Re: TB, Nod32 and email tags
Hello Ted, Friday, January 20, 2006, 6:45:30 AM, you wrote: Anyone out there that is using TB with Nod32 as AV? I just noticed that while most of my emails are obviously scanned by NOD and do show their proper tag at the bottom, some other emails seem to be either ignored or do not have the tag (confirming the scan). Same here, and I hadn't noticed it before, but as you say some emails are tagged by NOD32 and others aren't. -- Graham Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB, Nod32 and email tags
Hallo Ted, On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:45:30 +1100GMT (20-1-2006, 7:45 +0100, where I live), you wrote: TD Btw, is there a security issue of reading emails in HTML when using TD TB. No. TB doesn't execute any included scripts nor does it display any files that aren't sent along with the message as it's unable to let the viewer connect to non included elements. TD I know some users are plaintext purists but I am just wondering TD about the security issue in this respect? Any info is greatly TD appreciated Me being such a purist like you mentioned above also means that it would really bother me to have my virus scanner include signatures to incoming mail (and to outgoing mails they don't make any sense at all) that I'm not knowledgeable at all about what could cause a feature like that to function or not. (Apart from that I don't use Nod32) But I guess they could be right on the Nod32 forum. I'd check what those non-tagged messages have in common: sender/mailer/attachments/html/originating ISP/whatever -- Groetjes, Roelof Windows! The magic of turning a 486 into a Gameboy! The Bat! 3.65.04 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgp1V1K3AvBoO.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: The Bat! keeps trying to dowload deleted messages.
Hallo Bob, On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 16:23:24 +1000GMT (20-1-2006, 7:23 +0100, where I live), you wrote: BM I figure that there must be some sort of cache that The Bat! is BM referring to and that it thinks that there is still mail to retrieve. Close TB and delete the account.m_r and account.m_d files matching with the problem account. When you're using OTFE the extensions are .emr and .emd I'm not sure whether this solves the problem so I'd appreciate some feedback, but unless you keep mail on the server (and you deleted everything) you don't really need them. -- Groetjes, Roelof Yeah, but what's the speed of DARK? The Bat! 3.65.04 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgpRE6mqyqk2d.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB, Nod32 and email tags
Hello Ted Dane everyone else, on 20-Jan-2006 at 07:45 you (Ted Dane) wrote: Anyone out there that is using TB with Nod32 as AV? I just noticed that while most of my emails are obviously scanned by NOD and do show their proper tag at the bottom, some other emails seem to be either ignored or do not have the tag (confirming the scan). Could it be that these messages are multiparted (with attachments, signed, html format)? If so, the scanner may not be able to add its tagline to the readable part of the message. -- Tom That sig delimiter ain't working, its missing a trailing whitespace. :) -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) History is more or less bunk. -- Henry Ford Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Best way to mark an email in a flexible way for filtering in VF's
Hello Martin, a special keyword in the memo-field: not very comfortable: I have to hit Shift-Ctrl-I for Autoview-Memo, type in the key, press the save-button and close the autoview-memo-window You are right, it is not very comfortable but it is the only solution I've found for a situation similar to yours. Well, I now decided (and already used) Roelofs suggestion to use color groups. I did not consider the possibility that a color group can also be colorless, thus only be used as a special mark without modifying the mail's appearance in the message list (which I would not want). Yes, I also use colour (or colourless) groups and they are a good solution when a message can only belong to one category. But if a message can belong to 2 or more, there is no way to do it with groups. And the only alternative I've found for that is to use the memo. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.65.04 Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: The Bat! keeps trying to dowload deleted messages.
