Re: Automatic backups

Hello Jack on TBUDL, Saturday, July 24, 2010, 9:27:14 AM, you wrote: > On Saturday, July 24, 2010 you wrote: m>> I can do a normal full backup whenever I like, using The Bat tools/backup/standard method manually. Scheduled (automatic) full backups fail to work after the first one, however, ap

Re: "Reply to" problem

On Friday, October 13, 2006, 3:24:35 PM, Arjan de Groot on TBUDL wrote: >>Its configurable, so what. Maybe it should be off by default though. > That doesn't make it any less superfluous or stupid. I never have understood why we had that option to begin with. That's always one of the first thin

Re: Template Question

On Thursday, October 12, 2006, 11:33:18 AM, Thomas Fernandez on TBUDL wrote: > On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 08:01:56 -0400 GMT (12/10/2006, 19:01 +0700 GMT), > David Calvarese wrote: >>> Actually, I don't have a regex that cuts this off, and it doesn't >>> show in

Re: Template Question

On Wednesday, October 11, 2006, 9:22:32 PM, Thomas Fernandez on TBUDL wrote: > On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 14:43:28 -0400 GMT (12/10/2006, 01:43 +0700 GMT), > David Calvarese wrote: DC>> Thanks, but that still isn't pulling out the Group Links portion, like DC>> this: D

Re[2]: Template Question

Hello Mica, Wednesday, October 11, 2006, 3:10:07 PM, you wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 >***^\ ."_)~~ > ~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 11 Oct 2006, >@ @ at 14:11:54 -0400, when David Calvarese wrote: >>

Re: Template Question

On Wednesday, October 11, 2006, 3:45:15 PM, Marck D Pearlstone on TBUDL wrote: > Although my own personal version looks more like this: > ,--/ \-- > %QUOTES='%SETPATTREGEXP="(?is)%- > ((\s*)?\n?-BEGIN PGP SIGNED.*?\n(Hash:.*?\n)?\s*)?%- > (\s*)?%- > ((Dear|Hi|Hello|Hey|Greetings|Howd

Re: Template Question

On Wednesday, October 11, 2006, 2:34:24 PM, Mary Bull on TBUDL wrote: > Hello David! > On Wednesday, October 11, 2006, 8:13 AM, you wrote: >> Can anyone help me with a better macro to clean out all the >> ads, PGP signatures, ect. from messages I'm replying too? > Here's mine. Works like a char

Re: Template Question

On Wednesday, October 11, 2006, 1:44:13 PM, Mica Mijatovic on TBUDL wrote: > ***^\ ."_)~~ > ~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 11 Oct 2006, >@ @ at 09:13:47 -0400, when David Calvarese wrote: >> I have a bit of a problem I'm using the re

Template Question

Hello TBUDL, I have a bit of a problem I'm using the reply macro from the regex macro collection that is supposed to remote all the Yahoo groups information when I reply to a message, but it's leaving all that stuff in the message. Can anyone help me with a better macro to clean out all the ads

Re: Problems with GnupG and PGP integration

Kevin Coates wrote: > Hi David, > > On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 14:40:13 -0500 (2:40 PM here), David Calvarese > [DC] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>>> gpg: conversion from `utf-8' to `CP0' not available > > DC> Upgrade to the 1.4.1rc2, it fi

Re: Problems with GnupG and PGP integration

ng DSA > key ID 1C9D5360 > gpg: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message > gpg: BAD signature from "David Calvarese > > And for this message of yours is same. > > I don't know if this relates to something specific to TB or not. I'm not sure either... The

Re: Problems with GnupG and PGP integration

Mica Mijatovic wrote: >***^\ ."_)~~ > ~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 02 Mar 2005, >@ @ at 14:40:13 -0500, when David Calvarese wrote: > > . > > I get this when check your signature, David. This sort of GPG message is > new to

