moving mail account from one user acct to another user acct

2008-09-16 Thread Achdut18
Hi, everyone, 

How does one move a mail account from one user to another?  Here are the 
details:

Let's say there are two users, A and B, on a computer, each with their own 
Windows account.  Each has administrator privileges and can access the other 
account.  User B has always had The Bat! running and has, say, five different 
mail accounts within The Bat!  User A had always used The Bat! by logging in to 
user B.  However, one week ago, a sixth, separate mail account was created for 
user A within User A's Windows account in a copy of The Bat! that was 
created within A Windows account.  Only that one mail account appears within 
that running of The Bat!  All other mail accounts, but not the newly created 
account for User A appear within the instance of The Bat! that runs within B's 
Windows account. After one week, user A decided that she would prefer to have 
her separate mail account as part of the list found on The Bat! running within 
B's Window account and no longer wishes to have that separate mail account 
running in The Bat! within her own Window's account.

What is the best way to move that account?  Can I move it from within Windows 
Explorer from one copy of The Bat! to another?  Is there a more elegant way?  
If trying to do this would create more problems, such as conflict errors, etc., 
I can just delete the account from The Bat! running in A's Window account and 
re-create it in The Bat! running within B's user account since there is only 
one mail message that would be lost, and the message is not critical. However, 
I would like to know if there is a more elegant method for future reference, as 
well.  Also, it would keep me from having to reset all of the account 
properties if I could do it more elegantly.

Thanks.

-- 
Avram Sacks

The Bat Home Edition ver. 4.0.18 on Windows XP Pro, SP2.

Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: One time encryption

2008-09-16 Thread Privateofcourse
Hello Jack,

This is what you said on Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:23:31 -0500 your time:

 Is there an easy way to encrypt the info so it can't be read if it's
 intercepted in transit and yet *can* be read by the recipient?

Mostly, any secure system would require that the receiving part had a
key/password to unlock the information that you send them.

There are many ways to do this:

Send a password protected WinRAR archive (or zip) and either phone them and
let them know the password or send them the password/unlock code in a
separate email.

Send them a password protected PDF file. Lots of software available for free
for that.

There is Steganos LockNote (free) which fits this role perfectly. Although
you'll have to rar or zip the bare exe file as it may not get delivered.

PGP / GnuPG, but that is dependent on the recipient already being familiar
with this form of encryption.

Anyhow, there are many ways, not just those above, but the requirement will
always be that the recipient has the password to unlock the information you
send them. Of course sending the password or unlock code by email is
insecure as well, but I would definitely prefer to do that than send my
details in an insecure email...and it's just not good practice to do that
IMO.

 Or am I worrying about nothing?

Certainly not. I think it is completely sensible to think about these things
and find solutions for them.


-- 
Simon (Privateofcourse)
#27836. Woe Wig End Rhos? ¶
 
 
 TB! 4.0.34  WinXP Pro Service Pack 3







Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: One time encryption

2008-09-16 Thread Nick Dutton
Hello Jack,

On Monday, September 15, 2008, you wrote:
JSL I need to send credit card info to a vendor in payment for a part yet
JSL to be shipped. Is there an easy way to encrypt the info so it can't be
JSL read if it's intercepted in transit and yet *can* be read by the
JSL recipient? Or am I worrying about nothing?

Some people, myself included, think that the anonymity offered by the
sheer scale of the Internet outweighs the risk of identifying your
message as interesting by including an easy to spot encryption
header or similar.  Some people allege that governments only filter
encrypted traffic, on the assumption that that's how terrorists are
communicating.  On that subject, I don't think that the government
needs to snoop my e-mail to get my CC details, or anything else for
that matter...

Once you turn over this stone, however, it's not long before you're
employing steganography and by the end of the week you'll be sleeping
under the bed with a gun!

Oh no, now you've got me started.  Sorry.



-- 

Nick | [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: One time encryption

2008-09-16 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Monday, September 15, 2008, 22:23:31, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:

 I need to send credit card info to a vendor in payment for a part yet
 to be shipped. Is there an easy way to encrypt the info so it can't be
 read if it's intercepted in transit and yet *can* be read by the
 recipient? Or am I worrying about nothing?

The safest way is to use a secure web form, if the vendor offers it
(and if they do, it's likely that the info you send them in any other
way will end up being entered to that webform by an employee anyway,
so you just increase the risk of the data being intercepted in-flight
by using other means of communication).

