Hi Darrin,
On Monday, November 17, 2003, at 12:34:05 PM PST, you wrote:
Does anyone know anything about this program
http://www.spambutcher.com/ I was curious if it works with TheBat
and if its any good?
Why pay for spam filtering when there are really good free filters?
I'm using K9 (a
Hi Darrin,
On Thursday, November 13, 2003, at 7:43:07 PM PST, you wrote:
After a year and a half of using TB, im still learning things. Its
great :)
I've been using TB! for over two years, and I feel like I'm still just
scratching the surface (in fact, I *know* I am!). :-)
--
Melissa
PGP
Hi Allie,
On Thursday, November 13, 2003, at 2:52:29 PM PST, you wrote:
Who would think of right clicking text on a bar? :)
Hee hee...I right-click on everything...just in case there's something
to discover! :-)
Very often, my mom calls me with a question about this or
that...usually having
Hi Kitty,
On Wednesday, November 12, 2003, at 8:45:16 AM PST, you wrote:
The good news is that my problem is solved and I can now post
without incident.
Finally! I'm very glad to hear that the problem has been sorted out.
:-)
The only one that tempted me at all was Pocomail. There are
Hi Bo,
On Wednesday, November 12, 2003, at 11:45:37 AM PST, you wrote:
Oh well, it's not the end of the world, but would be nice if I could
do that.
TB! usually has several ways to do one thing (hmmm...how many ways can
TB! change a lightbulb? :-)). Anyway...
If you want to read each thread
Hi Bo,
On Wednesday, November 12, 2003, at 9:00:51 PM PST, you wrote:
Perhaps I am failing to describe my problem adequately, so let's say
you open a message in your inbox, then you select the Next icon
option. It has been my experience that the next message will
automatically open and
Hi Rich,
On Monday, November 10, 2003, at 11:26:04 AM PST, you wrote:
I have asked several times how force my mail to wrap as youse guys
want to read it and still use the editor I am comfortable with. I
suppose you can just ignore that.
Okay...I'll try not to ignore you on this particular
Hi Nick,
On Monday, November 10, 2003, at 1:47:23 PM PST, you wrote:
What is the shortcut for opening an entire thread.
Here's one way that I know of (but it opens *all* threads in the
folder): Ctrl+*
For the moment, I've forgotten the close all threads shortcut, but
this happens naturally
Hi Simon,
On Monday, November 10, 2003, at 2:12:11 PM PST, you wrote:
Shift + Ctrl + =
Great...thanks! Collapsing the single thread is: Shift + Ctrl + -
--
Melissa
PGP public keys:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Body=Please%20send%20keys
TB! v2.01.3 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1
Hi Nick,
On Sunday, November 09, 2003, at 3:02:43 PM PST, you wrote:
1.1 MIME_BASE64_LATIN RAW: Latin alphabet text using base64 encoding
0.2 MIME_BASE64_NO_NAMERAW: base64 attachment does not have a file name
1.1 MIME_BASE64_TEXT RAW: Message text disguised using base64 encoding
Hi Rich,
On Saturday, November 08, 2003, at 3:47:43 PM PST, you wrote:
I set my word wrap at something between 70 76 characters as
suggested by other users on this mail list.
I don't know why, but your text isn't wrapping here. The larger the
viewing window I open, the longer your lines get
Hi Rich,
On Saturday, November 08, 2003, at 4:47:24 PM PST, you wrote:
I set mine to 70 in an effort to make sure it is not too
uncomfortable to read. Funny, if that is too short for convention
then why are my line too long to read?
They look fine now.
It seems the other way around here!
Hi Peter,
On Saturday, November 08, 2003, at 5:15:11 PM PST, you wrote:
Hence, do not hard-wrap lines. Let the end-user decide what s/he
likes.
snip
In HTML-lingo it's called liquid design. Wrapping adjusts to the end
users' browser width.
Thankfully, I can, as I prefer to, deal with
Hi Marck,
On Thursday, November 06, 2003, at 8:22:41 AM PST, you wrote:
Either 1) the connection is permanent and the checking frequency is
immaterial and there is no problem to start with ...
Here are some of *my* concerns...
I have a cable (ethernet) connection, and by default, it's always
Hi Tony,
On Thursday, November 06, 2003, at 8:51:12 AM PST, you wrote:
I can't believe your moaning about an always on connection.
