Hello Thomas,
Sorry for the late answer, I was out.
MS It is a free folder (it is under no account). But the fact that you
MS are the first one who answers makes me feel like its not such an
MS obvious bug.
No, not obvious. I just highlighted a common folder (that's the
technical term for the
Hello Mica,
[smtp]
logging=1
log=smtp.session
I found out, it does not make a difference whether you write
'log=smtp.session', 'log=smtp.trace' or 'log=myLogFile.txt'.
In each case a log file is provided with the appropriate name.
@Mary
Verbose log function is more recent, I think. The
Hello Roelof,
On Wednesday, July 13, 2005, you wrote:
RO Those are the things that make it worth your while to visit tbbeta.
RO There they come from the horse's mouth, err .. I mean from the
RO development team.
Sorry to drift OT, but to go back to another oft-trodden thread (can
you tread a
Hi Vili,
Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 10:08:14 PM, you wrote:
Two workarounds:
1. Save as VCF and pick the emails out of the file.
2. Address book, File, Print, Address list. Select some PDF writer and
you can extract the text from the PDF, or select some Text only
printer and redirect the
Hello tbudl,
We've got so many messages telling us we changed viewmode, save? and
other important things. But I don't know how many times I messed up a
viewmode by wanting to switch the viewmode, but instead...
- right clicking on the list headers in list view
- being not very concentrated
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 13 Jul 2005,
@ @ at 23:18:13 +0200, when Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Hello Chris everyone else,
on 13-Jul-2005 at 22:59 you (Chris) wrote:
And the apostrophe: account
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 12:41:49 +0200, Mica Mijatovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Anyway, it didn't want to work due to the wrong settings syntax (it had
to be log=smtp.session instead log=smtp.trace).
I don't think thats the problem. I had mine set to smtp.log and it worked
just fine. Odd.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Thu, 14 Jul 2005,
@ @ at 10:52:12 +0100, when Nick Dutton wrote:
Hello Roelof,
On Wednesday, July 13, 2005, you wrote:
RO Those are the things that make it worth your while to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Thu, 14 Jul 2005,
@ @ at 11:33:36 +0200, when Miroslav Florensen wrote:
Hello Mica,
[smtp]
logging=1
log=smtp.session
I found out, it does not make a difference whether
Hello Martin,
Thursday, July 14, 2005, 5:18:21 AM, you wrote:
We've got so many messages telling us we changed viewmode, save? and
other important things. But I don't know how many times I messed up a
viewmode by wanting to switch the viewmode, but instead...
Hello Miroslav!
On Thursday, July 14, 2005, 4:33 AM, you wrote:
@Mary
Verbose log function is more recent, I think. The first I ever noticed
it was about a month ago when Maxim called it to someone's attention.
Are you sure? I found no reference to an verbose log function from Max in
Mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Thu, 14 Jul 2005,
@ @ at 14:09:39 +0200,
when Alexander S. Kunz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 12:41:49 +0200, Mica Mijatovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Stuart,
We've got so many messages telling us we changed viewmode, save? and
other important things. But I don't know how many times I messed up a
viewmode by wanting to switch the viewmode, but instead...
Options/Preferences/Messages/Viewmodes. There are options at the
bottom that
Hello,
Here's the mid for Maxim Masiutin's post to TBBETA, on May 5, 2005:
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks Mary, I overlooked this message and also overlooked these
verbose log settings.
--
Best regards
Miroslav
BAT-MAIL.DE.VU - http://bat-mail.de.vu
News-Ticker:
Hi all,
I am a new user to TB and although I subscribed to this mailing list about
three years ago this is my first post. My setup is as follows; I have TB
3.5.30 with one account which is pointing at our Exchange 2003 server (using
MAPI) . The account will send and receive messages fine
Hello paul,
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 16:19:55 +0100 GMT (14/07/2005, 22:19 +0700 GMT),
paul meathrel wrote:
pm I am a new user to TB and although I subscribed to this
pm mailing list about three years ago this is my first post.
Nice to read you.
pm My setup is as follows; I have TB 3.5.30 with one
Hello Thomas!
On Thursday, July 14, 2005, 10:42 AM, you wrote:
pm My setup is as follows; I have TB 3.5.30 with one account which is
pm pointing at our Exchange 2003 server (using MAPI) .
You are using a beta version. I remember that there was work on the
competibility with Exchange in this
Hello Mary,
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 10:56:10 -0500 GMT (14/07/2005, 22:56 +0700 GMT),
Mary Bull wrote:
MB Version 3.5.30 is on the public download page as a Post-release fix.
Gee, I only looked at the footer in this list and thought 3.51 was the
current release. Thanks for pointing this out.
--
Thanks for the prompt reply Thomas. Which is the current release version? All I
did was go to www.ritlabs.com and click on download and
selected the current version of TB Pro. Looking at the release date I should
have guessed that it was a beta although there is nothing on the
web page,
Thanks for the reply Mary. Are there any others using Exchange who have a work
around? Could I use IMAP4 or POP3 to achieve the same
thing using Exchange?
