Re: Addressbook query

2007-05-03 Thread Tom
Friday, May 4, 2007, 12:13:51 PM, you wrote: > Hi > On Friday 4 May 2007 at 2:50:42 AM, in > , Tom wrote: >> I am surprised though that this came allocated to one of my >> earlier unrelated queries instead of a new question? > Here, the first of your two posts starts a new thread as expected.

Re: Addressbook query

2007-05-03 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Tom, On Fri, 4 May 2007 11:50:42 +1000 GMT (04/05/2007, 08:50 +0700 GMT), Tom wrote: T> I am surprised though that this came allocated to one of my earlier T> unrelated queries instead of a new question? You started a new thread over here. I sort by references only. Maybe you sort by subje

Re: Addressbook query

2007-05-03 Thread MFPA
Hi On Friday 4 May 2007 at 2:50:42 AM, in , Tom wrote: > I am surprised though that this came allocated to one of my > earlier unrelated queries instead of a new question? Here, the first of your two posts starts a new thread as expected. Have you inadvertently re-threaded it? -- Best regards

Re: Addressbook query

2007-05-03 Thread Tom
Friday, May 4, 2007, 9:32:17 AM, you wrote: > Hello Everyone, > I recently created a new Addressbook containing the addresses of all > incoming emails. This worked fine as I then set up a filter to show > incoming mails from existing contacts in a special folder. > Today I intended to add a furt

Addressbook query

2007-05-03 Thread Tom
Hello Everyone, I recently created a new Addressbook containing the addresses of all incoming emails. This worked fine as I then set up a filter to show incoming mails from existing contacts in a special folder. Today I intended to add a further folder for "important or suspicious" contacts based

Re: addressbook query

2007-01-21 Thread Tom
Sunday, January 21, 2007, 8:36:01 PM, you wrote: >>> Well, you're forgetting about folder templates, they go between group >>> templates and account templates. T>> Well, actually I read about these but did not understand when I would T>> be using them nor where I would set up the details. If I r

Re: addressbook query

2007-01-21 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Tom, On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 19:58:01 +1100GMT (21-1-2007, 9:58 +0100, where I live), you wrote: T>>> Got it now -priority individual template / group template / account template >> Well, you're forgetting about folder templates, they go between group >> templates and account templates. T> W

Re: addressbook query

2007-01-21 Thread Tom
T>> Got it now -priority individual template / group template / account template > Well, you're forgetting about folder templates, they go between group > templates and account templates. Well, actually I read about these but did not understand when I would be using them nor where I would set up

Re: addressbook query

2007-01-21 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Tom, On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 10:19:33 +1100GMT (21-1-2007, 0:19 +0100, where I live), you wrote: T> Got it now -priority individual template / group template / account template Well, you're forgetting about folder templates, they go between group templates and account templates. T> and if you

Re: addressbook query

2007-01-20 Thread Tom
Saturday, January 20, 2007, 6:07:59 PM, you wrote: T>> Also, if I have set up templates for the group, it appears that they T>> have priority over templates of the individual. > Actually, it's the other way around. If a individual template exists, > it will always override the group template. >

Re: addressbook query

2007-01-20 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Tom, On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 11:19:59 +1100 GMT (20/01/2007, 07:19 +0700 GMT), Tom wrote: T> I would like to include a contact in a "formal" group (with legal T> templates) for recurring messages but also have private emails with T> this person, how would I do that? If I want to meet for tennis

Re: addressbook query

2007-01-20 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Tom, On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 11:19:59 +1100GMT (20-1-2007, 1:19 +0100, where I live), you wrote: T> Also, if I have set up templates for the group, it appears that they T> have priority over templates of the individual. Actually, it's the other way around. If a individual template exists, it w

Re: addressbook query

2007-01-19 Thread Robin Anson
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 at 11:19:59 +1100, Tom wrote: > Also, if I have set up templates for the group, it appears that they > have priority over templates of the individual. Assuming this is > correct and I would like to include a contact in a "formal" group > (with legal templates) for recurring mess

Re: addressbook query

2007-01-19 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Tom, Friday, January 19, 2007, 6:19:59 PM, you wrote: > While I can set up contacts in various groups, why do they "disappear" > from the overall addressbook listing? In the group properties, uncheck "Hide items if not Explicitly selected". -- Stuartmailto:[EM

addressbook query

2007-01-19 Thread Tom
Hello Everyone, I am trying to improve my usage of addressbook, groups and template functions and stumbled across two queries. It appears that if I include a contact in a group, this contact can no longer be searched in the normal addressbook but only in the groups. While I can set up contacts in