Re: No Bayesit Stats

2006-01-12 Thread Barry
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:35:01 -0500, MikeD (2) wrote: Ahh, I get it now. My explanation of the behavior of the '~' file is, I think, still correct. As to why you are not seeing any spam filtering, if you your black and white lists are doing was much as you say, I think that means that not

Re: No Bayesit Stats

2006-01-12 Thread Darrin
Hello Barry, Thursday, January 12, 2006, 12:58:48 AM, you wrote: B Well, I've taken your lead and installed a copy of AGAVA for a trial. And I B have to say that first impressions are pretty favourable. I trained it up B with my batch of spam emails and its working very well. Ive been using it

Re[2]: No Bayesit Stats

2006-01-12 Thread MikeD (2)
Hello Darrin, Thursday, January 12, 2006, 9:34:29 AM, you wrote: D Hello Barry, D Thursday, January 12, 2006, 12:58:48 AM, you wrote: B Well, I've taken your lead and installed a copy of AGAVA for a trial. And I B have to say that first impressions are pretty favourable. I trained it up B with

Flying Bat display for incoming mail

2006-01-12 Thread Thomas Michael
Hello I was recently referred to this list and following the initial instructions I set up a special folder to collect the incoming emails relating to this list. I would like to exclude this folder from the flying bat display . I managed to adjust the mail ticker so that incoming mail is no