Re[2]: Security newby and yellow circles
Hi On Tuesday, 28 September, 2004, at 11:25:57 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote: but basically, you call up PGPKeys, and see if you have the keyservers: keyserver.pgp.com europe.keys.pgp.com pgp.mit.edu is a useful addition to that list, IMHO -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Mail aliases
Hi On Thursday, 30 September, 2004, at 3:40:10 PM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: TN At least when the filters are working... ;) Filters? They don't relate to folder templates. Are you sure that's what you meant? I suspect Thorvald meant that when the filters are working the message is sorted to the correct folder and so the correct folder template is invoked. ;-) -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: OT : How to setup a GMail account with The Bat!
Hi On Friday, 24 September, 2004, at 2:42:38 AM, Kevin Coates wrote: - From tests that I've done recently, only FreePOPs will preserve the message integrity allowing inlined or PGP/MIME message to be downloaded and decrypted without difficulty. The current release of gPopper changes the message content enough to alter PGP data. gPopper v1.1 has so far not posed me any problems with PGP inlined messages. I have not tried MIME. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Rogues pics
Hi On Wednesday, 13 October, 2004, at 9:25:29 AM, Bill McQuillan wrote: Follow up is Ritlabs way of renaming the RFC References header field to make it more confusing. There seems to be no good reason for this. :-) You can see this renaming by selecting Preferences-Message Headers and scroll down the list to see Follow up under Display As next to References under RFC Name. Thank you. That's what confused me. I have Follow up and References under Display As and both of them are References under RFC Name. Notice also the bizarre renaming of the perfectly good RFC Name Sender to X-Sender. . And X-mailer to mailer. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: Mod: Top posting (was: Save decrypted PGP messages?)
Hi On Saturday, 16 October, 2004, at 3:14:28 PM, Stuart Cuddy wrote: As a matter of fact England is currently looking into joining the DST club. Eh? We have had British Summer Time since 1916 (with different arrangements 1940-47 and 68-71). I think it's just a way for the government to dictate that we get up earlier in the summer. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Moving to version 3
Hi On Monday, 18 October, 2004, at 4:08:00 AM, Chris wrote: Excuse the language, but things would go to hell for administrators if normal users could install programs willy nilly. Which is why the Admin account would be password-protected... -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Is it safe to delete the setup files in the Temp directory?
Hi Is it safe to delete the files in the following directory? C:\Documents and Settings\Username\Local Settings\Temp\The Bat! Setup The files are bat_del.exe, SSCE5132.dll, TBMapi.dll and a subdirectory called Images containing a file called default.msl -- Best regards, MFPA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: message flags icons
Hi On Saturday, 16 October, 2004, at 11:34:13 PM, Roman Katzer wrote: On Saturday, October 16, 2004, 18:08:25, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: My unread messages are shown bold... :-) I use colour groups, so that all unread messages are listed in red. Mine too, but if you've turned threaded views on and one message at the end of a thread is unread, all previous messages are bold, too. I find with threaded messages that the Subject column is all I can see anyway... -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: How to bounce a message?
Hi On Saturday, 16 October, 2004, at 6:48:11 PM, Luc wrote: Good evening John, It was foretold that on 11-12-2003 @ 15:23:34 GMT-0600 (which was 23:23:34 where I live) John Morse would write: snipped a bit TB Highlight all the text you want to bounce, press F4. Type bounce and hit TB ctrl+enter and it'll generate a message saying your address has no valid TB recipient. bounce bounce -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: How to bounce a message?
Hi On Wednesday, 20 October, 2004, at 5:20:33 AM, John Morse wrote: Tuesday, October 19, 2004, 10:41:19 PM, you wrote: TB Highlight all the text you want to bounce, TB press F4. Type bounce and hit TB ctrl+enter and it'll generate a message saying TB your address has no valid TB recipient. bounce M bounce No there is more to it than this... Evidently, from the two lines above that say bounce! You have to have the bounce template setup before that will work. The bounce template? -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: : : TB 3.01 Installer
Hi On Sunday, 17 October, 2004, at 6:22:48 PM, Perry Nelson wrote: Hi Jeff, Sunday, October 17, 2004, 1:06:46 PM, you wrote: I did notice that I don't have the same properties screens available for *.zip and *.pdf files as I do for *.exe files. There doesn't seem to be a Summary tab for those. For *.exe I have General, Version, Compatibility, Virus Property, Summary. For *.zip and *.pdf I have General, Virus Property, Summary. For *.msi: General, Digital Signatures, Custom, Virus Property, Summary. YMMV ;-) -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Determiing Reply Type in Macros
Hi On Saturday, 16 October, 2004, at 7:06:09 PM, Roelof Otten wrote: Hallo Bill, On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 10:38:09 -0700GMT (16-10-2004, 19:38 +0200, where I live), you wrote: BM TB has two buttons: Reply to the message selected and Reply to all. Is there BM any way in a reply template to determine which one was pushed? 'Reply to all' is likely to have more addressees, so you could check for those. If I select reply for your message I generate an email to Roelof Otten [EMAIL PROTECTED] with nothing in CC: or BCC:. If I select reply to all I generate an email to Roelof Otten [EMAIL PROTECTED] with CC: to Bill McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED]. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP support in TB 3.x: OpenPGP option and spotting PGP messages with filters
Hi On Monday, 18 October, 2004, at 12:22:48 PM, Allie Martin wrote: You may wish not to use OpenPGP from within TB! and only externally. There are those who do not wish to use integrated support. I find that if I use TB!'s integrated support to encrypt and sign with PGP 8.1 the message is only sometimes sent, further attempts to sign or encrypt using the integrated support bring up Access Violation messages, and often I can no longer verify or decrypt using the integrated support until I close down and restart TB! (restarting PGPserv won't help). The bug report is at https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3488 -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP support in TB 3.x: OpenPGP option and spotting PGP messages with filters
Hi On Wednesday, 20 October, 2004, at 9:08:44 PM, Anthony G. Atkielski wrote: The first part of this problem appears to have been fixed in 3.x; I had similar problems and now they seem to be gone, although it's still early. Good to hear. Looking forward to being able to use this feature reliably. I downloaded the latest version of TB! last night. I suspect I shall install and try it out soon. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Is it safe to delete the setup files in the Temp directory?