Before entering the data, ensure that the address starts with https,
and that there's a lock symbol near the titlebar (or in status bar,
depending on your browser). https and the lock icon signify that the
connection is encrypted, and that nobody will be able to read the
data, even if it's intercepted.

Note that listening in on phone conversations (and fax communications)
is much easier than intercepting even unencrypted communication over
the internet.

-- 
 Jernej Simončič  http://eternallybored.org/ 

The solution to a problem changes the problem.
   -- Peer's Law



Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: One time encryption

2008-09-16 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Tuesday, September 16, 2008, 13:19:26, Gunivortus Goos wrote:

 Note that listening in on phone conversations (and fax communications)
 is much easier than intercepting even unencrypted communication over
 the internet.
 Except for Skype's IP-phonecalls, I experienced, they're obviously encrypted.

I was referring to POTS (plain old telephone service), not IP
telephony (which is about as hard to tap into as other internet
communications; note that Skype's encryption isn't to be trusted).

-- 
 Jernej Simončič  http://eternallybored.org/ 

The grass is brown on both sides of the fence.
   -- Ed Yourdonradar's Fundamental Truth



Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: One time encryption

2008-09-16 Thread Gunivortus Goos
Hi Jernej Simončič,

 Note that listening in on phone conversations (and fax communications)
 is much easier than intercepting even unencrypted communication over
 the internet.

Except for Skype's IP-phonecalls, I experienced, they're obviously encrypted.



   And in a strange turn of events, the cat was electrocuted.
-- 
Regards,
Gunivortus
Using The Bat Vs. 4.0.34.4 under Vista Ultimate 32 bit



Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: One time encryption

2008-09-16 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Gene,

On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 20:53:21 -0400 GMT (16/09/2008, 07:53 +0700 GMT),
Gene Brown wrote:

 Or am I worrying about nothing?

GB Maybe I've naive, but I've never had a problem with doing this. If
GB you send your credit card number to the vendor, what happens to it
GB after that? How does the vendor secure it?

I agree with you on this. The main problem is how the vendor stores
the information. Even banks got hacked, or their customer details
copied on CD for sale.

GB When I use a credit card in a restaurant, I give it to the waiter
GB and he disappears for several minutes. Does he have a buddy back in
GB the kitchen who collects these numbers for resale? I don't know, but
GB I don't worry about it.

Neither do I. In the past, I had billings on my credit card that
weren't from me:

1.) In a hotel. I asked the CC company to forward me a copy of the
sales slip with my signature. Once they realised they couldn't provide
it, they credited the amount to me and blacklisted the vendor. (Visa)

2.) By internet. Somebody had used my CC details to subscribe to a
porn website. My number had obviously been burnt, i.e. circulated to
people who practice fraud. The amount was credited back to me, and I
was offered a new CC number. BTW they can actually check the IP
address from which the CC payment instruction originated, so I think
somebody got in trouble. (Amex)

GB Is the internet really any riskier than how I use the card every
GB day?

On the other hand, I do second Jernej's suggestion to give your credit
card number only over a secured website, if offered. This prevents the
trouble of complaining and rejecting a charge, which is a bit of
paperwork. On second thought, there still remains the question of how
secure the vendor stores the information.

Remember that credit card companies still have to prove that it was
you who bought the goods or services. This means they cannot charge
your card out of whim. If they didn't care, they would loose customers
quickly. But then, laws and practices in different countries differ.

Back to the original question, I don't think the average vendor will
go through the procedures of a one-time encryption. If they don't have
a secure website and thus aren't security-conscious, submit your CC
details by phone and worry about how they store the information.

I'm now off to book a rental car for my upcoming trip to Europe, using
my credit card on their website...

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

When a clock is hungry, it goes back four seconds.
http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/

Message reply created with The Bat! 4.0.28.4
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2






Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: moving mail account from one user acct to another user acct

2008-09-16 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Avram,

On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 02:28:01 -0500GMT (16-9-2008, 9:28 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:

A Let's say there are two users, A and B, on a computer, each with
A their own Windows account. Each has administrator privileges and
A can access the other account. User B has always had The Bat!
A running and has, say, five different mail accounts within The Bat!
A User A had always used The Bat! by logging in to user B. However,
A one week ago, a sixth, separate mail account was created for user
A A within User A's Windows account in a copy of The Bat! that
A was created within A Windows account. Only that one mail account
A appears within that running of The Bat! All other mail accounts,
A but not the newly created account for User A appear within the
A instance of The Bat! that runs within B's Windows account. After
A one week, user A decided that she would prefer to have her separate
A mail account as part of the list found on The Bat! running within
A B's Window account and no longer wishes to have that separate mail
A account running in The Bat! within her own Window's account.

