USA homepage: www.nyx.net/~dgrunber/ Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: PC-cillin and TB!
You might want to try a server based spam/virus filter. At our company we use Sentinare PostGuard www.sentinare.com so that spam/viruses are trapped on the server level, so that they don't waste time/resources downloading and scanning garbage emails. They have a easy web-based quarantine interface in case you need to rescue a message, but it's rare that you have to. They use SpamAssassian and some other filters to get really good accuracy, my account at work is 99.6% accurate. -Jason ===Original message text=== From: Leo Landa [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thursday, November 4, 2004, 3:58:12 PM Subject: PC-cillin and TB! On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, P.Johnson wrote: Hello, I'm getting a new computer and want to get the best firewall and virus protection I can, and have been looking at Trend Micro PC-cillin Internet Security. I am wondering if any TB! users have tried this suite; and more generally, if there has to be specific compatibility between email programs and virus software. I have a Trend Micro Office Suite mandatory at work, including the laptop which runs The Bat (1.x) for my private mail. I receive a lot of spam, and some of it is virus-infected. The problem is, that when the Bat stores this virus attachment on disk, the OfficeScan pops up saying it's a virus. For some reason TheBat cannot continue operation (I guess because OfficeScan takes over the file for quarantine or smth), and the message is not deleted on the server. This means that every 5 minutes (my polling period) I get this message and have to delete the e-mail manually on the server. Plus, all our admins receive a virus warning. Hence, I have been asked to remove The Bat. Just my experience - those problems may be obsolete by now. Leo. Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html End of original message text=== Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PC-cillin and TB!
Hello Pat! On Thursday, November 04, 2004, 5:03 PM, you wrote: PJ I'm getting a new computer and want to get the best firewall and PJ virus protection I can, Pat, I have had no problems with F-Secure. http://www.f-secure.com/ I am using only its AV (it now offers a suite, new this year, with firewall) and I have just renewed my license, after one year's use. The interface is friendly and it has the advantage of combining 3 separate virus-scanning engines. XP SP2 recognizes it. There's no plug-in for TB!, but that's not necessary. F-Secure recognizes an e-mail infection as it is being downloaded. It recognizes an infected file as soon as it's clicked on. For my firewall I'm using the free Sygate. Just upgraded to the latest one. I like it for its simple user interface, also. But WilWilWil has a good set-up, too, with the free anti-virus program AVG--which *does* have a plug-in for TB!--and Kerio as firewall. I used AVG for about six months. Left it for Kaspersky (KAV), because Kaspersky updated more often. Kaspersky's interface I found quite complicated. And it no longer supports The Bat! with a plug-in. Last November I moved to F-Secure. It can be set to check automatically for updates as often as you like. Virus Definitions are usually updated daily, but sometimes more often. The question of choosing an AV and a firewall to go with TB! comes up rather often on tbudl. You might try a search on the Gmane archives for more opinions. -- Best regards, Mary The Bat! 3.0.2.4 Rush on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Reply Filtering
Hi On Friday, 5 November, 2004, at 1:05:38 AM, Dan Grunberg wrote: In the Outgoing filters, filter on this header. Can he do this without having a filter for each folder? That'll be a no then... Create a Quick Template, let's call it ComFold %Rem BEGIN QT ComFold===%- %- %SetHeader(Comments,%FolderName)%- %- %Rem END QT ComFold===%- Then add this line to each folder's Reply Template: %QINCLUDE(ComFold) What is the advantage of using a Quick Template here, rather than just adding the line %SetHeader(Comments,%FolderName)%- to all your reply templates? All of the Outgoing Mail filters will be the similar, so 1. Inside TheBat!, create and troubleshoot an Outgoing Mail filter for one of the folders. 2. Copy the Outgoing Mail filter and paste and re-paste it into a word processor document once for each of the remaining folders. 3. Systematically use the word processor to [...] 4. Copy the whole word processor document and paste it into TheBat!'s Outgoing Mail filters. I like that trick. Certainly this is a pain, but certainly it can be done. Perhaps it can be done in the time it takes to complain about having to do it. |grin| -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re:PC-cillin and TB!
P.Johnson, Thursday, November 4, 2004, 6:03:59 PM, you wrote: PJ Hello, PJ I'm getting a new computer and want to get the best firewall and virus PJ protection I can, and have been looking at Trend Micro PC-cillin PJ Internet Security. I am wondering if any TB! users have tried this PJ suite; and more generally, if there has to be specific compatibility PJ between email programs and virus software. I use Trend OfficeScan, which has the same or similar engine to PC-Cillin. I had to manually change my Account Properties so that the mail server was 'localhost' and the user was of the format 'xxx%domain.com/pop.domain.com'. It's not as integrated as the programs that work directly with TheBat! but the other features of the product are nice. -- Michael Rudnick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 3.0.1.33 on Windows 5.1 (2600) Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
TheBat! Visual Interface
When Ritlabs announced v3.0 they said: Amongst all the improvements the most visually outstanding is the new look user interface. The opportunity to replace the default interface glyphs with those of your own preference has been expanded: you can now use transparent images and new formats of graphic files. You will soon be able to download alternative glyph sets from our website Now that I've upgraded, can anyone tell me how to *easily* do this? -- Michael Rudnick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 (2600) Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Glyphs file folder
A friend has installed TB! v2.01.3 on both a desktop and a notebook. However, the buttons (toolbars) look different on these computers. I think a glyphs.bmp file is to blame, but I cannot find it in TB! instalation folder. Any suggestion? Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
