Re: cut-line RFC and client support

2004-02-03 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Andrew, @3-Feb-2004, 22:40 +0200 (03-Feb 20:40 UK time) Andrew Perevodchik [AP] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: tko can someone tell me if this is defined by some RFC and also tko what other e-mail clients take this convention into account? AP Afaik no. It's just Bat's behaviour.

Re: mailto: link craziness

2004-02-02 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Jonathan, @2-Feb-2004, 11:57 -0600 (02-Feb 17:57 UK time) Jonathan Angliss [JA] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: Yes. It's an IE configuration error. Go into Internet Options (Tools | Options in IE) and go to the Programs tab. Go to 'E-mail' and select something other than TB.

Re: PC Mag Review Of The Bat!

2004-01-31 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Chris, @30-Jan-2004, 23:10 -0500 (31-Jan 04:10 UK time) Chris [C] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to John: C Are the help files really written in Moldovan and then translated C into English? No. They're written in sort-of English by Moldovans and then some of it is translated to real English

Re: Insert [snip] on deleting a chunk

2004-01-31 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Daniel, @30-Jan-2004, 19:58 +0100 (30-Jan 18:58 UK time) dAniel hAhler [DH] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: MDP ' DH ^ ;) MDP That's there for GPG non-MIME signatures. The TB plug in strips MDP trailing blank lines before signing. I must update my templates MDP to make it

TBUDL Mission Statement

2004-01-31 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
to send a message to the list moderation team, please send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is moderated by the following persons of ill repute: Marck D Pearlstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] A. Curtis Martin [EMAIL

Re: Insert [snip] on deleting a chunk

2004-01-30 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Henkdebruijn, @30-Jan-2004, 06:52 +0100 (30-Jan 05:52 UK time) Henk de Bruijn [H] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: H snipped H Sorry for stepping in. H I am pretty new to the Bat. It is not clear to me what has to be H in the Quick Template. Well, in my case I have a much simpler

Re: Insert [snip] on deleting a chunk

2004-01-30 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Marten, @30-Jan-2004, 09:39 Marten Gallagher [MG] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: The combination of Quick Template and the Shortcuts editor will let you define the 'CR [snip] CR' as a Quick Template called (say) 'Snipper' then Alt-F12 to get into the Shortcut editor and assign

Re: SMTP-S issue

2004-01-30 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Oliver, @30-Jan-2004, 11:28 +0100 (30-Jan 10:28 UK time) Oliver Wolfram [OW] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Oliver: Hello fellow Bat-ers, OW Really nobody who can help me here? Apparently not. It sounds like a bug to me. Or strict adherence to RFC in the face a server that doesn't. OE

Re: Insert [snip] on deleting a chunk

2004-01-30 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Marten, @30-Jan-2004, 12:56 Marten Gallagher [MG] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: MG On Friday, January 30, 2004 at 11:27:56 AM, you wrote: MG Thanks everyone for your help - CTRL-X and manual CRs it is then. You might prefer Alt-X since Ctrl-X is used for 'Cut to clipboard'. --

Re: Insert [snip] on deleting a chunk

2004-01-30 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Daniel, @30-Jan-2004, 13:47 +0100 (30-Jan 12:47 UK time) dAniel hAhler [DH] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: MDP An alternative is to put a single quote or something as an end point MDP and hit a backspace after it. DH Like this? MDP Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator

Re: MyDoom and The Bat

2004-01-29 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Jean, @29-Jan-2004, 15:31 +0100 (29-Jan 14:31 UK time) Jean Site [JS] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to tbudl: JS What do you think about MyDoom and The Bat ! JS Is there any risk? No risk at all - unless you open attachments when you don't know know what they are or that you were not

Re: Insert [snip] on deleting a chunk

2004-01-29 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Marten, @29-Jan-2004, 22:27 Admin at AK [MG] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to The: ... snip MG I.e: when a message is being replied to - in the Message Editor window MG - if I highlighted a portion and did CTRL-DELETE it would place a CR MG then [snip] then CR. ... snip MG I am I missing