Was I moaning about my BB connection? Or was I saying that I felt
there could/should be a way to easily toggle online/offline...without
either tedious account by
Hi William,
On Thursday, November 06, 2003, at 11:27:14 AM PST, you wrote:
Do you not have the option to block by application?
Even if I do, this would not alleviate annoyance caused by 10 error
beeps every five minutes when TB! insists on polling...regardless of
whether or not I've stopped
Hi Kitty,
Having an unreasonably severe curiosity when it comes to email clients
and text editors, I've tried and/or used/purchased several of the
choices you've mentioned here (and several more as well!). To date,
TB! always has been, and remains (in my very biased opinion), the
best of the
Hi Marck,
On Wednesday, November 05, 2003, at 1:54:36 AM PST, you wrote:
I'm clicking on the '?' icon to verify and letting the built-in
GnuPG support handle it rather than using GPGShell hotkeys to check
the window. Like I say, all signatures are good here.
That may well make the
Hi Bo,
On Wednesday, November 05, 2003, at 11:13:42 AM PST, you wrote:
I have not found a simple way of going off-line yet.
This is something I'd really like to see as well. I have a cable
connection that is always on, and I have to stop *all* traffic via my
firewall or unplug the cable (with
Hi Bo,
On Wednesday, November 05, 2003, at 12:21:52 PM PST, you wrote:
I checked my settings ... seemed to be OK ... except I had to switch
to use MicroEd ... hope that does the trick!
Your wrapped lines look good here now. :-)
--
Melissa
PGP public keys:
mailto:[EMAIL
Hi Bo,
On Wednesday, November 05, 2003, at 12:53:53 PM PST, you wrote:
...you by any chance taking classes up on the hill there in
Valencia? Cal Institute of the Arts?
I'm an alumna of CalArts ('78-'82). The school gave me a couple of
email addresses for life to use as I please, so I continue
Hi Jonathan,
On Tuesday, November 04, 2003, at 7:54:09 PM PST, you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
For some reason, GnuPG doesn't like the very long Version: comment
line in your signature (PGP didn't care, and verified the signature as
Good):
gpg: armor header: gpg: armor header:
Hi Melissa,
On Tuesday, November 04, 2003, at 8:02:35 PM PST, you wrote:
For some reason, GnuPG doesn't like the very long Version: comment
line in your signature
I see what happened...
I first verified your message in the message preview pane, and the
long comment line was wrapped to fit.
Hi Jonathan,
On Tuesday, November 04, 2003, at 9:43:42 PM PST, you wrote:
Hrm, then I'd say that would be a bug in TB as it is altering the
content of the mail to view (which I think isn't bad), but passing
the modified version to GPG... which is bad.
On the other hand, PGP seems to be
Hi Kitty,
On Tuesday, November 04, 2003, at 10:32:05 PM PST, you wrote:
I did check my editor preferences. It is set to wrap lines at 70!
This is very curious, as your lines are still not wrapping here. Did
you check under the Utilities menu in your message editor to see if
auto-wrap is
Hi Rich,
On Monday, November 03, 2003, at 8:46:00 AM PST, you wrote:
I have NEVER been able to send ANY email from TB! with any HTML
component. It just WILL NOT SEND. I can ONLY send mail from TB! if I
choose one of the 2 text options. Very frustrating!
:-) You make a good thing sound like
Hi rich,
On Sunday, November 02, 2003, at 10:49:30 AM PST, you wrote:
The vulgar literal translation to English is The Bald Mouse!.
I know...but I still think it looks nice. :-)
In any vulgar translation from one language to another, there can be
interesting cultural connotations inferred.
Hi Vasiliy,
On Thursday, October 30, 2003, at 1:11:03 PM PST, you wrote:
Hmm... And what are you means? I don't understand.
We're still waiting for the mole recipe. :-)
--
Melissa
PGP public keys:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Body=Please%20send%20keys
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP
Hi DZ-Jay,
On Friday, October 31, 2003, at 2:45:24 AM PST, you wrote:
Can't you just let it go and concentrate on other *real* TB-ish
topics?
Not until we get that mole recipe! :-)
--
Melissa
PGP public keys:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Body=Please%20send%20keys
pgp0.pgp
Hi Darrin,
On Friday, October 31, 2003, at 6:30:38 AM PST, you wrote:
(mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Body=Please%20send%20key
For some reason it isn't recognizing (%20send%20key) this part of it.
