Re: Mod: Top posting (was: Best 3.x Version?)
Hello Marck, Saturday, February 23, 2008, 1:52:45 PM, you wrote: MDP> Dear Scott, MDP> @23-Feb-2008, 13:28 -0600 (23-Feb 19:28 here) Scott [S] in MDP> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to MAU: S>> Does v4 fix the issue where if you get an email addressed to MDP> ... S>> Tuesday, February 12, 2008, 9:00:23 AM, you wrote: >>> Hello Alto, MDP> MDP> Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not MDP> just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have MDP> instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Scott. MDP> )<)))'> MDP> This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting. MDP> Top posting, i.e., typing all your reply text at the top of your MDP> message and following it with all quoted text below, is not MDP> encouraged and we actually request that you not do so on this list MDP> because MDP> a) It makes it difficult to glean context from what you typed at the MDP>top of the message MDP> and MDP> b) It encourages excessive quoting. MDP> We would much prefer if you quote just that much of the message to MDP> which you're replying, so we know what it is you're referring to, MDP> and then below the quotation, type your response. If you're MDP> responding to more than one part of the original, then quote each MDP> part separately and follow each part with your response. MDP> Now, I know that you may not personally prefer this format and that MDP> you may disagree with some of the reasoning here. We very much MDP> respect this. However, this is the format that most of the active MDP> members here prefer and all members are expected, and are being MDP> asked to use the format that will make most of the active membership MDP> here comfortable reading. You'll likely get a more responsive group MDP> when you post using a style that is comfortable for them to read and MDP> understand. MDP> To find out why these MOD messages are posted to the list instead of MDP> private mail, please read the welcome message you received when you MDP> subscribed. MDP> Thank you. MDP> Testing the default template being put back -- Best regards, Using The Bat! v3.99.3 on Windows XP 5 Current version is 4.0.14.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Best 3.x Version?
Does v4 fix the issue where if you get an email addressed to multiple people (everyone on my sports team) and you want to save the list of people, highlighting the TO or CC field with all the names, right click --> add to address book and you only add the 1st name in the list? This broke somewhere in v3 because it used to go thru and bring up a card for everyone so I could add them and make tweaks as I go. Tuesday, February 12, 2008, 9:00:23 AM, you wrote: > Hello Alto, >> So I stopped fiddling with the awkward system and rather reported to >> the mailing list. Developers are reading there, and they can't fail to >> notice the report. If they want to "manage" it further, they can do >> so themselves. > Whether awkard or not, the BT works and gets attention from the > developers. Have you taken a look lately to see how many bugs have been > resolved and closed? The closed ones are not displayed by default, you > have to change the "filter". >>> If you did, it would be good if you post the links to them. >> You want me to make the effort twice? Either the list or the tracker. >> And since the tracker apparently doesn't get much attention, the list. > Well, posting the links helps others who may habe the same problem to > add confirmations notes. -- Using The Bat! v3.99.3 on Windows XP 5 Current version is 4.0.14.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
The Bat 4.x and PGP 9.x
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there, I have searched, so I'm sorry if I have missed this. However, I am trying to set up PGP Desktop 9.0.6 to work via the bat. Right now I have to use the tray icon. Is there any way around this? Thank you all you helpful tbudl folks! - -- Martin Moranommoran at telusplanet dot net Beaumont, Alberta http://www.telusplanet.net/public/ommoran/publickey.txt "When you're caffeinated, all is right with the world" PGP Public Key Fingerprint: CEF6 48D8 73FC 2A36 3287 FC20 CAEC 75D1 9C58 B861 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP Desktop 9.0.6 (Build 6060) Comment: Always use an envelope - encrypt your e-mail with PGP. iQA/AwUBR8BmD8rsddGcWLhhEQIkgQCgsSjfKVzwNZvHU/Her/kkvPB6JJYAn2Lu TG+AnzuuZ887Q186skTxTRss =tRWH -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 4.0.14.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Memory usage
Hello Tom, Friday, February 22, 2008, 12:37:51 PM, you wrote: > just wondering what your average memory usage is for your bat? I've got a realatively fresh install of The Bat! with 5 pop3 accounts that have about 3,400 messages and one imap account with about 2,200 messages. Right now it's been running for approximately 5 minutes and uses 20m of memory and 42m of VM. It's not doing much, though. > I never paid much attention to this but I recently noticed in task > manager something like 60,000-70,000 K and was a bit surprised. > Would that be normal on XP? I guess it depends on how much stuff there is in it. I recon if you have lots of complicated filters and a whole lot of mail comming in all the time it takes up more memory. And there might also be a difference between versions since you are using 3.99 and I'm not. -- Using The Bat! v4.0.14 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 4.0.14.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Memory usage
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, at 07:44:21 [GMT +0100] (which was 7:44 where I live) Peter Meyns wrote: > Hi Christopher, > on Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:09:46 -0600GMT (22.02.2008, 23:09 +0100GMT here), > you wrote: CW>> Peter Meyns @ 2008-2-22 1:41:52 PM CW>> "Memory usage" >>> Here it is >>> Virtual Memory: 75k >>> Physical Memory >>> Working Set: 42k >>> WS Private: 38k >>> Peak Working Set: 51k CW>> I assume those K's are actually M's. > Of course you are right. My mistake. Process Explorer? -- grtz, Henk M. de Bruijn __ The Bat! E-Mail System version 4.0.14.5 Pro on Windows XP SP2 AntispamSniper for the Bat! 2.7.1.5 Thawte notary, CAcert assurer, GSWoT introducer Gossamer Spider Web of Trust http://www.gswot.org pgpgrbnTJmcmW.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 4.0.14.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Memory usage
Bonjour Laura, 2/23/2008,10:19 AM,GMT,vous écriviez: (reply to message of Friday, February 22, 2008) Hi Tom, > just wondering what your average memory usage is for your bat? I > never paid much attention to this but I recently noticed in task > manager something like 60,000-70,000 K and was a bit surprised. > Would that be normal on XP? 72,880 K, my taskmanager says. -- Laura. www.ratje-toe.nl 2/23/2008,10:19 AM,GMT: My task manager on Windows XP 6,554K, perhaps it is because I run Window Washer prior to using the bat. -- Votre Ami, Virtualfrenchman Addresse pour Répondre: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 4.0.14.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Memory usage
(reply to message of Friday, February 22, 2008) Hi Tom, > just wondering what your average memory usage is for your bat? I > never paid much attention to this but I recently noticed in task > manager something like 60,000-70,000 K and was a bit surprised. > Would that be normal on XP? 72,880 K, my taskmanager says. -- Laura. www.ratje-toe.nl Current version is 4.0.14.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
