Re[2]: Replying to ReplyTo (again!)

[Han's]

Hello Roelof,

Wed, 10 Apr 2002 12:47:21 AM, Roelof Otten [RO] wrote:
...
RO When you're really without a workable solution you could try:

RO %To=%-
RO %If:%OReplyAddr=:'%To=%OFromAddr':'%To=%OReplyAddr'

RO The if-statement checks whether there is a reply-address. Couldn't
RO find a message without a reply-to, so I couldn't check that
RO performance..

can you help me for fix 'To' using %To, example:
in Address Book: John Wo [EMAIL PROTECTED], i want to take full name and
address when i reply message from John Wo...

many thanks Roelof ;)


-- 
Best regards,
 Han'smailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

winamp:. now playing:
...silence



Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re[2]: Replying to ReplyTo (again!)

[Han's]

Hello Roelof,

Wed, 10 Apr 2002 11:07:18 PM, Roelof Otten [RO] wrote:
...
RO I'm not sure what you're getting at. But I'd say try using the
RO %AbToName macro.

Thanks Roelof, I try using %AbToName.

-- 
Best regards,
 Han'smailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re[2]: Replying to ReplyTo (again!)

[Daniel Grunberg]

on Tuesday, April 9, 2002, 1:47:21 PM, Roelof Otten wrote:

 Hello Daniel,

 On Mon, 8 Apr 2002 19:32:38 -0400GMT (9-4-02, 1:32 +0200GMT, where I
 live), you wrote:

DG TheBat! uses the original From address and not the original ReplyTo
DG address, even when there is an original ReplyTo address.

DG Is there something I must do to enable replies to the ReplyTo address?

 Since I jumped in the previous time, I thought I'd also do so now.
 ;-)

Thank you Roelof.  Your interference is, and was, is much appreciated.
Both times, really.

 I can't find any switches to disable the usage of the Reply-To
 header for TB's replies. That's why I thought you'd might have been
 playing with your reply-template.

Yes, I had been playing with the templates, just as you suspected.

 However, there is a switch that enables/disables the use of the
 name-part of the original from-address. That might look like TB not
 using the reply-to, where it tries to be smart about the name-part.

This struck a chord with me.  I began to consider that the problem
might be mine, rather than TheBat!'s, just as you said. After some
experimentation on the reply template of a test folder (which i
created for this purpose), I discovered that TheBat!'s original reply
template does work correctly.  Then I replaced each of my accounts'
reply templates with a copy of the original reply template, and I
fixed only what really had to be fixed.

 When replying to this message it should get send to the list,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] TB will address it to Roelof Otten
 [EMAIL PROTECTED], but not to Roelof Otten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (the address in the from-header)

Thanks Roelf.  Now everything works as it should work.  (I'd like to
blame my problems on encroaching old age, but I don't want to tempt
fate, so I'll just chalk it up to experience. g)  I guess I owe
theBat! Team an apology. Thanks again.



Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]