Re: Bug in 3.99.24
Hello all, Monday, September 17, 2007, Tim Hamm wrote: > Lately, I have been having issues with TB retrieving e-mail. I can > retrieve e-mail from Outlook Express but not from TB. This has > to be some kind of bug in Version 3.99.24. Other versions of TB I > have not had this issue. if You open Log window (Ctrl+Shift+A), what error is there? Did not You activated unsupported authentication for example? -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 3.99.24 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 with MyMacros,XMP,AnotherMacros, NOD32 Antivirus plugin and AntispamSniper v 2.6.1.2 Notebook Toshiba, Core2 Duo 1.83 GHz, 1 GB RAM Current version is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Sub Filters: can I create 'filter groups'?
Hello Roelof, On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:08:12 +0200 your time, you said: RO> The latter is why I love filtering on AB groups, though my groups are RO> collected in group related folders. Thanks again for your help on this. I eventually plumped for: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and checked 'automatically create if necessary and it is working a treat. Folders are automatically created when someone from the address book list group contacts me. Man alive, I've been doing the long way around up until now. What a time saver! -- Slán, SI{mon} * W2K Pro SP5 + TB! 3.99.24 Current version is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Bug in 3.99.24
Hello TBUDL, Lately, I have been having issues with TB retrieving e-mail. I can retrieve e-mail from Outlook Express but not from TB. This has to be some kind of bug in Version 3.99.24. Other versions of TB I have not had this issue. -- Best regards, Tim mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
TB! Version 3.99.3
Hello TBUDL: I have noticed that most people on this list seem to be using TB! version 3.99.2x or below, and not 3.99.3. Did I miss something? Is 3.99.3 not a particularly stable release? Okay, I've had this release of TB! bottom out me a few times, annoyingly wiping out account folders, but after a lot of poncing about I did eventually recover them lurking within the email base. Oh, and there's also a particularly strange issue when a notepad replacement I use called Metapad is open at the same time as the Sorting Office. Selecting text in Metapad and copying it whilst the Sorting Office is open will TB! crash every time. Of course to get around this I use my main text editor, Notetab, instead, so no big deal for me. But apart from that, everything else seems hunky dory so far. But should I be at all concerned about anything else? -- Slán, SI{mon} * W2K Pro SP5 + TB! PE 3.99.3 Current version is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB! Version 3.99.3
Hello Simon, I was running the same version as you prior to 3.99.24. It was available from TB's website at one time but there must have been issues with this release and is no longer available. -- Best regards, Timmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Monday, September 17, 2007, 11:44:09 AM, you wrote: > Hello TBUDL: > I have noticed that most people on this list seem to be using TB! version > 3.99.2x or below, and not 3.99.3. Did I miss something? Is 3.99.3 not a > particularly stable release? > Okay, I've had this release of TB! bottom out me a few times, annoyingly > wiping out account folders, but after a lot of poncing about I did > eventually recover them lurking within the email base. > Oh, and there's also a particularly strange issue when a notepad > replacement I use called Metapad is open at the same time as the Sorting > Office. Selecting text in Metapad and copying it whilst the Sorting Office > is open will TB! crash every time. Of course to get around this I use my > main text editor, Notetab, instead, so no big deal for me. > But apart from that, everything else seems hunky dory so far. But > should I be at all concerned about anything else? Current version is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB! Version 3.99.3
The Janitor, On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 20:42:06 +0100 your time, you said: S>> Yup! Indeed, I 'mistakenly' did, to split an infinitive also. TJ> No, you didn't :-) Yes, caught! Well you know you are correct of course. Don't know what I was thinking actually. Well I do, because I intended to properly split one. ;-) -- Slán, SI{mon} * W2K Pro SP5 + TB! 3.99.24 Current version is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Bug in 3.99.24
Hello all, Monday, September 17, 2007, Tim Hamm wrote: > I am using antispamservant.tbp not antispsniper are you saying these > are the same? sorry, You have right, my mistake, they have similar name... remove AntispamServant and check if they released new version. > Also, I noticed you are using the NOD32 anti-virus plug-in. I have > NOD32 but where did you get the plug-in? I went to Preferences under > Anti-virus and I see no plug-in. try this latest build, it is placed in beta directory, but works without problems for year: http://www.thebat.cz/stazeni/beta/nod32.rar (50kB) -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 3.99.24 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 with MyMacros,XMP,AnotherMacros, NOD32 Antivirus plugin and AntispamSniper v 2.6.1.2 Notebook Toshiba, Core2 Duo 1.83 GHz, 1 GB RAM Current version is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB! Version 3.99.3