Hello Bob, As a check I have accessed the offending account both via web-mail and by PocoMail, both of which report that there is no mail currently in the account. Have you tried with TB's Dispatcher? -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.65.04 Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Option allow local delivery disapeared
Hello Gerard, On my just installed latest version of TB! the option under Option-NetworkAdmin allow local delivery seems to be missing. You are right, I had not noticed it. What I don't know is if this is intentional or a bug. I'm CCing this to TBBeta to see if anyone there knows. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.65.04 Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Option allow local delivery disapeared
Hello all, Friday, January 20, 2006, MAU wrote: On my just installed latest version of TB! the option under Option-NetworkAdmin allow local delivery seems to be missing. You are right, I had not noticed it. What I don't know is if this is intentional or a bug. I'm CCing this to TBBeta to see if anyone there knows. AFAIK Client/Server mode was removed since 3.65.03 version. -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 3.70.01 (Beta) under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Notebook Acer, Pentium4-M 2.2 GHz, 512 MB RAM, ADSL line Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Option allow local delivery disapeared
ON Friday, January 20, 2006, 10:36:19 AM, you wrote: M You are right, I had not noticed it. What I don't know is if this is M intentional or a bug. M I'm CCing this to TBBeta to see if anyone there knows. Thx. I hope someone knows how to get it back. I noticed that it said it the Help File that it is an option on the server version, so it should still be in here. -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Each man takes care that his neighbor shall not cheat him. But a day comes when he begins to care that he does not cheat his neighbor. Then all goes well -- he has changed his market-cart into a chariot of the sun. -Ralph Waldo Emerson- Using The Bat! v3.65.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB, Nod32 and email tags
Hello Graham, Friday, January 20, 2006, 9:33:12 AM, you wrote: Anyone out there that is using TB with Nod32 as AV? I just noticed that while most of my emails are obviously scanned by NOD and do show their proper tag at the bottom, some other emails seem to be either ignored or do not have the tag (confirming the scan). GS Same here, and I hadn't noticed it before, but as you say some emails GS are tagged by NOD32 and others aren't. I have set Nod32 to only tag those messages that contained/had attachments containing viri. -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 3.65.04 Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: TB, Nod32 and email tags
Hello Mark, Friday, January 20, 2006, 10:05:02 AM, you wrote: Hello Graham, Friday, January 20, 2006, 9:33:12 AM, you wrote: Anyone out there that is using TB with Nod32 as AV? I just noticed that while most of my emails are obviously scanned by NOD and do show their proper tag at the bottom, some other emails seem to be either ignored or do not have the tag (confirming the scan). GS Same here, and I hadn't noticed it before, but as you say some emails GS are tagged by NOD32 and others aren't. I have set Nod32 to only tag those messages that contained/had attachments containing viri. I haven't set NOD32 to do anything specific, but of this thread, two messages aren't tagged (including the root message) and the rest are. -- Graham Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB, Nod32 and email tags
Hallo Graham, On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:11:57 +GMT (20-1-2006, 11:11 +0100, where I live), you wrote: GS I haven't set NOD32 to do anything specific, but of this thread, two GS messages aren't tagged (including the root message) and the rest are. Be more specific please. Of this thread only my message contains attachments, is that part of the problem? The rest were plain text messages. All messages claimed to be using us-ascii as charset and 7 bits as content type, except for yours. (And mine only claimed that in the description of the attachments.) -- Groetjes, Roelof Error 99: Dead mouse in hard drive. The Bat! 3.65.04 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgpaEdQTrWqIi.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: TB, Nod32 and email tags
Hello Roelof, Friday, January 20, 2006, 10:25:20 AM, you wrote: Hallo Graham, On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:11:57 +GMT (20-1-2006, 11:11 +0100, where I live), you wrote: GS I haven't set NOD32 to do anything specific, but of this thread, two GS messages aren't tagged (including the root message) and the rest are. Be more specific please. Of this thread only my message contains attachments, is that part of the problem? The rest were plain text messages. All messages claimed to be using us-ascii as charset and 7 bits as content type, except for yours. (And mine only claimed that in the description of the attachments.) Ok, the the message that started the thread off from Ted isn't tagged. I also thought that your response to Ted wasn't tagged, but in fact it is, but in a separate tab Part.txt So in this thread, only the original message from Ted isn't tagged. -- Graham Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Best way to mark an email in a flexible way for filtering in VF's