Re: Insert [snip] on deleting a chunk

2004-01-29 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Roelof, @30-Jan-2004, 01:24 +0100 (30-Jan 00:24 UK time) Roelof Otten [RO] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Dan: DP You can only access it by going into a message reply window and DP then press Alt+F12 and then navigate there through Main Menu DP - Utilities - Insert Quick Template RO

Re: Insert [snip] on deleting a chunk

2004-01-29 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Peter, @30-Jan-2004, 02:56 +0100 (30-Jan 01:56 UK time) Peter Ouwehand [PO] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: MDP Sort of ... but you do have to be in the place you want the key to MDP be active to be able to define it. Makes a kind of sense. PO Not really if you want to install the

Re: Insert [snip] on deleting a chunk

2004-01-29 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Peter, @30-Jan-2004, 03:13 +0100 (30-Jan 02:13 UK time) Peter Ouwehand [PO] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: PO Think about Admin support. It should be available at all times! MDP It is. It's the editor that must be open, not just a reply. MDP Just start a new message. PO Uhm, the

Re: Insert [snip] on deleting a chunk

2004-01-29 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Daniel, @30-Jan-2004, 05:46 +0100 (30-Jan 04:46 UK time) dAniel hAhler [DH] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: MDP you define the 'CR [snip] CR' as a Quick Template called (say) MDP 'Snipper' DH How would that look like? I've tried, but did not manage to get DH an extra newline at the

Re: upgrade: WARNING!

2004-01-28 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Jean, @28-Jan-2004, 10:50 +0100 (28-Jan 09:50 UK time) Jean Site [JS] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: is may indeed work, but make sure you switch the accounts to POP3 first and backup the messages you want to keep safe from any IMAP accounts. JS you switch the accounts to POP3

Re: New spam plugin

2004-01-28 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Tb, @28-Jan-2004, 15:08 -0600 (28-Jan 21:08 UK time) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [T] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: T I'm fed up with all the crap and have decided T to write a spam plugin today. Where's the SDK? T And, why is the SDK download so well hidden? Wrong list. Please refer to the

Re: upgrade: WARNING!

2004-01-27 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Ken, @27-Jan-2004, 17:18 -0600 (27-Jan 23:18 UK time) ken green [K] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBUDL: K My main business account Inbox came back empty (from the IMAP to K Pop conversion?) Hang on a minute... I didn't think there was such a thing. The instructions for the upgrade were

Re: upgrade: WARNING!

2004-01-27 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Ken, @27-Jan-2004, 17:35 -0600 (27-Jan 23:35 UK time) ken green [K] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to ken: ... snip K Would it help to set all accounts to POP and do another full K backup in 1.62? Then try to restore from that? This is the optimum route. ... snip K One more thing... I

Re: upgrade: WARNING!

2004-01-27 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Ken, @27-Jan-2004, 18:14 -0600 (28-Jan 00:14 UK time) ken green [K] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: K My main business account Inbox came back empty (from the IMAP to Pop K conversion?) Hang on a minute... I didn't think there was such a thing. K If there were no such thing, why

Re: Searching the archives

2004-01-23 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Stuart, @23-Jan-2004, 09:17 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SH] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBUDL: SH MAU kindly provided links to some old messages that he thought might SH be of interest. The links took the form SH mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. However, if you enter SH that string in the search box on

Re: Searching the archives

2004-01-23 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Jean, @23-Jan-2004, 15:04 +0100 (23-Jan 14:04 UK time) Jean Site [JS] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: ... snip SH mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. However, if you enter SH that string in the search box on the archive page you get no messages! MDP These links are for use within TB only. ...

Re: /EXPORT Office Rules Recipient

2004-01-15 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi St, @15-Jan-2004, 15:21 +0100 (15-Jan 14:21 UK time) St - Musaic.Net [SMN] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Stefan: Actually, it should be /EXPORTU=JunkShield - Musaic.Net; SMN Thank you - I will try that. Helpfile is wrong then? Not at all. The example in the help file looks like

Re: Macros understanding

2004-01-14 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Jean, @14-Jan-2004, 09:50 +0100 (14-Jan 08:50 UK time) Jean Site [JS] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to tbudl: JS I try to understand the language of macros ... snip JS %SETPATTREGEXP=(?m-s)^Date\:\s*?((.*?[\d]{4})\s*?([\d]{0,2}\:%- JS [\d]{0,2}\:[\d]{0,2})\s*?(.*))%REGEXPMATCH=%HEADERS JS

Re: Explain this macro?

