Re: Quarantine folder

2007-01-02 Thread tbudl

JK I'm using the AVG anti-virus plug-in, and it creates the Quarantine folder
JK only when an infection is detected.

That explains it! I too have AVG and noticed that some, though not all accounts 
had a quarantine folder. 
I could understand it if all or none had the folder, but could not work out the 
criteria that explained why some existed and others didn't. Creating them 
onlyif infection is found explains it.

Trevor

Current version is 3.95.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Quarantine folder

2007-01-02 Thread Jack S. LaRosa
Hello Jim,

Monday, January 1, 2007, 6:46:04 PM, you wrote:

JK I'm using the AVG anti-virus plug-in, and it creates the Quarantine folder
JK only when an infection is detected. I can delete the folder and it will
JK stay gone until another baddie shows up.

I too am using the AVG anti-virus. Thanks for solving the mystery. My
wife and I playfully refer to ourselves as 'geezers' but I was
beginning to think senility had finally arrived.

-- 

Best regards,
 Jackmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Now running TB! v3.95.6 from
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 - Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.95.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Quarantine folder

2007-01-02 Thread Jack S. LaRosa
Hello Roelof,

Monday, January 1, 2007, 6:17:50 PM, you wrote:

RO Hallo Jack,

RO On Mon, 1 Jan 2007 17:22:21 -0600GMT (2-1-2007, 0:22 , where I live),
RO you wrote:

JSL My question rather concerned the fact that neither I nor my
JSL wife ever remembers seeing a quarantine folder. It struck me as odd
JSL that we both should have noticed it within days of each other. My
JSL impression is that it appeared when neither of us was looking. Did TB!
JSL somehow create it?

RO It's very likely that TB created it. It's one of TB's system folders,
RO though I just created a new account (to test this) and the new account
RO didn't contain a quarantine folder, I don't know what triggered its
RO creation at your side.

Thank you for replying Roelof. As you can probably see, others have
responded with what appears to be the explanation as I too use AVG
Free edition anti-virus.

-- 

Best regards,
 Jackmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Now running TB! v3.95.6 from
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 - Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.95.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Organizing Filters

2007-01-02 Thread MFPA
Hi

On Thursday 28 December 2006 at 7:08:49 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], MAU wrote:

 Assume you have several filter with a common condition, for
 example:

 If A and B
 If A and C
 If A and D
 If A and E
 ...

 You can convert those to 1 filter and several sub-filters like
 this:

 If A
If B
If C
If D
If E
...

 The advantage (aside of clarity) is that sub-filters for
 conditions B, C, D, E... will not be checked at all unless the
 If A filter triggers (condition A met) first.

(Using v3.80.06) I have a (recently-created) subfilter that is
misbehaving in that it is triggered regardless of whether the
condition for its parent is met.

These filters relate to emails from a magazine publisher.

The parent is if sender contains any of (the domains they send
emails from) move to a certain folder.

I pay for a magazine subscription for my sister and keep
correspondence relating to the subscription in a subfolder called
subscription. This is only 4 or 5 emails per year and I have
previously moved them manually to the subscription subfolder.
When I received one today I decided to automate the process with a
subfilter:-

If subject contains 'subscription' move to the 'subscription'
subfolder.

I forwarded the subscription confirmation to my sister and found
her reply filtered to the subscription subfolder. I tested
filters and this confirmed the subfilter was being triggered. I
sent myself an empty email with the subject subscription and the
subfilter was triggered by that too.

Any ideas?
-- 
Best regards,
 
MFPA

Don't learn safety rules by accident... 

Using The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 3.95.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Organizing Filters

2007-01-02 Thread George Mitchell
MFPA wrote:

M (Using v3.80.06) I have a (recently-created) subfilter that is
M misbehaving in that it is triggered regardless of whether the
M condition for its parent is met.

M Any ideas?

Is it a common filter?  I'm pretty sure this bug isn't fixed yet:

https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4021

-- 
George

Using The Bat! 3.95.2 on Windows XP Pro, Service Pack 2.



Current version is 3.95.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Question about Voyager

2007-01-02 Thread Mike Greenbaum
I'm a bit puzzled about Voyager. 

Does one buy it separately or does it come automatically with The Bat! 
Professional?

I'm currently using 2.01.3 Business Edition and am thinking of taking advantage 
of the Christmas sale to upgrade, but I'm not sure whether Voyager is sold 
separately or as part of Professional.

Thanks for any clarification.

-- 
Mike



Current version is 3.95.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Question about Voyager

2007-01-02 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Mike Greenbaum  everyone else,

on 03-Jan-2007 at 06:34 you (Mike Greenbaum) wrote:

 I'm a bit puzzled about Voyager. 

 Does one buy it separately or does it come automatically with The Bat!
 Professional?

Its a part of the Pro license.

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de)

I'm just a collection of mirrors, reflecting what everyone else
expects of me. -- Rollo May



Current version is 3.95.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html