Hello Peter Ouwehand everyone else
06-Nov-2004 02:55, you wrote:
here, when forwarding an email, TB creates a msg with a whatever.eml
attachment. Is this intentional, or some setting in my TB setup?
Could it be that it only happens with HTML mails?
--
Best regards,
Alexander
Hello Mica again everyone else
05-Nov-2004 21:54, you wrote:
One of such ones is AntiVir (Personal Edition, which is free) I use
...OTOH it is very heavy on the online updates (I never saw an update
What is heavy for a broadband user? I just downloaded newest version
of ~4,5 MB, for some
ON Saturday, November 6, 2004, 12:32:18 AM, you wrote:
RO You're right I mixed them up, as I was in favor of both of them. ;-)
RO In this thread I meant this:
RO https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4026
Roelof,
That looks more like it although, at the risk of being called a , I need to
ON Saturday, November 6, 2004, 2:55:11 AM, you wrote:
PO Hello TBUDL,
PO here, when forwarding an email, TB creates a msg with a whatever.eml
PO attachment. Is this intentional, or some setting in my TB setup?
PO Ever more, recipents seem to reject emails with .eml attachments.
PO An .msg
Hallo ,
SCNR
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 10:27:15 +0100GMT (6-11-2004, 10:27 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
Z That looks more like it although, at the risk of being called a , I need to
Z say that this seems slightly more the we were discussing.
Of course. It had to be consistent.
Z You
Hello MAU,
On Saturday, September 18, 2004, 10:20:16 AM, you wrote:
Will this change? I thought it was a nice thing that you could
move a folder and the program could still find it.
M This is due to a bug discovered after 3.0 was released. It was already
M fixed in one of the post-release
Hello MFPA,
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 22:05:21 + GMT (05/11/2004, 05:05 +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
Use %Comment=%Folder in the Reply template.
M %SetHeader(Comments,%FolderName) ?
I didn't check. What I suggested is probably based on some old syntax,
so you may be right.
In the Outgoing filters,
Hello P.Johnson,
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 17:03:59 -0600 GMT (05/11/2004, 06:03 +0700 GMT),
P.Johnson wrote:
PJ I'm getting a new computer and want to get the best firewall and virus
PJ protection I can, and have been looking at Trend Micro PC-cillin
PJ Internet Security. I am wondering if any TB!
On Saturday, November 06, 2004 at 9:22:01 AM [GMT -0500], Thomas
Fernandez wrote:
I am using PC-Cillin and TB.
Problem 1: There is no plug-in. This means that every time a virus
comes, the email will not be imported into TB, as the initial bat*.tmp
file will be arrested by the PCC realtime
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Sat, 6 Nov 2004,
@ @ at 09:57:05 +0100, when Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
What is heavy for a broadband user? I just downloaded newest version
of ~4,5 MB, for some 25 minutes on
Hello Allie,
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 09:54:31 -0500 GMT (06/11/2004, 21:54 +0700 GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
Problem 1: There is no plug-in. This means that every time a virus
comes, the email will not be imported into TB, as the initial bat*.tmp
file will be arrested by the PCC realtime scan, a
AM
On Saturday, November 06, 2004 at 10:29:17 AM [GMT -0500], Thomas
Fernandez wrote:
Yes, I could. In fact, I excluded all file extensions by just turning
off the darned realtime scan. But the question was about TB and PCC,
and if the solution is to exclude the tmp files and the TB directory
Dear TBUDL members,
While checking mail on a number of accounts just before
signing off last night, I got a pop up saying that Common
Client User Session has encountered a problem and needs to
close. Looking at NIS showed Auto-Protect off and Email
Scanning Error. (NAV 10.0.1.13 is up to date.)
Hello Mica Mijatovic everyone else
06-Nov-2004 16:20, you wrote:
Actually, it would be pretty bad for a virus scanner to not recognize
base64 or uu-encoded inline attachments in a message(base). Most do.
KAV couldn't, NOD-32 couldn't, PC-Sillyn couldn't, F-prot couldn't...
My mistake,
Hello Allie,
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 11:03:23 -0500 GMT (06/11/2004, 23:03 +0700 GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
AM If you exclude the TB! directory and temp files, then still enabling the
AM realtime scan wouldn't be a useless combination. Attempting to open or
AM save an infected attachment to disk would
On Saturday, November 06, 2004 at 11:22:52 AM [GMT -0500], Thomas
Fernandez wrote:
Agreed. I'll wait for that plug-in for PCC though, because it is a
very good virus and trojan scanner.