2004-01-14 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Darrin, @14-Jan-2004, 06:28 -0800 (14-Jan 14:28 UK time) Darrin [D] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: D Ive been using this macro D (mid:%SETPATTREGEXP=;(.*)%REGEXPMATCH=%OMSGID%- ) D Can someone explain how it works? It sets up a regular expression pattern to extract all characters (.*)

Re: From Initials macro?

2004-01-14 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Darrin, @14-Jan-2004, 07:52 -0800 (14-Jan 15:52 UK time) Darrin [D] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: D Im looking on the silverstones site to find a from initials macro D for a reply. D Instead of it reading ...from (john doe)... I would like it to D read ..from (JD)... Im not able to find

Re: Failed sending messages to this group

2004-01-11 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
was addressed to Marck D Pearlstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Now, many purists say this is bad, wrong and irresponsible. It implies that my email address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] This can cause offence and mistakes. These purists address their own on-list replies without any real name attributions at all. I find

Re: Template addressing problem

2004-01-09 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Chris, @9-Jan-2004, 01:06 -0500 (09-Jan 06:06 UK time) Chris [C] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Munango-Keewati: ... snip C http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/templates.html#template woes C Remove the quotes before trying to access this URL. C NOTE to owner of the above URL: C Spaces are

Re: Creating an Out of Office Auto reply

2004-01-09 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Stuart, @9-Jan-2004, 12:19 Stuart Hemming [SH] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: SH Can I ask, do you have this list in your exempt group? No. I don't operate an OOO system myself. I run one from my TB for my business partner. He's not on this list. He is on other lists though and those

Re: Creating an Out of Office Auto reply

2004-01-09 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Stuart, @9-Jan-2004, 14:17 Stuart Hemming [SH] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: SH What I've done is create the OOO filter and put it after the filters SH that file away my list mail. That would work too. BTW, I can't verify your signatures - key is not retrievable from the LDAP servers. --

Re: Creating an Out of Office Auto reply

2004-01-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Shemming, @8-Jan-2004, 14:44 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [S] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: S I'm thinking of trying to implement this in TB! using filters. S First off, has anyone done this? I'm not so bored that I want to S reinvent the wheel. Yes, I have. S 1. I only want to send out the OOO

Re: Creating an Out of Office Auto reply

2004-01-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Stuart, @8-Jan-2004, 16:52 Stuart Hemming [SH] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: MDP It's a good scheme. I just use an AB group scheme myself. SH Do you have to manually clear out the AB group when you switch the SH filter off or is there a way of doing that automagically? Yes. It's just as

Re: Failed sending messages to this group

2004-01-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Thomas, @8-Jan-2004, 17:28 -0300 (08-Jan 20:28 UK time) Thomas Martin [TM] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TheBat!UDL: TM strange things happen. Sometimes i can't send messages to this group, TM sometimes yes. Ideas? TM ,- [ Report ] TM | [EMAIL PROTECTED] TM | SMTP error from remote

Re: Failed sending messages to this group

2004-01-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Thomas, @8-Jan-2004, 17:28 -0300 (08-Jan 20:28 UK time) Thomas Martin [TM] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TheBat!UDL: (another on escaped) TM strange things happen. Sometimes i can't send messages to this group, TM sometimes yes. Ideas? TM ,- [ Report ] TM | [EMAIL PROTECTED] TM |

Re: Failed sending messages to this group

2004-01-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Thomas, @8-Jan-2004, 19:38 -0300 (08-Jan 22:38 UK time) Thomas Martin [TM] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: Please fix your name mangling macro. It keeps using the email address instead of the name to form the '[Name] on TheBat! UDL' part of the address line. TM Will do so, but

Re: Removing from this list.

2004-01-08 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Mark, @8-Jan-2004, 17:49 -0600 (08-Jan 23:49 UK time) Mark Thomas [MT] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: MT I deleted the email that tells me how to subscribe/unsubscribe from MT this list. MT I need to drop the extra emails for a while. MT Can someone forward the Unsubscribe info to me!

