Re: ReplyTo etc Macros problem

2005-11-18 Thread Tom Plunket
Dwight A Corrin wrote:

 On the other issue, it does not seem like a bug that whenever you hit
 ctrl-n or the 'create a new message' icon that it always starts with
 the cursor at To:

I've brought that up in the past, and it sounded like that was by
design, despite the fact that one might not want or need to put
anything into the To: field (say, for instance, it's filled in
already).


-tom!

-- 



Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: ReplyTo etc Macros problem

2005-11-18 Thread Tom Plunket
Marten Gallagher wrote:

 Now comes the bit that always used to work:

For what it's worth, this key bit of information was not present in
earlier messages.

If it is literally the case that it used to work, and then you changed
nothing and now it doesn't work, well, that's not good.  Since this
case is highly unlikely, it might be worth pondering what you have
changed since it worked.  Did you upgrade to a newer version of TB?
Did you upgrade anything else?

-tom!

-- 



Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: ReplyTo etc Macros problem

2005-11-18 Thread Tom Plunket
Marten Gallagher wrote:

 Marten Gallagher wrote:

 Alternatively, you could just set the following in your per-folder
 reply templates (but it's more to manage):

 %From=Webmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 That's what I'm doing - I obviously wasn't clear in my original message.

 It doesn't work here...

Ok, none of your previous messages have done this.

Try a template without a line that clears the %From first; such a line
is unnecessary as you can't have a message from more than one address
anyway.


-tom!

-- 



Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Folder (not account) macros not working

2005-11-18 Thread Tom Plunket
Roelof Otten wrote:

 But the from identity is always managed by the folder identity, works
 fine on all of the TB list for instance.

I have an account-wide reply template that has quite a bit of macro
code to figure out what email address should be stuffed into my From
field.

Once I got the syntax of the %If macro right (mostly due to not having
any else clause), I've never had a problem with it.

%From=Tom Plunket its_like_magic

I do have a couple of per-folder reply macros, but the emails coming
into those folders would get the same generated From: address as the
macro creates, so I don't actually know what's happening under the
hood.  However, now that I've figured out how to do this, I have no
need for per-folder identities since I can always respond either with
the email address that received the mail, or with something else that
I generate as appropriate...

-tom!

-- 



Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: ReplyTo etc Macros problem

2005-11-18 Thread Marten Gallagher
 Marten Gallagher wrote:

 Now comes the bit that always used to work:

 For what it's worth, this key bit of information was not present in
 earlier messages.

 If it is literally the case that it used to work, and then you changed
 nothing and now it doesn't work, well, that's not good.  Since this
 case is highly unlikely, it might be worth pondering what you have
 changed since it worked.  Did you upgrade to a newer version of TB?
 Did you upgrade anything else?

I cannot be sufficiently precise on that - things change all the time here. I 
have
recently upgraded to 3.62.14 but it could have started not working before that.

-- 
Marten Gallagher
Annery Kiln Web Design
www.annerykiln.co.uk
Using The Bat! 3.62.14
with POPFile 0.22.3
on Windows XP 5.1 




Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: ReplyTo etc Macros problem

2005-11-18 Thread Marten Gallagher
 Marten Gallagher wrote:

 Marten Gallagher wrote:

 Alternatively, you could just set the following in your per-folder
 reply templates (but it's more to manage):

 %From=Webmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 That's what I'm doing - I obviously wasn't clear in my original message.

 It doesn't work here...

 Ok, none of your previous messages have done this.

 Try a template without a line that clears the %From first; such a line
 is unnecessary as you can't have a message from more than one address
 anyway.

Been there, done that, no diff


-- 
Marten Gallagher
Annery Kiln Web Design
www.annerykiln.co.uk
Using The Bat! 3.62.14
with POPFile 0.22.3
on Windows XP 5.1 




Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Folder (not account) macros not working

2005-11-18 Thread Marten Gallagher
 Roelof Otten wrote:

 But the from identity is always managed by the folder identity, works
 fine on all of the TB list for instance.