Hello MAU, Yes, I also use colour (or colourless) groups and they are a good solution when a message can only belong to one category. But if a message can belong to 2 or more, there is no way to do it with groups. And the only alternative I've found for that is to use the memo. Well, you are of course right. Hm... I just took the time to look through many of the emails in my project folder and found that there are only few mails that belong to two virtual folders *without* one of the factors being recipient or sender or subject. So in most cases color groups will do. But in the other case I of course still have to use the memo field. Thanks for pointing that out! I would wish the memo auto view would be a dockable window, just like the attachment window or a header field (the way it's displayed while composing the email), just some kind of a small area that is always available if I wish to see it, instead of a separate window. Would someone support such a wish? Or am I again the only one using that feature, in which case I would rather prevent keeping ritlabs from doing more important stuff like IMAP and ... (I always have the feeling they'd rather do new stuff than debugging old stuff ;-) -- Martin TB! 3.65.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB, Nod32 and email tags
Hallo Graham, On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:58:54 +GMT (20-1-2006, 11:58 +0100, where I live), you wrote: GS Ok, the the message that started the thread off from Ted isn't tagged. And that was the only non TB message. And it was carrying these headers: ,- [ ] | Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 | Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable | Content-Disposition: inline `- So Nod32 might have problems with one of those headers. -- Groetjes, Roelof '95 - The number of calls to tech support before you can get it to run The Bat! 3.65.04 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgpcRqHBQriJi.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Best way to mark an email in a flexible way for filtering in VF's
Hallo Martin, On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:05:12 +0100GMT (20-1-2006, 12:05 +0100, where I live), you wrote: MS I would wish the memo auto view would be a dockable window, just like MS the attachment window or a header field (the way it's displayed while MS composing the email), just some kind of a small area that is always MS available if I wish to see it, instead of a separate window. It's available as column in the message list. -- Groetjes, Roelof No one tests the depth of a river with both feet. The Bat! 3.65.04 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgpDfgVVdUAw6.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Best way to mark an email in a flexible way for filtering in VF's
Hello Martin, On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MS I would wish the memo auto view would be a dockable window, just like MS the attachment window or a header field (the way it's displayed while MS composing the email), just some kind of a small area that is always MS available if I wish to see it, instead of a separate window. I think that's a very sensible suggestion. I use memos but normally have them viewable in a column because there are only two folders where I use them a lot. However, if they were dockable as you suggest, I'd probably use them even more for writing notes. -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.65.04 with SpamPal POP3 account and no Plug-ins | Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service Pack 2 | F-Prot AV, Outpost Firewall Pro 3.0, Spysweeper, Adaware, SpyBot Holiday in France: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/lazyhomes/holiday.html Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: TB, Nod32 and email tags
Hello Roelof, Friday, January 20, 2006, 11:09:24 AM, you wrote: Hallo Graham, On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:58:54 +GMT (20-1-2006, 11:58 +0100, where I live), you wrote: GS Ok, the the message that started the thread off from Ted isn't tagged. And that was the only non TB message. And it was carrying these headers: ,- [ ] | Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 | Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable | Content-Disposition: inline `- So Nod32 might have problems with one of those headers. That is strange, because the contents of that message contains a signature: Tom using TB 3.6503 Home on XP with NOD32 -- Graham Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Best way to mark an email in a flexible way for filtering in VF's