Re: Problems with GnupG and PGP integration

Melissa Reese wrote: > Here's what happens when I try to verify a simple inline clear > signature using the TB! integration with GnuPG: > > gpg: conversion from `utf-8' to `CP0' not available Upgrade to the 1.4.1rc2, it fixes that problem. Note that there are other GnuPG issues, especially whe

Re: Outlook .ics meeting invitations

Nick Dutton wrote: > Hello, > > I've just moved my contacts and calendar over to outlook after years on > Lotus Organizer. > > Has anyone managed to get e-mail responses to OL meeting invitations > (*.ics) to use TB? Mine keep spawning an OL window. Might want to have a look at Sunbird. That's

Re: new AV plug-in for TB

B R i a N S wrote: > On Date : Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:11:07 -0500 > David Calvarese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote this lines: > > David> B R i a N S wrote: >>> :o At last!!! i've been waiting a long time for it!! >>> >>> ClamAV is a very good antivir

Re: new AV plug-in for TB

B R i a N S wrote: > :o At last!!! i've been waiting a long time for it!! > > ClamAV is a very good antivirus solution. > > Better than Avast? -- Dave Calvarese PGP Key Available at http://home.comcast.net/~dhcalva/DavidCalvarese-dh.asc signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature _

Re: More observation on Bayesit!

On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 at 09:01:40 +, Barry wrote: B> Hi B> Well I'm still persevering! B> I've now transcribed 83 different regex rules over to Bayesit. I extracted B> them from my copy of MailWasher. B> This seems to have made a dramatic improvement in spam catching. I've now B> reduced the

Re: the bat! "on the fly encryption" and tokens

On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 at 21:58:18 +0100, Claude Renaud wrote: CR> Hi Marek, CR> Le dimanche 20 février 2005 à 21:18:47, vous écriviez : MM>> iKey is supported for OTFE, I didn't tested it for authentication. CR> How can we activate OTFE ? CR> Does the authentication based on token is planned ? I

(no subject) Re: TB & GnuPG

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 at 21:54:32 +0100, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: ASK> on 18-Feb-2005 at 20:31 you (David Calvarese) wrote: >> Hrm... Would PGP V8 be any better for that? I wouldn't object to >> buying it if I had to. ASK> Buy? Do you need to use it commercially? If not:

(no subject) Re: TB & GnuPG

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 at 21:02:16 +0100, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: ASK> on 18-Feb-2005 at 20:47 you (Peter Meyns) wrote: >> Let's see how it behaves regarding the sig delimiter. ASK> Much better if you ask me, because its PGP/MIME instead of inline signing, ASK> and the sig delimiter is also totall

(no subject) Re:

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 at 20:50:31 +0100, Henk de Bruijn wrote: HdB> live), Peter Meyns wrote: PM>> on Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:54:20 -0500GMT, you wrote: DC>>> I've got a little problem... Using TB! along with GnuPG, it messes DC>>> up my sig delimter so that it's only -- instead of --. Any DC>>

(no subject) Re: TB & GnuPG

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 at 20:14:40 +0100, Peter Meyns wrote: PM> Hi David, PM> on Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:54:20 -0500GMT, you wrote: DC>> I've got a little problem... Using TB! along with GnuPG, it messes DC>> up my sig delimter so that it's only -- instead of --. Any DC>> way to fix that? PM

(no subject)

Hey All, I've got a little problem... Using TB! along with GnuPG, it messes up my sig delimter so that it's only -- instead of --. Any way to fix that? -- Best regards, David Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 __

Re: Spamalizer

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 at 06:46:02 -0800, Darrin Rich wrote: T>> I wouldn't trust a server-side spam filter that just deletes mails it T>> thinks is spam. I have never used spamalizer myself. Make sure you T>> have control, or you'll lose mails. DR> It seems like it should work well according to th

Re: Why am I finding BayesIt so difficult?

On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 at 17:40:56 +, Tony Boom wrote: TB> A reminder of what David Calvarese on TBUDL typed on: TB> 17 February 2005 at 15:32:23 GMT +0100 DC>> I'm not so impressed with BayesIt right now either. Doesn't seem to DC>> do a thing. I'm trying

Re: Why am I finding BayesIt so difficult?

