[no subject]

(cross-posted to TBUDL, TBBETA) Hello, What do you think about the screenshots of the upcoming The Bat! v9 which is currently in development? You can see the screenshots at https://www.facebook.com/emailman/posts/10157552017414120 If you like them, please put "Like". If you don't, please put

Re: Regex to clean up subject

On Thursday, September 3, 2015, 7:31:37 AM, MFPA (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com) wrote: > "Regular Expressions" (or simply "RegEx", "regex") a way of setting > patterns of characters to search for in strings. There is quite a lot > about them in TB!'s help file, most of it impenetrable unless you

Re: Regex to clean up subject

)?\s*(\[[^\]]*\]\s)|(?:(?:[^:]{0,4}(?:[\[\(]\d+[\]\)])?:)?\s*(?:\[[^\]]*\]\s*)?)?)%- >> \s*(?:(?:[^:]{0,4}(?:[\[\(]\d+[\]\)])?:)?\s*(?:\[[^\]]*\]\s*)?)*%- >> (.*?)%- ([\(\[].+[\)\]])?$/%- >> %RegExpBlindMatch="%OSubj"%- >> %Subject='Re: %SUBPATT="1"%SUBPATT=

Re: Regex to clean up subject

Hi On Monday 31 August 2015 at 3:54:22 PM, in , Fred wrote: >> Marck Pearlstone has a library of useful macros at >> . > Unfortunately, right now I got "Warning: > mysql_connect() [function.mysql-connect]:

Re: Regex to clean up subject

Dear Mfpa, @3-Sep-2015, 5:48 +0100 (03-Sep 12:35 here) MFPA [M] in mid:1069448339.20150903123548@my_localhost said to Fred: ... >> Unfortunately, right now I got "Warning: >> mysql_connect() [function.mysql-connect]: Access denied >> for user 'marck'@'80.229.140.13' (using password: YES) >>

Re: Regex to clean up subject

]*\]\s*)?)*%- > (.*?)%- > ([\(\[].+[\)\]])?$/%- > %RegExpBlindMatch="%OSubj"%- > %Subject='Re: %SUBPATT="1"%SUBPATT="2"' It would be very helpful if someone could explain what is going on here. Thanks. -- Leonard S. Berkowitz Using The Bat! v

Re: Regex to clean up subject

Thanks!! -- Rick > On Monday, August 31, 2015, 5:04:44, Rick Grunwald wrote: >> Someone once gave me an excellent regular expression that would clean >> up the subject of things like [this] and {that} >> I lost it along with all my mail in a hard drive crash >> I

Re: Regex to clean up subject

On Monday, August 31, 2015, 5:04:44, Rick Grunwald wrote: > Someone once gave me an excellent regular expression that would clean > up the subject of things like [this] and {that} > I lost it along with all my mail in a hard drive crash > If someone has it, could you kindly repost

Re: Regex to clean up subject

Hello Fred, On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 10:54:22 -0400GMT Fred wrote: >> Marck Pearlstone has a library of useful macros at >> . F> Unfortunately, right now I got "Warning: mysql_connect() F> [function.mysql-connect]: Access denied for user

Re: Regex to clean up subject

> Try this one: http://silverstones.com/thebat/samples.html > In the reply template section you will find the reply-cleaner. Thanks, Feli and MFPA for the links. It looks as if I will have some interesting reading there. :-) -- Fred Using TheBat V.4.2.44.2 for POP3 mail with Windows 7 Service

Re: Regex to clean up subject

Thanks! I had one removed some of the stuff added to headers by Yahoo groups etc. I appreciate the reply and did bookmark that site -- Rick > Hello Fred, > On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 10:54:22 -0400GMT Fred wrote: >>> Marck Pearlstone has a library of useful macros at >>>

Re: Regex to clean up subject

Using The Bat! 5.8.8 on Windows Vista Build 6002 On Monday, August 31, 2015, 4:04:44 AM, Rick Grunwald wrote: > Someone once gave me an excellent regular expression that would clean > up the subject of things like [this] and {that} > I lost it along with all my mail in a hard dr

Re: Regex to clean up subject

> Marck Pearlstone has a library of useful macros at > . Unfortunately, right now I got "Warning: mysql_connect() [function.mysql-connect]: Access denied for user 'marck'@'80.229.140.13' (using password: YES) in D:\Data\wwwroot\cgi\library.php on line 28