Martin, On 20-01-2006 12:05, you [MS] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: MS I would wish the memo auto view would be a dockable window, just MS like the attachment window or a header field (the way it's displayed MS while composing the email), just some kind of a small area that is MS always available if I wish to see it, instead of a separate window. Of course, memos are of little use in IMAP accounts. One Clear cache and they're all gone. I'd prefer them to be in external files (and not the index) and linked to messages using message-ids. -- greeting Best regards /greeting author Peter Fjelsten /author thebat version 3.70.01 (Beta) Pro /thebat version env. ~4 POP3, 7 IMAP (UW IMAP 2002e) 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 175K msgs. /env. os Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 /os Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Dual address books
Hello Bob, Thursday, January 19, 2006, 11:15:14 PM, you wrote: BM G'day Jack, BM Friday, January 20, 2006, 1:20:39 PM, you wrote: BM snipped I see where my wording on this question may have caused you to misunderstand. If we assume there are no parked messages but only saved, ready-to-send messages, and I choose GET NEW MAIL FOR ALL I would expect TB to do only a receive, not a send/receive which is what it does. I would expect a send/receive only if I had chosen SEND + CHECK FOR ALL. BM Have you checked Account Properties - Transport to see if the box BM marked Combined Delivery (Send + Receive) is ticked. If the box is BM ticked The Bat! will do both actions together whenever you ask it to BM Send OR Check for new mail. That was it. Thank you Bob. -- Best regards, Jackmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Now running TB! v3.65.03 from Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 - Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Best way to mark an email in a flexible way for filtering in VF's
Hello Roelof, Hallo Martin, On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:05:12 +0100GMT (20-1-2006, 12:05 +0100, where I live), you wrote: MS I would wish the memo auto view would be a dockable window, just like MS the attachment window or a header field (the way it's displayed while MS composing the email), just some kind of a small area that is always MS available if I wish to see it, instead of a separate window. It's available as column in the message list. Yeah, wish I could edit them there... -- Martin TB! 3.65.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Best way to mark an email in a flexible way for filtering in VF's
Hello Martin, On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] It's available as column in the message list. MS Yeah, wish I could edit them there... You can. CTRL+SHFT+I -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.65.04 with SpamPal POP3 account and no Plug-ins | Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service Pack 2 | F-Prot AV, Outpost Firewall Pro 3.0, Spysweeper, Adaware, SpyBot Holiday in France: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/lazyhomes/holiday.html Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Best way to mark an email in a flexible way for filtering in VF's
Hello Peter, MS I would wish the memo auto view would be a dockable window, just MS like the attachment window or a header field (the way it's displayed MS while composing the email), just some kind of a small area that is MS always available if I wish to see it, instead of a separate window. Of course, memos are of little use in IMAP accounts. One Clear cache and they're all gone. That is bad. I'd prefer them to be in external files (and not the index) and linked to messages using message-ids. I'd say yes, but I guess that would cause quite some overhead when viewing and deleting messages, in case the number of memos is big. TB would have to look up in that external file(s) for a certain message ID to fetch the memo and display it. For a long message list (with memos displayed in a column) that could be a problem. The alternative I can think of is a small database-like storage file for memos and the mids they belong to. That would speed up the access to the memos when building message lists and viewing messages. But the file would not be human readable (in case you want to move or edit it manually) and the fact that there is still no databaselike construction to find messages quickly via global search shows me that ritlabs don't seem to like that database concept a lot. Another solution (not my favorite though) would be to store the memo in the message in a header field, but that would of course lead to other problems: - The integrity of incoming messages would be harmed (i.e. the TB!-rule that no incoming message is to be messed with in any way would no longer be followed) - if the message is forwarded the header would be included, maybe also confidential informations therein... Any thoughts? -- Martin TB! 3.65.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Deleting duplicate addresses and returned addresses