That requires some assistance and commitment from the PC-Cillin
producers. Are they interested in a plugin
Hello Allie,
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 11:56:32 -0500 GMT (06/11/2004, 23:56 +0700 GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
AM That requires some assistance and commitment from the PC-Cillin
AM producers. Are they interested in a plugin for TB!?
I have no idea.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Ever notice that PRICE and WORTH
Hello Alexander,
On Saturday, November 6, 2004, 11:49 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
ASK Well, if you don't mind - its OK. I wouldn't like it, even though I'm on a
ASK DSL. :) The whole update process is a bit uncomfortable. You download the
ASK complete installation archive at least twice a
Hello Pat,
sending this off-list so people won't think I'm advertising. :-)
06-Nov-2004 18:52, you wrote:
Can I ask what AV program you are using?
Sure. Its the GData AntiVirusKit from http://www.gdatasoftware.com (this is
their english page, the german page is http://www.gdata.de - its more
Sat, 6 Nov 2004 21:04:33 +0700 (9:04 AM EST here) Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Hello MFPA,
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 22:05:21 + GMT (05/11/2004, 05:05 +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
Use %Comment=%Folder in the Reply template.
M %SetHeader(Comments,%FolderName) ?
I didn't check. What I suggested is
Hello TB User Discussion List,
One annoyance of redirect is that it adds a
Resent-from header field. In my case, I'm usually
redirecting things, for my wife's attention, to her.
It ends up improperly filtered on her end - because it
looks like it's from me (an X-Sender is generated).
I've tried
Bill McCarthy [BM], wrote:
One annoyance of redirect is that it adds a
Resent-from header field. In my case, I'm usually
redirecting things, for my wife's attention, to her.
It ends up improperly filtered on her end - because it
looks like it's from me (an X-Sender is generated).
I've
Hello TB User Discussion List,
Two minor enhancements would make the spell checker
more user friendly:
(1) Add a `Mail anyway` dialog to `Cancel`. As it is,
when one mails, say source code, with many spelling
errors one has to either turn off spell checking or
click on `Ignore all` many times.
On Sat 6-Nov-04 2:48pm -0400, Martin Webster wrote:
snipped
Thanks for that totally useless response ;-)
--
Best regards,
Bill
Beta 3.0.2.5 Pro BayesIt! 0.7.3 XMP 0.9.6 XP Pro SP2 POP3
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL'
On Sat 6-Nov-04 2:24pm -0400, Bill McCarthy wrote:
One annoyance of redirect is that it adds a
Resent-from header field.
Here's one way to get around it:
Queue the send. Then open the mail from the Outbox,
invoke the QT from the body, and then send. The
Resent-from header field is removed.
Bill McCarthy [BM], wrote:
BM Thanks for that totally useless response ;-)
I beg you pardon? If you request help don't knock it when received
whether useful to you or not. If I've misunderstood you say so, don't
start TTP!
--
.\\artin | ICQ 15893823
I've learnt more from my failures than
Hallo Bill,
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 14:24:18 -0600GMT (6-11-2004, 21:24 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
BM In my case, I'm usually redirecting things, for my wife's
BM attention, to her. It ends up improperly filtered on her end -
BM because it looks like it's from me (an X-Sender is generated).
Hallo Bill,
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 14:53:50 -0600GMT (6-11-2004, 21:53 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
BM Two minor enhancements would make the spell checker
BM more user friendly:
Why not set the spell checker for automatic checking, it'll give you
some coloured lines, but it won't bother you
Hello P.Johnson,
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 11:49:12 -0600 GMT (07/11/2004, 00:49 +0700 GMT),
P.Johnson wrote:
PJ Thanks Thomas, your comments have really helped.
You're welcome.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Things You Would Never Know Without the Movies: Most laptop computers
are powerful enough to override
On Sat 6-Nov-04 6:25pm -0400, Roelof Otten wrote:
Why not set the spell checker for automatic
checking, it'll give you
some coloured lines, but it won't bother you with dialogues.
It is set for automatic checking. That doesn't stop
the dialog OK box. I type fast enough that I often
plan to
On Sat 6-Nov-04 5:05pm -0400, Martin Webster wrote:
Bill McCarthy [BM], wrote:
BM Thanks for that totally useless response ;-)
If you request help don't knock it when received
whether useful to you or not.
You provided zero assistance. Your info was useless
in solving the problem. Get
31 matches
Mail list logo