On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 at 14:24:45 +, Barry wrote: B> I don't like being beaten so I decided to try again with a clean install B> but now I don't appear to have any dictionaries. B> Mail Washer Pro is beginning to look very attractive! :-) I'm not so impressed with BayesIt right now either. Do

Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?

On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 at 11:22:51 -0600, Mary Bull wrote: M> How thoroughly do you filter, so that emails apparently from M> Amazon _cannot_ be spoofed? There is that... but we have to put a level of trust in someplace... MB>>> I like to get my "ads" from Amazon. However, if they sent

Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?

On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 at 21:29:57 -0600, Mary Bull wrote: M>>> How thoroughly do you filter, so that emails apparently from M>>> Amazon _cannot_ be spoofed? >> There is that... but we have to put a level of trust in someplace... MB> I like to get my "ads" from Amazon. However, if they sent me an MB

Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?

On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 at 21:29:57 -0600, Mary Bull wrote: M>>> How thoroughly do you filter, so that emails apparently from M>>> Amazon _cannot_ be spoofed? >> There is that... but we have to put a level of trust in someplace... MB> I like to get my "ads" from Amazon. However, if they sent me an MB

Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?

On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 at 06:38:24 -0500, Allie Martin wrote: AM> Fernandez wrote: GL>>> That said, you can retrieve the entire message, external images and GL>>> all, even in 1.62. All you have to do is double-click the icon for the GL>>> HTML page to open it in your default browser. So, if you want

Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?

On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 at 02:22:58 +, MFPA wrote: M> Hi M> On Saturday 5 February 2005 at 2:29:09 PM, in M> <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Calvarese wrote: >> Even being able to take certain addresses as 'safe' to >> automaticly display the images for them.

Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?

On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 at 14:33:26 +0100, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: ASK> on 05-Feb-2005 at 12:24 you (Marck D Pearlstone) wrote: >> Preferences..Viewer/Editor..Default message/text editor. ASK> D'oh - its already there... :-) ASK> What we need now is some solution for the remote images, as described

Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?

On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 at 12:48:31 +, Geoff Lane wrote: GL> On 05 February 2005, 10:46, Tony Boom wrote: >> To be honest, I'm easy either way. I have no problem with displaying html >> images direct from the web in email, it can't hurt can it? GL> ~~~ GL> I, for one, am very glad that TB won't

Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?

On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 at 12:52:44 +0100, Jurgen Haug wrote: JH>>> yeah that would be nice, it would have made me convert some people JH>>> to TB! This and HTML mail as standard when you start a new mail. >> Preferences..Viewer/Editor..Default message/text editor. >> Enjoy. (Or shudder, as I do). J

Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?

On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 at 22:02:41 +1100, Ian A. White wrote: IAW> Thorvald, IAW> On Saturday, February 5, 2005, 9:34:50 PM, you (Thorvald Neumann) wrote: TN>> Hæ! TN>> Saturday, February 5, 2005, 11:13, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: >>> Decide whats best for you, and let other people decide whats best

Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?

On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 at 11:08:06 +0100, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: ASK> on 05-Feb-2005 at 09:16 you (Thorvald Neumann) wrote: >>> This and HTML mail as standard when you start a new mail. >> No, sorry, this would let many people go away. ASK> Should be made configurable. Whats the problem with a sw

Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?

On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 at 09:16:42 +0100, Thorvald Neumann wrote: TN> Hæ! TN> Saturday, February 5, 2005, 08:09, Jurgen Haug wrote: >> This and HTML mail as standard when you start a new mail. TN> No, sorry, this would let many people go away. TN> HTML should not be used for emails. I think he mea

Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?

On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 at 10:33:53 +0100, Thorvald Neumann wrote: TN> Hæ! TN> Saturday, February 5, 2005, 10:25, Mic Cullen wrote: >> Sometimes it's extremely useful. Rarely, but when you need it, you >> really need it. TN> No, sorry. I do not see any sense in using HTML for emails at all. I see mo

Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?