Dear List, Have 2 Questions:- 1. I have a lot of duplicate email addresses running into thousands of them. No, i do not do network marketing. How do i find these duplicates and delete only the ones that does not have a HANDLE? 2. Have a lot of addresses bouncing back. How can i select them all and delete from the AB? for example, if 100 addresses return, is there a way to select only the addresses and delete them? Thank you in advance for your assistance. -- Best Regards Vernon Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: The Bat! keeps trying to dowload deleted messages.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Fri, 20 Jan 2006, @ @ at 10:39:09 +0100, when MAU wrote: Hello Bob, As a check I have accessed the offending account both via web-mail and by PocoMail, both of which report that there is no mail currently in the account. Have you tried with TB's Dispatcher? That would be easiest and cleanest way. Particularly handy for dial-up connections when one or more messages with larg(er) attachments are waiting for download. Such messages can be then scheduled for a later download (with having unchecked Download and Delete options for them), or deleted from server. - -- Mica PGP keys nestled at: http://blueness.port5.com/pgpkeys/ [Earth LOG: 506 day(s) since v3.0 unleashing] OSs: Windows 98 SE Micro Lite Professional IVa Enterprise Millennium Windows XP(ee) Micro Lite Professional 1.6, and, for TB sometimes, Gentoo and Vector Linuxes via Wine... ~~~ For personal mail please use my address as it is *exactly* given in my From|Reply To field(s). ~~~ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEVAwUBQ9DWLrSpHvHEUtv8AQOoVwf+Nb9Cbey8IE9z4VtQraS+w+lY877A0lYI d3Sa1DrZNIDQbHcKJ6dLvSLlCtcH8u9xjBvRzBjMHp6m+cNtHuAUWFKTwud+8Fy1 J0eGWa9n3ubBk+xcDHIXJJ23bvpc1wZeSqTFAkgqoKtPJ9f6wlqFTLgE45QbjkZv KRPVZyl+nCsnhJGpQ0ds6rbYZM+dBFeK6kKR5gU+jKa90Dvcz+kyE0j3cWWti7Qc Bvsc0RZu7HFGL3Q0VdAexeGHrIQYZxRbtzdHo/aXgtxVNkDY0LWS1zoPLX3JWu8x VeCz42zO/87mdH+NOsi2WPFkK4uDyb+KD5ZLyZzk/utV6ORZTClDpQ== =DN1t -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Best way to mark an email in a flexible way for filtering in VF's
Hello Richard, Hello Martin, On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] It's available as column in the message list. MS Yeah, wish I could edit them there... You can. CTRL+SHFT+I Of course I know, how would a memo start its life otherwise ;-) ? But as I stated before the steps to open the window, type the memo, press save and close the window again seem rather complicated for just adding a keyword maybe. Just trying to find a simpler solution. -- Martin TB! 3.65.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Best way to mark an email in a flexible way for filtering in VF's
Martin, On 20-01-2006 13:18, you [MS] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'd prefer them to be in external files (and not the index) and linked to messages using message-ids. MS I'd say yes, but I guess that would cause quite some overhead when MS viewing and deleting messages, in case the number of memos is big. Yup. Probably. MS The alternative I can think of is a small database-like storage file MS for memos and the mids they belong to. That would speed up the MS access to the memos when building message lists and viewing MS messages. Maybe - I wouldn't know. :-) MS Another solution (not my favorite though) would be to store the memo MS in the message in a header field, but that would of course lead to MS other problems: MS - The integrity of incoming messages would be harmed (i.e. the TB!-rule MS that no incoming message is to be messed with in any way would no MS longer be followed) Personally, I have no problem with this. MS - if the message is forwarded the header would be included, maybe also MS confidential informations therein... Yeah, this would be pretty bad. MS Any thoughts? Well, my only input is that the current implementation is pretty bad for IMAP (not at least because the current state of IMAP requires a fair number of Clear caches). -- greeting Best regards /greeting author Peter Fjelsten /author thebat version 3.70.01 (Beta) Pro /thebat version env. ~4 POP3, 7 IMAP (UW IMAP 2002e) 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 175K msgs. /env. os Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 /os Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB, Nod32 and email tags
Hallo Graham, On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:32:53 +GMT (20-1-2006, 12:32 +0100, where I live), you wrote: GS Ok, the the message that started the thread off from Ted isn't tagged. And that was the only non TB message. GS That is strange, because the contents of that message contains a GS signature: GS Tom GS using TB 3.6503 Home on XP with NOD32 Nonetheless. His message id is definitely not generated by TB. -- Groetjes, Roelof WinErr: 019 User error - Not our fault. Is Not! Is Not! The Bat! 3.65.04 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgpseilx82dx7.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Mod: Reply for new thread (was: Deleting duplicate addresses and returned addresses)