Hi On Wednesday, 20 October, 2004, at 9:13:06 AM, Roelof Otten wrote: Hallo MFPA, On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 04:19:24 +0100GMT (20-10-2004, 5:19 +0200, where I live), you wrote: M Is it safe to delete the files in the following directory? M C:\Documents and Settings\Username\Local Settings\Temp\The Bat! Setup Yes, it was done so automatically on my system. I presume that this isn't the directory you installed TB to. ;-) I've renamed the folder to C:\...\Temp\The Bat! Setup_THIS FOLDER MAY BE SAFE TO DELETE and will keep it for a couple of days just in case. ;-) -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Empty Mail
Hi On Tuesday, 19 October, 2004, at 12:12:34 AM, Julian Beach (Lists) wrote: I have not seen TB empty a mail exactly, but I have problems with TB! (or something along the way that affects only TB!) changing the Part boundaries of messages so the file names do not appear correctly. snip The problem is that the name should actually be Draft Cheshire Supporting People Eligibility Criteria v2.8.doc, but it gets chopped at the first space in the file name snip I created a bug report at the time this started affecting me: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=2043 I reported that too,as https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3396. I have added a note to both reports indicating that they appear to be reporting the same behaviour -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Determiing Reply Type in Macros
Hi On Wednesday, 20 October, 2004, at 11:50:04 PM, Roelof Otten wrote: Yes, that's more or less what I said, isn't it? Or are you making a point that I don't get? I don't think I was trying to make a point but I don't appear to have added anything useful. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Date of a sent message ?
Hi On Monday, 25 October, 2004, at 1:02:12 PM, Peter Hampf wrote: What about another kludge X-Deliverydate: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 00:11:22 +0200 Or perhaps x-sentdate: as TB probably has no way of knowing when it will be delivered. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Date of a sent message ?
Hi On Monday, 25 October, 2004, at 10:23:15 PM, Peter Hampf wrote: that's a case of definition. When TB sents the message to the host defined in the account settings, it has *delivered* the mail. The SMTP host defined in my account settings is localhost. I would say a message is not delivered until it is available to the recipient. (eg on his POP3 server) But that's splitting hairs. Indeed it is. Any kludge would be useful ... Yes. Has anybody put it on the wish-list? -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: New filter does not move message
Hi On Tuesday, 26 October, 2004, at 3:13:52 PM, Michael Geyer wrote: That's one of the effects of a missing cancel button in NFS - if I'm allowed to throw in this thought :-) I have never been able to find a cancel button in OLD filter system. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Boycott then purchase of V3
Hi On Wednesday, 27 October, 2004, at 1:37:49 PM, WilWilWil wrote: I have just ordered V3 Pro! [...] I wanted to boycott this purchase, because I had asked for a free renewal of my V2 licence towards V3 because it had less than 3 months. Boycott, because Ritlabs did not answer me. Today they answered me. 1 month of waiting for the answer. Free Update Refused! But at least they answered. Of course, no hello, no thanks, no courtesy or consideration of the customer. But nevertheless, they proposed to me a special offer only for me at 15,75 EUR for the Pro. Here the complete copy of their very rich answer: Ritlabs We cannot give you a free licence. We can Ritlabs add to the 30% discount to the existing 50% discount. Ritlabs (15,75 EUR) Ritlabs Ritlabs address: Ritlabs https://secure.element5.com/esales/cart.html?PRODUCT[5423.. You fared better than I did. I emailed Ritlabs on 4th September, having purchased my version 2 licence on 20th August. They only took two days to reply to me with:- RL You are not obliged to upgrade to the 3.xx version. The RL Bat! version that you purchased is fully functional and has no time RL limit in using. Upgrading is optional. At least I got Hello and Best regards. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Boycott then purchase of V3
Hi On Wednesday, 27 October, 2004, at 1:37:49 PM, WilWilWil wrote: I have just ordered V3 Pro! I am sure not to exploit the advantages of the Pro, but indeed, 2 EUR is noy so lot. And perhaps other advantageous functions will be available and only for Pro version I wanted to boycott this purchase, because I had asked for a free renewal of my V2 licence towards V3 because it had less than 3 months. Boycott, because Ritlabs did not answer me. Today they answered me. 1 month of waiting for the answer. Free Update Refused! But at least they answered. Of course, no hello, no thanks, no courtesy or consideration of the customer. But nevertheless, they proposed to me a special offer only for me at 15,75 EUR for the Pro. Here the complete copy of their very rich answer: Ritlabs We cannot give you a free licence. We can Ritlabs add to the 30% discount to the existing 50% discount. Ritlabs (15,75 EUR) Ritlabs Ritlabs address: Ritlabs https://secure.element5.com/esales/cart.html?PRODUCT[5423.. ...91]=1COUPON1=UpgradeV3currencies=EUR perhaps? The same place you end up if you go to ritlabs.com and follow links for an upgrade to v3 Professional on a student/non-profit licence. ... this morning I see the information of Denis (TB-FR) concerning the preferential rate (www.ritlabs.com/upgrade-privilege-pro.html) and I know now that Ritlabs didnt offer me a commercial pleasure to me. Everyone can keep this low price ! Indeed. That link redirects to the same place too. I suppose it helps to keep the pricing structure simple ;-) -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP in v2.12
Hi On Thursday, 28 October, 2004, at 2:47:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] However, if you're running PGP v8, the integrated support is the best to use. But it still gives me problems such as reported at https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3488 Is there a PGP v8 freeware? Yes. If yes, should I upgrade or not? [I don't use PGP that often.] I couldn't tell you. If yes, where can I download it? Try http://www.pgp.com/downloads/freeware/index.html Before you install you might look at https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/ehowes/www/ss/pgp8fw/pgp8fw.htm Are there substantial differences between PGP v6.x and v8? Tom McCune's got it pretty well covered at http://www.mccune.cc/PGPpage2.htm -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP in v2.12
Hi On Thursday, 28 October, 2004, at 3:12:35 AM, Allie Martin wrote: [...] They're usually placed either in the TB! installation directory or in any directory that's in your system path. I keep seeing the terms system path and (in tip of the day) system's PATH Environment variable. Does that mean (for example) C:\Program Files\The Bat!\thebat.exe ? -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Forwarding a HTML mail
Hi On Thursday, 28 October, 2004, at 12:42:22 PM, Roelof Otten wrote: JS Proper extension for e-mail messages is actually .MSG - .EML is Microsoft's JS invention. Z So why is TB! using it? Dunno. Z TB! is not know for its adherence to MS standards and were can I change this Z in TB! from EML to MSG? Is this something that's changed since version 2? If I select alternative forward for an HTML message I get a blank message with an attachment called 1.msg If I select forward the attachment is message.html -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP in v2.12
Hi On Thursday, 28 October, 2004, at 6:21:28 AM, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: Its the path to executable files (and such - goes for batch files etc. as well). If you have added a directory-path to the system's PATH environment variable, that directory will be searched for commands if you enter them without specifying a directory. I see you're using WinXP - right click on My Computer, Properties, select the Advanced Tab, on the bottom is a button that leads you to the Environment variables. When you locate the PATH variable, you can add additional entries to it - separate multiple entries with a semicolon (;). [for example, I have my mp3 encoder (lame.exe) in D:\SFX\MP3\lame - I have added that path to the PATH environment variable, this allows me to use lame.exe from a command prompt without adding the path to the executable file, so instead of having to type d:\sfx\mp3\lame\lame I can simply type lame ...] Thanks. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Spell checker
Hi On Friday, 29 October, 2004, at 7:59:12 PM, MAU wrote: Hello Allie, Maybe it was in a dream but I remember the spell checker suggesting to splitting up words. For example when I typed spellchecker it suggested spell checker Or mailserver mail server Was I dreaming or fully awake? No, you weren't dreaming since I got a number of those suggestions just today. It doesn't not work with CSAPI, only with normal TB dictionaries. However, for this to work, in Spell Checker/Options you must select Suggest split words. I get very odd suggestions for spellchecker, including Seychelles and belched. I am using British English, yet I also get paycheck (which should be pay cheque). -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: cannot connect to server
Hi On Saturday, 30 October, 2004, at 1:21:11 PM, Mary Bull wrote: How could the View window distinguish between a legitimate, long-standing, conventional use of the colon and the hi-jacked Smiley use of enclosing colons? A colon in the conventional usage wuuld always be followed by a space. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Spell checker
Hi
On Sunday, 31 October, 2004, at 7:00:32 AM, Tony wrote:
M I get very odd suggestions for spellchecker, including
M Seychelles and belched. I am using British English,
I get those suggestions too but only under 'suggest more'
'suggest more' almost works like an anagram solver :)
I was getting them without using suggest more unless I selected
Suggest split words.