On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 at 10:33:53 +0100, Thorvald Neumann wrote: TN> Hæ! TN> Saturday, February 5, 2005, 10:25, Mic Cullen wrote: >> Sometimes it's extremely useful. Rarely, but when you need it, you >> really need it. TN> No, sorry. I do not see any sense in using HTML for emails at all. I see mo

Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?

On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 at 08:09:50 +0100, Jurgen Haug wrote: MR>>> I don't think you can download images directly into the message pane, MR>>> but you should be able to open the attached HTML document into a MR>>> browser if you really want to see all the images. >> Yeah, I know that. He wants to be

Re: Remote Images in HTML mail?

On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 at 20:27:26 -0800, Melissa Reese wrote: >> Is there a way to make TB! display remote images in an HTML mail for >> email that we know is safe? Say from like Amazon.com or Newegg.com? >> I'm trying to convince a friend of mine to switch over to TB! MR> I don't think you can down

Remote Images in HTML mail?

Hey All, Is there a way to make TB! display remote images in an HTML mail for email that we know is safe? Say from like Amazon.com or Newegg.com? I'm trying to convince a friend of mine to switch over to TB! -- Best regards, David Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Se

Re: Registration Code

On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 at 12:02:25 +1100, John Phillips wrote: >> Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 JP> Is this the latest release? Nope, latest Beta. The latest release is V3.0.1.something. -- Best regards, David Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2

Registration Code

Hey All, I finally got my reg code for V3! YAY ME! *coughCough* Sorry about that. :) -- Best regards, David Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: h

Re: Catch-22, Kafka-esque - Take Your Pick: Can't Get Registration Help

On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 at 12:43:17 +0100, Gerard wrote: DC>> Upgrading is even better right now too, with the 30% offer... I just DC>> hope I don't get screwed over on that with CIFNet. G> Hi David, G> I am nit sure but don't you need your password for the V3 upgrade version to? G> This ia a long s

Re: Catch-22, Kafka-esque - Take Your Pick: Can't Get Registration Help

On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 at 03:11:10 +, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: MDP> Dear David, MDP> @3-Feb-2005, 22:03 -0500 (04-Feb 03:03 UK time) David Calvarese [DC] MDP> in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: MDP>>> "CIFnet" is one clue. DC>> I feel his pain. I'

Re: Catch-22, Kafka-esque - Take Your Pick: Can't Get Registration Help

On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 at 02:43:59 +, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: MDP> Dear Jerrold, MDP> @3-Feb-2005, 21:22 -0500 (04-Feb 02:22 UK time) Jerrold Mundis [JM] in MDP> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: JM>> Will one of the moderators -- or anyone with any kind of connection at JM>> all with Ritlabs -- ple

Re[2]: Blind Copy Header

Hello Eric, Saturday, March 13, 2004, 9:49:07 AM, you wrote: E> ("X-Archive","encrypt") On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 13:33:34 + E> GMT(13/03/2004, 13:33 + GMT), David Elliott wrote: N>>> Because I was BCCed (Blind Copy) into the email his N>>> email client had inserted the following. N>>> IMPORT

Re[2]: URLs

Hello Jonathan, Wednesday, March 10, 2004, 10:10:50 AM, you wrote: JA> On Wednesday, March 10, 2004, David Calvarese wrote... DC>>>> Is there any way to make TB! open URLS in a new IE window DC>>>> instead of reusing an open one? MDP>>> Yes. Shift click on

Re[2]: URLs

Hello Jernej, Wednesday, March 10, 2004, 10:14:02 AM, you wrote: JS> On Wednesday, March 10, 2004, 15:21:55, David Calvarese wrote: >> Helpful. :) But I meant open then that way by default. JS> It's not possible without breaking other browsers. I'm sure it is, as the

Re[2]: URLs

Hello Marck, Wednesday, March 10, 2004, 9:16:26 AM, you wrote: MDP> Dear David, MDP> @10-Mar-2004, 09:13 -0500 (10-Mar 14:13 UK time) David Calvarese MDP> [DC] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: DC>> Is there any way to make TB! open URLS in a new IE window DC>> instead o

URLs

Is there any way to make TB! open URLS in a new IE window instead of reusing an open one? -- Best regards, David mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.05 Beta/1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Assisted by BayesIt! 0.4gm SE ___

Re[2]: Templates/Macros

Hello Urban, Friday, March 5, 2004, 10:31:11 PM, you wrote: U> Saturday, March 6, 2004, David Calvarese wrote: >>>> But I recall getting some really nice templates from the group before. >>>> I just don't recall from who. U>>> What did they do? >&

Re[2]: Templates/Macros

Hello dAniel, Saturday, March 6, 2004, 12:10:10 AM, you wrote: dh> on Fri, 5. Mar 2004 at 17:55:45 -0500 rich gregory wrote: dh> In general, I have a 'message' and 'reply' Quick-template (I do not dh> forward often) that is simply included for my account's newmail/reply dh> templates and I don

Re[4]: Templates/Macros

Hello Peter, Friday, March 5, 2004, 8:43:09 PM, you wrote: PO> Hello David Calvarese, PO> on Fri, 5 Mar 2004 20:31:19 -0500 (2004-03-06 02:31:19 in .nl) in the PO> message with reference <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you PO> [DC] wrote (at least in part): DC>> Unfortunately,

Re[2]: Templates/Macros

Hello Urban, Friday, March 5, 2004, 4:51:13 PM, you wrote: U> Friday, March 5, 2004, David Calvarese wrote: >> But I recall getting some really nice templates from the group before. >> I just don't recall from who. U> What did they do? Unfortunately, I don't re

Re[2]: Templates/Macros

Friday, March 5, 2004, 3:22:01 PM, you wrote: MDP> Dear David, MDP> @5-Mar-2004, 15:14 -0500 (05-Mar 20:14 UK time) David Calvarese [DC] MDP> in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: DC>> Does anyone have any that they would be willing to send to me? DC>> I got all mine off of her

Templates/Macros

Well, I'm back to using TB once again since I switched away from using MSN (Thank God!) Unfortunately, I seem to have lost all the macros/templates that I had before... So Does anyone have any that they would be willing to send to me? I got all mine off of here before and off of a web p

Re[2]: Too many 0 byte batXXX.tmp files under %temp% dir

Hello Chris, Saturday, November 1, 2003, 7:03:46 PM, you wrote: C> On Saturday, November 1, 2003 at 3:31:50 PM, Mark Wieder wrote in the C> message "Too many 0 byte batXXX.tmp files under %temp% dir" C> : >> I hate to say this about a Microsoft product, but win2k has been

Re: Woody's EMAIL Essentials?

... It's a close thing though. Dave Using Fastmail on the Web in IE6 at Work. :) -- David Calvarese darshu_AT_fastmailbox_DOT_fm Current version is 2.00.6 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Spampal and NOD POPscan

Hi The Bat! User Discussion list, On Sunday, April 06, 2003 at 21:08:46GMT -0500 (which was 9:08 PM where I live) Joseph N. wrote and made these points on the subject of "Spampal and NOD POPscan": JN>On Saturday, April 05, 2003, David Calvarese wrote in JN> <mid:[EMA

Re: UBE

Hi The Bat! User Discussion list, On Sunday, April 06, 2003 at 20:06:24GMT -0500 (which was 8:06 PM where I live) Joseph N. wrote and made these points on the subject of "UBE": JN> Okay, I surrender. I have been content with dealing with spam on a JN> per-email basis, using the dispatch on se

Re: Question About The Bat Structure and Temp Files in XP

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, March 27, 2003 at 15:05:29GMT -0500 (which was 3:05 PM where I live) Kim wrote and made these points on the subject of "Question About The Bat Structure and Temp Files in XP": K> With the Bat, things seemed to work a bit differe

Portability

Hello All, Well, after trying the program called "The Batch" that was mentioned, I found a big problem with it... It doesn't like going form XP to 98 machines. Anyone else have any suggestions for making a portable version of TB! for use on a USB-Flash drive? In other news, I tried

Re: SOT: mail servers

On Wednesday, March 26, 2003 at 12:39:02GMT -0600 (which was 1:39 PM where I live) Joseph N. wrote and made these points on the subject of "SOT: mail servers": JN> Anyone here care to venture an opinion on Merak and Postcast mail JN> servers? Anyone have another to recommend? Mercury does n

Re: Links?

On Tuesday, March 25, 2003 at 19:50:53GMT +0100 (which was 1:50 PM where I live) Miguel A. Urech wrote and made these points on the subject of "Links?": >> What, other than http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat and >> http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBFAQ.html ? I don't know of many >> others.

Re: The Bat! Portable?

On Tuesday, March 25, 2003 at 19:36:38GMT +0100 (which was 1:36 PM where I live) Carsten Thönges wrote and made these points on the subject of "The Bat! Portable?": CT> * David Calvarese writes: >> Does anyone have any experiance installing and using TB! from a >>

Re: Links?

On Tuesday, March 25, 2003 at 17:24:41GMT + (which was 12:24 PM where I live) Marck D Pearlstone wrote and made these points on the subject of "Links?": MDP> @25-Mar-2003, 11:48 -0500 (16:48 UK time) David Calvarese [DC] in MDP> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: DC>>

Links?

Hello All, Does anyone have any links to The Bat! pages in english? I've ran across some that appear to be in German or something (http://www.bat.caschy.org/ and http://home.arcor.de/thebat/) , so I was just wondering if there are any English language resource pages out there... Dave -- Best

The Bat! Portable?

Hello All, Does anyone have any experiance installing and using TB! from a portable drive, such as a USB-flash drive? -- Best regards, David Member of E-mailaholics International PGP Key at http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCC7E7664 "Good morning" is a contradiction

Re: Very important issue has come to my attention!!

On Tuesday, March 25, 2003 at 07:57:50GMT -0500 (which was 7:57 AM where I live) Spike wrote and made these points on the subject of "Very important issue has come to my attention!!": S> Hello tbudl'ers and the other TB! lists, S> Sorry for the cross-post, but I feel it is VERY important t

Re: Execute a manual filter

On Sunday, March 23, 2003 at 14:47:25GMT -0800 (which was 5:47 PM where I live) Michael L. Wilson wrote and made these points on the subject of "Execute a manual filter": MLW> Historians believe that on Sunday, March 23, 2003 , at 17:39:44[GMT MLW> -0500](which was 2:39 PM where I live) you

Re: Execute a manual filter

On Sunday, March 23, 2003 at 14:46:12GMT -0800 (which was 5:46 PM where I live) Michael L. Wilson wrote and made these points on the subject of "Execute a manual filter": MLW> Historians believe that on Sunday, March 23, 2003 , at 17:39:44[GMT MLW> -0500](which was 2:39 PM where I live) you

Storage

Hello All, Here's something I thought some of you might be interested in, especially those of you that use TB! on 2 different computers (work and home) and like to keep them in sync. TigerDirect has a USB 'keychain' type drive for $9.99 after a $20 rebate for a 64MB unit. http://www.tigerdirec

Re: Execute a manual filter

On Sunday, March 23, 2003 at 14:07:51GMT -0800 (which was 5:07 PM where I live) Michael L. Wilson wrote and made these points on the subject of "Execute a manual filter": MLW> Historians believe that on Sunday, March 23, 2003 , at 16:00:05[GMT MLW> -0600](which was 2:00 PM where I live) you

Re: Problem with large file attachments?

On Saturday, March 22, 2003 at 01:50:55GMT + (which was 8:50 PM where I live) Mike Alexander wrote and made these points on the subject of "Problem with large file attachments?": MA> Saturday, March 22, 2003, 1:14:27 PM, you wrote: MP>> ZDNet Downloads for: MP>> Free

Re: Disappearing Subject

On Friday, March 21, 2003 at 20:52:08GMT -0800 (which was 11:52 PM where I live) Michael L. Wilson wrote and made these points on the subject of "Disappearing Subject": MLW> When I reply to messages and use the "fixsub" macro from MLW> http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/samples.html MLW

Re: Nod32 + Filtering + Return Email

On Friday, March 21, 2003 at 09:55:32GMT +0100 (which was 3:55 AM where I live) Roelof Otten wrote and made these points on the subject of "Nod32 + Filtering + Return Email": RO> Hallo David, RO> On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 19:31:46 -0500GMT (21-3-03, 1:31 +0100, where I RO> live), you wrote: R

Re: Nod32 + Filtering + Return Email

On Thursday, March 20, 2003 at 00:18:30GMT +0100 (which was 6:18 PM where I live) Roelof Otten wrote and made these points on the subject of "Nod32 + Filtering + Return Email": RO> Hallo David, RO> On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 14:49:41 -0500GMT (20-3-03, 20:49 +0100, where I RO> live), you wrote:

Re: Nod32 + Filtering + Return Email

On Thursday, March 20, 2003 at 20:42:21GMT +0100 (which was 2:42 PM where I live) Jernej Simončič wrote and made these points on the subject of "Nod32 + Filtering + Return Email": JS> 20. marec 2003, 20:30:16, you wrote: DC>> What I want to do is to copy that entire block (no matter what t

Nod32 + Filtering + Return Email

Hello All, I've just bought Nod32 AV and I'm using Beta 2. I've managed to get TB! to filter infected emails into the quarantine folder without using a plugin (since it doesn't work with the new version) so I can use IMON... Now, here's what I want to do. When I get an infected email in, I wa

Re: Nod32

On Wednesday, March 19, 2003 at 20:46:29GMT -0600 (which was 9:46 PM where I live) Joseph N. wrote and made these points on the subject of "Nod32": JN> David, JN>On Wednesday, March 19, 2003, David Calvarese wrote in JN> <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: DC>> ho

Re: Nod32

On Wednesday, March 19, 2003 at 14:17:56GMT -0600 (which was 3:17 PM where I live) Joseph N. wrote and made these points on the subject of "Nod32": JN> David, JN>On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, David Calvarese wrote in JN> <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: DC>> Is

Re: E-mail address in message body

On Wednesday, March 19, 2003 at 20:54:18GMT +0100 (which was 2:54 PM where I live) Marcus Ohlström wrote and made these points on the subject of "E-mail address in message body": MO> On Wednesday, March 19, 2003, 14:10, Carsten Thönges wrote: >> They can send me a mail and I will put them

Nod32

Hello All, Is the plugin for Nod32 in the ftp://ftp.ritlabs.com/pub/the_bat/bav/ directory the latest version? It seems to completely lock TB! up when I try to use it with the trial version of Nod. -- Best regards, David Member of E-mailaholics International PGP Key at http://search.keyserve

Re: NOD32

On Friday, March 14, 2003 at 21:25:42GMT + (which was 4:25 PM where I live) Mike Alexander wrote and made these points on the subject of "NOD32": MA> Thursday, March 13, 2003, 8:52:56 AM, you wrote: WM>> I still fail to understand why people bother with the AV plug-ins MA> Because thos

OT: Spampal Group

Hello All, I know this is off topic, but since I know some people on this list use SpamPal, I just thought I'd mention that there's now a SpamPal mailing list in English on Yahoo. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spampal-en/ -- Best regards, David He who hesitates is constipated. Using The Bat!

Re: Using PC-Cillin 2000 Pop 3 Scan with The Bat

On Wednesday, March 12, 2003 at 21:32:51GMT + (which was 4:32 PM where I live) Duncan Strand wrote and made these points on the subject of "Using PC-Cillin 2000 Pop 3 Scan with The Bat": DS> Mark Partous on Sunday, March 9, 2003, 4:43:22 PM, you scribed: >> Perhaps this is nothing new

Re: NOD verses AVG or AntiVir ?

On Wednesday, March 12, 2003 at 23:24:27GMT -0600 (which was 12:24 AM where I live) John Morse wrote and made these points on the subject of "NOD verses AVG or AntiVir ?": JM> I was sent a Virus... my favorite Anti-Virus program Grisoft AVG did JM> not detect it, and I have the latest upda

Cookies and Macros

Hello All, I have a question... First off, how much can we store in the cookies template in account properties? Second, will this macro work to wrap cookies that are really long? %WRAPPED="%COOKIE" -- Best regards, David Heaven won't have me and Hell's afraid I'll take over. Using The Bat!

Re:

On Sunday, March 09, 2003 at 18:33:55GMT -0500 (which was 6:33 PM where I live) Allie Martin wrote and made these points on the subject of "": AM> David Calvarese [DC] wrote: DC>> On Sunday, March 09, 2003 at 18:05:46GMT -0500 (which was 6:05 PM DC>> where I liv

Re:

On Sunday, March 09, 2003 at 00:38:10GMT +0100 (which was 6:38 PM where I live) Roelof Otten wrote and made these points on the subject of "": RO> Hallo David, RO> On Sun, 9 Mar 2003 18:17:00 -0500GMT (10-3-03, 0:17 +0100, where I RO> live), you wrote: DC>> Templates DC>> X-BeenThere: [EMA

Re:

Allie Martin wrote and made these points on the subject of "Templates": AM> David Calvarese [DC] wrote: DC>> I've got a strange little problem. For some reason, when I reply to DC>> a message, I've got about 3-4 blank lines between the Hello like and DC>&

Templates

Hello All, I've got a strange little problem. For some reason, when I reply to a message, I've got about 3-4 blank lines between the Hello like and the quote header. Any ideas? -- Best regards, David "It is a fine thing to have ability, but the ability to discoverability in others is th

Re: simple feature request

On Sunday, March 09, 2003 at 18:29:28GMT -0400 (which was 5:29 PM where I live) Task Control wrote and made these points on the subject of "simple feature request": TC> Hellow tbudl arroba thebat.dutaint.com TC> i wish: TC> - a shortcut key to: Send And Check for all. TC> I never use Che

Re: Yahoo Ads

On Friday, March 07, 2003 at 02:22:58GMT + (which was 9:22 PM where I live) Marck D Pearlstone wrote and made these points on the subject of "Yahoo Ads": MDP> (pssst - the standard "Quote extraction" macro set in the Library MDP> already does this for you). MDP> http://www.silverstones.c

Re: Yahoo Ads

On Friday, March 07, 2003 at 21:03:13GMT -0500 (which was 9:03 PM where I live) Roberto Machorro wrote and made these points on the subject of "Yahoo Ads": RM> I'll give this some thought over the weekend. If I add up all seconds RM> or minutes I've spent deleting junk from e-mail before I star

Re: Yahoo Ads

On Friday, March 07, 2003 at 20:37:57GMT -0500 (which was 8:37 PM where I live) Roberto Machorro wrote and made these points on the subject of "Yahoo Ads": RM> Hi RM> I've been wanting to do this, too. I know how to create the RegEx to RM> identify the Yahoo stuff (I've done it in Perl before)

Yahoo Ads

Hello All, Okay, I'm getting annoyed at having to cut out all the yahoo adds on the Yahoo group emails when I reply to one... Does anyone have a macro to automatically cut them out? -- Best regards, David Windows is NOT a virus. Viruses DO something. Using The Bat! v1.62i on Windows 98

Re: open URl with mozilla

On Friday, March 07, 2003 at 20:50:06GMT +0100 (which was 2:50 PM where I live) Peter Meyns wrote and made these points on the subject of "open URl with mozilla": PM> Hi David, PM> on Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:19:01 -0500GMT (07.03.03, 20:19 +0100GMT here), PM> you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : P

  1   2   >