Re: Export filter

2004-01-07 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Rich, @7-Jan-2004, 04:12 -0500 (07-Jan 09:12 UK time) rich gregory [RG] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Chris: C ... Sorting Office, right-click the filter ... select Copy. C Then, paste into your e-mail message. RG THAT'S what I did wrong. It doesn't work if you use CTRL-C to copy. Hmmm.

Re: Filter not working as expected

2004-01-07 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Rich, @7-Jan-2004, 05:27 -0500 (07-Jan 10:27 UK time) rich gregory [RG] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to MAU: M Should be '30gov'. That is, Location should be Text and not Kludges. RG (I am pretty sure) I had it set to TEXT (not kludges) FIRST! RG (I am pretty sure) I had it set to TEXT

Re: not receiving attachments

2004-01-07 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Ken, @6-Jan-2004, 22:46 -0600 (07-Jan 04:46 UK time) ken green [K] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: This is file association gone sour down to silly content type settings. K Sounds like you are on the right track. This problem does not K appear to be happening on my laptop at all,

Re: Cookies

2004-01-07 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Darrin, @7-Jan-2004, 06:44 -0800 (07-Jan 14:44 UK time) Darrin [D] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: D ... cookies ... a few of them that are more than one line of D text. With these ones, TB! is reading each line as a separate D cookie instead of one cookie that is three lines. My question is D

Re: TBUDL Archive?

2004-01-06 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Jim, @6-Jan-2004, 04:26 -0500 (06-Jan 09:26 UK time) Jim Dever [JD] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: JD Is there an archive kept of TBUDL messages (especially recent JD ones)? Yes. The address of the archive can be found in the TBUDLinfo link on the bottom of every message (or in the part.txt

Re: not receiving attachments

2004-01-05 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Ken, @5-Jan-2004, 02:01 -0600 (05-Jan 08:01 UK time) ken green [K] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Mark: How long do you go without rebooting your computer? Windows likes to be rebooted every so often K Yeah, I know about Windows... ;) I have gone for weeks without a K reboot, but

Re: not receiving attachments

2004-01-05 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Ken, @5-Jan-2004, 02:01 -0600 (05-Jan 08:01 UK time) ken green [K] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Mark: Try again - that one escaped! K Yeah, I know about Windows... ;) I have gone for weeks without a K reboot, but that's rare. I experienced this recent attachment K issue (nothing to do

Re: not receiving attachments

2004-01-05 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Ken, @5-Jan-2004, 17:38 -0600 (05-Jan 23:38 UK time) ken green [K] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: K Not sure if this helps, but if I invoke Message Dispatcher and K re-download the message in question, the Word doc attachment K shows up. *AND* the previous version of message that

Re: Log when re-apply filter

2004-01-03 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Cs4l, @3-Jan-2004, 09:59 +0100 (03-Jan 08:59 UK time) cs4l [C] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: C Is there an option that allows to write in the log file when C re-applying filters on a folder? C The filter activity goes to the log when receiving new mail, but C apprently not when re-applying

Re: Version 2.02.3 (CE) using up system resources?

2004-01-03 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Susanne, @3-Jan-2004, 19:51 -0800 (04-Jan 03:51 UK time) Susanne [S] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBUDL: S I recently upgraded to the CE, and now find myself constantly S restarting the computer, because I'm running out of resources. S Is this a known issue with this version, and

Re: Picture in message pane.

2004-01-02 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Roopesh, @2-Jan-2004, 01:04 -0800 (02-Jan 09:04 UK time) Roopesh [R] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: R Please tell me if there is any way to send small .jpg or .gif R images (image of signatures - as in incredimail) in the message R area and not as attached file. No. Not even incredimail can

Re: Problem with Kaspersky anti-virus.

2004-01-01 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Jean, @1-Jan-2004, 11:37 +0100 (01-Jan 10:37 UK time) Jean Site [JS] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to tbudl: JS I have deleted the message in folders Inbox and Trash. JS But Kaspersky don't understand and is going to tell JS Virus alert for the same message! JS What's wrong? Kapersky don't

Re: PGP (or GnuPG) signing hidden on authentication?