Hallo Vernon, On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:18:07 +0600GMT (20-1-2006, 12:18 +0200, where I live), you wrote: M Have 2 Questions:- moderator Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Vernon. ' Please don't use reply to start a new thread. Your question has been posted at the bottom of an unrelated topic. The Bat! is a threading mail client. See View | View threads by | Reference to see where it ended up. The result is that it will only be seen by those reading that thread instead of by all users. I recommend that you post your question again using a New message if you want to see more replies to your query. To find out why these MOD messages are posted to the list instead of private mail, please read the welcome message you received when you subscribed. Thank you. /moderator -- Groetjes, Roelof Moderator Rule #4: Warnings are for wimps, cut links! pgpYW4GLQvZhi.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: TB, Nod32 and email tags
Hello Roelof, Friday, January 20, 2006, 12:39:18 PM, you wrote: Hallo Graham, On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:32:53 +GMT (20-1-2006, 12:32 +0100, where I live), you wrote: GS Ok, the the message that started the thread off from Ted isn't tagged. And that was the only non TB message. GS That is strange, because the contents of that message contains a GS signature: GS Tom GS using TB 3.6503 Home on XP with NOD32 Nonetheless. His message id is definitely not generated by TB. Yes, I don't disbelieve you, just pointing it out :-) -- Graham Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB, Nod32 and email tags
On 1/20/06, Alexander S. Kunz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could it be that these messages are multiparted (with attachments, signed, html format)? If so, the scanner may not be able to add its tagline to the readable part of the message. Not sure how to answer this. Most of my emails (A) only contain text and sometimes attachments (xls or doc or jpg). These attachments would be shown in the pane as an icon and have only text in the main pane. Some emails (B) would have text and the attachment as an html picture. In these case I may have two tabs in the main pane, one for text and one for the html picture. If I click on this Ican see the picture in TB without opening any other viewer. In both cases (AB) I have the NOD tag shown. The email in question (C) contained text and about a dozen jpg files as attachments. All of them also have tabs in the main pane and can be viewed directly. In this case no NOD tag is shown. Looking at the text though I think there may be a problem as it looks weird : Our BP specification is: Key Specifications/Special Features: O Automatic and fast accurate measurement OHave time setting function OHave auto average function and so on. I guess the O does not belong there and indicates some incorrect coding. -- Tom Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Re[2]: TB, Nod32 and email tags
On 1/20/06, Graham Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That is strange, because the contents of that message contains a signature: Tom using TB 3.6503 Home on XP with NOD32 Sorry, did not want to confuse you. I am using TB but not when writing to this list. I have not yet properly configured the Gmail account with TB and write this from within Gmail. BTW, why is there a function in the list to have the email address hidden, when this is obviously not happening. I checked a few times by reply via email to ... and was able to see the underlying address. Is this normal? -- Tom Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[4]: TB, Nod32 and email tags
Hello Ted, Friday, January 20, 2006, 12:48:04 PM, you wrote: On 1/20/06, Graham Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That is strange, because the contents of that message contains a signature: Tom using TB 3.6503 Home on XP with NOD32 Sorry, did not want to confuse you. I am using TB but not when writing to this list. I have not yet properly configured the Gmail account with TB and write this from within Gmail. The key point is that of the email messages in this thread, yours are the only ones that NOD32 isn't tagging. I cannot help with the other question, being very new to The Bat -- Graham Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Deleting duplicate addresses and returned addresses
Hallo Vernon, On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:18:07 +0600GMT (20-1-2006, 12:18 +0100, where I live), you wrote: M 1. I have a lot of duplicate email addresses running into thousands of M them. No, i do not do network marketing. How do i find these M duplicates and delete only the ones that does not have a HANDLE? Open the Address Book. Add the handle column to the view Sort on addresses and manually delete the duplicates without handles. When you simply don't want any entries without handle then you can sort on handle and select and delete all entries without a handle. The second method is practically instantaneous compared to the first. M 2. Have a lot of addresses bouncing back. How can i select them all M and delete from the AB? for example, if 100 addresses return, is there M a way to select only the addresses and delete them? As I've mentioned before to you. This kind of thing can be done automatically with dedicated list server software, but it has to be done manually with TB, entry by entry. -- Groetjes, Roelof Luxury: Costs $7.69 to make and $20.00 to market. The Bat! 3.65.04 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgpYXCDawXIXq.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Best way to mark an email in a flexible way for filtering in VF's
Hello Martin, On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MS Of course I know, how would a memo start its life otherwise Sorry. It's just that, from the way you replied about wishing to be able to edit the memos there (as I suggested, in the memo column) seemed that you didn't know you could do it that way. I'll go back into my corner now :-( -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.65.04 with SpamPal POP3 account and no Plug-ins | Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service Pack 2 | F-Prot AV, Outpost Firewall Pro 3.0, Spysweeper, Adaware, SpyBot Holiday in France: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/lazyhomes/holiday.html Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Deleting duplicate addresses and returned addresses
Dear List, Have 2 Questions:- 1. I have a lot of duplicate email addresses running into thousands of them. No, i do not do network marketing. How do i find these duplicates and delete only the ones that does not have a HANDLE? 2. Have a lot of addresses bouncing back. How can i select them all and delete from the AB? for example, if 100 addresses return, is there a way to select only the addresses and delete them? Thank you in advance for your assistance. -- Best Regards Vernon Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Best way to mark an email in a flexible way for filtering in VF's
Hello Martin, Thursday, January 19, 2006, 8:59:08 AM, you wrote: MS Any other suggestions? Thanks a lot for your time! I had an idea that might work for this, but I am having trouble testing it and need some help. My idea was to use manual filters with hotkeys to set a User Parameter for a message based on the content. For example if: sender contains Joe set ABC=1 subject contains lift set ABC=2 sender contains Joe and subject contains lift set ABC=3 You cannot test for User Parameter in a VF, so you would have to filter in Sorting office to assign color groups to the various user parameters and then set up the VF's based on this. You could then set these as Manual only and when you receive a message that matches your rule you could trigger it using a hotkey. Hopefully this makes sense in your given situation. Now the problem, I don't seem to be able to get user parameters to work. Can anyone assist with this. Are there any directions, I don't find any in the help file. -- Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.65.03 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Best way to mark an email in a flexible way for filtering in VF's
Hello Richard, MS Of course I know, how would a memo start its life otherwise Sorry. It's just that, from the way you replied about wishing to be able to edit the memos there (as I suggested, in the memo column) seemed that you didn't know you could do it that way. I'll go back into my corner now :-( :-) don't you worry, you could as well have been right (I often overlook the most obvious things...) -- Martin TB! 3.65.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB, Nod32 and email tags
Hi Ted, On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, at 17:45:30 [GMT+1100] (which was 17:45:30 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: Anyone out there that is using TB with Nod32 as AV? I just noticed that while most of my emails are obviously scanned by NOD and do show their proper tag at the bottom, some other emails seem to be either ignored or do not have the tag (confirming the scan). All works ok here, even with .jpg attachments. -- John Phillips, Sydney, Australia Using The Bat! v3.65.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 I'm not nearly as think as you confused I am. Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: The Bat! keeps trying to dowload deleted messages.
G'day Roelof, Friday, January 20, 2006, 6:57:33 PM, you wrote: Hallo Bob, Close TB and delete the account.m_r and account.m_d files matching with the problem account. When you're using OTFE the extensions are .emr and .emd I'm not sure whether this solves the problem so I'd appreciate some feedback, but unless you keep mail on the server (and you deleted everything) you don't really need them. Thanks MAU, Roelof and Maurice for your suggestions. I gave up in frustration last night (prior to your replies), shut the computer down and went to bed. This morning on re-booting The Bat! successfully downloaded all the messages (including the one with the very large attachment) that both my ISP web-mail interface and PocoMail had reported as already having been deleted from my account. I have no idea how or what happened, but it is now resolved. I have politely suggested to my friend that I would prefer not to receive his large mass mailings in future. Sorry Roelof that I can't be the guinea-pig to test the effects of deleting the account.m-r and account.m-d files :-) . -- Bob Mo®®is Saturday, 21 January 2006 Using The Bat! PRO v3.65.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
