Re: WARNING: there were no compatible authentication protocols
Hello Deboo, Here's a graphic of the smtp settings I have http://www.rootshell.be/~crashd/smtpauth.jpg Please check. The exact error I get is WARNING: there were no compatible authentication mechanisms detected. If I recall correctly, you also had problems with your Gmail account. These are the setting I use for mine and I never had a problem: http://www.rancho-k.com/TB/Gmail_conf.jpg Also, in the fastmail account in your dump, why do you have TLS set for POP but not for SMTP? -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.98.6 Current version is 3.98.04 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Old Messages
Hello Roelof, Thursday, March 22, 2007, 10:47:30 PM, you wrote: RO When you check at the server, are they really deleted? How come you always (well, almost always) ask the right question. No they really weren't deleted on the server. They are now and then I get to see if it continues happening. Thanks. -- Best regards, Richardmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === Using The Bat! v3.98.6 on Windows XP5 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.98.04 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Old Messages
Hallo Richard, On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 10:18:12 -0400GMT (23-3-2007, 15:18 +0100, where I live), you wrote: RO When you check at the server, are they really deleted? RN How come you always (well, almost always) ask the right question. Actually I started to ask whether there were a lot of bat.tmp files, but then I switched into 'let's not blame TB mode' :-) So I blamed the server. -- Groetjes, Roelof Blessed are the pessimistic, for they hath made backups. http://www.voormijalleen.nl/ The Bat! 3.98.6 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgp6DMr4XyzFp.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.98.04 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Old Messages
Hello Roelof, Friday, March 23, 2007, 12:25:22 PM, you wrote: RO Actually I started to ask whether there were a lot of bat.tmp Actually none. RO So I blamed the server. I blamed TB because another installation of TB was behaving differently downloading the same messages from the server. Thought I was missing a TB setting . . . time will tell. Thanks again. -- Best regards, Richardmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === Using The Bat! v3.98.6 on Windows XP5 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.98.04 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: WARNING: there were no compatible authentication protocols
Deboo @ 2007-3-23 1:02:35 AM WARNING: there were no compatible authentication protocols mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Here's a graphic of the smtp settings I have http://www.rootshell.be/~crashd/smtpauth.jpg Those don't seem to match the documentation at: http://www.fastmail.fm/docs/faqparts/ExternalMail.htm#ServerDetails Specifically, they suggest using port 587 with TLS for SMTP. -- Chris Using The Bat! v3.98.4 on Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6000. Accessing a POP3 mailbox. How can you tell when sour cream goes bad? pgpycQFj3y2pL.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.98.04 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
filter incoming mails according to what time they were created
Hello Everyone, for statistical purposes I would like to filter incoming mails of a specific account by the time they were created. My intention is to have one filter for all emails I receive that were created between 08.00AM and 05.00 pm. Similar filters for 5.00pm to midnight and midnight to 08.00AM. I looked a the source code of incoming email and tried to find the information required. I am not sure which line has the right information and get confused by the fact that there may be an adjustment to my time zone or GMT. In most emails it appears that the line Date underneath subject shows the right time and if the adjustment (+11.00) is identical to my own, than the time is correct. In other cases it appears as -7.00 and looking at other data, the correct time would be deducting 7 hours from the time shown. Could someone please explain this to me and provide some guidance as to how I best write a filter? I suppose some regEx can do this but that's beyond me. I don't think I could do this with the easy conditions offered under filters? -- Best regards, Tom using TheBat! 3.98.4 on XP Current version is 3.98.04 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: WARNING: there were no compatible authentication protocols
Hello Chris, Saturday, March 24, 2007, 9:27:41 AM, you wrote: Deboo @ 2007-3-23 1:02:35 AM WARNING: there were no compatible authentication protocols mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Here's a graphic of the smtp settings I have http://www.rootshell.be/~crashd/smtpauth.jpg Those don't seem to match the documentation at: http://www.fastmail.fm/docs/faqparts/ExternalMail.htm#ServerDetails Specifically, they suggest using port 587 with TLS for SMTP. Yesterday after getting MAU's reply, I went to the smtp settings again, tried to send a mail using the FM account again and the server gave a different error than the warning message it gave previously. It was some temporary deferral error. I tried again later and same error. Then last night, after googling about the warning message problem, I read someone saying it's due to checking the Perform RFC 2554 authentication in SMTP settings. So I just tested with removing that check mark as well as the require secure authentication. The server gave the normal authentication required error. I checked the Perform SMTP authentication again and the message went thru without anyu problem. I did not change anything at all. What happened? I had tried all this and all possible SMTP settings last 3 weeks and never was able to send and now the message went as if nothing had happened. Strange thing. What was the problem and how did it get solved automatically? Even on this page someone said that this problem went away automatically: http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forum/read.php?FID=4TID=4026MID=15532phrase_id=120292 -- Best regards, Deboo Current version is 3.98.04 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