Re: Regex to clean up subject

Hi On Monday 31 August 2015 at 8:29:36 AM, in <mid:603496881.20150831082...@gjctech.co.uk>, Geoff Lane wrote: > Many years ago, Marck Pearlstone sent me the following > to clean up subject lines: > %subject="Re: > %setpattregexp=""(?i)\A\:?(\s*\[.*\])?(\s

Regex to clean up subject

Someone once gave me an excellent regular expression that would clean up the subject of things like [this] and {that} I lost it along with all my mail in a hard drive crash If someone has it, could you kindly repost it? Thanks -- Rick The Bat !: Version 7.0.2.1 (BETA) (64-bit

Re: Subject: history

I have a particular subject that I use frequently. How can I nail it in the Subject: history data so that it will always be there? Thanks. Use a template either address book for one person, group or a folder template (or a quick template) %SUBJECT=History data or whatever you want -- Rick

Re: Subject: history

On Thursday, June 4, 2015, 12:22:58 PM, you (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com) wrote: Use a template either address book for one person, group or a folder template (or a quick template) %SUBJECT=History data or whatever you want Thanks. That approach just did not occur to me. -- Leonard S

Re: No subject in replies

Hello MAU, On Saturday, September 14, 2013 you wrote: M Hello Jack, Is there a macro to generate a thread subject? M Try this in your reply template: M %SUBJ=%SUBJ=%OFULLSUBJ Thank you Miguel, that works perfectly. -- Best Regards, Jack LaRosa :usflag: Central Alabama Using The Bat

Re: No subject in replies

Hello Roelof, On Friday, September 13, 2013 you wrote: RO Hallo Jack, RO On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 09:16:05 -0500GMT (12-9-2013, 16:16 , where I RO live), you wrote: JSL Ok, here's the NEW template: RO Nothing in your templates that should empty the subject header. RO Though I'd use %SetEditor=1

Re: No subject in replies

Hello Jack, Is there a macro to generate a thread subject? Try this in your reply template: %SUBJ=%SUBJ=%OFULLSUBJ -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v5.4.8 My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com My photoblog: http://mau.aminus3.com

Re: No subject in replies

to a list message, the JSL subject line is empty when it should contain the thread subject. If I take the JSL SetEditor line out of the template, the subject line is once again filled with JSL the thread subject but I'm back to an HTML editor. Is there something else I JSL should add

Re: No subject in replies

Hallo Jack, On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 09:16:05 -0500GMT (12-9-2013, 16:16 , where I live), you wrote: JSL Ok, here's the NEW template: Nothing in your templates that should empty the subject header. Though I'd use %SetEditor=1%- in both templates. -- Groetjes, Roelof Of course, you know

No subject in replies

Hello TBUD Listers, I just recently discovered that I could add the line %SetEditor=1 to my NEW and REPLY templates to guarantee that Plain Text would always be used in those instances. I just noticed that when I reply to a list message, the subject line is empty when it should contain

Re: No subject in replies

JSL Hello TBUD Listers, JSL I just recently discovered that I could add the line %SetEditor=1 to JSL my NEW and REPLY templates to guarantee that Plain Text would always be used in JSL those instances. I just noticed that when I reply to a list message, the JSL subject line is empty when

Re: [TBUDL] Subject line says (see body)

on the fact that the word PayPal is present in subject is a stupid SMN anti-spam-filter. I mean, apparently it's stupid to you and me... but SMN it is also *professionally stupid* - one would think a professional SMN company had a better system running than that? I once worked for a company who's sysad

Subject line says (see body)

Greetings Oracle, I tried several times to send someone an email whose subject line read PayPal but none of the attempts were successful. It wasn't until I changed the subject line to read PP that it finally went through. Because of that I refrained from putting the word PayPal in the subject

Re: Subject line says (see body)

On 23 January 2013, 17:48, Jack S. LaRosa wrote: This method always failed but the message always re-appeared in the SENT mail folder every time I did this. It wasn't until I changed the subject line from PayPal to PP that the recipient finally received it. This suggests that TB

Re: Subject line says (see body)

