On Saturday, August 22, 2009, 12:32:20 PM, Bill McQuillan wrote:
Now I have figured the reason is that RitLabs considers that the Windows
Editor is to be normally used with proportional fonts and that the number
of characters is not an appropriate measurement (although they seem to
handle it
Hi
On Thursday 20 August 2009 at 9:35:48 PM, in
mid:43201374.20090820153...@jimkyle.com, Jim Kyle wrote:
Charles found an interesting anomaly that I'm now
exploring, implying that the %- macro might be
involved since the On of the first line was getting
suppressed. I've got to plan out a
Hello, Roelof;
Sunday, August 16, 2009, 11:23:46 PM, you wrote:
RB So why do I have over 3,000 messages in the message base? What,
RB please, have I misunderstood about automatic deletion?
Are there any unread messages in the folder that's to be purged?
Yes, most of them ;)
You're
Hallo Robert,
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 20:19:38 +0100GMT (23-8-2009, 21:19 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
RB Looks like that's where my problem was. Neither of those were
RB checked. They are now :)
Did that help?
--
Groetjes, Roelof
It is hard to believe that even his friends like him.
Hello Robert,
Are there any unread messages in the folder that's to be purged?
Yes, most of them ;)
I believe *unread* messages are not purged, even if you have the proper
settings.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v4.2.9.1
My photos at:
Hallo Miguel,
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 23:09:40 +0200GMT (23-8-2009, 23:09 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
M I believe *unread* messages are not purged, even if you have the proper
M settings.
I have to contradict that.
Just tested it with the current beta in my (plain) test setup.
--
Groetjes,
Hello Roelof,
I believe *unread* messages are not purged, even if you have the proper
M settings.
I have to contradict that.
Just tested it with the current beta in my (plain) test setup.
OK, you win then :) I did not test it but was quite convinced it was so.
I guess I had never noticed or
7 matches
Mail list logo