2004-01-01 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Greg, @1-Jan-2004, 17:32 -0600 (01-Jan 23:32 UK time) Greg Strong [GS] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBUDL: GS In order to get the PGP signatures hidden do I have to use the GS commercial product, or is it possible to configure with GnuPG? I use GnuPG and PGP/MIME signing right here. ...

Re: PGP (or GnuPG) signing hidden on authentication?

2004-01-01 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Greg, @1-Jan-2004, 18:48 -0600 (02-Jan 00:48 UK time) Greg Strong [GS] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: GS The hidden signatures is referred to as PGP/MIME? Correct? MDP No idea. Never heard it referred to as that before. GS So what is the hidden signature of PGP (or GPG) called? At

Re: PGP (or GnuPG) signing hidden on authentication?

2004-01-01 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Greg, @1-Jan-2004, 20:00 -0600 (02-Jan 02:00 UK time) Greg Strong [GS] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: GS In Privacy Preferences under Tools | OpenPGP | Open GS PGPPreferences I have caching of passphrase selected for 5 GS minutes. It is NOT working. Is this a bug or a configuration

Re: Make it STOP!!

2003-12-31 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi David, @31-Dec-2003, 09:13 David Elliott [DE] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: MDP You'll find its details in the TBUDLInfo web page (see below). DE Not on my system. DE See the attached part.txt which contains D'oh - forgot about the PGP/MIME sig that makes the footer appear as an

Re: Antivirus question

2003-12-31 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Dan, @31-Dec-2003, 09:48 -0500 (31-Dec 14:48 UK time) Dan Grunberg [DG] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: No and yes. TB has an interface for BAV (Bat Anti-Virus) plug ins. Any AV software for which there is a BAV available can be used. See here:

TBUDL Mission Statement

2003-12-31 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
to send a message to the list moderation team, please send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is moderated by the following persons of ill repute: Marck D Pearlstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] A. Curtis Martin [EMAIL

Re: how do i put my subscriptio on hold?

2003-12-31 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Alists, @31-Dec-2003, 16:19 -0800 (01-Jan 00:19 UK time) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [A] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: A im wondering how to put my subscription on hold. im on vacation A till 2/15 and won't be able to check mail. Use the web interface to your list subscription. You should shortly

Re: Have most people upgraded to the Christmas edition?

2003-12-30 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Vishal, @30-Dec-2003, 00:37 -0500 (30-Dec 05:37 UK time) Vishal Nakra [V] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Allie: AM http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/news_detail.php?ID=389 V I did look at that but was wondering if there were any major bugs V with those features. The folder views

Re: Make it STOP!!

2003-12-30 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Scott, @30-Dec-2003, 21:50 -0600 (31-Dec 03:50 UK time) Scott [S] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Peter: S Dont know what/where bug tracker is... You'll find its details in the TBUDLInfo web page (see below). -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v2.03 Beta/25 on Windows

Re: Revoking GnuPG key

2003-12-29 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Edgar, @29-Dec-2003, 23:44 +0100 (29-Dec 22:44 UK time) Edgar [E] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to All: E How should I've done it (if I did it wrong) Just as you have. TB's GnuPG support has just been fixed in the latest beta. ,--/ From the release notes for \-- [-] When signing

Re: Upgrade problems

2003-12-28 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Susanne, @28-Dec-2003, 13:04 -0800 (28-Dec 21:04 UK time) Susanne [S] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: S Any advice as to what I'm missing? It sounds to me like you've done a CD restore at some point and left your executable and many other files setup as Read Only. That would behave the way

Re: Upgrade to version 2?

2003-12-27 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Susanne, @27-Dec-2003, 13:39 -0800 (27-Dec 21:39 UK time) Susanne [S] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: S I'm considering an upgrade from version 1.53d to version 2.0. S Can anyone tell me if I will have to completely set up TB from S scratch again after the update, or if my settings will stay.

Re: Upgrade to version 2?

2003-12-27 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Susanne, @27-Dec-2003, 17:43 -0800 (28-Dec 01:43 UK time) Susanne [S] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: Some settings will stay. New features or reworked features may require reconfiguration. S How about folders and filters? S I have quite a large number of them, and might decide to

Re: 2.0 Underwhelmed...

