Battyfolk,
I'm finding that the TB! spam plug-in is pretty useless as I don't see
any improved spam filtering over many weeks many msgs. Maybe I'm
doing something wrong or there's something I need to check. Anyone
experiencing the same , if so, what are you doing about it?
Thanks.
--
Jan
Jan,
On 10-06-2005 14:49, you [JR] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
JR Anyone experiencing the same , if so, what are you doing about it?
I am using BayesIt here at work and it is far, far worse at correctly
marking spam than my setup at home: SpamPal (with white/blacklists,
private and public)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Peter,
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:00:22 +0200 (9:00 AM here), Peter Fjelsten [PF]
wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
JR Anyone experiencing the same , if so, what are you doing about
JR it?
PF I am using BayesIt here at work and it is far, far worse at
PF I am using BayesIt here at work and it is far, far worse at
PF correctly marking spam than my setup at home: SpamPal (with
PF white/blacklists, private and public) with the Bayesian and P2P
PF plugins. This combination is probably running at over 99,5%
PF success rate. Continuously.
KC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Goos,
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:23:00 +0200 (9:23 AM here), Goos [G] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
KC Periodically I retry BayesIt and Bayes Filter, as a plug-in would
KC be simpler. I always go back to SpamPal as it catches almost
KC everything
Hello Kevin,
Friday, June 10, 2005, 3:00:00 PM, you wrote:
KC - From the messages posted here, both recently and in the past, I think
KC its safe to conclude that 3rd party relay type solutions seem to offer
KC better performance than the plug-ins. For those with a spam problem,
KC its probably
Hello Philip,
Friday, June 10, 2005, 7:51:48 PM, you wrote:
PS I find it odd that you think because a few people have problems the
PS system is flawed. Every relay/3rd party solution no doubt has a
PS mailing list or forum, on which practically every user has a problem -
PS or they wouldn't be
Hi all!
Thank you for your replies.
OK, the default email client seems good and has gotten your aproval, but do I
guess right if I say
that I won't be able to check my mail on the server any more? Now, _that's_ a
fantastic feature in
TheBat, I just hit Alt+2, my chosen accounts get checked,
Hello again!
Seing the post Moving the Bat! data files to another computer I've just
realized that this must
be the best place to wonder about the same thing - but now from my PC to a
Mac.
I suppose that I'll need to export each of the main folders like inbox, sent
mail and some of the
Hello Dragan,
Friday, June 10, 2005, 8:52:45 PM, you wrote:
DMR When moving mail, and this is where this idea came up - one way
DMR could be that I export from TheBat
DMR mail to Outlook first and then use Outlook2Mail to move _everything_.
Don't know if this can help you:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Philip,
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 18:51:48 +0100 (1:51 PM here), Philip Storry [PS]
wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
KC I think its safe to conclude that 3rd party relay type
KC solutions seem to offer better performance than the plug-ins
PS I
On Friday, June 10, 2005, 20:52:45, Dragan Mac Ruzic wrote:
Now, selecting Inbox and going to Tools/Export... I've got three
choices, which one to chose?
Unix Mailbox - it's a standard format that almost all mail software
supports.
--
Jernej Simoncic http://deepthought.ena.si/
Any fool
Hello Kevin,
On Friday, June 10, 2005 at 15:15:36 GMT -0400 (which was 21:15:36
where I live), Kevin Coates wrote and made these valuable points on
the subject of spamalot:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Philip,
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 18:51:48 +0100 (1:51 PM here), Philip
Hallo Dragan,
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:45:44 +0200GMT (10-6-2005, 20:45 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
DR Best regards,
DR Homesick Mac (... getting a Mac, my friends are already making fun of this
:-) )
DR
DR Current version is 3.5.25 |
Hello Dick,
On Friday, June 10, 2005 at 10:44:52 PM Dick [DH] wrote:
DH Yesterday, I saw an article in a Dutch magazine about a brand new
DH Dutch anti-spam program
[...]
DH If you want to know how the program is performing its task, have a look
here:
DH
Hi Bat! Fans,
Sorry to rehash this one, but just can't seem to get it right!
How do I get rid of blank lines in macros?
For instance, see blank line above Hi Bat! Fans.
The macro I use is
%FROM=John Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED]
%TO=%TO=TBUDL@thebat.dutaint.com%-
%CC=%CC=%-
Hi Bat! Fans,
Is
Dear John,
@11-Jun-2005, 08:18 +1000 (10-Jun 23:18 UK time) John Phillips [JP] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
JP How do I get rid of blank lines in macros?
With %-
JP For instance, see blank line above Hi Bat! Fans.
JP The macro I use is
JP %FROM=John Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JP
17 matches
Mail list logo