M yet I also
M get paycheck (which should be pay cheque).
According to my paper dictionary it should be paycheck.
Also according this on-line dictionary http://www.m-w.com/
Mirriam-Webster Online is an _American_ dictionary.
http://www.freesearch.co.uk/dictionary defines paycheck as noun
{C} US FOR pay packet
For my level of English the spell checker comes close to perfection.
It's probably ok for somebody whose first language is not English.
The British English spellchecker was suggesting Americanisation
of so many correctly spelt English words that I had to install an
alternative dictionary file in order to use it.
I hope RitLabs is also considering grammar checking.
I've seen it in MS Word.
But not in Outlook Express. You could copy/paste from a word
processor into an email client.
It's far from perfect
Definitely.
but does detect a fair number of errors.
And also regularly suggests changing perfectly clear, correctly
constructed sentences into complete nonsense.
--
Best regards,
MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: URL bug (was: Re: Auto Backup)
Hi On Monday, 1 November, 2004, at 4:28:17 PM, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: Maybe TB detects the slash and expects some more - because (http://www.centered.com) without the slash works. I often find that unless you follow the URL with a space or (without quotes), whatever you type next is treated as part of the URL. Not just by TB but also M$OE, M$ word... -- Best regards, MFPA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Reply Filtering
Hi On Thursday, 4 November, 2004, at 3:56:43 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote: Hello Paul, On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 14:48:55 + GMT (02/11/2004, 21:48 +0700 GMT), Paul Jansen wrote: PJ Is it possible to have a reply to an e-mail automatically filtered to PJ the same folder as the original message without having to set up a PJ filter for each folder? I have quite a lot of folders! Use %Comment=%Folder in the Reply template. %SetHeader(Comments,%FolderName) ? In the Outgoing filters, filter on this header. Can he do this without having a filter for each folder? -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Reply Filtering
Hi On Friday, 5 November, 2004, at 1:05:38 AM, Dan Grunberg wrote: In the Outgoing filters, filter on this header. Can he do this without having a filter for each folder? That'll be a no then... Create a Quick Template, let's call it ComFold %Rem BEGIN QT ComFold===%- %- %SetHeader(Comments,%FolderName)%- %- %Rem END QT ComFold===%- Then add this line to each folder's Reply Template: %QINCLUDE(ComFold) What is the advantage of using a Quick Template here, rather than just adding the line %SetHeader(Comments,%FolderName)%- to all your reply templates? All of the Outgoing Mail filters will be the similar, so 1. Inside TheBat!, create and troubleshoot an Outgoing Mail filter for one of the folders. 2. Copy the Outgoing Mail filter and paste and re-paste it into a word processor document once for each of the remaining folders. 3. Systematically use the word processor to [...] 4. Copy the whole word processor document and paste it into TheBat!'s Outgoing Mail filters. I like that trick. Certainly this is a pain, but certainly it can be done. Perhaps it can be done in the time it takes to complain about having to do it. |grin| -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Reply Filtering
Hi On Friday, 5 November, 2004, at 5:13:14 PM, Dan Grunberg wrote: Create a Quick Template, let's call it ComFold [...] What is the advantage of using a Quick Template here, rather than just adding the line %SetHeader(Comments,%FolderName)%- to all your reply templates? 1. It's easier to remember the QT's name than it is to remember how to use %SETHeader. This can be a real advantage if you want only some folders to have replies filed in them, and/or if you decide each time you create a new folder. Possibly. 2. Let's suppose that you have some folders where you want to decide whether or not to file each reply, as you write the reply. Set up filters for those folders, but don't include the QT in their reply template. Then, if you were to type the following, anywhere in the the message, a reply (or, for that matter, any message) written while one of the filtered folders was the highlighted, the reply (or any message) would be filed in the folder: ComFold followed immediately (i.e. no space) by Ctrl+Space Good point (if you can remember it) 3. If you ever want to add more to every folder's reply template, Or address book templates you need only modify the one QT. That could make life a whole lot easier -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PC-cillin and TB!
Hi On Friday, 5 November, 2004, at 8:54:35 PM, Mica Mijatovic wrote: So, it's good then to keep all attachments separately. *Then* you can check them for viruses successfully, even if they are not open in TB. from TB help file: Attachments stored separately from message bodies may not get moved between account folders if a message body is moved. Is this still true? -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PC-cillin and TB!