2003-12-24 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Rich, @24-Dec-2003, 16:04 -0500 (24-Dec 21:04 UK time) rich gregory [RG] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: ... snip seasonal harmony and agreements ... RG BTW, what's vbg? Very Big Grin ;-). -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator SB! v2.03 Beta/22 on Windows XP 5.1.2600

Re: more than one macro

2003-12-24 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Henkdebruijn, @24-Dec-2003, 14:40 +0100 (24-Dec 13:40 UK time) Henk de Bruijn [H] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBUDL: H I use the macros Smart Quote Prefixing and Quote Extraction. But H now I read about the macro Re Wrap and I donĀ“t know what to do. I H made the two quicktemplates but

Re: Filtering on HTML tags?

2003-12-24 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Munango-Keewati, @24-Dec-2003, 17:35 -0600 (24-Dec 23:35 UK time) Munango-Keewati said to TBUDL: Is it possible to filter on HTML tags, such as html or !? I've been trying without success, using the Text setting. Doesn't the filter run on raw text, without regard for what is or isn't

Re: 2.0 Underwhelmed...

2003-12-23 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Rich, @23-Dec-2003, 15:21 -0500 (23-Dec 20:21 UK time) rich gregory [RG] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: MDP This is such a tiny flaw compared to RG Tiny? I'll give you small! There are times when I have a heck RG of a lot of email addresses on the BCC: line that need to be RG

Re: 2.0 Underwhelmed...

2003-12-22 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Rich, @22-Dec-2003, 18:29 -0500 (22-Dec 23:29 UK time) rich gregory [RG] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to jwayne: j ... the Ctrl-shift-left arrow keeps everything highlighted and j puts the cursor at the beginning of the field. RG This is one of my BIGGEST complaints with TB. Though I use TB

Re: Aargh - new macro problem with 2.0!

2003-12-22 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Jwayne, @22-Dec-2003, 22:41 -0500 (23-Dec 03:41 UK time) jwayne said: Any work-around? Just touch the message body once. As long as it is modified you can change the TO header at will and it will stick. If the body is unmodified, the template is re-evaluated when you move from header to

Re: Despatching emails at set -- but different -- times

2003-12-21 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Iain, @21-Dec-2003, 14:06 Iain D. Brown said: Surely, if you create a Create message entry in the scheduler for each event, they should be distinct and go off one at a time. However, can you please clear up or clarify how one includes specific text for the message's source. As far as I

Re: Despatching emails at set -- but different -- times

2003-12-21 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Thomas, @21-Dec-2003, 21:26 +0700 (21-Dec 14:26 UK time) Thomas Fernandez said to Marck: You made extra work for me and that's not fair g. You received two messages: one via TBUDL and one by PM. Why didn't you just reply to the TBUDL posting? Would have kept your template intact. ;-) It

Re: Despatching emails at set -- but different -- times

2003-12-19 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Iain, @19-Dec-2003, 14:27 Iain D. Brown said: I have been testing using the Scheduler, but find it just sends all the e-mails at the same time. Surely, if you create a Create message entry in the scheduler for each event, they should be distinct and go off one at a time. What's the

Re: Despatching emails at set -- but different -- times

2003-12-19 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Rich, @19-Dec-2003, 12:09 -0500 (19-Dec 17:09 UK time) rich gregory [RG] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: I have been testing using the Scheduler, but find it just sends all the e-mails at the same time. MDP if you create a Create message entry in the scheduler for MDP each event,

Re: Adding space between last line and Gnupg 1.2.3. signature

2003-12-17 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Edgar, @17-Dec-2003, 20:24 +0100 (17-Dec 19:24 UK time) Edgar said to Marck: How can I ad a space between my last line and the signature? Only by introducing a spacing character in the line, as I do here. How do I get it there? is it a Alt combination? (Forgot the code for that one) can

Re: Adding space between last line and Gnupg 1.2.3. signature

2003-12-16 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Edgar, @16-Dec-2003, 20:40 +0100 (16-Dec 19:40 UK time) Edgar said to All: When I switched to the 1.2.3 version of Gnupg, the signature is right under my mailto link. Although I've added some space underneath it the signature will remove it and place it self right behind my message.

