Hi All,
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001 at 01:23:00 GMT +0700 (8/29/2001 1:23 AM GMT +0700
where you think I live) "Syafril Hermansyah"=[SH]typed the following :
>>> I haven't this additional string in my lists too, there is no reason to
>>> have them in subject line.
>> Okay !
> Hmm...the blank space s
Hi All,
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001 at 01:05:41 GMT +0700 (8/29/2001 1:05 AM GMT +0700
where you think I live) "Syafril Hermansyah"=[SH]typed the following :
>> I haven't this additional string in my lists too, there is no reason to
>> have them in subject line.
> Okay !
Hmm...the blank space should
Hi All,
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001 at 19:51:24 GMT +0200 (CEST) (8/29/2001 12:51 AM
GMT +0700 where you think I live) "Marek Mikus"=[MM]typed the
following :
>> > Others opinion ?
>>
>> I've found that adding Subject tags such as "tbudl" tag is redundant,
>> and only adds length to the Sub
Hi All,
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001 at 10:41:46 GMT -0700 (8/29/2001 12:41 AM GMT
+0700 where you think I live) "Nick Andriash"=[NA]typed the following
:
>> Others opinion ?
> I've found that adding Subject tags such as "tbudl" tag is redundant,
> and only adds length to the Subject line. In my
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Nick Andriash wrote:
> > Others opinion ?
>
> I've found that adding Subject tags such as "tbudl" tag is redundant,
> and only adds length to the Subject line. In my PGP-Basics List, I
> removed the Subject tag much to the delight of the Members, even though
> some had to ch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Syafril,
On Tuesday, August 28, 2001, at 10:12:55 AM -0700, you wrote:
> Others opinion ?
I've found that adding Subject tags such as "tbudl" tag is redundant,
and only adds length to the Subject line. In my PGP-Basics List, I
removed the Su
Hello Dwight,
Tuesday, August 28, 2001, 11:58:20 PM, you wrote to Timothy J. Luoma:
>> Why does a mailing list for a mail program that can sort on any
>> header need to have a Subject tag for each message?
DAC> I'll second that protest. Please advise what message we have to send
DAC> the serv
Hello Timothy,
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001 12:54:50 -0400 GMT (29/08/2001, 00:54 +0800 GMT),
Timothy J. Luoma wrote:
TJL> TjL, who dislikes list-tags that can't be turned off
I agree to every word you said.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.
Und heisst Du nicht Wi
On Tuesday, August 28, 2001, 11:54:50 AM, Timothy J. Luoma wrote:
> Why does a mailing list for a mail program that can sort on any
> header need to have a Subject tag for each message?
I'll second that protest. Please advise what message we have to send
the server to turn off that feature.
-
Why does a mailing list for a mail program that can sort on any header
need to have a Subject tag for each message?
Now I have to write another procmail script for the server to yank it
out.
We now have "Re: [tbudl] Re: Test" for a Subject line (at least that's
how it appea
Hi All,
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001 at 18:28:01 GMT +0200 (8/28/2001 11:28 PM GMT
+0700 where you think I live) "Peter Palmreuther"=[PP]typed the
following :
SH>> Testing
> the 'new'/'other' lists daemon (the one that prepends [tbudl]) misses the
> 'X-MDMailing-List:' Header therefore my f
Hello Syafril,
Tuesday, August 28, 2001, 11:22:26 PM, you wrote to Syafril
Hermansyah:
SH>> Testing
SH> Test #2
Test #3
--
Best regards,
Syafrilmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
__
Archives : http://
Hello Syafril,
Tuesday,August28,2001, 11:15:32 PM, you wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
SH> Testing
Test #2
--
Best regards,
Syafrilmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
__
Archives : http://tbudl
13 matches
Mail list logo