Hi On Friday, 5 November, 2004, at 5:10:36 PM, P.Johnson wrote: The Kaspersky site says there is a plugin for TB!, but did say version 1.x and up, which doesn't exactly build confidence. :-) Just for comparison: To install AVG plugin, a version 1.60 (or newer) of The Bat! is required. The previous versions don't contain a support of anti-virus plugins. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Reply Filtering
Hi On Saturday, 6 November, 2004, at 6:44:03 PM, Dan Grunberg wrote: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 21:04:33 +0700 (9:04 AM EST here) Thomas Fernandez wrote: Hello MFPA, On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 22:05:21 + GMT (05/11/2004, 05:05 +0700 GMT), MFPA wrote: Use %Comment=%Folder in the Reply template. M %SetHeader(Comments,%FolderName) ? I didn't check. What I suggested is probably based on some old syntax, so you may be right. The syntax works fine here. But here it has to be the %SetHeader version. [...] In version 2 (and perhaps in version 3), if you wouldn't otherwise need separate reply templates for each folder, I think you can include the %SetHeader in the account's reply template. Correct, at least for v2.12.00. Or indeed in an address book template per addressee. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: How to get rid of Resent-from?
Hi Is this Resent-from: header something introduced in version 3? Forwarding messages here using v2.12.00 does not generate it. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Forwarding and TB attachment extension
Hi On Sunday, 7 November, 2004, at 1:18:31 AM, Peter Ouwehand wrote: [...] First I would like to have some understanding as to why .eml attachments are generated when forwarding plain text msgs, see my reply to Alexander. Here, plaintext emails forwarded as attachments are usually called 1.msg. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Total Commander
Hi On Friday, 5 November, 2004, at 1:54:45 PM, Jeff Gaines wrote: Hello Group On Friday, November 5, 2004, 6:06:15 AM, z5worg wrote: [snipped] I doubt that you can make a backup that you can just copy back in the way you suggest and expect it to work. If nothing else the registry changes all the time and, even if you can copy it (it is always open or in use) it won't be up to date because it will be a snapshot. You'll also need an OS already installed to run TC. [snipped] Anybody else keep receiving multiple copies of Jeff's message? I have had about a dozen so far. Just used Message Despatcher to delete another three. Headers show all copies Received: from 62.80.28.11 (EHLO thrall.its-toasted.org) (62.80.28.11) by mta108.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; Fri, 05 Nov 2004 13:55:32 + but all X-Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] via 217.12.10.62; Fri, 05 Nov 2004 at different times -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: How to get rid of Resent-from?
Hi On Sunday, 7 November, 2004, at 12:05:18 PM, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: You can either forward or redirect messages (right-click a message in the messagelist, redirect is right below forward). Thank you. I *was* confusing forward and redirect. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: How to get rid of Resent-from?look for resent-from header
Hi Sorry Alexander. I have no idea why the redirected message came to the group as I redirected it to myself [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Hello MFPA everyone else 07-Nov-2004 12:31, you wrote: Is this Resent-from: header something introduced in version 3? Forwarding messages here using v2.12.00 does not generate it. You can either forward or redirect messages (right-click a message in the messagelist, redirect is right below forward). A redirected message looks as if it was coming from the original sender. To distinguish between the original message and the redirected message, the resent-from header is added. Found the Resent-from header! ;-) Anybody suggest why this was delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm confused. Headers are:- X-Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] via 217.12.10.70; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 12:45:46 + X-Originating-IP: [212.85.229.140] Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 212.85.229.140 (HELO host) (212.85.229.140) by mta100.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 12:45:46 + Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 12:45:38 + From: Alexander S. Kunz [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: The Bat! (v2.12.00) Personal Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: http://www.neurowerx.de X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: How to get rid of Resent-from?look for resent-from header Resent-from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The log from my smtp server:- 07/11/2004 12:45:45 DNS Query: Try to get mail exchange host information... Get 2 MX host information. Try to deliver message to mx1.mail.ukl.yahoo.com. Message size: 1575 Bytes. Mail sending details: Sending mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED][mx1.mail.ukl.yahoo.com] ... 220 YSmtp mta100.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ESMTP service ready mx1.mail.ukl.yahoo.com[195.50.106.7] connected CMD: HELO host 250 mta100.mail.ukl.yahoo.com CMD: MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 sender [EMAIL PROTECTED] ok CMD: RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 recipient [EMAIL PROTECTED] ok CMD: DATA 354 go ahead CMD: Sending Data... CMD: . 250 ok dirdel CMD: QUIT 221 mta100.mail.ukl.yahoo.com 250 ok dirdel Mail delivered successful. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB and AI RoboForm
Hi On Sunday, 7 November, 2004, at 1:27:10 PM, Ralph wrote: Hello Allie Martin, @Sonntag, 07. November 2004, 14:16 you wrote: On Sunday, November 07, 2004 at 8:09:50 AM [GMT -0500], Ralph wrote: click (left or right) the icon in the tray and select e.g. identities. Right-click them and you should see the option to send it by mail. puzzle solved? perhaps you could try it out and tell me if it works for you... It works here. TB! is invoked and the identity attached to a new message. strange, i alway get a failure message about a Failed MAPI-Logon... any ideas or tips for me? using win xp home (sp2) I'm shooting in the dark but is TB your simple MAPI request handler? Options, Preferences, Applications... -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Forwarding and TB attachment extension
Hi On Tuesday, 9 November, 2004, at 5:12:48 PM, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: [...] I don't know that either, but one possible explanation may be compatibility: Outlook Express can't do a thing with *.msg files (according to something I googled, no warranty), If you save the *.msg attachment to disk, you can right-click and choose program from list to open it with OE. To get OE to actually recognise it and open it when you click, you have to associate the .msg extension with OE. Both of these may be beyond the average OE user ;-) -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
batpgpXX.dll files in folder C:\Program Files\The Bat! required?
Hi http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/tbudp/tiki-index.php?page=Program+Folders+and+Files suggests there should be batpgpXX.dll files required for using PGP/GPG in TB in folder C:\Program Files\The Bat! I don't have these and have problems encrypting from within The Bat! using PGP 8.1. Could it be due to not having these dll files? Searching for files named *pgp*dll shows 8 files in C:\WINDOWS\system32 but none in C:\Program Files\The Bat! I can decrypt with no problems as long as I don't try to encrypt. More info is at https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3488. -- Best regards, MFPA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: batpgpXX.dll files in folder C:\Program Files\The Bat! required?
Hi On Wednesday, 10 November, 2004, at 10:22:43 AM, Allie Martin wrote: On Tuesday, November 09, 2004 at 10:40:23 PM [GMT -0500], Mfpa wrote: http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/tbudp/tiki-index.php?page=Program+Folders+and+Files suggests there should be batpgpXX.dll files required for using PGP/GPG in TB in folder C:\Program Files\The Bat! That's for older versions of TB! before integrated support for PGP v5,6,7,8 came on stream. I had tried the integrated support with v6 and though it worked, there were little cosmetic quirks that were ironed out if I used the traditionally provided dlls you're now referring to. So, with the integrated support they are not needed? I don't have these and have problems encrypting from within The Bat! using PGP 8.1. Could it be due to not having these dll files? Searching for files named *pgp*dll shows 8 files in C:\WINDOWS\system32 but none in C:\Program Files\The Bat! I can decrypt with no problems as long as I don't try to encrypt. PGP v8 will not work with those old dll files. The DLL's provide plugin support for v5 and 6. Versions 7 and 8 require the integrated support. The dll's I have are the ones installed when I installed PGP (either 8.0.3 or 8.1) More info is at https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3488. Hmmm. I've never had that problem before and I've been using PGP v8 since my v2 days. The only problem I've recalled having was that the PGPSDK service would crash, but that was long ago and it spontaneously stopped. I had that once or twice too. TB! and the PGPSDK service is having a problem on your machine. I don't know why. Sorry that I can't be of any better help. Thanks for your help. It's a mystery to me too. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: batpgpXX.dll files in folder C:\Program Files\The Bat! required?
Hi On Wednesday, 10 November, 2004, at 10:05:07 AM, Roelof Otten wrote: Can you encrypt from PGPmail? Dunno. As I can't do it from within TB I generally use either clipboard or current window function. I shall read up on PGPmail and try it out. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: [FYI] Abuse -- Spam-Reporting Software [Free]
Hi On Wednesday, 17 November, 2004, at 7:38:56 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote: [snipped] Paul's message displays on my machine in a different font, a different colour, with a different background colour from other messages. I view all messages in plaintext only, using the MicroEd viewer. Paul's message displays in the fonts / colours set for the source viewer; if I view RFC-822 headers, these are displayed on a separate tab and in the correct fonts / colours. Anybody any ideas what's going wrong? -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: [FYI] Abuse -- Spam-Reporting Software [Free]
Hi On Thursday, 18 November, 2004, at 11:58:52 PM, Robin Anson wrote: So why does that make the message display in Rich Text mode rather than plain text?? That is a very good question. More to the point, how do I force *all* messages to display as plaintext? -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Serious mail download problem
Hi On Tuesday, 16 November, 2004, at 2:53:09 PM, Stuart Cuddy wrote: Secondly, your reply to me does not contain a reference header. Is this by design? I would hope it was not by design as it prevents threading. Perhaps something to do with the particular webmail being used? -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: [FYI] Abuse -- Spam-Reporting Software [Free]
Hi On Friday, 19 November, 2004, at 7:14:41 AM, thn wrote: UTF-8 messages are *only* displayed in the RTV. At least this is my experience. No idea why. If you select Reply | View Original Text, the text of the original message is displayed using the PTV. Have reported at https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4067 -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: question from a newbie
Marck D Pearlstone Hi On Saturday, 20 November, 2004, at 12:52:18 AM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: I actually rather dislike replies to a person on a mailing list being addressed just to the list even more than the (pretty poor) habit of allowing TB's default of associating a person's name with the list address (shudder). I firmly believe that the method I (and many others here) use is the best of all worlds. You can see that I have replied to you directly and so can everyone else. Yet I still make it clear that the message addressed to you is not going to your email address. I have just added the following line to my TBUDL reply template to try and achieve this. Have I got it right? Worked this time. %SetHeader(To,%OFROMNAME on TBUDL %OREPLYADDR)%- -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: question from a newbie
Peter Meyns Hi On Saturday, 20 November, 2004, at 4:36:38 PM, Peter Meyns wrote: M %SetHeader(To,%OFROMNAME on TBUDL %OREPLYADDR)%- It works as intended. I didn't know the approach via %SETHEADER, but why not?! Many ways to skin a cat... :)) It was the only way I could think of to do it. Is there an easier way? -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: -=[ Rogues in SecureBat Lite 2.12 ? ]=-
Hi On Sunday, 21 November, 2004, at 6:02:17 AM, John Morse wrote: The Bat does nothing but piss me off anymore. I think I'm going to try Becky, and I recommend you do to. The relevance to the subject of Rogues in SecureBat Lite 2.12 is not immediately obvious. Why will you not stop top posting? Do you have a problem with enabling people to follow what you are rabbiting on about? And yes, I'm top posting... and I will not stop. Sorry. ~John Presumably the ~ means something like of the order of magnitude? -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
AVG antivirus and TB
Hi Testing AVG and TB using the Eicar test string. It's detected in at attachment but not in the body of a message. Is this normal? -- Best regards, MFPA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: AVG antivirus and TB
Hi On Sunday, 21 November, 2004, at 2:59:37 PM, Jernej Simoncic wrote: On Sunday, November 21, 2004, 15:43:16, MFPA wrote: Is this normal? Yes, since viruses normally don't come in message bodies. Ominous? -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Can't add words to spelling list.
Hi On Monday, 22 November, 2004, at 1:21:48 AM, Greg Strong wrote: Other possibility is if your using NTFS file system and your logged in as a limited user. You will have to change security so that the limited user can modify the UserDic.TLX file. What I did is reboot into safe mode on WinXP Pro and open Windows Explorer for the C:\Program Files\The Bat!\Speller directory. Right click and select the security tab. Check for the user name, then add modify capabilities. I think the security tab is not present in XP Home; I used a command line utility called CACLS to edit permissions. Alternatively, copy the speller directory to somewhere the user does have write permission, such as C:\Documents and Settings\Your_User_Name\Application Data\The Bat! and tell TB to look there. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Can't add words to spelling list.
Hi On Tuesday, 23 November, 2004, at 8:33:34 PM, Dan Grunberg wrote: I used a command line utility called CACLS to edit permissions. Will that work in XP Home? Yes. If it will, how do you use it? * Please note I do not claim to be an expert. You follow my suggestions at your own risk. * Open a command window. (Start menu Run cmd) Change the directory by typing (without the quotes) cd C:\Program Files\The Bat! (assuming that's where you have installed it) Type (without quotes) cacls *.* /t /e /g Users:f Just typing cacls without all the switches should bring up a list of what they do, or you could google for it. Alternatively, copy the speller directory to somewhere the user does have write permission, such as C:\Documents and Settings\Your_User_Name\Application Data\The Bat! and tell TB to look there. If I go this route, how should I tell TB to look there? Method 1: In a New Message window, Spell Checker Dictionaries... Add File. Then browse to where you've copied the files to and click open. This will add entries to the file list at Spell Checker Dictionaries... File:. You can remove the extras from the list with the remove button. Probably easier to remove before adding if the file names in both locations are the same. If you want to add the custom dictionary that you've put words into from MS word or OE it's probably at C:\\Documents and Settings\\USER_NAME\\Application Data\\Microsoft\\Proof\\CUSTOM.DIC Method 2: edit the registry. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Can't add words to spelling list.
