Hello TBUDL
On Tuesday, June 22, 2004 at 9:50:06 AM, clairvoyants were mystified when TBUDL [JR]
conjured:
RO As I just did a fresh install, I respectfully have to disagree with
RO you. I thought it went kind of easy.
JR Are you sure that's due to your familiarity with the program?
I just
Hallo Jan,
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 21:40:45 -0400GMT (20-6-2004, 3:40 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
JR In either case, it is my opinion that TB! installation is a
JR PITA shouldn't be @ this stage of its development.
As I just did a fresh install, I respectfully have to disagree with
you. I
Hi Roelof,
At 4:25 PM on Sunday, June 20, 2004 Roelof Otten RO wrote the
following in regards to An overview of the file structure please:
JR In either case, it is my opinion that TB! installation is a
JR PITA shouldn't be @ this stage of its development.
RO As I just did a fresh install
OK the consnesus so far is that I can copy the entire MAIL directory
from one machine to another.
But there is also a suggestion that a egistry key has to be copied
too.
Which registry key and, as a mater of interest/understadning why? What
does this registry key(s) represent ion realtion to the
Hallo admin,
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 13:44:41 +0100GMT (19-6-2004, 14:44 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
A OK the consnesus so far is that I can copy the entire MAIL directory
A from one machine to another.
That's what I did.
A But there is also a suggestion that a egistry key has to be copied
A
Hi Roelof,
At 6:46 PM on Saturday, June 19, 2004 Roelof Otten RO wrote the
following in regards to An overview of the file structure please:
RO snip It tells TB the names of the accounts, where to find them.
RO It stores the registration key, the sizes of the different screens
RO ans
RO where
Hello Roelof,
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 00:46:27 +0200 GMT (20/06/2004, 05:46 +0700 GMT),
Roelof Otten wrote:
A But there is also a suggestion that a egistry key has to be copied
A too.
RO That´s possible too. I didn´t do that, but that´s a personal decision.
I would certainly recommend it. That's
I am getting very frustrated with the various methods of
'synchronising' The Bat betwen two machines.
A - The synchronise tool is not really synchrinise; it's actually add
this lot onto what wa there before. I.e: if I have deleted an email
from machine 2 then syncrinise back again the copy on
Hello admin,
Friday, June 18, 2004, 6:41:17 PM, you wrote:
aacu I am getting very frustrated with the various methods of
aacu 'synchronising' The Bat betwen two machines.
aacu B - I tried the seting up of Machine 1 to send BCC of all outgoing
aacu mails, not delete them from the server and then
Hello admin,
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 22:11:17 +0100 GMT (19/06/2004, 04:11 +0700 GMT),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
aacu C - Neither of these would be a huge problem with one or even two
aacu email accounts but with 42 - it's an impossibility unles I empliyed
aacu someone full-timeto manage it !! ;-))
10 matches
Mail list logo