Login to Windows as user A.
Don't start TB
Start Regedit and delete this directory from the registry:
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT
Move the one account ftrom user A to the mail directory of user B
Logoff as user A
Login to Windows as user B
Start TB
Add a new account, give it the name of A´s account.
Close TB
Logoff from Windows
Login as user A
Start TB
Set the mail directory to user B´s mail directory
Create new accounts
Name those new accounts the same as they have for user B
Now you´re done

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

If at first you don't succeed, you must be using Windows.
http://www.voormijalleen.nl/
The Bat! 4.0.34.3
Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6001 Service Pack 1
3 pop3 accounts
OTFE enabled
Quad Core 2.4GHz
4 GB RAM

pgp5zAaSMLQQ5.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

RE: moving mail account from one user acct to another user acct

2008-09-16 Thread Sacks, Avram
Hi, Roelof,

In response to my question about moving a mail account from one user's windows 
account to another user's window's account on the same computer, you wrote:

1. Login to Windows as user A.
2. Don't start TB
3. Start Regedit and delete this directory from the registry:
4. HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT
5. Move the one account ftrom user A to the mail directory of user B
6. Logoff as user A
7. Login to Windows as user B
8. Start TB
9. Add a new account, give it the name of A´s account.
10. Close TB
11. Logoff from Windows
12. Login as user A
13. Start TB
14. Set the mail directory to user B´s mail directory
15. Create new accounts
16. Name those new accounts the same as they have for user B
17. Now you´re done

First, thank-you VERY much.  [I LOVE this list! I am still waiting *days* for 
an answer from the support team of another, unrelated application in another 
matter.]  I understand your instructions (which I have numbered) up through no. 
13.  However, I don't know how to set the mail directory to user B's mail 
directory.  Can you elaborate? 

Secondly, what will be the practical consequence of setting the mail directory 
to user B's mail directory:  

Once I create new accounts in the instance of The Bat! that is running 
in user A's Windows account with the same name as they have for user B, does 
that then mean that both User A and User B will be able to see the same mail 
from within their own Window's user account?

If the answer is yes, does this also include previous mail, or does 
it only include mail downloaded from this point forward?

-- 
 Avram L. Sacks
 Riverwoods, IL 60015
 The Bat ver. 4.0.18 on Windows XP Pro, SP2.



Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: One time encryption

2008-09-16 Thread Jack S. LaRosa
Hello Privateofcourse,

Tuesday, September 16, 2008, 5:21:19 AM, you wrote:

P Hello Jack,

P This is what you said on Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:23:31 -0500 your time:

 Is there an easy way to encrypt the info so it can't be read if it's
 intercepted in transit and yet *can* be read by the recipient?

P Mostly, any secure system would require that the receiving part had a
P key/password to unlock the information that you send them.


-snip--

P Certainly not. I think it is completely sensible to think about these things
P and find solutions for them.

Thanks Simon. Please see the response from Gene Brown. I tend to get
un-realistically paranoid at times.

--

Best regards,
 Jackmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using TB! v3.99.3 from
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 - Service Pack 3



Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: One time encryption

2008-09-16 Thread Jack S. LaRosa
Hello Nick,

Tuesday, September 16, 2008, 6:00:49 AM, you wrote:

ND Hello Jack,

ND On Monday, September 15, 2008, you wrote:
JSL I need to send credit card info to a vendor in payment for a part yet
JSL to be shipped. Is there an easy way to encrypt the info so it can't be
JSL read if it's intercepted in transit and yet *can* be read by the
JSL recipient? Or am I worrying about nothing?

ND Some people, myself included, think that the anonymity offered by the
ND sheer scale of the Internet outweighs the risk of identifying your
ND message as interesting by including an easy to spot encryption
ND header or similar.  Some people allege that governments only filter
ND encrypted traffic, on the assumption that that's how terrorists are
ND communicating.  On that subject, I don't think that the government
ND needs to snoop my e-mail to get my CC details, or anything else for
ND that matter...

ND Once you turn over this stone, however, it's not long before you're
ND employing steganography and by the end of the week you'll be sleeping
ND under the bed with a gun!