Hello Geoff, On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 you wrote: GL On 23 January 2013, 17:48, Jack S. LaRosa wrote: This method always failed but the message always re-appeared in the SENT mail folder every time I did this. It wasn't until I changed the subject line from PayPal to PP

Re: [TBUDL] Subject line says (see body)

positives are almost inevitable, and I suspect that your message was falsely tagged as spam. This is very true - but if an anti-spam filter reject messages based on the fact that the word PayPal is present in subject is a stupid anti-spam-filter. I mean, apparently it's stupid to you and me

Re: [TBUDL] Subject line says (see body)

of phishing spam claim to be from Paypal, that some false positives are almost inevitable, and I suspect that your message was falsely tagged as spam. SMN This is very true - but if an anti-spam filter reject messages based SMN on the fact that the word PayPal is present in subject is a stupid SMN anti

Re: Subject line says (see body)

Hi On Wednesday 23 January 2013 at 6:53:07 PM, in mid:1101239910.20130123125...@charter.net, Jack S. LaRosa wrote: Hmmm, interesting (and probably correct). After sending these several attempts I went directly to my email ISP's site and looked at my email directly and found no evidence

Re: [TBUDL] Subject line says (see body)

Hi On Wednesday 23 January 2013 at 7:00:04 PM, in mid:1681765046.20130123130...@charter.net, Jack S. LaRosa wrote: After I responded to Geoff's message I sent myself a message with PayPal in the subject line and it went through just fine. It's probably getting out OK but being blocked

Re: Subject line says (see body)

Hello MFPA, On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 you wrote: M Hi M On Wednesday 23 January 2013 at 6:53:07 PM, in M mid:1101239910.20130123125...@charter.net, Jack S. LaRosa wrote: Hmmm, interesting (and probably correct). After sending these several attempts I went directly to my email ISP's

Re: Subject line says (see body) SOLVED

Hello Jack, On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 you wrote: JSL Greetings Oracle, JSL I tried several times to send someone an email whose subject line read PayPal JSL but none of the attempts were successful. It wasn't until I changed the subject JSL line to read PP that it finally went through

Re: Parsing Subject line when replying of forwardin

On Monday, November 5, 2012, 2:19:18, Rick wrote: I am in some Yahoo groups. Each group ads an identifier in the subject, [bracketed text that can vary] I would like to parse out the brackets and text. Is there any way to do that? Thanks in advance You can't alter the display

Re: Parsing Subject line when replying of forwardin

You can't alter the display of these subjects, but it's possible to remove the text when replying or forwarding by using macros. Thank you it works GREAT on replies but not on forwards for some reason But THANK YOU VERY MUCH!! -- Rick Only reason can convince us of those three fundamental

Re: Parsing Subject line when replying of forwardin

R I am in some Yahoo groups. Each group ads an identifier in the R subject, [bracketed text that can vary] R I would like to parse out the brackets and text. Is there any way to do that? R Thanks in advance This was supposed to go to TBUDL - resending -- Rick Help bring to a close, the Age

[no subject]

Wednesday, March 09, 2011 1:57:52 AM please remove my name and email address. howard b. schwartz mailto:howa...@comcast.net Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

[no subject]

Wednesday, March 09, 2011 2:44:33 AM remove my name and email address. howard b. schwartz mailto:howa...@comcast.net Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Subject lost when replying

Hello Rick, On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:14:58 -0400 GMT (24/Jul/10, 8:14 AM +0700 GMT), Rick wrote: R I have a fresh install of Windows. The Bat has been working correctly R for 2 days. Tonight, when I reply to a message, the subject is blank. R Any idea of how to fix this? If a restart

Subject lost when replying

I have a fresh install of Windows. The Bat has been working correctly for 2 days. Tonight, when I reply to a message, the subject is blank. Any idea of how to fix this? -- Rick Love is the delightful interval between meeting a beautiful girl and discovering that she looks like a haddock

Re: Subject lost when replying

Hello Rick, On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:14:58 -0400 GMT (24/Jul/10, 8:14 AM +0700 GMT), Rick wrote: R I have a fresh install of Windows. The Bat has been working correctly R for 2 days. Tonight, when I reply to a message, the subject is blank. R Any idea of how to fix this? If a restart doesn't

[no subject]

-- With best regards Lars Sölter mailto:lars.soel...@eanschrift.de The Bat! Version 4.2.36.4 Windows 7 / (Build 7600) Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: [Wish] Automatic (was: ...), if subject line of reply is edited.

