Re[2]: %cursor was: Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-12-01 Thread Jast
Morning Steve Lamb, My reply to this is a little belated, I guess. I just remembered what I wanted to write ;-) Toggle macros are just like checkboxes. On, off. OTOH, they do take up space[*] unless you tack them onto the end of a line somewhere and then you can't see them. That's just

Re: %cursor was: Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-11-23 Thread Steve Lamb
Monday, November 22, 1999, 6:47:19 PM, Thomas wrote: OK, so by default the cursor should always go into the header, even if there is data (TO/Subject/...) already. Unless there is a %SkipHeader macro. This defines the default as opposite to what I was thinking of, but I get your point.

Re: %cursor was: Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-11-23 Thread Steve Lamb
Monday, November 22, 1999, 7:26:01 PM, Paula wrote: I would say that if the user has put a %SkipHeader macro in the template, then TB shouldn't worry about whether or not there is anything entered in the header, unless the intent is to allow the %SkipHeader only if the TO is filled in. I

Re[2]: %cursor was: Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-11-23 Thread Jast
Morning Steve Lamb, That it would. I like the idea of a template definition, just not sure if I want to fully endorse another template macro which is nothing more than a toggle that is better served, IMHO, by checkboxes on the templates. I prefer template macros. They are more versatile

Re: %cursor was: Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-11-23 Thread Steve Lamb
Tuesday, November 23, 1999, 2:03:17 PM, Jast wrote: I prefer template macros. They are more versatile (in regard to usability - you never know what functionality you could add to a macro) and don't take up window space if you don't use it. Really, I don't like long option lists. Of

Re[3]: %cursor was: Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-11-23 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Jast, on Wednesday, November 24, 1999, 6:03:17 AM GMT+0800, Jast wrote: That it would. I like the idea of a template definition, just not sure if I want to fully endorse another template macro which is nothing more than a toggle that is better served, IMHO, by checkboxes on the

Re: %cursor was: Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-11-22 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Oleg, On Monday, November 22, 1999, 8:57:38 PM (GMT+0800), Oleg Zalyalov wrote: It has nothing to do with %cursor macro, while is reasonable wish. But I'm afraid it is hardly implementable, while it does work so when you hit reply. PF Well, it would seem that it is

Re[2]: %cursor was: Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-11-22 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Steve, on Tuesday, November 23, 1999, 2:33:19 AM GMT+0800, Steve Lamb wrote: SL Monday, November 22, 1999, 6:15:22 AM, Thomas wrote: You mean a switch like a %SkipHeader macro? SL That would work. I'd actually like to see the current behavior of the SL reply template changed so that

Re: %cursor was: Re[2]: (No Subject)

1999-11-22 Thread Paula Ford
On Monday, November 22, 1999, Thomas Fernandez wrote: OK, so by default the cursor should always go into the header, even if there is data (TO/Subject/...) already. Unless there is a %SkipHeader macro. This defines the default as opposite to what I was thinking of, but I get your point.