Hello Mark, On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 20:58:11 +0200 your time, you said: MP> I think you mistakenly consider .3 to be the same as .30 and thus a more MP> recent version than .24... Yup! Indeed, I 'mistakenly' did, to split an infinitive also. MP> Perhaps you would have expected 3.99.3 to be named 3.99.03? Yes, you're correct, I would have expected that. MP> If it is of any consolation: you're not the only one to be 'deceived'! MP> :-) Well no, it is no consolation really, but I have been enlightened, for which I grateful :-) -- Slán, SI{mon} * W2K Pro SP5 + TB! 3.99.3 Current version is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB! Version 3.99.3
Hello Tim, On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 12:00:43 -0700 your time, you said: TH> I was running the same version as you prior to 3.99.24. It was TH> available from TB's website at one time but there must have been TH> issues with this release and is no longer available. Thanks for the pointer. :-) I was relying on the 'Check For Update' menu option to work under TB! quite honestly. So when the 'no updates available box' appeared I assumed that was the case. Upon checking the website I find as you have said, that there is, in fact, an update. I shall download now. Thanks. -- Slán, SI{mon} * W2K Pro SP5 + TB! PE 3.99.3 Current version is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: TB! Version 3.99.3
17 September 2007 - 20:40 Hello Simon, Monday, September 17, 2007, 8:08:58 PM, you wrote: S> Yup! Indeed, I 'mistakenly' did, to split an infinitive also. No, you didn't :-) -- Best regards, William Flying with The Bat! Professional version 3.99.3 Current version is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Bug in 3.99.24
Hello all, Monday, September 17, 2007, Tim Hamm wrote: > FYI, This is a message I just received from NOD32 Tech Support. The > English is not very good but I get the point. > "This is not a plug-in made it by ESET and is not installed > automatically with NOD32. this is right, plugin is created by Ritlabs, Eset has other priorities and I was unable to force them to do it. > You don't need this plug-in, IMON and AMON will be protecting > constantly your The Bat accounts without needing any further > configuration." 1) if You will use SSL/TLS for encrypting communication, other app like NOD32 will be unable to check data You are sending/receiving 2) IMON/AMON and other "proxy" app can't check attachments stored in encrypted S/MIME or PGP messages, TB will check them via plugin, when You receive such message and decrypt 3) if will be message devided to more parts and sent to rescipient, such "proxy" will check every mail separately -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 3.99.24 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 with MyMacros,XMP,AnotherMacros, NOD32 Antivirus plugin and AntispamSniper v 2.6.1.2 Notebook Toshiba, Core2 Duo 1.83 GHz, 1 GB RAM Current version is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB! Version 3.99.3
Hello Simon, Monday, September 17, 2007, 8:44:09 PM, you wrote: S> I have noticed that most people on this list seem to be using TB! version S> 3.99.2x or below, and not 3.99.3. Did I miss something? Is 3.99.3 not a S> particularly stable release? I think you mistakenly consider .3 to be the same as .30 and thus a more recent version than .24... Perhaps you would have expected 3.99.3 to be named 3.99.03? If it is of any consolation: you're not the only one to be 'deceived'! :-) -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 3.99.24 Current version is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Bug in 3.99.24
Hello Marek, I removed the AntiSpamServant and TB is now retrieving e-mail. Must be a bug in AntiSpamServant. I will have to inform them of this. FYI, This is a message I just received from NOD32 Tech Support. The English is not very good but I get the point. "This is not a plug-in made it by ESET and is not installed automatically with NOD32. You don't need this plug-in, IMON and AMON will be protecting constantly your The Bat accounts without needing any further configuration." -- Best regards, Timmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Monday, September 17, 2007, 11:43:44 AM, you wrote: > Hello all, > Monday, September 17, 2007, Tim Hamm wrote: >> I am using antispamservant.tbp not antispsniper are you saying these >> are the same? > sorry, You have right, my mistake, they have similar name... > remove AntispamServant and check if they released new version. >> Also, I noticed you are using the NOD32 anti-virus plug-in. I have >> NOD32 but where did you get the plug-in? I went to Preferences under >> Anti-virus and I see no plug-in. > try this latest build, it is placed in beta directory, but works without > problems for year: > http://www.thebat.cz/stazeni/beta/nod32.rar (50kB) Current version is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Bug in 3.99.24