) Ummm, three different people and three different opinions. Can you provide information about a reliable source which deals with this subject? a) Semiautomatic You can run the QT at any time even if the textbody of the new message is already modified. It would take me longer to look at the QT

Re: [Wish] Automatic (was: ...), if subject line of reply is edited.

(was: 4.0.0.19) No! Should be - BETA (was: Re: 4.0.0.19) Ummm, three different people and three different opinions. Can you provide information about a reliable source which deals with this subject? Actually, I was just reacting to the emphatic That's WRONG! I think any of the above serves

Re: [Wish] Automatic (was: ...), if subject line of reply is edited.

(40tude Dialog) does so, too: If you edit the subject line of a reply the client sets the original subject in brackets like above. I found a (quite good) solution for this problem: a) Semiautomatic - Create a Quicktemplate and (out of convenience) assign a shortcut: %If:%Subj%OSubj:%Subject

Re: [Wish] Automatic (was: ...), if subject line of reply is edited.

WRONG! If it would ever be implemented, it should be Re: BETA (was: 4.0.0.19) No! Should be - BETA (was: Re: 4.0.0.19) Good idea! - My favorite news client (40tude Dialog) does so, too: If you edit the subject line of a reply the client sets the original subject in brackets like above

Replying to Arabic subject

Hello All, I noticed that when I reply to a message with Arabic characters in the subject line, the characters turn into a series of question marks like this: Re: ??? ?? ?? ? ? I would like to grasp the opportunity to ask another question regarding reply to html messages

Re: Replying to Arabic subject

Hello Assad, On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:25:21 +0500 GMT (26/Feb/09, 0:25 +0700 GMT), Assad Kety wrote: AK I noticed that when I reply to a message with Arabic characters in the AK subject line, the characters turn into a series of question marks like AK this: Re: ??? ?? ?? ? ? Please

Re: Replying to Arabic subject

Hello Thomas, On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 05:11:24 +0700 GMT (26/Feb/09, 5:11 +0700 GMT), Thomas Fernandez wrote: AK I would like to grasp the opportunity to ask another question AK regarding reply to html messages. If I received a message in html with AK emoticons, the emoticons are not

[no subject]

Dear all, Could you please look at this filter? It doesn't work as it should. My idea is to filter the TBUDL Mission Statement based on Subject and Recipient. Any idea why it doesn't do as intended? Many thanks ',- [ Filter for TBUDL Mission Statement ] '| TB! Message Filter

[no subject]

Hello tbudl, For many years I have shared TheBat across several computers on a small domestic network by installing a separate copy on each computer. I then set up appropriate accounts on each machine for all of the users who wanted to see each other users' email traffic in addition to

Re: (no subject)

On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 21:00:53 +0100 Marek Mikus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Hello, too. -- Cheers, Thomas. Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: (no subject)

Hello Thomas, you wrote: TF On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 21:00:53 +0100 TF Marek Mikus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, TF Hello, too. TF -- TF Cheers, TF Thomas. Hello, three. -- Cheers, Maurice Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using

(no subject)

Hello, -- Thanks and Bye, Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 4.0.0.17 (ALPHA) under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Notebook Acer, Pentium4-M 2.2 GHz, 512 MB RAM, ADSL line

Threading by references+subject does not work with german AW: reply

Hello Tbudl, Hope this wasn't covered somewhere before, I only found a very old message from 2001 about this: Did anybody find a solution to thread correctly the answers from Outlook users replying with the german version of RE: namely AW:? references+subject does not match in this case

Re[2]: Filtering on [] in subject string

rg I have a spam filter meant to trigger if a subject line contains rg [SPAM]. ... the filter is ignoring the brackets ... as any message rg with SPAM anywhere in the subject line is being sent to the spam rg folder. rg Must I do something special to alert the filtering tools NOT to rg ignore

Re[2]: Filtering on [] in subject string

IAW Try a \ before each [ or ] to make the [ or ] seen literally. rg Old string = [SPAM] rg New string = \[SPAM\] rg With the old string the filter ignored the []s so ANY message with SPAM rg in the subject (no matter with or without the []s) was placed in the rg junk folder. rg With the new

