Hello Peter,
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 you wrote in
PO> 'localhost' is the computer you were working on at that time
PO> '127.0.0.1' is the same as 'localhost'
PO> Both are not likely to be valid as account or server, unless you
PO> created such a setup yourself.
I didn't set it up but that is, beli
Hello Roelof,
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 you wrote in
RO> Kill spamkiller when you're using Voyager on your dad's system.
I've actually uninstalled it as my Dad doesn't use his PC a great deal
and knows nothing about them so, when something goes even slightly
wrong, he's flummoxed and it's difficult a
Hello Alexander,
Tuesday, December 26, 2006, 3:49:31 PM, you wrote:
ASK> Hello Tony & everyone else,
ASK> on 26-Dez-2006 at 14:43 you (Tony) wrote:
>> Disabling the eye-candy is the 1st thing I do for sure.
ASK> I don't know about Vista, but dis/-enabling "eye candy" in XP has no
ASK> effect o
Hello Tony & everyone else,
on 26-Dez-2006 at 14:43 you (Tony) wrote:
> Disabling the eye-candy is the 1st thing I do for sure.
I don't know about Vista, but dis/-enabling "eye candy" in XP has no
effect on the performance. When you disable menu fading and menu delay,
window zooming etc. things
Hello Alexander,
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 you wrote in
ASK> 1. you can't send with Voyager and
ASK> 2. your dad can't connect using OE.
ASK> Is that correct?
Indeed it is. I used to be able to send with no problems but the last
two times I've been up (and since he upgraded his McAfee) I haven't b
Hello Jernej,
JS> Some time ago (very soon after Vista RTM was released to MSDN subscribers),
JS> a few people I know compared Vista with XP on a 1GHz Via C3 system. With all
JS> effects disabled, Vista still needed 30% CPU when *idle*, compared to XP,
JS> which needed 2-5%..
Don't get me wrong.
On Monday, December 25, 2006, 23:49:41, Tony wrote:
> My problems where mainly with commercial software. Maybe the software
> itself worked but things crashed due to anti-piracy measures.
> (hardware keys/dongles etc)
Hardware dongles are something else, and I can easily imagine that they
don't w
Hallo Costas,
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 12:51:23 +0200GMT (26-12-2006, 11:51 , where I
live), you wrote:
CP> By the way, with the other duplicate email addresses, the nicknames
CP> appear inconsistently in the email messages, that is for some group
CP> members the nickname is the correct one
Hallo BJH,
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 10:58:10 +GMT (26-12-2006, 11:58 , where I
live), you wrote:
B> With regard to duplicate email addresses.
B> I have a customer who uses his Secretary's email address so that all
B> emails to him are filtered by her.
B> I sometimes need to email her individual
Hello Barry & everyone else,
on 26-Dez-2006 at 11:58 you (Barry) wrote:
> I take it that this causes problems in TB!?
Depends on what you're doing. If you're using two different templates
for the boss and the secretary, yes. How should TB determine which email
address belongs to whom when you're
Roelof Otten wrote:
That's duplicate enough to cause problems.
With regard to duplicate email addresses.
I have a customer who uses his Secretary's email address so that all
emails to him are filtered by her.
I sometimes need to email her individually so I have two address book
entries fo
Hello Roelof,
Tuesday, December 26, 2006, 12:28:42 PM, you wrote (possibly edited):
> On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 08:42:16 +0200GMT (26-12-2006, 7:42 , where I
> live), you wrote:
CP>> it's true that I have
CP>> duplicate entries in my Addressbook, if one counts as duplicates those
CP>> entries that ha
Hallo Costas,
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 08:42:16 +0200GMT (26-12-2006, 7:42 , where I
live), you wrote:
CP> Regarding the possible causes of the error, it's true that I have
CP> duplicate entries in my Addressbook, if one counts as duplicates those
CP> entries that have the same email address, bu
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED] & everyone else,
on 25-Dez-2006 at 19:28 you ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'm using Voyager up at my Dad's house and am having problems. Whatever
> I set I can't send, only receive. I have to send via Mail2web. My Dad's
> PC has McAfee security centre and he gets the follo
Hi,
,- - [ Le lundi 25 décembre 2006 vers 21:28 Jernej Simonèiè écrivait: ] - -
|
>> Sorry but i need those logs for archival purpose. I know i can send them
>> as attachements, but it's easier for me like that, it's why i use TheBat!,
>> wich is able to handle those kind of mails, even if it us
15 matches
Mail list logo