Hi Marek, on Mon, 17 Sep 2007 20:33:11 +0200GMT (17.09.2007, 20:33 +0200GMT here), you wrote: MM> Monday, September 17, 2007, Tim Hamm wrote: >> !9/17/2007, 10:50:42: FETCH - Access violation at address 100053CB in >> module 'antispamservant.tbp'. Read of address ^^^ You didn't read carefully! ;-) But I agree with you that removing the plugin should solve the problem. -- Cheers Peter The three most dangerous things are a programmer with a soldering iron, a manager who codes, and a user who gets ideas. Current version is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Bug in 3.99.24
Hello Marek, I am using antispamservant.tbp not antispsniper are you saying these are the same? Also, I noticed you are using the NOD32 anti-virus plug-in. I have NOD32 but where did you get the plug-in? I went to Preferences under Anti-virus and I see no plug-in. -- Best regards, Timmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Monday, September 17, 2007, 11:33:11 AM, you wrote: > Hello all, > Monday, September 17, 2007, Tim Hamm wrote: >> !9/17/2007, 10:50:42: FETCH - Access violation at address 100053CB in >> module 'antispamservant.tbp'. Read of address >> > remove AntispSniper plugin first, receiving will work I think. > Then check if You have latest version of AntispamSniper, I am using 2.6.1.2 > and have no AV here. Current version is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Bug in 3.99.24
Hello all, Monday, September 17, 2007, Tim Hamm wrote: > !9/17/2007, 10:50:42: FETCH - Access violation at address 100053CB in > module 'antispamservant.tbp'. Read of address > remove AntispSniper plugin first, receiving will work I think. Then check if You have latest version of AntispamSniper, I am using 2.6.1.2 and have no AV here. -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 3.99.24 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 with MyMacros,XMP,AnotherMacros, NOD32 Antivirus plugin and AntispamSniper v 2.6.1.2 Notebook Toshiba, Core2 Duo 1.83 GHz, 1 GB RAM Current version is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Bug in 3.99.24
Hello Marek, !9/17/2007, 10:50:42: FETCH - Access violation at address 100053CB in module 'antispamservant.tbp'. Read of address -- Best regards, Timmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Monday, September 17, 2007, 11:23:46 AM, you wrote: > Hello all, > Monday, September 17, 2007, Tim Hamm wrote: >> Lately, I have been having issues with TB retrieving e-mail. I can >> retrieve e-mail from Outlook Express but not from TB. This has >> to be some kind of bug in Version 3.99.24. Other versions of TB I >> have not had this issue. > if You open Log window (Ctrl+Shift+A), what error is there? Did not You > activated unsupported authentication for example? Current version is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Exception in newest version
Hello Harald, (Indeed easier to pronounce ;-)) On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 22:10:37 +0200 GMT (17/09/2007, 03:10 +0700 GMT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rgd> Well, as I do not see any other solution to get rid off this Rgd> annoying exception, I think I will have to go for an older Rgd> version - unless any other of you specialists does have any Rgd> idea/solution. Since nobody seems to be able to reproduce the problem, this is what I'd recommend. -- Cheers, Thomas. Things You Would Never Know Without the Movies: It doesn't matter if you are heavily outnumbered in a fight involving martial arts - your enemies will wait patiently to attack you one by one by dancing around in a threatening manner until you have knocked them out. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 3.99.3 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
recover deleted message?
Hello List, I have a problem with a mail that was deleted by mistake. The account is an IMAP account and the deletion setting is "Mark as deleted". The problem is, the bat! doesn't seem to use the imap "delete" flag, because i can't find the deleted mail on the imap server at all. "browse deleted messages" doesn't show anything either. oh, and it's not in the Trash folder. Any chance? regards, johannes -- Best Regards, Johannes Rußek Linux/UNIX Administration win.rar GmbH Unser Lieben Frauen Kirchhof 10 28195 Bremen Germany www.win-rar.com(website) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (e-mail) +49 421 63939-0 (tel Zentrale) +49 421 63939-99 (fax) win.rar GmbH Bremen |HR B-Nr. 22804 Management: Öncül Kaya, Burak Canboy |Amtsgericht Bremen Current version is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html