-----Original Message----- From: "Alexander S. Kunz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Oct 21, 2004 8:39 AM To: "Michael L. Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Access violation when moving folders for rules
Hello Michael L. Wilson & everyone else 21-Okt-2004 00:03, you wrote: > I know this and say this because I worked for 16 years in Redmond > Washington, for Microsoft >Since we remember (from the days of *that* signature of yours *g*) that you >are a teacher, critic and ecclesiastic (sp?) philosopher, may I ask what >position you did occupy there? [no stab at discrediting you or something >ntended, I'd just find it interesting to know what kinda people are >working for Microsoft, you know...] I was software QA. My job was to setup new systems and see what happened to the registry and temp files area after installing third party items. I was in several meetings where memos from Hard Drive comapnies were used by programmers to purposly not delete temp and old items. In this way, MWindows would fill up a hard drive quickly and cause the user to buy a new one. Windows XP is the best and most stable, as hard drive size increases have virtually stopped. If 95 or 98 or me is used, the DOS kernal is the most unstable. DOs is not multi-tasking, multi-user or multi-threading, and windoes tries to add all those features while DOs is fighting it. NT is for servers. 200 is bloatware. XP is the first, sort-of departure from old paterns. It too, however, self-corrupts -- ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