Subject Drop Down

Hi Batpeople, Where, oh where, is the toggle to make drop downs saved in the Subject pop-up actually pop-up as you type. Long, long ago I shut it of and can't find where they moved the toggle. Thanks. -- Best regards, Richard mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Using

Re: Subject Drop Down

Hallo Richard, On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 17:10:54 -0500GMT (6-2-2007, 23:10 +0100, where I live), you wrote: RN Where, oh where, is the toggle to make drop downs saved in the RN Subject pop-up actually pop-up as you type. Long, long ago I shut it RN of and can't find where they moved the toggle

Re[2]: Subject Drop Down

Hello Roelof, Tuesday, February 6, 2007, 6:00:43 PM, you wrote: RO Options - Preferences - Message headers - Subject - Edit - Editing Thanks for the guided tour . . . that got me to just where I wanted to be. Your messaged is no parked/saved for prosterity. RO It looks like your

Filtering on [] in subject string

Hello Bat-Folk! I have a spam filter meant to trigger if a subject line contains [SPAM]. It seems as though the filter is ignoring the brackets though as any message with SPAM anywhere in the subject line is being sent to the spam folder. Must I do something special to alert the filtering

Re: Filtering on [] in subject string

On Wednesday, January 31, 2007, 3:05:23 PM, rich gregory wrote: Must I do something special to alert the filtering tools to not ignore the brackets? just a guess, try enclosing [spam] in ' eg '[spam]' -- Dwight A. Corrin 928 S Broadway Wichita KS 67211 316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568

Re: (no subject)

Hi On Tuesday 10 October 2006 at 7:49:24 PM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Roelof Otten wrote: Could not connect to the server is an odd error. You tried this: smtp.googlemail.com TLS to port 465 pop.googlemail.comTLS to port 995 smtp authentication enabled of course, but don't select

Re[2]: (no subject)

Hello Roelof, Tuesday, October 10, 2006, 2:49:24 PM, you wrote: RO Hallo MikeD, RO On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:18:49 -0400GMT (10-10-2006, 19:18 , where I RO live), you wrote: RO You're not able to connect, is that with pop3, smtp or both? M Both. When I try to receive or send email with TB, it

Re[2]: (no subject)

Hello Alexander, Tuesday, October 10, 2006, 1:00:49 PM, you wrote: ASK Hello MikeD (2) everyone else, ASK on 10-Okt-2006 at 13:35 you (MikeD (2)) wrote: I suspect that the problem is that it is a 'hosted' email, that is, it is not an '@gmail.com' address, but a different 'domain' that is

(no subject)

Hello all, OK ... this is related to this thread: http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forum/read.php?FID=4TID=2349 I have been through that one, but I am still not able to connect. I suspect that the problem is that it is a 'hosted' email, that is, it is not an '@gmail.com' address, but a

Re: (no subject)

Hello MikeD! On Tuesday, October 10, 2006, 6:35 AM, you wrote: OK ... this is related to this thread: http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forum/read.php?FID=4TID=2349 I have been through that one, but I am still not able to connect. I suspect that the problem is that it is a 'hosted'

Re: (no subject)

Hallo MikeD, On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 07:35:52 -0400GMT (10-10-2006, 13:35 , where I live), you wrote: MI have been through that one, but I am still not able to connect. MI suspect that the problem is that it is a 'hosted' email, that is, Mit is not an '@gmail.com' address, but a

Re: (no subject)

Hello MikeD (2) everyone else, on 10-Okt-2006 at 13:35 you (MikeD (2)) wrote: I suspect that the problem is that it is a 'hosted' email, that is, it is not an '@gmail.com' address, but a different 'domain' that is being serviced by gmail. I have no idea what you mean with this. As far as I

Re[2]: (no subject)

Hello Roelof, Tuesday, October 10, 2006, 8:36:41 AM, you wrote: RO Hallo MikeD, RO On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 07:35:52 -0400GMT (10-10-2006, 13:35 , where I RO live), you wrote: MI have been through that one, but I am still not able to connect. MI suspect that the problem is that it is a

Re[2]: (no subject)