Here's the reason:
Since TB! recognizes its own macros by the % symbol at the beginning
of the macro,
Hi Douglas,
On Friday, October 31, 2003, at 5:33:35 AM PST, you wrote:
Upgrades rarely cost the same as an original purchase.
Which can be a good thing. Unfortunately, in the case of my favorite
Office software (StarOffice), the upgrade from v6 to v7 is basically
a full price bug fix! :-(
--
Hi Peter,
On Friday, October 31, 2003, at 12:28:28 PM PST, you wrote:
I'm sure you know about OpenOffice, which is the open source edition
derived from Sun's StarOffice. Couldn't that be an option for you?
I have OpenOffice as well, but I like the added features of StarOffice
(v7 has the
Hi MAU,
On Friday, October 31, 2003, at 1:10:20 PM PST, you wrote:
Wasn't StarOffice free some time ago (a few years)?
It was if you downloaded it (I have a cable connection, so downloading
the rather large SO v5.2 was quick and easy). That policy was
discontinued with SO v6 (post beta
Hi Douglas,
On Friday, October 31, 2003, at 1:36:14 PM PST, you wrote:
I see you're using La Chauve-Souris! (v2.01.3) as your mailer. Does
that mean you're using Linux?
Hee hee...no. It's The Bat! in French. :-)
--
Melissa
PGP public keys:
mailto:[EMAIL
Hi Paul,
On Thursday, October 30, 2003, at 3:21:46 PM PST, you wrote:
so, if he is using M2, why is he on a TB mailing list?
Could be any of several reasons...
He/she could just be using a computer in which TB! isn't installed. Or
could just be interested in learning more about TB! with the
Hi Maggie,
On Thursday, October 30, 2003, at 4:32:52 PM PST, you wrote:
MR In any event, I'm happy to welcome anyone who wants to learn more
MR about this wonderful email client! :-)
Especially if they bring the mole recipe.
Indeed! :-)
--
Melissa
PGP public keys:
mailto:[EMAIL
Hi Darrin,
On Wednesday, October 29, 2003, at 5:00:35 AM PST, you wrote:
I went to http://www.pgp.com/index.html. Is this a good place to get
PGP for TB? Or is there another?
The PGP site is the *best* place to get official PGP. :-) If you
install any of the official PGP builds, there's no
Hi Melissa,
On Wednesday, October 29, 2003, at 8:51:48 AM PST, I wrote:
The PGP site is
Oops! I'm not sure what I did, but in checking my signature, I see
that I apparently accidentally signed the last message with two
different keys! For purposes of keeping my email traffic slightly
Hi again Melissa!
On Wednesday, October 29, 2003, at 9:04:58 AM PST, I wrote:
Oops!
Oops again! :-) Apparently, I didn't manage to double-sign that
previous message. I think that I had just forgotten to close that
silly PGPlog verification window after verifying a different
message, and when
Hi Michael,
On Wednesday, October 29, 2003, at 10:30:12 AM PST, you wrote:
I've never used pgp, but the discussion on here has made me curious.
I checked the pgp.com website, but I still have only the vaguest
idea of how it works.
In addition to the copious documentation that comes with PGP
Hi Andy,
On Wednesday, October 29, 2003, at 12:09:34 PM PST, you wrote:
In short, to decrypt a message from someone, you need *their* public
key, and you need *your* private key. Imagine a door with two locks,
to unlock it you need BOTH keys.
Well, not really. If you have my public key, you
Hi Allie,
On Saturday, October 25, 2003, at 9:10:44 PM PST, you wrote:
Your setup sounds exactly like mine does. I'm at a loss as to what
the problem is. I'll keep experimenting to see if I can reproduce
the problem.
A small update (though nowhere near finished testing all
possibilities
Hi Peter,
On Tuesday, October 28, 2003, at 12:38:30 PM PST, you wrote:
Am I missing something, or is the To: hyperlink simply not
functional to open the address picker?
It works here with all three...To, CC, and BCC
--
Melissa
PGP public keys:
mailto:[EMAIL
Hi Martin,
On Monday, October 27, 2003, at 10:10:17 AM PST, you wrote:
There's some merit in having the mail folder under Documents and
Settings (XP) and I guess this could be a future install option.
Albeit there's nothing stopping you from doing this now.
I keep my TB! mail folder in an
Hi Nick,
On Monday, October 27, 2003, at 3:29:48 PM PST, you wrote:
What if you would want a choice as to which address is used to send
that particular message... is that possible with TB's AB? By the
looks of it, it's not. :o(
Here's what I do...
