Re: Slimming Down the database / Archiving

2022-06-25 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Saturday, June 25, 2022, 14:07:36, Tom wrote: > So, you guys never felt the need for this ?  With 152 gb I would expect TB to > be quite slow to open and having proper backups to be a pain? Used to be that TB was a bit slow (=5 seconds) to open folders with more than ~9000 messages, but

Re: Slimming Down the database / Archiving

2022-06-25 Thread Tom
Saturday, June 25, 2022, 6:33:05 PM, you wrote: > On Saturday, June 25, 2022, 10:25:45, Chris Wilson wrote: >> Watching with interest 40 + GB of mail and attachments here, which stored in >> the current database is ridiculous > 152 GB here… So, you guys never felt the need for this ?

Re[2]: Slimming Down the database / Archiving

2022-06-25 Thread Chris Wilson
Hello Jernej, On Saturday, June 25, 2022, you wrote: JS> On Saturday, June 25, 2022, 10:25:45, Chris Wilson wrote: >> Watching with interest 40 + GB of mail and attachments here, which stored in >> the current database is ridiculous JS> 152 GB here… That's an amazing amount of mail,

Re[2]: Can I test TB! V on a time limied basis before purchase?

2022-06-25 Thread Chris Wilson
Hello Jernej, On Saturday, June 25, 2022, you wrote: JS> On Saturday, June 25, 2022, 10:24:27, Chris Wilson wrote: >> Thanks Jernej and MAU, that's remarkable, I never thought that would still >> be an option. I really do like my threading lines :) JS> You'll probably also like the option

Re: Can I test TB! V on a time limied basis before purchase?

2022-06-25 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Saturday, June 25, 2022, 10:24:27, Chris Wilson wrote: > Thanks Jernej and MAU, that's remarkable, I never thought that would still be > an option. I really do like my threading lines :) You'll probably also like the option next to it - "Use denser display of items" :) -- < Jernej

Re: Slimming Down the database / Archiving

2022-06-25 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Saturday, June 25, 2022, 10:25:45, Chris Wilson wrote: > Watching with interest 40 + GB of mail and attachments here, which stored in > the current database is ridiculous 152 GB here… -- < Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< https://eternallybored.org/ > Any fool can make a rule, and every

Re: Slimming Down the database / Archiving

2022-06-25 Thread Chris Wilson
Hello Tom, On Saturday, June 25, 2022, you wrote: T> Hello Everyone, T> my TB has grown over the years and the backup files are now more than T> gb in size. T> I would like to tidy up a bit without messing up everything. T> My idea is to create new Archive folders and then moving older

Re[2]: Can I test TB! V on a time limied basis before purchase?

2022-06-25 Thread Chris Wilson
Hello MAU, On Friday, June 24, 2022, you wrote: M> Hello Chris, >> Only disappointment so far is that in my preferred threaded view >> mode the interconnecting lines between messages have gone and are >> replaced by arrows and unmarked indents. I do not suppose there's a >> way of getting

Slimming Down the database / Archiving

2022-06-25 Thread Tom
Hello Everyone, my TB has grown over the years and the backup files are now more than gb in size. I would like to tidy up a bit without messing up everything. My idea is to create new Archive folders and then moving older emails into these archive folders. Can I then remove these completely