Hello Mary, Tuesday, October 10, 2006, 7:58:44 AM, you wrote: MB Hello MikeD! MB On Tuesday, October 10, 2006, 6:35 AM, you wrote: OK ... this is related to this thread: http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forum/read.php?FID=4TID=2349 I have been through that one, but I am still not able to

Re: (no subject)

Hallo MikeD, On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:18:49 -0400GMT (10-10-2006, 19:18 , where I live), you wrote: RO You're not able to connect, is that with pop3, smtp or both? M Both. When I try to receive or send email with TB, it goes out and M begins the process ... after about 20 seconds I get a could

(no subject)

Hi -- Best regards, MFPA Ultimate consistency lies in being consistently inconsistent Using The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:

Re: (no subject)

Oops. That one escaped. Sorry. -- Best regards, MFPA No matter where you go, there you are. Using The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL'

Re[2]: Is there a way to set up a Reply to automatically use a specific Account based on the Subject?

Wednesday, July 19, 2006, Chris W. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] @ 2006-7-19 6:47:27 PM Is there a way to set up a Reply to automatically use a specific Account based on the Subject? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] %If:%subject=[FCNYC]:%- %account='Account3':%- %account='Zworg

Re: Is there a way to set up a Reply to automatically use a specific Account based on the Subject?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] @ 2006-7-20 1:59:06 AM Is there a way to set up a Reply to automatically use a specific Account based on the Subject? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For this, take a look at regular expressions. I looked at Regular Expressions in online help; and it is all greek to me. Would

Re[3]: Is there a way to set up a Reply to automatically use a specific Account based on the Subject?

Hello z5worg, Thursday, July 20, 2006, 12:59:06 AM, you wrote: I looked at Regular Expressions in online help; and it is all greek to me. Would appreciate if someone would provide me with the exact syntax. It would be easier to just use Contains [FCNYC]. This will not use regex, but must

Re: Is there a way to set up a Reply to automatically use a specific Account based on the Subject?

Hello Stuart Cuddy everyone else, on 20-Jul-2006 at 14:47 you (Stuart Cuddy) wrote: It would be easier to just use Contains [FCNYC]. If this worked in a %IF macro clause, indeed. ;-) -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de) NP: Star Above Parvati (Bijli Mahadev mix) by Doof

Filter for subject empty

Lately I am getting a lot of spam with no subject. I use Bayes Filter, which doesn't put it in the spam folder. How can I set up my incoming filter for indicating subject: empty. I would place it after the filter for known therefore in case one of my correspondent forget to put a subject line

Re[2]: Is there a way to set up a Reply to automatically use a specific Account based on the Subject?

Thursday, July 20, 2006, Chris W. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] @ 2006-7-20 1:59:06 AM Is there a way to set up a Reply to automatically use a specific Account based on the Subject? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For this, take a look at regular expressions. I looked at Regular

Re[3]: Is there a way to set up a Reply to automatically use a specific Account based on the Subject?

Tuesday, July 18, 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tuesday, July 18, 2006, Robin Anson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 at 00:50:18 -0400, Z5worg wrote: Can one write a conditional filter for the Outgoing message to use Account XYZ if the Subject is ABC? If yes, please specify

Re: Is there a way to set up a Reply to automatically use a specific Account based on the Subject?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] @ 2006-7-19 6:47:27 PM Is there a way to set up a Reply to automatically use a specific Account based on the Subject? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] %If:%subject=[FCNYC]:%- %account='Account3':%- %account='Zworg' The Subject heading would be something like [FCNYC

Re: Is there a way to set up a Reply to automatically use a specific Account based on the Subject?

On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 at 00:50:18 -0400, Z5worg wrote: Can one write a conditional filter for the Outgoing message to use Account XYZ if the Subject is ABC? If yes, please specify the exact macro(?). Sure. Put the following in an appropriate message template or quick template: %If:%subject

Re: Is there a way to set up a Reply to automatically use a specific Account based on the Subject?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] @ 2006-7-18 12:50:18 AM Is there a way to set up a Reply to automatically use a specific Account based on the Subject? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] We are discussing this very topic since yesterday, in the messages starting with msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] which you might want to read

Re[2]: Is there a way to set up a Reply to automatically use a specific Account based on the Subject?

Tuesday, July 18, 2006, Robin Anson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 at 00:50:18 -0400, Z5worg wrote: Can one write a conditional filter for the Outgoing message to use Account XYZ if the Subject is ABC? If yes, please specify the exact macro(?). Sure. Put the following

Re: Is there a way to set up a Reply to automatically use a specific Account based on the Subject?

in the Subject. We are discussing this very topic since yesterday, in the messages starting with msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] which you might want to read first to avoid the redundancy. -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de) NP: Accountancy Shanty by Monthy Python (from the 1989 album

Re[2]: Is there a way to set up a Reply to automatically use a specific Account based on the Subject?

(instead of to the list's address). But the List is identified in the Subject. We are discussing this very topic since yesterday, in the messages starting with msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] which you might want to read first to avoid the redundancy. How do I get to that topic? I tried the archive

Is there a way to set up a Reply to automatically use a specific Account based on the Subject?

I subscribe to a mailing list which is set up so that a Reply would automatically go the email address of the message's author (instead of to the list's address). But the List is identified in the Subject. So is there a way to set up a Reply to automatically use a specific email Account based

Re: (no subject)

Hello rich, On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 22:01:01 -0400 GMT (15/07/2006, 09:01 +0700 GMT), rich gregory wrote: rg Hello Bat-Folk! Hallo folder template! -- Cheers, Thomas. Reason for leaving last job: They insisted that all employees get to work by 8:45 am every morning. I couldn't work under

(no subject)

Hello Bat-Folk! -- Beautiful Butterfly Displays http://FramedButterflyArt.com Random tagline: I'd hate to be a teetotaller. Imagine getting up and knowing that's as good as you're going to feel all day. - Dean Martin Current version

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] inserted in subject line

it. As you wrote above: when my recipient reply to me It is not an incoming filter because the subject of the receipt confirmation that I get from MAILER-DAEMON says Delivery report: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Did you check if your recipient received the msg including [Suspected Spam] in the subject

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] inserted in subject line

Hello Arjun, On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 16:44:07 +0530GMT Arjun Sahani wrote: Did you check if your recipient received the msg including [Suspected Spam] in the subject? What's the answer? AS Yes they do receive. I strongly feel it is my ISP the main culprit. I AS suspect they have some sort

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] inserted in subject line

Hello Arjun Sahani everyone else, on 21-Apr-2006 at 02:21 you (Arjun Sahani) wrote: I am only using the web inteface of hotmail to send this until I find a solution for the Suspected Spam problem. Are you using thìs hotmail account when you use TheBat? If so, you can't simply relay messages

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] inserted in subject line

of Norton Internet Security will add things to the Subject of incoming mail that is scanned for spam. I think the ISP has such a filter but what puzzled me is that the filter operates on outgoing mail as well. It is weird. As to why it does not happen with other mail clients, some spam filters

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] inserted in subject line

Hi Feli, Did you check if your recipient received the msg including [Suspected Spam] in the subject? What's the answer? AS Yes they do receive. I strongly feel it is my ISP the main culprit. I AS suspect they have some sort of bayesian filter running and does not like AS something

[SUSPECTED SPAM] inserted in subject line

Hi, I have a very weird problem when using the bat! I have [SUSPECTED SPAM] inserted infront of my subject. It's not inserted by my smtp server because when I use another email program I do not get this. I spoke with the ISP and they have no clue either. They tell me it is my email program

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] inserted in subject line

Hello Arjun Sahani everyone else, on 20-Apr-2006 at 23:02 you (Arjun Sahani) wrote: I have a very weird problem when using the bat! I have [SUSPECTED SPAM] inserted infront of my subject. It's not inserted by my smtp server because when I use another email program I do not get this. I spoke

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] inserted in subject line

Hi Alexander, I have a very weird problem when using the bat! I have [SUSPECTED SPAM] inserted infront of my subject. It's not inserted by my smtp server because when I use another email program I do not get this. I spoke with the ISP and they have no clue either. They tell me it is my

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] inserted in subject line

is entirely empty? I tried playing with the X-Mailer field but did not work. Ah. You mean the subject line is included in messages SENT by you? In that case, it can't be any antispam plugin, because it is only used on message you are receiving. Its not used for outgoing messages. Check your Sent

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >