On Wednesday, December 13, 2006, 0:55:22, Mica Mijatovic wrote:
Yes, they do that too, and in various ways. Basically, the entire
administration can be (and indeed is, by more advanced, demanding,
weird users) divided into much more specialized sectors, and perhaps
best example is the quite
Hallo Jernej,
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:08:51 +0100GMT (13-12-2006, 10:08 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
JS Modern Linux distributions let you do as you please. For a typical home
moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to,
Hello Gerrit,
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GK No problem at all. I offered you a hack. Surely the way I go about
GK this is not the recommended way for any normal installation. It gives
GK you the possibility to reinstall Voyager on the USB stick even after
GK you
Today I posted a message in comp.lang.php about a php form question. It had to
do with how mail client like TB or OE react to my form.
To my horror and surprise, the first respons I got mentioned this:
Beware: TheBat! is well-known as a spammer's mailer (even if the
spammers just fake headers
Dear A,
@14-Dec-2006, 00:36 +0100 (13-Dec 23:36 here) A.Translator [AT] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
... snip
AT Beware: TheBat! is well-known as a spammer's mailer (even if the
AT spammers just fake headers from TheBat!) and it's often blocked.
... snip
AT How do we fight the negative
Dear all,
How do we fight the negative image?
What is the best response?
I'm new to this list, but let me give my opinion anyway. The first thing I
would do is improve the communication with my user base - it seems to take one
month on the average until the developers of The Bat! actually
Hallo Loek,
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:54:26 +0100GMT (14-12-2006, 0:54 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
LVK I'm new to this list,
Welcome. However, you're message is breaking a list rule, hence thos
reply.
moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the
Hello,
I notice that when new replies come into a thread, The Bat doesn't
automatically push the entire thread to the top. This is so even when
I sort messages according to Received time.
This behaviour is typical if you use the gmail webinterface. It is
very useful because not only you can see
Sorry,
Test
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Dear Roelof,
Please include a signature delimiter in your messages. This consists
of a dashdashspacereturn, i.e., a '-- ' by itself on a line.
This allows your readers, when replying, to quote your text without
the signature and list footers since everything below and including
the sig
Hello Baphomet,
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry, no sig delimiter!
--
Regards,
Richard
| The Bat! 3.86.10 beta with POP3 account AntispamSniper 1.7.0.8
| Windows XP (build 2600) version 5.1 Service Pack 2
| F-Prot AV, Outpost Firewall Pro, Spysweeper, Adaware,
Hello Kelvin,
Wednesday, December 13, 2006, 8:20:58 PM, you wrote:
snip
I notice that when new replies come into a thread, The Bat doesn't
automatically push the entire thread to the top. This is so even when
I sort messages according to Received time.
snip
You can change your default
12 matches
Mail list logo