On Thu Jul 14 16:56 , Mary Bull [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
Hello Thomas!
On Thursday, July 14, 2005, 10:42 AM, you wrote:
pm My setup is
Hello paul,
Thursday, July 14, 2005, 9:19:55 AM, you wrote:
Paul
Current version is 3.51 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note
Hello Paul!
On Thursday, July 14, 2005, 11:04 AM, you wrote:
Thanks for the reply Mary. Are there any others using Exchange who
have a work around? Could I use IMAP4 or POP3 to achieve the same
thing using Exchange?
It does seem as if the problems do lie with MAPI.
However, IMAP is also in
Hello Mary Bull everyone else,
sorry to break into this thread, but I wonder whats going on... OK, Paul
seems to use a mailer that can't thread propperly, but your reply should
thread propperly... which it doesn't do! Hu?!?
How can everyone get a different message ID?
Paul's Message-Id is
Hello Alexander!
On Thursday, July 14, 2005, 11:58 AM, you wrote:
What the... ? How can Paul's message have a different ID on your
machine than on mine?
No idea. I just did my normal Reply from the toolbar button.
Another bug in beta v. 3.51?
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat! 3.51 on Windows
Hi Alexander,
on Thu, 14 Jul 2005 18:58:55 +0200GMT (14.07.2005, 18:58 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
ASK Hello Mary Bull everyone else,
ASK sorry to break into this thread, but I wonder whats going on... OK, Paul
ASK seems to use a mailer that can't thread propperly, but your reply should
ASK
Hallo Alexander,
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 18:58:55 +0200GMT (14-7-2005, 18:58 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
ASK What the... ? How can Paul's message have a different ID on your machine
ASK than on mine?
That's rather easy. He doesn't add a Message-ID to his messages.
Therefore on of the smtp
Hello Alexander,
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 18:58:55 +0200 GMT (14/07/2005, 23:58 +0700 GMT),
Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
ASK Leif's Reference is [EMAIL PROTECTED] but the message
ASK he's moderated is [EMAIL PROTECTED] here.
ASK What the... ? How can Paul's message have a different ID on your machine
Hello paul,
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 17:00:04 +0100 GMT (14/07/2005, 23:00 +0700 GMT),
paul meathrel wrote:
pm Thanks for the prompt reply Thomas. Which is the current release
pm version?
3.51, according to the list footer. But Mary said that's not true.
I downloaded it from here:
Hello Mary,
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 11:40:25 -0500 GMT (14/07/2005, 23:40 +0700 GMT),
Mary Bull wrote:
MB However, IMAP is also in a cleaning up problems stage of beta
MB testing. Don't understand, myself, about what happens when one uses
MB POP3 with Exchange, since I don't do that, and have never
Hello Roelof,
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 19:21:42 +0200 GMT (15/07/2005, 00:21 +0700 GMT),
Roelof Otten wrote:
RO The easiest solution for this would be that Paul would start to use a
RO client that's RFC compliant. In this case that would mean that it
RO inserts a Message-ID.
Not really. Mails sent
Hello Thomas!
On Thursday, July 14, 2005, 12:23 PM, you wrote:
pm Thanks for the prompt reply Thomas. Which is the current release
pm version?
3.51, according to the list footer. ...
I don't know why Marck put that footer; to the best of my knowledge,
RitLabs has not yet put v. 3.51 on the
Hello Thomas!
On Thursday, July 14, 2005, 12:28 PM, you wrote:
MB However, IMAP is also in a cleaning up problems stage of beta
MB testing. Don't understand, myself, about what happens when one uses
MB POP3 with Exchange, since I don't do that, and have never used
MB Exchange. Although my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Thu, 14 Jul 2005,
@ @ at 13:13:55 +0200, when Mica Mijatovic wrote:
[...]
Oops! You are right. A file smtp.trace has already been created with
the appropriate SMTP trace data,
Hello Mica!
On Thursday, July 14, 2005, 10:56 AM, you wrote:
Should have been hadn't overseen
instead.
Overlooked. Overlooked feels more idiomatic than overseen over
here. :)
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat! 3.51 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2
Hi
On Wednesday 13 July 2005 at 12:51:45 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Mary Bull wrote:
It's about filtering certain incoming mail to a virtual (chat)
folder.
Not just a chat folder.
Any virtual folder watches other folders (and displays messages
in those folders that match the filter you
Hello MFPA!
On Thursday, July 14, 2005, 3:14 PM, you wrote:
It's about filtering certain incoming mail to a virtual (chat)
folder.
Not just a chat folder.
Any virtual folder watches other folders (and displays messages
in those folders that match the filter you have set for the
virtual
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Thu, 14 Jul 2005,
@ @ at 14:33:24 -0500, when Mary Bull wrote:
Hello Mica!
On Thursday, July 14, 2005, 10:56 AM, you wrote:
Should have been hadn't overseen instead.
37 matches
Mail list logo
