On Mon, 5 Feb 2001 22:48:09 +0100, Jannik Lindquist wrote:
I would very much like to learn, what you think could be a
better solution.
This question alone shows the lack of experience you have with other
e-mail clients.
It seems to me that you are asking the impossible, if you want TB to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mark,
On 08 February 2001 at 19:36:33 -0500 (which was 00:36 where I live)
Mark Knipfer wrote and made these points:
I would very much like to learn, what you think could be a
better solution.
MK This question alone shows the lack of
Mark Knipfer wrote:
MK This question alone shows the lack of experience you have with
MK other e-mail clients.
WADR
What does WADR mean? I have no idea what the acronym means.
it shows that Jannik would be interested to hear a constructive view
from you as to what could adequately replace
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mark,
On 08 February 2001 at 21:01:38 -0500 (which was 02:01 where I live)
Mark Knipfer wrote and made these points:
WADR
MK What does WADR mean? I have no idea what the acronym means.
"With all due respect".
- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D.
Hello all,
Tuesday, February 06, 2001, Mark Knipfer wrote:
While this is absolutely true and not acceptable for a large and fully
staffed software house, those of us that are more used to the lack of
response from the less well endowed labs accept that they are busy
guys and submit bug
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001 10:54:59 +0100, Marek Mikus wrote:
As I know, Stefan spends '6'!!! hours daily for mail support. If they
will answer each bugreport and suggestion, when will they create code
for TB? Nevermind!
I agree. A programmer's time is better spent coding rather than answering
Hello Mark,
On Monday, February 05, 2001 21:56:07 [ -0500 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to '! 1.49: Message Column Lists moves to the
right, message threading':
Mark [...] no ambition and initiative to report these problems to RIT
Mark Labs since they will probably ignore them. To me
Hello Mark and other TBUDL's,
On Monday, February 05, 2001 at 15:47:18 GMT -0500 Mark Knipfer wrote on "!
1.49: Message Column Lists moves to the right, message threading":
BUG: I found one annoying bug. In a message thread if you click on the plus
signs throughout the entire mess
Hello
Tuesday, February 06, 2001, 8:48:09 AM, someone claiming to be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As you probably know, the news reader Agent solves all these
problems by
1) putting a limit on how many follow up-levels there can be in a thread
and
2) allowing control of the degree of
Mark Knipfer wrote:
In TheBat! 1.49 I am using the 'Full-height Account Tree' setting
(View | Split Mode | Full-height Account Tree) and the following for
message threading:
View | Display | All Messages (Ctrl =)
View | Sort by | Received Time (Ctrl 1)
View | Sort by | Descending
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mark,
On 05 February 2001 at 15:47:18 -0500 (which was 20:47 where I live)
Mark Knipfer wrote and made these points:
.. If you do this through a long threaded message discussion, you will
see the remaining Message List Columns just goes to
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001 21:19:36 +, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
.. If you do this through a long threaded message discussion, you will
see the remaining Message List Columns just goes to the far right
where you have to right scroll over to see them.
MK I have not received any word back
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mark,
On 06 February 2001 at 21:56:07 -0500 (which was 02:56 where I live)
Mark Knipfer wrote and made these points:
IMHO you probably won't. RITl labs have a strict policy of only
responding to the first originator of a new bug report.
MK
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001 03:40:44 +, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
MK If this is true, then this may not provide other TB! users enough
MK initiative to report program bugs and problems since their effort,
MK time, and work is not worthwhile to RIT Labs.
While this is absolutely true and not
I am currently testing out TheBat! 1.49 and it is a great program. I
previously tried TheBat! and it did not look that good at that time.
I guess I really did not look in to the program that well. Because
the last two days I have been thoroughly analyzing the program and I
cannot find any con's
Subject: ! 1.49: Message Column Lists moves to the right, message threading
From: Mark Knipfer
Dated: Sun, 4 Feb 2001, 10:28:46 (9:28:46 AM Local)
~~
M Because the last two days I have been thoroughly analyzing the
M program and I
On February 4, 2001, at 7:28:46 AM, Mark Knipfer Wrote:
MK View | Display | All Messages (Ctrl =)
MK View | Sort by | Received Time (Ctrl 1)
MK View | Sort by | Descending Order (Ctrl 0)
MK View | View Threads by | References (Alt 1)
Mark, I have found that if you simply view threads by
Nick Danger wrote:
ND Subject: ! 1.49: Message Column Lists moves to the right, message threading
NDFrom: Mark Knipfer
ND Dated: Sun, 4 Feb 2001, 10:28:46 (9:28:46 AM Local)
ND ~~
M Because the last two days I have been thoroughly
Nick Andriash wrote:
NA On February 4, 2001, at 7:28:46 AM, Mark Knipfer Wrote:
MK View | Display | All Messages (Ctrl =)
MK View | Sort by | Received Time (Ctrl 1)
MK View | Sort by | Descending Order (Ctrl 0)
MK View | View Threads by | References (Alt 1)
NA Mark, I have found that if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001 07:51:33 -0800, Nick thoughtfully wrote the
following:
--snip--
NA I've just found it easier and cleaner to view threads by Subject
NA alone, and not bother with the References.
... The problem with this being that any minor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001 10:54:10 -0500, Mark contributed this to our
collective wisdom:
--snip--
ND Beyond that, I do agree however that the way TB! expands threads
ND is annoying.
MK At least I know I am not the only one thinks this.
This is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001 10:58:54 -0500, Mark wrote these words of wisdom:
--snip--
MK I prefer to view the message threads by References rather than
MK Subject since I am used to viewing message threads by References.
MK If I view threads by
On February 4, 2001, at 8:00:08 AM, A. Curtis Martin Wrote:
ACM ... The problem with this being that any minor alteration of the
ACM subject breaks the thread and I've also noted that these subject
ACM threads break up for no apparent reason as well, especially when the
ACM threads are very
A. Curtis Martin wrote:
MK I prefer to view the message threads by References rather than
MK Subject since I am used to viewing message threads by References.
MK If I view threads by Subject, I may loose track of the discussion
MK -- the order of which the message are received and threaded.
ACM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001 08:13:48 -0800, Nick thoughtfully wrote the
following:
ACM ... The problem with this being that any minor alteration of the
ACM subject breaks the thread and I've also noted that these subject
ACM threads break up for no apparent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001 11:21:44 -0500, Mark contributed this to our
collective wisdom:
MK I may try this setup:
MK View | Display | All Messages (Ctrl =)
MK View | Sort by | Received Time (Ctrl 1)
MK View | Sort by | Descending Order (Ctrl 0)
MK
A. Curtis Martin wrote:
MK I may try this setup:
MK View | Display | All Messages (Ctrl =)
MK View | Sort by | Received Time (Ctrl 1)
MK View | Sort by | Descending Order (Ctrl 0)
MK View | View Threads by | Subject (Alt 2) -- change
ACM This is the exact settings I use for discussion
Hello Mark,
(MK == "Mark Knipfer") [EMAIL PROTECTED] etched:
Just a few alternatives:
MK View | Display | All Messages (Ctrl =)
You can also use Ctrl + *(on the num pad) to expand all threads, and
you can simply hit Esc to display all messages.
As for expanding and retracting threads,
28 matches
Mail list logo