I create separate address book entries for
Hi Nick,
On Monday, October 27, 2003, at 3:29:48 PM PST, you wrote:
What if you would want a choice as to which address is used to send
that particular message... is that possible with TB's AB? By the
looks of it, it's not. :o(
Oops! I also forgot to mention that I can access the favorites
Hi Marck,
On Monday, October 27, 2003, at 4:03:30 PM PST, you wrote:
Click on the right-most icon (hint text is 'address book') in a
message address line to get to the address picker. Right click on
the AB entry in the let hand list box. If it has alternate address,
that's how you can get to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 7:11:20 AM PST, Krister Ekstrom
wrote:
I'm currently evaluating the pro version of Avg and the bat plug-in,
and i'm not sure i've done everything correctly.
Hi Krister,
If you were only considering using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 6:26:09 AM PST, Nick Dutton wrote:
Is there any way that I can edit a received message? I use many of
my TB folders for reference and would like to be able to modify some
of the messages for clarity etc.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 7:50:23 PM PST, Jonathan Angliss
wrote:
I don't think there is a key combination to expand and collapse All
threads.
To expand all threads in a folder, use Ctrl-* (*on the number pad).
The only way I can see
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Saturday, November 23, 2002, at 9:47:11 AM PST, Scott Frederick
wrote:
Some of the accounts require mail to be in front of the server
name and others do not. It seems as though The Bat! is adding mail
when it is not there, causing a login
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Saturday, November 23, 2002, at 10:39:20 AM PST, Scott Frederick
wrote:
There is no mail.whatever in my Transport settings but the server
logs show that The Bat! is sending it with mail added.
That's very peculiar...I've never experienced
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 5:33:46 AM PST, Allie C Martin wrote:
For the unwary, using the above macro as described, is not without
problems. If the user wishes to send a message to an e-mail address
within one of the TBUDL message
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 3:29:36 PM PST, Allie C Martin wrote:
If your needs and thoughts of what you wish to achieve are going in
this direction, then I suggest that its time to install a macro
tool. PowerPro is very good and is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Wednesday, November 13, 2002, at 10:26:20 PM PST, ETM wrote:
I use backup regularly but for some folders I would like to save the
entire folder in a format that can be read away from TB!.
Here's the perfect solution:
Mailbag Assistant:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, November 09, 2002, at 11:00:53 AM PST, Mike wrote:
On a different subject and possible one that's been asked before? I
noticed that many of you are using PGP keys. Can someone point me to
a place that gives the correct procedure to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, November 05, 2002, at 6:25:08 AM PST, Daniel Dekany wrote:
Allie:
It seems to me to be just a matter of taste and what your eyes have
grown accustomed to. If I use only the simple '' prefix, then
quoting the blank lines are neither
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, November 02, 2002, at 2:57:51 PM PDT, Tom Sadler wrote:
I'm currently using NOD32 as my AV scanner, and I'd like to put a
tagline in all outgoing mail to the effect that the mail has been
scanned by NOD32, version such and such.
This
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, October 30, 2002, at 12:04:21 AM PDT, Krister Ekstrom
wrote:
...i wonder what people suggest i use as a good virus scanner that
works well with Tb!.
After having tried and/or used several different AV programs, I've
been very happy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, October 19, 2002, at 9:20:04 AM PDT, Nick Andriash wrote:
And I still have the marks to prove it! ;o)
But you did get the smell out, right? ;-)
Melissa
- --
PGP public keys:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, October 14, 2002, at 5:56:59 PM PST, Chris Weaven wrote:
One further question, when you update the virus definitions, do you
then need to re-start the machine? That's something that really bugs
me about AVG!
No :-)
Melissa
- --
PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, October 05, 2002, at 7:31:58 PM PST, Sudip Pokhrel wrote:
Yes: Pocomail (www.pocomail.com). Fantastic mail client with HTML
support both ways. Has an option to toggle picture(s) download
on/off. IMO, the best client after TB! Easy to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, June 22, 2002, at 4:19:54 AM PST, David van Zuijlekom
wrote:
It's better to disable this feature or set it at the same length as
TB! if you also use PGP for other programs.
Hello David,
Just to be safe, I would recommend setting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, June 21, 2002, at 10:02:21 AM PST, Jonathan Angliss wrote:
Nothing wrong at this end... except one point... you have setup a
filter to respond when somebody requests your PGP signature... and
then put your PGP signature underneath...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, June 21, 2002, at 11:15:06 AM PST, Jonathan Angliss wrote:
I know that... but go back and read his post again... and he has put
his PGP signature *below* that email request link, even though he
has the email request filter setup. Just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, June 21, 2002, at 9:55:48 AM PST, Mike Apsey wrote:
PGP Key mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=key_request
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6
Hello Mike,
This has really nothing to do with TB!, but since it's just one little
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, May 20, 2002, at 12:29:47 PM PST, Christopher Taylor-Davies
wrote:
Is there a way to configure TB to attempt to authenticate with the
SMTP server's pop service before sending mail?
Hello Christopher,
I mentioned in another message in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, May 20, 2002, at 1:24:52 PM PST, Christopher Taylor-Davies
wrote:
It does all work if I manually check on the work account for mail
before sending, it would be good if it was automatic.
Another possible work around that has additional
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, May 16, 2002, at 5:39:42 AM PST, David van Zuijlekom
wrote:
This is because you should disable the word wrapping in the PGP
options.
Or just set PGP's wrap to a couple characters *greater than* TB!'s
wrap setting. This is what I do,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, May 09, 2002, at 8:17:47 PM PST, Joseph N. wrote:
Mailbag Assistant is an answer. I personally find it to be *the*
answer to the archiving/search issues you described.
http://www.fookes.com/mailbag/index.html
I will second Joseph's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, May 05, 2002, at 4:59:57 AM PST, Jonathan Angliss wrote:
I don't personally use threading on most emails, but might try it on
this list.
Eek! Threading - especially with the variety of threading options
provided by TB! - is one of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, May 05, 2002, at 11:25:18 AM PST, Michael Kellogg wrote:
...with 3 attachments: One is an almost-blank HTML file, one is some
decoy file, like a jpg or Word doc, and one is a .zl? file, where
? = 3 or 9 usually.
As Miguel mentioned,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, May 05, 2002, at 2:29:42 PM PST, Ricardo M. Reyes wrote:
so, if it's standard, anyone knows why PGP destroys de delimiter when
you sign a message?
I can only give you a partial answer to why?...
I guess you'd have to ask Phil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, May 05, 2002, at 6:31:23 PM PST, Lynna Lunsford wrote:
Forgive me if this has been covered previously but If I choose to
use the Internal SMIME signing feature
There are a few additional configuration options available. Which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, May 05, 2002, at 7:31:57 PM PST, Julius S. wrote:
Can't find where to get latest Winrar, or Beta files for 1.60j.
I don't use WinRar, so I don't know about that one, but you can get
the very latest TB! builds here:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, May 04, 2002, at 3:36:49 AM PST, Dierk Haasis wrote:
Tim:
My response is: Many people post complaining about the editor. The
replies can usually be summarised as Get used to it, you'll love
it. That is, change yourself not the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, May 04, 2002, at 1:16:36 PM PST, Costas Papadopoulos
wrote:
I'm trying to include the following text in my signature:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=Send%20PGP%20Key
When I put this in a Quick Template, the '%20' script ends up
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I use PowerArchiver for all my zipping and unzipping of various
compressed files. It usually has no trouble with .rar archives.
However...
Today, I downloaded the TB! 1.60j .rar file from the TB! beta ftp site
(twice - just to be sure that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, May 04, 2002, at 2:03:21 PM PST, Ben Mills wrote:
Both 160i and 160j are corrupted. No recovery record and Winrar
can't fix it.
I downloaded and installed UltimateZip (thanks Lynna!), and it
didn't complain when I tried to extract
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, May 04, 2002, at 2:36:34 PM PST, Melissa Reese (that's
me!) wrote:
I think the issue must be what Jernej and Marck mentioned - PA and
WinRar not being able to deal with the new Rar format (I've just
written to PA support to see
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
With all the recent discussion about S/MIME signatures, my curiosity
reached critical mass, and I went and got myself a Thawte Freemail
certificate. I sent myself a S/MIME signed message, and it seems to
work (via MS CryptoAPI at this point).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, May 02, 2002, at 12:48:13 AM PST, Eddie Castelli wrote:
I Figured out something similar while changing to CryptoAPI the
Certificate Card (found in the Contact properties) has being gone
too. Switching back to Internal brings my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, May 02, 2002, at 3:54:48 AM PST, Allie C Martin wrote:
Have you imported your S/MIME certificate into TB!?
Hello Allie,
Thanks - that's what I had to do (duh). It now works either way (TB
internal S/MIME or MS CryptoAPI). However -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, May 02, 2002, at 8:09:02 AM PST, myob wrote:
Mandara:
M I even cannot open recent Lynna's messages: only what I see is the
M line in the header window; body window retains previous body
M contents.
myob:
Same here.
If you go into
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, May 02, 2002, at 10:34:52 AM PST, Keith Rodrigues wrote:
First, Mike wrote:
MT I have an existing PGP 7.0.3 keyring and I want to use the
MT OpenPGP integrated in The Bat! 1.60h. Is there some way I can use
MT the existing keyring, or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, May 02, 2002, at 3:40:38 PM PST, Adam wrote:
How do you delete a thread?
Shift+Ctrl+Del
Or...
Right-click any message in a thread, go to Thread, and choose
Delete.
Melissa
- --
PGP public keys:
mailto:[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, May 02, 2002, at 3:54:19 PM PST, Michael L. Wilson wrote:
Sarcasm
What a great idea. Every time I want to check my mail or send some
mail, I can import stuff into my registry, re-import all my data,
send the mail, then delete it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, May 02, 2002, at 4:42:32 PM PST, Mark Knipfer wrote:
Tim:
T So, is this email properly signed?
Mark:
I see Invalid Signature.
I get valid on Tim's message using MS CryptoAPI S/MIME setting.
I get invalid on the same message using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, May 01, 2002, at 1:26:56 AM PST, Marck D Pearlstone
wrote:
Lynna: Don't change anything. You are doing fine.
Your certificate is valid. It appears as valid here. It will appear
as valid for anyone who imports it. Anyone who says it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, May 01, 2002, at 4:30:41 AM PST, Michael Disabato wrote:
And yours are still invalid here, BTW.
Same here (Lynna's signatures show as invalid, while yours show as
valid). I'm using TB! 1.60c, and the above is true whether I'm
using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, May 01, 2002, at 4:47:21 AM PST, Allie C Martin wrote:
Once setup correctly Lynda's signatures are all valid.
Okay Allie - please explain to me how to set up my TB! 1.60c
correctly to show Lynna's signatures as valid.
I get invalid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, April 30, 2002, at 9:36:13 PM PST, Julius S. wrote:
Let's make this work!! Ideas??
Hello Julius,
I don't know about you, but my Bat works perfectly well for 99.9% of
what I want it to do. In fact, most of the time, that's 100%.
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, April 28, 2002, at 9:38:48 AM PST, Joseph N. wrote:
My small collection of downloaded TB! files, held on hand in case I
need to reinstall, now includes the following:
As you can see below, I get a very different size reading on the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, April 28, 2002, at 12:52:25 PM PST, David Stone wrote:
Is it me should I have done something ;)
1.60h has a bug that prevents you from opening S/MIME signed messages
(the little check mark icon signifies that the message was signed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, April 27, 2002, at 6:54:34 AM PST, Colin Grant wrote:
First, Allie wrote:
As soon as the typical user meets PGP, they don't wish to learn
about it because of the learning curve ... the usual response...
'Why learn all this stuff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, April 26, 2002, at 9:45:43 AM PST, Gene Gough wrote:
Just that h is available on the beta site.
Or that h is now available on the public release site. :-)
Melissa
- --
PGP public keys:
mailto:[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, April 26, 2002, at 5:06:19 AM PST, Marck D Pearlstone
wrote:
First, Nathalie wrote:
Where I am supposed to find the two correct dll files mstext35.dll
and scrrun.dll?
What are these files for? I don't recognize them as having
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, April 26, 2002, at 11:14:20 AM PST, Miguel A. Urech wrote:
It happens that both of Nathalie's messages are S/MIME signed, but I
have no idea if this could be the reason and, if yes, why.
Hello Miguel,
I noticed that (S/MIME signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, April 26, 2002, at 11:30:11 AM PST, Miguel A. Urech wrote:
Unless it is something peculiar to 1.60h, I have no idea what the
problem may be.
I've experienced this once before while using an earlier version, so I
don't think it's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, April 26, 2002, at 12:16:53 PM PST, Peter Palmreuther
wrote:
Stay at 'c' ... I'd suggest.
I've discovered a possible problem with S/MIME signed messages using
'h', so it seems for every fixed bug two new become introduced :-(
Hello
101 - 200 of 304 matches
Mail list logo