Hi On Monday, 29 November, 2004, at 2:50:55 PM, Dan Grunberg wrote: This didn't solve the problem. Non-administrators still can't add words to the spelling lists. I moved my speller dictionaries initially and I thought it did it for me but there was some problem that I can't remember. I then decided to edit permissions with cacls and it's been ok since. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Can't add words to spelling list.
Hi On Wednesday, 1 December, 2004, at 12:09:52 AM, Dan Grunberg wrote: What is/are cacls? CALCS is a command line utility for setting file permissions which is built into Windows NT,2000 and XP. See mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: HTML versions of mail
Hi On Wednesday, 1 December, 2004, at 8:09:16 PM, Anthony G. Atkielski wrote: For what it's worth, one of the reasons I bought TB was to eliminate things like HTML e-mail. I prefer to see only plain text in e-mail. It's the only safe e-mail. I agree entirely. It's such a shame that TB will not display UTF-8 mail using the plain text viewer. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
text and background colours in message list and account tree
Hi Is it possible to change the colours of text and background in the message list and account tree windows? I find light text colour on dark background colour much easier on the eye can only work out how to achieve this for the preview pane and message text window (via plain text viewer settings). -- Best regards, MFPA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: text and background colours in message list and account tree
Hi On Wednesday, 1 December, 2004, at 11:09:12 PM, Mica Mijatovic wrote: But what you do with the folder pane? Well... I see that folders can be coloured as well. How? -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: text and background colours in message list and account tree
Hi On Thursday, 2 December, 2004, at 12:30:41 AM, wayne_king wrote: While consistent look and feel is often a good idea, it depends on the application and the taste and needs of the user. Indeed. Why would anybody want the same settings for a window full of text as for a window full of icons, for example? -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: text and background colours in message list and account tree
Hi On Wednesday, 1 December, 2004, at 9:59:03 PM, Tony Boom wrote: Not sure about the account tree Can't think of a way so far... but there is a way for the message list. I have a filter that changes the colour of unread mail and also the colour on my own posts. You could filter all messages to a colour if there isn't another way. Thank you. I have just edited my colour groups so that all have black background. Kind of works for the message list but looks odd at left hand side when viewing threaded. Thanks also to everyone else. Anybody got any ideas for the account tree window? -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: text and background colours in message list and account tree
Hi On Thursday, 2 December, 2004, at 6:21:33 AM, Mica Mijatovic wrote: Anybody got any ideas for the account tree window? Colour all folders in black? Where is the option to do that, please? -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: text and background colours in message list and account tree
Hi On Thursday, 2 December, 2004, at 10:32:01 PM, I wrote: Colour all folders in black? Where is the option to do that, please? OK I got it... Just a right click on a folder and select a Color Group (you have to have defined the background colour of the given Color Group first). Thanks. Looking much better now. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Winter skin for The Bat! from Andrey Perevodchik
Hi On Sunday 5 December 2004 at 4:55:10 AM, Robin Anson wrote: On Sat 4 December 2004, 19:22:29 +1000, Code 2 wrote: For those who don't know how to use the glyph set, just copy the glyphs.bmp file to your c:\Program Files\The Bat! folder (assuming that's where you installed the application), close The Bat! and restart it. But this wasn't a glyph.bmp file. It had a batskin.ini file and a set of icons that looked similar to a glyph.bmp although it is a PNG file. Anyone got any instructions on how the batskin functionality works? Copying both batskin.ini and new_icons.png into c:\Program Files\The Bat! and restarting TB works here. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Gmail POP settings
Hi On Sunday 5 December 2004 at 12:47:34 PM, Tony Boom wrote: My settings are: SMTP server = smtp.gmail.com Connection = Secure to regular port (STARTTLS) Port = 587 Mail Server - pop.gmail.com User name - Pass word - Connection - Secure to dedicated port (TLS) Port 995 I just set mine up using these settings and it worked straight away, with just one issue. Each time I send or receive, I get a dialog box about the server not supplying a root certificate and I have to press OK to continue. I couldn't find any help for this on Gmail's help pages. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Duplicate Message Search
Hi On Monday 6 December 2004 at 5:47:18 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote: AMG Curious as to how TB! does its duplicate message AMG search. IIRC on Message-ID A then it isn't working fully, or there are some other criteria in play. [...] A (also explains why the sent folder never found any dupes, no A Message ID). Messages in my sent folders all have message id. This message has message id mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] and I am still creating it. AFAIK dupes are identified both message-ID and Date header. Yes, that is the reason why dupes in the Sent folder are not detected. If I copy a message from Sent Mail to another folder and then move the copy to Sent Mail, selecting Remove Duplicates leads to the detection and removal of one copy. A Using TB! 3.0.1.33 OK, even though I use a v3, my wisdom usaully really applies to v1 and v2, so take my posting with a bit of grain. It happened two or three times on this list that what I said what not true for v3 any more, but I don't recall any change with regards to dupes. According to TB! v3 help file:- Duplicates are detected by the following combination of message attributes: Message ID, Sender and date of creation. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Gmail POP settings
Hi On Sunday 5 December 2004 at 3:17:11 PM, Tony Boom wrote: M Each time I send or receive, I get a dialog box about the M server not supplying a root certificate and I have to press M OK to continue. Sorry my old Son but I can't help you with that. I've never had that happen so I wouldn't know how to fix it. This is what the account log says. 06/12/2004, 10:22:07: FETCH - Certificate S/N: 3E9C89, algorithm: RSA (2048 bits), issued from 16 Sep 2004 to 16 Sep 2005, for 1 host(s): pop.gmail.com. 06/12/2004, 10:22:07: FETCH - Owner: US, California, Mountain View, Google Inc, pop.gmail.com. 06/12/2004, 10:22:07: FETCH - Issuer: ZA, Western Cape, Cape Town, Thawte Consulting cc, Certification Services Division, Thawte Server CA, [EMAIL PROTECTED] !06/12/2004, 10:22:07: FETCH - TLS handshake failure. Invalid server certificate (The issuer of this certificate chain was not found). (Then it sends or receives the messages, if I click OK.) I just followed the instructions on site and left them as they was. That probably means you have a certificate for Thawte Server CA in your address book. I have lots of entries in mine but for each one, the certificate tab is empty. :-( I know there used to be certificates there but restoring the address books from a backup does not bring them back. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Gmail POP settings
Hi On Sunday 5 December 2004 at 12:36:55 PM, Nav wrote: I still can't get TheBat! to work with G-Mail. The authentication suceeds, but after that connection hangs forever. [...] Could there be some bug in TheBat! See https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3979 -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Gmail POP settings
Hi On Monday 6 December 2004 at 11:23:23 AM, MFPA wrote: That probably means you have a certificate for Thawte Server CA in your address book. I have lots of entries in mine but for each one, the certificate tab is empty. :-( I know there used to be certificates there but restoring the address books from a backup does not bring them back. Downloaded the required certificate from https://www.verisign.com/support/thawte-roots.zip and all now works fine. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Trusted Root CA address book - most entries have no certificates
Hi I have 104 entries in my Trusted Root CA address book but only 14 of them have certificates. Is this normal? -- Best regards, MFPA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Trusted Root CA address book - most entries have no certificates
Hi On Monday 6 December 2004 at 1:38:39 PM, MFPA wrote: I have 104 entries in my Trusted Root CA address book but only 14 of them have certificates. Is this normal? Nobody has replied here but the issue is discussed at https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4049 -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Gmail POP settings
Hi On Monday 6 December 2004 at 12:34:03 PM, MFPA wrote: Hi On Monday 6 December 2004 at 11:23:23 AM, MFPA wrote: That probably means you have a certificate for Thawte Server CA in your address book. I have lots of entries in mine but for each one, the certificate tab is empty. :-( I know there used to be certificates there but restoring the address books from a backup does not bring them back. Downloaded the required certificate from https://www.verisign.com/support/thawte-roots.zip and all now works fine. Also see https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4049 Deleting the RootCA.ADB file and restarting TB! will bring it all back (apart from any certificates you had added yourself). -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Email from address book
Hi On Wednesday 8 December 2004 at 5:37:27 AM, Paul Berger wrote: In Version 1.62, you double clicked on a name in the address book, and a new message template opened up. In Version 3 this seems to require clicking on the mew message icon on the toolbar. I had not even noticed that icon. I usually select the AB entry then right-click and select new | message from the context menu. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Flying bat Animation
Hi On Wednesday 8 December 2004 at 8:08:30 PM, Chris Weaven wrote: I would like to add my vote! Me too. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Toolbar button for new message
Hi On Monday 13 December 2004 at 1:12:18 PM, Zeynel wrote: How do I set an address as a favorite ? Open Address Book, put a tickmark for a contact in favourite column By default my favourites column header showed as F until I made the column wider. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Plugin Hotmail for TB3 ?
Hi On Tuesday 14 December 2004 at 4:39:14 PM, Tony Boom wrote: Who uses Hotmail anyway other than kids and spammers? WilWilWil, apparently. He says he has to ;-) -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Gmane / subject on replies with counter / threading
Hi On Friday 17 December 2004 at 6:02:11 AM, Bill McQuillan wrote: However, just about everyone agrees that any other notations (like: Re(2):, 2Re:, Ant:, or many others) should NEVER be used since email programs cannot be expected to figure out all of the clever things that programmers like to put in. Note that an email program needs to find and ignore any such prefix in order to search and sort Subjects or to create its own reply Subjects. I find reply numbering useful /as long as I happen to be corresponding with somebody whose email client does it in the same way/. ;-) And Re[5]: Subject is *so* much more elegant than Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Subject, or even Re: Re[2]: ... -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Plugin Hotmail for TB3 ?
Hi On Friday 17 December 2004 at 3:34:03 PM, Tony Boom wrote: I get loads of Z's where there should be ' Not just regular Zs: these have a kind of down-arrow attached to the top. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
References header won't display in preview pane
Hi I cannot get the References: header to display at the top of the preview pane. It is ticked on the list at View | Message Header. Viewing the RFC-822 headers shows that the message in view does actually have References: (for example, replies in this mailing list). -- Best regards, MFPA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: References header won't display in preview pane
Hi On Monday 20 December 2004 at 1:31:15 PM, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: Hello MFPA, Monday, December 20, 2004, 1:03:24 PM, you wrote: I cannot get the References: header to display at the top of the preview pane. It is ticked on the list at View | Message Header. Viewing the RFC-822 headers shows that the message in view does actually have References: (for example, replies in this mailing list). That header field is called follow up here (the display name), and I can add it to the preview pane just fine. My mistake. I find I had Display Name = Follow up: , RFC Name = References but had at some point mis-defined an additional header with Display Name = References: , RFC Name =References:. The second one was the one that would not display (because of the extra colon) and I did not recognise the Follow up: one because it does not display most of the content from the References header in the message. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: References header won't display in preview pane
Hi On Monday 20 December 2004 at 1:20:49 PM, Mica Mijatovic wrote: I can view them while editing a reply. But only one of them in the header pane at the top of the preview pane? I don't know if it would be practical to see 20 and more references in header pane. (-: I mean who needs such a feature? That is, as I understand the question. Probably not too practical. It was, however, what I was trying to do. ;-) -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Macro to change the importance to HIGH?
Hi On Monday 20 December 2004 at 1:19:31 PM, Peter Fjelsten wrote: %PRIORITY = H/N/L set the message priority to High/Normal/Low :) So why does %SetHeader(X-Priority,1)%- not work? -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: G-Mail... Again!
Hi On Thursday 23 December 2004 at 7:40:05 PM, Leif Gregory wrote: Hello AC, Thursday, December 23, 2004, 12:39:11 PM, you wrote: A If I take one, does this mean that I'll be caught in that cycle of A having all those invites to give out? :) Unfortunately, yes... It's getting bad. It used to be you'd only get invites every once in a while. Now you can't get rid of them fast enough. I accepted an invitation in early September and have only this week given out my first 4 invitations. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: G-Mail... Again!
Hi On Sunday 26 December 2004 at 6:02:09 PM, Mica Mijatovic wrote: So, those who use *gmail* for *private* correspondence may simply use crypto, and no fuss no problem. Isn't that obvious? And the recipient then archives a plaintext version to facilitate text searches... -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: HELP recovering deleted messages!!
Hi On Monday 27 December 2004 at 10:22:36 AM, Nav wrote: Actually I can see all messages one by one I guess from Folder2,..(using browse deleted messages) but how can I make all of them appear in same folder. In the deleted messages view, you could try selecting all messages and pressing delete (or selecting undelete from the right-click menu, if you are a mouse person) [...] -- Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html I think your cut mark didn't work because it is missing its trailing space (dash dash space return). -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: G-Mail... Again!
Hi On Monday 27 December 2004 at 11:20:16 AM, Mary Bull wrote in Message-ID [EMAIL PROTECTED]: So, those who use *gmail* for *private* correspondence may simply use crypto, and no fuss no problem. Isn't that obvious? And the recipient then archives a plaintext version to facilitate text searches... :) But at least Google has not parsed your text, which you sent as an innocent bystander, non-Gmail-member. Small comfort, I guess. Unless the location of the archive is a Gmail account. ;-) -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Message attachment
Hi On Monday 27 December 2004 at 12:26:33 PM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Ciprian Trofin wrote: Hi all, Is it possible to attach a message to another message ? I am replying an email, and I want to attach another message I sent before. As far as I can guess, the attachment should be something like alternative forward Depending on whether you have a tick in the box at Accounts | Properties | Templates | Forward. If you haven't it's Alternative Forward, if you have it's just Forward. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Message attachment
Hi On Monday 27 December 2004 at 4:18:47 PM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Thomas Fernandez wrote: ... it will be attached as a .msg file. I notice that sometime since mid-October TB! has changed from attaching messages as .msg files in favour of .eml files. I don't remember changing any relevant options during that time but I upgraded from v2.12.00 to 3.0.1.33 about 4 weeks ago. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: birthay bug?
Hi On Wednesday 29 December 2004 at 1:50:51 PM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Perry Nelson wrote: Hi Thomas, Wednesday, December 29, 2004, 8:40:44 AM, you wrote: TF I do believe that's by design. You are reminded a day before the TF event. You could be right, but if so, I don't like the design. I would prefer to be reminded on the date I choose. If I want to be reminded the day before the birthday, I can set it to do that. The scheduler should follow my choices rather than make such choices for me. Better, I think, to be able to choose when to be reminded: for certain people I'd like to be reminded on the day so I could just send a message straightaway, others I might want enough notice to buy a gift or organise a get-together. A box to choose how many days in advance, with the facility for a second reminder on the day itself, would suffice. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: birthay bug?
Hi On Wednesday 29 December 2004 at 9:48:06 PM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Alexander S. Kunz wrote: That should be integrated into the Scheduler, shouldn't it? Yes, the birthday reminders could be set up via the Scheduler but having it as part of the address book entry is pretty neat and I was suggesting further enhancements. Does using the Scheduler remove the problem of the reminder coming a day early for GMT-x time zones? -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: birthay bug?
Hi On Thursday 30 December 2004 at 2:48:26 AM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Mic Cullen wrote: Shouldn't this just be looked after in your PIM? Maybe. Or even with a diary or calendar. But we were discussing a function built into TB! -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: birthay bug?
Hi On Thursday 30 December 2004 at 9:25:05 AM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Alexander S. Kunz wrote: That should be integrated into the Scheduler, shouldn't it? Yes, the birthday reminders could be set up via the Scheduler but having it as part of the address book entry is pretty neat and I was suggesting further enhancements. Thats what I meant - when I enter a birthday in the AB there should be a way (requester, checkbox, whatever) that asks the user if he/she wants to add the date to the scheduler, and if yes, open the scheduler with the pre-filled fields so that the user can make adjustments. Would be neat. Sorry, I misunderstood. Great idea. Perhaps it should go on the wish-list? Does using the Scheduler remove the problem of the reminder coming a day early for GMT-x time zones? Haven't tried that, I'm GMT+ :-) I'm on GMT in the winter and +1 in the summer, so it doesn't affect me either ;-) -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: birthay bug?
Hi On Thursday 30 December 2004 at 8:09:17 AM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Mic Cullen wrote: Yes, and I'm suggesting that perhaps TheBat! should be doing email, being as it's an email client, and other things should be looking after the other stuff... Point taken. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Quick Filter?
Hi On Saturday 1 January 2005 at 6:30:16 PM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Darrin Rich wrote: PM BTW, where can I obtain your public PGP key? Here http://www.sidnak.net/pgp/ I imported your key by copying and pasting from your website. Unfortunately, when I press the button marked Import KeyID: 0xA3B4AFA5 an Alert box pops up saying The URL is not valid and cannot be loaded. It seems to be trying to link to http:///;. (In case it's relevant, I'm using Firefox.) Replacing a href=http://; with a href=http://www.sidnak.net/pgp/0xA3B4AFA5.zip; worked when I tried it locally. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Quick Filter?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hi On Monday 3 January 2005 at 7:28:05 PM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Meyns wrote: Hi MFPA, on Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:39:44 +GMT, you wrote: PM BTW, where can I obtain your public PGP key? Here http://www.sidnak.net/pgp/ M I imported your key by copying and pasting from your website. M Unfortunately, when I press the button marked Import KeyID: M 0xA3B4AFA5 an Alert box pops up saying The URL is not valid and M cannot be loaded. It seems to be trying to link to http:///;. M (In case it's relevant, I'm using Firefox.) M Replacing a href=http://; M with a href=http://www.sidnak.net/pgp/0xA3B4AFA5.zip; M worked when I tried it locally. I think the fault is not on Darrin's side. I could easily import his key via GPGtray - Current window. The signature on his first message turns out good now. I can import it by PGPtray | current window | decrypt and verify as well as by C P. I was referring to the button marked Import KeyID: 0xA3B4AFA5 that Darrin has thoughtfully provided on his web page. It works using M$IE. Using SlimBrowser a download manager opens but nothing happens. Using Firefox, an Alert box pops up as previously described. - -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 8.1 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com iQCVAwUBQdmnWqipC46tDG5pAQGkmwP9HiZJBL8yTVpXD9+p1MywMf5XV6iN3ruU +XvLIlQifRr1RceW7MCC29MysJPZkRmHabxo3/9F5Ct/dnqnPWPrJTGpReirulNk 1SitUsUTiDUci9yKZC5z1UHrUUJzSr0hiqxgUJz9EX6hMMo1SK1VI1GGGy4uSdl3 XbsoVeC+RXk= =pZvv -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
UTF-8 messages not recognised as pgp-encrypted by TB!
Hi Incoming messages that are encoded with the utf-8 character set and then pgp-encrypted (inline) are are not recognised as PGP-encrypted messages by TB!. No button is provided to decrypt and so the message cannot be read within TB! Anybody confirm this? -- Best regards, MFPA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Quoute () empty lines too?
Hi On Tuesday 4 January 2005 at 10:32:59 AM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Roelof Otten wrote: Hallo Robin, On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:22:40 +1100GMT (3-1-2005, 0:22 +0100, where I live), you wrote: %QuoteEmptyLines RA When did that get introduced? Don't know. RA It doesn't appear in my helpfile, Neither does it appear in mine. I happened to read about it on the TB forum at the Ritlabs site. As you can see, the empty lines appear within the above quote. The relevant macro in my reply template is simply %Quotes. Have I misunderstood something? -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