ND Oh no, now you've got me started.  Sorry.

See! Now THAT'S what I'm talkin 'bout!:)

Now, where'd I put that darned gun

--

Best regards,
 Jackmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using TB! v3.99.3 from
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 - Service Pack 3



Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: One time encryption

2008-09-16 Thread Jack S. LaRosa
Hello Gene,

Monday, September 15, 2008, 7:53:21 PM, you wrote:

GB On Monday, September 15, 2008, 4:23:31 PM, you wrote:

 Or am I worrying about nothing?

GB Maybe I've naive, but I've never had a problem with doing this. If
GB you send your credit card number to the vendor, what happens to it
GB after that? How does the vendor secure it?

GB When I use a credit card in a restaurant, I give it to the waiter
GB and he disappears for several minutes. Does he have a buddy back in
GB the kitchen who collects these numbers for resale? I don't know, but
GB I don't worry about it.

GB Is the internet really any riskier than how I use the card every
GB day?

It's called Web Paranoia and it's probably completely un-justified.
You're right in everything you say. Ultimately, we decided to just
conduct the transaction over the phone, a cell phone yet. Probably
being eavesdropped upon (cell phone paranoia).

--

Best regards,
 Jackmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using TB! v3.99.3 from
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 - Service Pack 3



Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: One time encryption

2008-09-16 Thread Gene Brown
Hello, Jack--

On Tuesday, September 16, 2008, 1:37:33 PM, you wrote:

GB Is the internet really any riskier than how I use the card every
GB day?

 It's called Web Paranoia and it's probably completely un-justified.
 You're right in everything you say. Ultimately, we decided to just
 conduct the transaction over the phone, a cell phone yet. Probably
 being eavesdropped upon (cell phone paranoia).

This is getting dangerously off topic, and we're probably risking a
good trouting. (It's called Bat! Paranoia.)

In my experience, the credit card companies are (thankfully) much
more paranoid than I am, and I have some stories to back that up.
But we should probably stop this thread or move it to TBOT.

-- Gene

--
Running The Bat! version 4.0.24 under Windows XP



Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: One time encryption

2008-09-16 Thread MFPA
Hi

On Tuesday 16 September 2008 at 12:19:26 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Gunivortus Goos wrote:


And in a strange turn of events, the cat was electrocuted.

Poor cat. What happened?

-- 
Best regards,
 
MFPA

Nothing a Pan-Galactic Gargle Blaster won't cure!

Using The Bat! v4.0.34 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600  




Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: One time encryption

2008-09-16 Thread MFPA
Hi

On Tuesday 16 September 2008 at 1:53:21 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Gene Brown wrote:
 On Monday, September 15, 2008, 4:23:31 PM, you wrote:



 When I use a credit card in a restaurant, I give it to the waiter
 and he disappears for several minutes.



 Is the internet really any riskier than how I use the card every
 day?

Unlikely to be riskier than allowing people to wander off with it.
Several years since I saw that - these days they usually have a
portable EPOS terminal they bring to you at the table. Failing that
they ask you to go to the counter.

-- 
Best regards,
 
MFPA

Keep them dry and don't feed them after midnight

Using The Bat! v4.0.34 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600  




Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: One time encryption

2008-09-16 Thread MFPA
Hi

On Tuesday 16 September 2008 at 12:22:24 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Jim Kyle wrote:


 The easiest way, if you have a fax machine, is to fax him the
 information. That's a straight phone-line connection, not networked, so
 the probability of anyone being able to tap into it is very small.

Although, of course, the other end may use fax software on a PC...

 In addition, the image format that fax uses is pretty effective as
 an encryption measure even though it's a published standard. A
 casual snooper isn't likely to have the necessary tools...

The casual snooper may be snooping at the paper coming off a fax
machine (-;

-- 
Best regards,
 
MFPA

Editing is a rewording activity

Using The Bat! v4.0.34 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600  




Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: One time encryption

2008-09-16 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Tuesday, September 16, 2008, 1:22:24, Jim Kyle wrote:

 The easiest way, if you have a fax machine, is to fax him the
 information. That's a straight phone-line connection, not networked, so
 the probability of anyone being able to tap into it is very small.

It's actually quite easy to eavesdrop on phone - you just need to
connect a cable at the appropriate place. Once you do that, it's not
even that hard to intercept faxes.

 In
 addition, the image format that fax uses is pretty effective as an
 encryption measure even though it's a published standard. A casual
 snooper isn't likely to have the necessary tools...

Much more likely to have them than anything that would let him
intercept IP traffic, be it through DSL or cable (not to mention that
even intercepting that traffic won't help when the site uses
encryption).

-- 
 Jernej Simončič  http://eternallybored.org/ 

Anything is possible if you don't know what you'retalking about.
   -- Green's Law of Debate



Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: moving mail account from one user acct to another user acct

2008-09-16 Thread Luc
Good afternoon Avram,  
  
It was foretold that on 16/09/2008 @ 11:29:33 GMT-0500 (which was
13:29:33 where I live) Sacks, Avram would write:

snipped a bit

 I understand your instructions (which I have numbered) up through
 no. 13.  However, I don't know how to set the mail directory to user
 B's mail directory.  Can you elaborate?

Options --- preferences --- System. That's where you define the
mail directory.
 
 
-- 
Best regards,
 Luc
 http://www.dzinelabs.com
 
---
Using the best e-mail client: The Bat! version 4.0.18 with Windows XP
(build 2600), version 5.1 Service Pack 2 and using the best browser:
Opera.

Whether you're an honest man, or whether you're a thief, Depends on
whose solicitor has given me my brief. - Benjamin Franklin
(1706–1790)

  




Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

RE: moving mail account from one user acct to another user acct

2008-09-16 Thread Sacks, Avram
Hi, Luc, 

You responded to my question concerning the transfer of one mail account
into another instance of the The Bat running in a separate Window user's
account, and explained what Roelof meant by setting  a mail directory
to another's user's mail directory by writing :   Options ---
preferences --- System. That's where you define the mail directory.

Thank you very much!  I am at the office now, and am unable to do this
at the moment, since I run The Bat on my home computer. However I will
try out your suggestion when I get home.   

--
Your answer leads me to another question about using The Bat! on home
networks which could be a separate thread, but which I will include
here, for now:

Last April I tried to set The Bat! up on a home network.  Because I did
not intend to keep mail on the mail server indefinitely, I used POP3
rather than IMAP, but set the mail server instructions to keep mail on
the server for at least 14 days--long enough for mail to be downloaded
on to both machines.  The system was imperfect, however, since it meant
cc'ing outgoing messages to myself to make sure I had a copy on both
computers.  Ultimately, the system would only work for mail on my own
private domain.  The system did not work for Gmail mail. Once one
computer downloaded gmail mail, the other computer would no longer be
able to download it.  

However, your answer, above gave me an idea.  It seems to me that rather
than try and create a self-contained version of my e-mail on both
computers, perhaps it would be better to have one computer see the other
computer's mail directory.  (We will just lose some e-mail functionality
while on vacation with the laptop, since new mail would only be
available via webmail.) 

If I want more than one computer on a network to access the same mail
directory, so that either computer user can read, compose, and delete
mail, would I use Options --- preferences --- System on the second
computer's running of The Bat! to point to the originating directory on
the first computer? 

All the best, 

-- 
Avi

 Avram L. Sacks
 2700 Lake Cook Road
 Riverwoods, IL 60015


Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: moving mail account from one user acct to another user acct

2008-09-16 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Avram,

On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 11:29:33 -0500GMT (16-9-2008, 18:29 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:

SA First, thank-you VERY much.  [I LOVE this list! I am still
SA waiting *days* for an answer from the support team of another,
SA unrelated application in another matter.]  I understand your
SA instructions (which I have numbered) up through no. 13.  However,
SA I don't know how to set the mail directory to user B's mail directory.  Can 
you elaborate?

As you deleted all of TB's registry setting for user A, TB will run
and think it's being run for the first time and will ask for a mail
directory, it's then that you browse to the mail directory for user B.

SA Secondly, what will be the practical consequence of setting the
SA mail directory to user B's mail directory:  

SA Once I create new accounts in the instance of The Bat!
SA that is running in user A's Windows account with the same name as
SA they have for user B, does that then mean that both User A and
SA User B will be able to see the same mail from within their own Window's 
user account?

Yes

SA If the answer is yes, does this also include previous
SA mail, or does it only include mail downloaded from this point forward?

All mail

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

Every person constructs their own bed of nails.
http://www.voormijalleen.nl/
The Bat! 4.0.34.5
Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6001 Service Pack 1
3 pop3 accounts
OTFE enabled
Quad Core 2.4GHz
4 GB RAM

pgpBINWXBKuL4.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html