Re: Adding space between last line and Gnupg 1.2.3. signature

2003-12-16 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Melissa, @16-Dec-2003, 14:05 -0800 (16-Dec 22:05 UK time) Melissa Reese said to Edgar: There's no need to add an actual character on the line after your actual message. This is not true in the case of using GnuPG via the built-in support. Any blank lines are stripped before the signature

Re: (no subject)

2003-12-15 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Lynn, @15-Dec-2003, 11:42 -0800 (15-Dec 19:42 UK time) The.Limit said to Roelof: RO Folder template? Following unsub instructions ... sigh I wonder if it worked??? lol! Doubtful. The listserver doesn't read commands sent to the list. You have to send them not to TBUDL@ but to [EMAIL

Re: %ISSIGNATURE - how to use it?

2003-12-14 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Vishal, @14-Dec-2003, 20:38 -0500 (15-Dec 01:38 UK time) Vishal Nakra said: I've been having problems trying to get this macro to work in my signatures. My quick template storing the signature is called sig. I've tried the following variations so far with no luck: ... snip Can anyone

Re: HTML not creating links

2003-12-13 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Ken, @12-Dec-2003, 21:05 -0800 (13-Dec 05:05 UK time) Ken Stuart [KS] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: KS If that same href were attached to a text, it would be KS clickable, so why not make the 77x17 box with the red X KS clickable ? You make good point Kemo Sabe. I agree. KS PS Has this

Re: Sorting filter question

2003-12-11 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Gerard, @11-Dec-2003, 13:23 +0100 (11-Dec 12:23 UK time) Gerard said to The: Can someone tell me how I can filter on Intel and not get a positive on Intelligent? The answer is in help for Sorting office - special filter strings. Square brackets [ ] mean that text enclosed by them will

Re: %AbToName

2003-12-03 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Andre, @3-Dec-2003, 17:45 +0100 (03-Dec 16:45 UK time) Andre Wichartz [AW] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to tbudl: AW So %AbToName does nothing at all. Could someone please explain AW why that is Because any changes to the To address (including initial assignment) are no longer completed

Re: %AbToName

2003-12-03 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Roelof, @3-Dec-2003, 18:38 +0100 (03-Dec 17:38 UK time) Roelof Otten said to Marck: AW and how to fix it? MDP Use %AbOFromName instead. Wouldn't that give the name of the original poster, so Andre would get something like 'Name on Name list-address', while he wanted something like 'Name

Re: Signature delimiter - Test

2003-12-02 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Simon, @2-Dec-2003, 22:06 Simon Fincham said to tbudl: Would you like to shoot a message using Pocomail to one of the other TB lists as a test? Sure. I have also tested sending to a friends E-Mail, they use ' Thunderbird ' which seems to handle ' Pocomail ' output OK. Let's see what

TBUDL Mission Statement

2003-11-30 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
to send a message to the list moderation team, please send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is moderated by the following persons of ill repute: Marck D Pearlstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] A. Curtis Martin [EMAIL

Mod: Untrimmed reply (was: A taboo question.)

2003-11-29 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Mark, @29-Nov-2003, 07:37 -0700 (29-Nov 14:37 UK time) Mark Thomas said to Tony: ... snip TB TB Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information: TB http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html ... snip I let him use Lookout to send

Re: Posting on ritlabs forum ?

2003-11-29 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Cedric, @29-Nov-2003, 11:16 -0500 (29-Nov 16:16 UK time) Cedric Fontaine [CF] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: CF I can't find the way to post/reply on The Bat Forum ? I'm CF registered but can't post on The Bat! Forum ? I can post on CF Public Forum shrug we don't support that here. This *is*

Re: Keep messages in the base for n days

2003-11-23 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Mau, @23-Nov-2003, 19:39 +0100 (23-Nov 18:39 UK time) MAU [M] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: M ,- [ Keep messages in the base for n days ] M | The maximum age of a message allowed in the message base. If a message M | is older than this, it will be automatically deleted from the message M

Re: Changing the Reply-To Header?

2003-11-19 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Nick, @19-Nov-2003, 07:27 -0700 (19-Nov 14:27 UK time) Nick Andriash [NA] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBUDL: NA Is there something I may have done to change all that? No - it is a sad delusional condition suffered by many *nix list admins who believe that nobody intends to reply to the

Re: Changing the Reply-To Header?

2003-11-19 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Thomas, @19-Nov-2003, 21:47 +0700 (19-Nov 14:47 UK time) Thomas Fernandez said to Nick: It's a setting in the mailing-list software. Is there something I may have done to change all that? Include the %ReplyTo=[EMAIL PROTECTED] macro in your AB template for that list. That won't help -

Re: AB templates for groups

2003-11-19 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Nick, @19-Nov-2003, 14:53 Nick Dutton said to Thomas: TF AB templates have preference over group templates. Thanks for that, but unfortunately new mails still pick up the default account templates rather than the group. ... auto-complete in the To: box. If I create the message from the

Re: Changing the Reply-To Header?

2003-11-19 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Nick, @19-Nov-2003, 08:29 -0700 (19-Nov 15:29 UK time) Nick Andriash [NA] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Include the %ReplyTo=[EMAIL PROTECTED] macro in your AB template for that list. That won't help - it will be replaced by the list server. I may have been jumping the gun here. If the

Re: AB templates for groups

2003-11-19 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Thomas, @19-Nov-2003, 22:32 +0700 (19-Nov 15:32 UK time) Thomas Fernandez said to Nick: TF AB templates have preference over group templates. Thanks for that, but unfortunately new mails still pick up the default account templates rather than the group. Oops, that would be a bug,

Re: AB templates for groups

2003-11-19 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Nick, @19-Nov-2003, 17:16 Nick Dutton said to Marck: MDP And I still call it a duplicate entry issue. I have this MDP problem often and it sometimes takes me ages to track down the MDP duplicate entry but there always is one and getting rid of it MDP always fixes the problem. But if I've

Re: Marck's SpamCop filters : (

2003-11-18 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi David, @18-Nov-2003, 19:13 David Boggon said: I have been trying to set up Marck's SpamCop filters to automatically submit mail to SpamCop on a hotkey command. Trouble is I can't get it to create a message. I just tested it here and it seems to work well. ... snip Is there not an

Re: Security concerns

2003-11-16 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Roelof, @16-Nov-2003, 15:43 +0100 (16-Nov 14:43 UK time) Roelof Otten said to Marck: Of course complaining about abuse by someone else would be like complaining about a burglar after you've left your front door open with a note on your window that you're gone. Precisely - and, again,

Re: Oh, the auto-complete woes!

2003-11-15 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Maggie, @15-Nov-2003, 07:27 -0500 (15-Nov 12:27 UK time) mm Meister [MM] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Bats: MM ... the auto complete adds the other people that were sent the MM previous time ... There is another way. In the Preferences dialog on the System page there is an option to

Re: Archiving again!

2003-11-15 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Allie, @15-Nov-2003, 08:18 -0500 (15-Nov 13:18 UK time) Allie Martin [A] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Barry: BH A valid name should be specified for the alternative deletion BH folder A I just setup my TBUDL folder and got no such errors here. ... while I am completely unable to enter

Re: Move messages older than 30 days

2003-11-15 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Tb, @15-Nov-2003, 09:12 -0600 (15-Nov 15:12 UK time) [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: ... snip tko move the messages into a subfolder called old if they are tko older than 30 days without conflicting with each other. You've got several options: ... snip Pick your choice, this all TB can do for you.

Re: Move messages older than 30 days

2003-11-15 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi William, @15-Nov-2003, 18:09 William Sigmund [WS] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: MDP There is the global Deletion action to allow you to move MDP purged messages to an alternate folder of your choice. This is MDP also available on a per-folder basis. Much better! WS Could you

Re: Security concerns

2003-11-15 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Rich, @15-Nov-2003, 16:42 -0500 (15-Nov 21:42 UK time) rich gregory [RG] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Roelof: RO Apart from that, there are no security issues for TB. TB RO doesn't do anything unless you tell it so. RG I ask because (though TB! does do stuff I've told it to in it's RG

Re: Move messages older than 30 days

2003-11-15 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Tb, @15-Nov-2003, 16:19 -0600 (15-Nov 22:19 UK time) [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: My messages are gone, not in Trash and not in the subfolder 'old'. I can only commend the habit of taking a backup before embarking on a newfangled 'purge' adventure. Other than that, I can only guess that your

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >