Re: Problem with Certain Characters in Mail

On Thu 7-Feb-08 11:19pm -0600, John Phillips wrote: On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, at 22:34:38 [GMT -0600] (15:34:38 08/02/2008 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: Both cases have character translations - for example I see several =20 sequences which are not in the sent mail. Is this in received

Re: Backup Query

Hallo Tom, On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 17:41:59 +1100GMT (8-2-2008, 7:41 +0100, where I live), you wrote: T I never used the ..tbk file to restore and I am just curious what the T difference is between backing up via ...tbk file or via saving the T mail directory? Any advantages or disadvantage of one

No way to purge unread messages in common folder

Hello, My Gmail account pulls in messages for the beta list for TheBat! Message count is over 5,000 and I have it set to keep *only* 300 messages. The messages are sorted and placed in a common folder: Lists TheBat! Beta The folder settings for Beta are set to Max stored messages =

Best 3.x Version?

Hello Tbudl, Sorry, if I used the wrong keywords to search the forum...I just did not find any relevant posts: As I am currently not brave enough (and neither have the time nor the need to upgrade to 4.x) I would simply like to install the latest and best 3.x version and live happily with it for

Re: No way to purge unread messages in common folder

Hallo Doug, On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 09:26:07 +GMT (8-2-2008, 10:26 +0100, where I live), you wrote: DH The folder settings for Beta are set to Max stored messages = 300, and I even tried DH max keep messages = 30 days. But nothing will get rid of them if they are unread. For DH my Gmail

Upgraded text editor in TB4: new paragraph handling or is it just the same?

|Upgraded Text Editor |The MicroEd text editor is improved. Now it supports Unicode and all |the available system fonts. You have the possibility to use different |fonts for different elements of the message and benefit of the system-wide |drag-and-drop option. We also added the Redo function

Re: Backup Query

Friday, February 8, 2008, 7:42:26 PM, you wrote: T I never used the ..tbk file to restore and I am just curious what the T difference is between backing up via ...tbk file or via saving the T mail directory? Any advantages or disadvantage of one over the other? Disadvantage is that you can

Re: Upgraded text editor in TB4: new paragraph handling or is it just the same?

Hi Luca, Friday, February 8, 2008, 11:01:20 AM, you wrote: |Upgraded Text Editor |The MicroEd text editor is improved. Now it supports Unicode and all |the available system fonts. You have the possibility to use different |fonts for different elements of the message and benefit of the

Re: Backup Query

Hallo Tom, On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 23:00:45 +1100GMT (8-2-2008, 13:00 +0100, where I live), you wrote: T On the other hand, you say that if i were to put my mail T directory on a separate drive when doing a new installation, an import T via tbk would fail? Yes. Unless it has been changed and I

Re: Backup Query

Friday, February 8, 2008, 11:13:18 PM, you wrote: Hallo Tom, On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 23:00:45 +1100GMT (8-2-2008, 13:00 +0100, where I live), you wrote: T On the other hand, you say that if i were to put my mail T directory on a separate drive when doing a new installation, an import T via tbk

Re: Best 3.x Version?

Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED], Friday, February 8, 2008, 3:51:52 AM, you wrote: MS Hello Tbudl, MS Sorry, if I used the wrong keywords to search the forum...I just did MS not find any relevant posts: MS As I am currently not brave enough (and neither have the time nor the MS need to upgrade to 4.x)

Re: Best 3.x Version?

Hi On Friday 8 February 2008 at 11:51:52 AM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Martin Schuster wrote: As I am currently not brave enough (and neither have the time nor the need to upgrade to 4.x) I would simply like to install the latest and best 3.x version and live happily with it for the next

Re: Best 3.x Version?

On Friday 8 februari 2008, 12:51 Martin Schuster wrote: I would simply like to install the latest and best 3.x version and live happily with it for the next years. Any opinions on which one to use? Which version proofed to contain the least number of bugs? I would say v3.98.4. That one is

Re: Best 3.x Version?

Friday, February 8, 2008, 10:51:52 PM, you wrote: As I am currently not brave enough (and neither have the time nor the need to upgrade to 4.x) I would simply like to install the latest and best 3.x version and live happily with it for the next years. Any opinions on which one to use? Which

Re: Best 3.x Version?

On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 at 12:51:52 +0100, Martin wrote: Hello Tbudl, As I am currently not brave enough (and neither have the time nor the need to upgrade to 4.x) I would simply like to install the latest and best 3.x version and live happily with it for the next years. I found 3.99.29 to be

What's with the version 4 updates?

Batfolk, I started this morning installing version 4.0.0.2, and now I have just downloaded and installed 4.0.11, going via 4.0.7 and 4.0.9 on the way. Anyone know what the updates have been about? Robin -- Robin Using The Bat! v4.0.11 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2

Re[2]: Best 3.x Version?

Hello Tom, Saturday, February 9, 2008, 8:31:35 AM, you wrote: Have not had any problems with 3.99.29 The *one* grouse I had with 3.99.29 was the compose message window where on attaching files I could not see the panel on the left that showed attach files. The promised they would fix it in

Re: What's with the version 4 updates?

On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, at 15:30:54 [GMT +1100] (which was 5:30 where I live) Robin Anson wrote: Batfolk, I started this morning installing version 4.0.0.2, and now I have just downloaded and installed 4.0.11, going via 4.0.7 and 4.0.9 on the way. Anyone know what the updates have been about?