 I have an account-wide reply template that has quite a bit of macro
 code to figure out what email address should be stuffed into my From
 field.

Yes but does it work on common folders?


-- 
Marten Gallagher
Annery Kiln Web Design
www.annerykiln.co.uk
Using The Bat! 3.62.14
with POPFile 0.22.3
on Windows XP 5.1 




Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: ReplyTo etc Macros problem

2005-11-18 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Marten,

On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 09:38:27 +GMT (18-11-2005, 10:38 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:

MG Been there, done that, no diff

Apparently something's gone corrupt in your installation.
Create a full internal backup with TB.
Uninstall TB
Install TB again
Restore your backup.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

Veni, Vidi, Vestibule ( I came, I saw, I hid in the closet )

The Bat! 3.62.14
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN
OTFE enabled
P4 3GHz
2 GB RAM


pgpDTMpiH6B0j.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: ReplyTo etc Macros problem

2005-11-18 Thread Marten Gallagher
 Hallo Marten,

 On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 09:38:27 +GMT (18-11-2005, 10:38 +0100, where
 I live), you wrote:

MG Been there, done that, no diff

 Apparently something's gone corrupt in your installation.
 Create a full internal backup with TB.
 Uninstall TB
 Install TB again
 Restore your backup.

Yes I was thinking that might be it.

Do I need to remove regsitry keys? If yes - where can I find a guide to which 
ones they
are?

-- 
Marten Gallagher
Annery Kiln Web Design
www.annerykiln.co.uk
Using The Bat! 3.62.14
with POPFile 0.22.3
on Windows XP 5.1 




Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: ReplyTo etc Macros problem

2005-11-18 Thread Marten Gallagher
 Hallo Marten,

 On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 09:38:27 +GMT (18-11-2005, 10:38 +0100, where
 I live), you wrote:

MG Been there, done that, no diff

 Apparently something's gone corrupt in your installation.
 Create a full internal backup with TB.
 Uninstall TB
 Install TB again
 Restore your backup.

OK - stripped everything out - uninstall, deleted registry key, moved message 
storage
folder, deleted Program files folder (after uninstall).

Re-installed.

Same problem!

So evidently I have some setting somewhere, some filter somewhere, somethign 
somewhere
that is over-riding the common folder templates.

The question is: where to start looking?


-- 
Marten Gallagher
Annery Kiln Web Design
www.annerykiln.co.uk
Using The Bat! 3.62.14
with POPFile 0.22.3
on Windows XP 5.1 




Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: ReplyTo etc Macros problem

2005-11-18 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Marten,

On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 10:19:41 +GMT (18-11-2005, 11:19 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:

MG Do I need to remove regsitry keys? If yes - where can I find a
MG guide to which ones they are?

When you're running TB from an Windows admin account, TB will strip the
registry during the uninstall. When you're running TB from a user
account (which you can't use for uninstalling) you need to strip it
yourself, everything in the tree:
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT\The Bat!

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

May we kiss those we please, and please those we kiss.

The Bat! 3.62.14
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN
OTFE enabled
P4 3GHz
2 GB RAM


pgpn482NbYwE4.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: ReplyTo etc Macros problem

2005-11-18 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Thursday, November 17, 2005, 4:56:24 PM, Marten Gallagher wrote:

 HOWEVER... at an unspecified time in the not too recent past, this
 seems to have changed and the FROM address is always
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the signature(s) are always that which is
 set for the [EMAIL PROTECTED] ACCOUNT FOLDER templates.

 Sorry to be so long-winded...

Not long winded, just more complete and explicit.

I created a common folder and populated it with some messages. Gave
the folder an indentity. Created a reply to one of the messages, which
used the reply template from the proper account. I readdressed the
reply to one of my accounts, and sent it. It showed up in the sent
folder of a different account than the identity account, but when I
got it back it had all the right headers. It was labeled as from the
chosen account, and had the correct reply to address.

I think that means that I was unable to recreate the problem you
described, and I think what I tried parallels what you are trying to
do? (I did all this in POP, not in IMAP)

-- 
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316.303.1411  fax 316.265.7568
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
Using IMAP with The Bat! 3.62.14 on Windows XP version 5,1



Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: ReplyTo etc Macros problem

2005-11-18 Thread Marten Gallagher
 On Thursday, November 17, 2005, 4:56:24 PM, Marten Gallagher wrote:

 HOWEVER... at an unspecified time in the not too recent past, this
 seems to have changed and the FROM address is always
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the signature(s) are always that which is
 set for the [EMAIL PROTECTED] ACCOUNT FOLDER templates.

 Sorry to be so long-winded...

 Not long winded, just more complete and explicit.

 I created a common folder and populated it with some messages. Gave
 the folder an indentity. Created a reply to one of the messages, which
 used the reply template from the proper account. I readdressed the
 reply to one of my accounts, and sent it. It showed up in the sent
 folder of a different account than the identity account, but when I
 got it back it had all the right headers. It was labeled as from the
 chosen account, and had the correct reply to address.

 I think that means that I was unable to recreate the problem you
 described, and I think what I tried parallels what you are trying to
 do? (I did all this in POP, not in IMAP)

So - just to double-check:

the email was in a COMMON FOLDER which had its own identity?

you created a reply to it?

the created email acquired (before sending) the FROM NAME, FROM ADDRESS, 
REPLYTO ADDRESS as set in that
COMMON FOLDER's identity?

Any signature set for that COMMON FOLDER template was acquired by the created 
reply before
sending)?

Do you have an account set as the default for mailto URLs?

-- 
Marten Gallagher
Annery Kiln Web Design
www.annerykiln.co.uk
Using The Bat! 3.62.14
with POPFile 0.22.3
on Windows XP 5.1 




Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: ReplyTo etc Macros problem

2005-11-18 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Friday, November 18, 2005, 6:41:45 AM, Marten Gallagher wrote:

 So - just to double-check:

 the email was in a COMMON FOLDER which had its own identity?

yes

 you created a reply to it?

yes

 the created email acquired (before sending) the FROM NAME, FROM
 ADDRESS, REPLYTO ADDRESS as set in that
 COMMON FOLDER's identity?

yes

 Any signature set for that COMMON FOLDER template was acquired by the created 
 reply before
 sending)?

yes

 Do you have an account set as the default for mailto URLs?

yes. A different one than I thought, and the one through which the
message was actually sent. So worked even more like it should have
than I thought.



-- 
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316.303.1411  fax 316.265.7568
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
Using IMAP with The Bat! 3.62.14 on Windows XP version 5,1



Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: ReplyTo etc Macros problem

2005-11-18 Thread Marten Gallagher
 On Friday, November 18, 2005, 6:41:45 AM, Marten Gallagher wrote:

 yes. A different one than I thought, and the one through which the
 message was actually sent. So worked even more like it should have
 than I thought.

Hmmm... it is now more mysterious - or perhaps if someine knows what theey're 
doing - less
mysterious:

A new message from a common folder fails to acquire the idientity as set and 
fails to use
the template as set.

A reply or a forward of a message in the same common folder DOES acquire the 
identity and
the template!

-- 
Marten Gallagher
Annery Kiln Web Design
www.annerykiln.co.uk
Using The Bat! 3.62.14
with POPFile 0.22.3
on Windows XP 5.1 




Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Reinstalled v2.04.7, lost all my accounts and folders

2005-11-18 Thread Chris Evans

Dear list,

I've always used TB! as a sort of backup Emailer as I never quite took
to it. However, I used it for most of my Email list traffic and would be
happy to continue to do so.  However, my computer hard disc crashed, I
have a backup of everything so I reinstalled TB! 2.04.7 and gave it my
registration codes and copied my old folder structure in c:\program
files\The Bat! across ... no go.

Is there a way to get the old accounts and folders back again?  Hope so!

TIA,

Chris




Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Reinstalled v2.04.7, lost all my accounts and folders

2005-11-18 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Chris,

On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 12:58:10 + GMT (18/11/2005, 19:58 +0700 GMT),
Chris Evans wrote:

CE However, my computer hard disc crashed, I have a backup of
CE everything so I reinstalled TB! 2.04.7 and gave it my registration
CE codes and copied my old folder structure in c:\program files\The
CE Bat! across ... no go.

How did you do the backup - with the internal utility or manually?

CE Is there a way to get the old accounts and folders back again?  Hope so!

Yes, there is. We'll walk you through it.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

...und wir gingen mit unserer Lehrerin im Park spazieren. Gegenueber
dem Park war ein Haus, wo die Muetter ihre Kinder gebaeren. Eine
Gebaermutter schaute aus dem Fenster und winkte uns freudig zu.
http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/

Message reply created with The Bat! 3.62.14
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2





Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Reinstalled v2.04.7, lost all my accounts and folders

2005-11-18 Thread Chris Evans

Thomas Fernandez wrote:

Hello Chris,

On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 12:58:10 + GMT (18/11/2005, 19:58 +0700 GMT),
Chris Evans wrote:

CE However, my computer hard disc crashed, I have a backup of
CE everything so I reinstalled TB! 2.04.7 and gave it my registration
CE codes and copied my old folder structure in c:\program files\The
CE Bat! across ... no go.

How did you do the backup - with the internal utility or manually?


manual backup of the entire directory trees of the machine


CE Is there a way to get the old accounts and folders back again?  Hope so!

Yes, there is. We'll walk you through it.


Wonderful.  Standing by!

Thanks,

Chris



--
Chris Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Consultant Psychiatrist in Psychotherapy, Rampton Hospital;
Research Programmes Director, Nottinghamshire NHS Trust,
Hon. Professor of Psychotherapy, Nottingham University,
Hon. SL Institute of Psychiatry
*** My views are my own and not representative of those institutions ***


Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Reinstalled v2.04.7, lost all my accounts and folders

2005-11-18 Thread MAU
Hello Chris,

 Is there a way to get the old accounts and folders back again?  Hope so!

Yes, create _new_ accounts with the same names you previously had (i.e.
account folder names). TB will find the account folder and will
automatically fill in the 'new' account settings with the ones you
previously had.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.62.14




Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Reinstalled v2.04.7, lost all my accounts and folders

2005-11-18 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Chris,

On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 15:05:29 + GMT (18/11/2005, 22:05 +0700 GMT),
Chris Evans wrote:


 How did you do the backup - with the internal utility or manually?

CE manual backup of the entire directory trees of the machine

How about the registry key?

 Yes, there is. We'll walk you through it.

CE Wonderful.  Standing by!

MAU already gave a valuable tip. If you didn't backup the registry
key, this is your next step. But be aware that TB will create new
messages.tbb files when you create these accounts, and you need to
overwrite them with you backupped ones. After creating the accounts
that is, and while TB is closed.

The same applies to filters and quick templates.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Mit einem Kostuemball kann man keine Tore schiessen.
http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/

Message reply created with The Bat! 3.62.14
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2





Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Reinstalled v2.04.7, lost all my accounts and folders

2005-11-18 Thread Chris Evans

Thomas Fernandez wrote:

Hello Chris,

On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 15:05:29 + GMT (18/11/2005, 22:05 +0700 GMT),
 Chris Evans wrote:



How did you do the backup - with the internal utility or
manually?


CE manual backup of the entire directory trees of the machine

How about the registry key?


I guess I can find the registry in the copy of c:\ but otherwise the
registry keys are gone and that's the problem with a few programs though
often reinstalling and then copying over the diretories suffices to
restore things!



Yes, there is. We'll walk you through it.


CE Wonderful.  Standing by!

MAU already gave a valuable tip. If you didn't backup the registry 
key, this is your next step. But be aware that TB will create new 
messages.tbb files when you create these accounts, and you need to 
overwrite them with you backupped ones. After creating the accounts 
that is, and while TB is closed.


OK.  The other little quirk that was baffling me is that the reinstalled
TB! seems to have all that in C:\documents and
settings\administrator\application data\batmail but the old one had it
in c:\program files\the bat!\MAIL\

That's got the accounts recreated I can close and recreate the the
messages.tbb files by copying.


The same applies to filters and quick templates.


What does?  Do you mean that this will recreate them?  I had filters I
liked but no templates that I'll miss.

Big problem I still can't see way through is that I had a folder lists 
with a series of subfolders for each of my various lists and another 
called Universal inbox into which my filters shunted most things 
picked up for most the the accounts.  I can't seem to get TB! to see 
those.


Aha, yes I can, laborious but it works: create the two root common 
folders in TB!  Go into common folder lists and use ins key to 
insert subfolders, close TB! and copy old MESSAGES.TBB and MESSAGES.TBI 
files into right places and heh presto!


OK. Before I finally risk picking up some Email, is there anything else 
I should probably do before that?!


Thanks both,

C


--
Chris Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Consultant Psychiatrist in Psychotherapy, Rampton Hospital;
Research Programmes Director, Nottinghamshire NHS Trust,
Hon. Professor of Psychotherapy, Nottingham University,
Hon. SL Institute of Psychiatry
*** My views are my own and not representative of those institutions ***


Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Reinstalled v2.04.7, lost all my accounts and folders

2005-11-18 Thread MAU
Hello Thomas,


 But be aware that TB will create new messages.tbb files when you
 create these accounts, and you need to overwrite them with you
 backupped ones.

Not if he does what I have told him. The 'new' account uses the folder
structure and tbb files he has on disk.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.62.14




Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Reinstalled v2.04.7, lost all my accounts and folders

2005-11-18 Thread MAU
Hello Thomas,

Sorry, forgot to comment on this.

 The same applies to filters and quick templates.

Again, this is not necessary if he has all the account and folder
structure on disk. When creating 'new' accounts with existing names, TB
recognised and uses the whole folder structure for the account and all
the settings, including filters, QTs, etc.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.62.14




Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Reinstalled v2.04.7, lost all my accounts and folders

2005-11-18 Thread MAU
Hello Chris,


 OK. Before I finally risk picking up some Email, is there anything else 
 I should probably do before that?!

See my replies to Thomas.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.62.14




Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: ReplyTo etc Macros problem

2005-11-18 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Tom Plunket  everyone else,

on 18-Nov-2005 at 09:22 you (Tom Plunket) wrote:

 On the other issue, it does not seem like a bug that whenever you hit
 ctrl-n or the 'create a new message' icon that it always starts with the
 cursor at To:

 I've brought that up in the past, and it sounded like that was by
 design, despite the fact that one might not want or need to put
 anything into the To: field (say, for instance, it's filled in
 already).

I don't know if its really necessary to add another check if the TO field
is not yet empty and jump to the subject or maybe mail body then... you may
just as well add another recipient, or a CC recipient... or... :-)

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)

If you tell the boss you were late for work because you had a flat
tire, the next morning you will have a flat tire.



Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Common folders template identity are not used for new messages (was: ReplyTo etc Macros problem)

2005-11-18 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Marten Gallagher  everyone else,

on 18-Nov-2005 at 00:01 you (Marten Gallagher) wrote:

 The ACCOUNT details and SUGNATURE that are used for all emails going out
 - whatever templates and identotied are set in COMMON FOLDERS - is the
 details and signatures for the ACCOUNT which is currently set as the
 DEFAULT for mailto URLs - or if no account is set as the default, then it
 is the account that was last checked as the default even though it may be
 no longer.

This is a bug.

The folder template of a common folder is simply not applied when the
common folder is selected and I press CTRL+N, and thats wrong.

And it doesn't use the identity that is configured in the folder properties
either. The identity is only used for replies, not for new messages.

Please add your confirmations to this bugtracker entry I just created:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5367

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)

The Unspeakable Law: As soon as you mention something; if it is good,
it goes away. if it is bad, it happens.



Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Common folders template identity are not used for new messages (was: ReplyTo etc Macros problem)

2005-11-18 Thread Marten Gallagher
 Hello Marten Gallagher  everyone else,

 on 18-Nov-2005 at 00:01 you (Marten Gallagher) wrote:

 The ACCOUNT details and SUGNATURE that are used for all emails going out
 - whatever templates and identotied are set in COMMON FOLDERS - is the
 details and signatures for the ACCOUNT which is currently set as the
 DEFAULT for mailto URLs - or if no account is set as the default, then it
 is the account that was last checked as the default even though it may be
 no longer.

 This is a bug.

 The folder template of a common folder is simply not applied when the
 common folder is selected and I press CTRL+N, and thats wrong.

 And it doesn't use the identity that is configured in the folder properties
 either. The identity is only used for replies, not for new messages.

 Please add your confirmations to this bugtracker entry I just created:
 https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5367

So I have just spent a whole day chasing this - trying to find what I had done 
wrong.

This didn't used to happen - anyone know which version/revision introduced this 
bug?



-- 
Marten Gallagher
Annery Kiln Web Design
www.annerykiln.co.uk
Using The Bat! 3.62.14
with POPFile 0.22.3
on Windows XP 5.1 




Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Common folders template identity are not used for new messages (was: ReplyTo etc Macros problem)

2005-11-18 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Marten Gallagher  everyone else,

on 18-Nov-2005 at 19:09 you (Marten Gallagher) wrote:

 So I have just spent a whole day chasing this - trying to find what I had
 done wrong.

It was not in vain. You found a bug, that happens. TB goes thru heavy
changes underneath the surface currently.

 This didn't used to happen - anyone know which version/revision
 introduced this bug?

I tried with 3.0.2.10 (the last 3.0 beta) and it works there. So it should
work in 3.0.1.33 (the last 3.0 stable). I don't have anything in between
these and the current 3.62.14 stable here to test it.

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)

Deliplayer2 is playing: Schnitzl'd In The Negev (4:17) by Shpongle
 from the 1995 album 'Nothing Lasts'



Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: What is the role of all those directories that are getting created .. in the Voyager ..??

2005-11-18 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Narayana,

On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 22:44:08 +0530GMT (18-11-2005, 18:14 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:

N Can someone tell me as to what is the role of all those directories
N getting created with *.EBB  *.EBI files inside them. I have only 4
N e-mail id's configured.
N Yet I seem to have a looot of directories with all these files with
N funny names as directories.

Not really a beta issue.
But they're your folders. You mention four id's, so I guess you mean
you've got four accounts configured. Per default every account has at
least six folders (inbox, inbox known, outbox, sent mail, trash and
junk) so four accounts gives you 24 folders, each with their own
directory with a messages.ebb/.ebi pair (.tbb and .tbi for a non
encrypted message base)
Part of TB's encryption system is that they've got odd names, where
a plain message base has names corresponding with the actual name as
shown by TB.


-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

The ultimate Virus, a self-installing copy of Bob.

The Bat! 3.62.14
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN
OTFE enabled
P4 3GHz
2 GB RAM


pgpe98fOF7jQG.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Common folders template identity are not used for new messages (was: ReplyTo etc Macros problem)

2005-11-18 Thread Marten Gallagher
 Hello Marten Gallagher  everyone else,

 on 18-Nov-2005 at 19:09 you (Marten Gallagher) wrote:

 So I have just spent a whole day chasing this - trying to find what I had
 done wrong.

 It was not in vain. You found a bug, that happens. TB goes thru heavy
 changes underneath the surface currently.

Well I wish had faith that it will be corrected quickly. DO you think it might 
be?
Otherwise I am going to have change all my filters and set up a cut and paste 
system to
put the correct details in 50% of the emails I send! That will tak a few hours 
to get
right.

What do you think the chances of this being corrected within a week, say?

-- 
Marten Gallagher
Annery Kiln Web Design
www.annerykiln.co.uk
Using The Bat! 3.62.14
with POPFile 0.22.3
on Windows XP 5.1 




Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Folder (not account) macros not working

2005-11-18 Thread Marten Gallagher
 Hallo Marten,

 In that case I'm lost. Folder templates work fine over here.
 But the from identity is always managed by the folder identity, works
 fine on all of the TB list for instance.

Could you please double check?

Does a common folder identity and template work for a NEW message created when 
the common
folder is highlighted?

According Alexander Kunz it is confirmed and he/we have created a bug report.

-- 
Marten Gallagher
Annery Kiln Web Design
www.annerykiln.co.uk
Using The Bat! 3.62.14
with POPFile 0.22.3
on Windows XP 5.1 




Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Common folders template identity are not used for new messages (was: ReplyTo etc Macros problem)

2005-11-18 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Marten Gallagher  everyone else,

on 18-Nov-2005 at 19:41 you (Marten Gallagher) wrote:

 What do you think the chances of this being corrected within a week, say?

Sorry, I really don't know. My crystal ball is defective. :-)

Before going thru the hassle of changing your setup a lot, you can revert
to 3.0.1.33 where the functions works (maybe someone else has a more recent
version to check if it worked it the 3.5.x series).

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)

Deliplayer2 is playing: Mentalism (2:54) by Shpongle
 from the 1995 album 'Nothing Lasts'



Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Folder (not account) macros not working

2005-11-18 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Marten,

On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 18:42:57 +GMT (18-11-2005, 19:42 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:

 In that case I'm lost. Folder templates work fine over here.
 But the from identity is always managed by the folder identity, works
 fine on all of the TB list for instance.

MG Could you please double check?

MG Does a common folder identity and template work for a NEW message
MG created when the common folder is highlighted?

I can double check, but as I don't have any common folders I won't
find your bug. (Common folders don't make much sense when you've got
just one account.)

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

there are three things that come next, uh four...

The Bat! 3.62.14
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN
OTFE enabled
P4 3GHz
2 GB RAM


pgp3swq8P1RzE.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Common folders template identity are not used for new messages (was: ReplyTo etc Macros problem)

2005-11-18 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Alexander,

On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 19:45:37 +0100GMT (18-11-2005, 19:45 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:

ASK Before going thru the hassle of changing your setup a lot, you can revert
ASK to 3.0.1.33 where the functions works (maybe someone else has a more recent
ASK version to check if it worked it the 3.5.x series).

Okay, I created a common folder and performed some tests (only folder
identity in a new message)
3.0.2.10 was fine
3.51.5 was fine
3.60.07 was fine
I had no other versions ready to use and I almost know for sure that
3.60.07 was a public release and no beta. I've still got the .msi
available over here and there must have been a reason that I still
have the executable in my TB program directory, so I guess it was
stable (or followed by something real buggy in the beta series g).

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

Facts are stubborn things.

The Bat! 3.62.14
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN
OTFE enabled
P4 3GHz
2 GB RAM


pgptnlopPmkZn.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

QT bug

2005-11-18 Thread Jon Polish
1. Create a new QT

2. Click the Macros button

3. Select Cookie from file...

Nothing happens. This works in 3.51.10. Any confirmations?

I am posting in two places because I am really not sure where this
belongs.

Jon

Using The Bat! v3.62.14 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2

-- 

Many years ago this was a thriving, happy planet - people, cities shops, a 
normal world. Except that on the high streets of these cities there were 
slightly more shoe shops than one might have thought necessary. And slowly, 
insidiously, the numbers of these shoe shops were increasing. It's a well known 
economic phenomenon but tragic to see it in operation, for the more shoe shops 
there were, the more shoes they had to make and the worse and more unwearable 
they became. And the worse they were to wear, the more people had to buy to 
keep themselves shod, and the more the shops proliferated, until the whole 
economy of the place passed what I believe is termed the Shoe Event Horizon, 
and it became no longer economically possible to build anything other than shoe 
shops. Result - collapse, ruin and famine. Most of the population died out. 
Those few who had the right kind of genetic instability mutated into birds - 
you've seen one of them - who cursed their feet, cursed the ground, and vowed 
that none should walk on it again. Unhappy lot. Come, I must take you to the 
Vortex. - The Restaurant at the End of the Universe



Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Reinstalled v2.04.7, lost all my accounts and folders

2005-11-18 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello MAU,

On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:54:51 +0100 GMT (18/11/2005, 23:54 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:

M Again, this is not necessary if he has all the account and folder
M structure on disk. When creating 'new' accounts with existing names, TB
M recognised and uses the whole folder structure for the account and all
M the settings, including filters, QTs, etc.

OK, I seem to remember that TB would not check whether these files
already exist, but only create new (empty) ones. I didn't try now, I
may be mistaken.

@Chris: Why not leave the files as MAU suggests but have another
backup handy. Let us know whether the files were overwritten.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Die Inseln des Mittelmeeres sind alle groesser oder kleiner als
Sizilien.
http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/

Message reply created with The Bat! 3.62.14
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2





Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: What is the role of all those directories that are getting created .. in the Voyager ..??

2005-11-18 Thread Peter Ouwehand
Hello Roelof Otten,

on Fri, 18 Nov 2005 19:04:35 +0100 (2005-11-18 19:04:35 in .nl) in the
message with reference mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you [RO]
wrote (at least in part):

RO Not really a beta issue.
RO But they're your folders. You mention four id's, so I guess you mean
RO you've got four accounts configured. Per default every account has at
RO least six folders (inbox, inbox known, outbox, sent mail, trash and
RO junk) so four accounts gives you 24 folders, each with their own
RO directory with a messages.ebb/.ebi pair (.tbb and .tbi for a non
RO encrypted message base)

Voyager doesn't offer you a choice between un-encrypted or encrypted
msg bases, in my experience as a TB-Home user and a Voyager
UNREGISTERED user.

-- 
Kind regards,
Peter Ouwehand
- - -
Using
A program which insists to be   : The Bat! V3.62.13 (Beta) (Home)
An anti-spam filter which insists to be : Bayes Filter Plugin v2.0.3 
An OS which insists to be   : Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service 
Pack 4
Multiple POP3, one gmail.com, one fastmail.fm IMAP




Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Shortcut tabs?

2005-11-18 Thread Munango-Keewati
Is there a way to set up a keyboard shortcut for the All and Unread
Message Tabs?  Ditto folder tabs?  How about setting the Unread tabs
as the startup defaults?

Thanks!

-- 
Best,

M-K
Using The Bat! v3.62.14 on Windows 98 4.10 Build  
 A 



Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Reinstalled v2.04.7, lost all my accounts and folders

2005-11-18 Thread Chris Evans

Thomas Fernandez wrote:

Hello MAU,

On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:54:51 +0100 GMT (18/11/2005, 23:54 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:

M Again, this is not necessary if he has all the account and folder
M structure on disk. When creating 'new' accounts with existing names, TB
M recognised and uses the whole folder structure for the account and all
M the settings, including filters, QTs, etc.

OK, I seem to remember that TB would not check whether these files
already exist, but only create new (empty) ones. I didn't try now, I
may be mistaken.

@Chris: Why not leave the files as MAU suggests but have another
backup handy. Let us know whether the files were overwritten.


They weren't.  And everything seems back fine now.

Cheers,

C


--
Chris Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Consultant Psychiatrist in Psychotherapy, Rampton Hospital;
Research Programmes Director, Nottinghamshire NHS Trust,
Hon. Professor of Psychotherapy, Nottingham University,
Hon. SL Institute of Psychiatry
*** My views are my own and not representative of those institutions ***


Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html