See http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/spammers.html
And why oh why do I get a 404?
I did, too.
I also cannot make X-ray delete the X-mailer. This has not
been my week.
Elaine
Northern Virginia USA
(without power much of the week, dealing with annoying
server techs when powered up, and
ON Tuesday, September 23, 2003, 7:40:50 AM, you wrote:
See http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/spammers.html
And why oh why do I get a 404?
E I did, too.
E I also cannot make X-ray delete the X-mailer. This has not
E been my week.
E Elaine
E Northern Virginia USA
E (without power much of
ON Tuesday, September 23, 2003, 7:40:50 AM, you wrote:
See http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/spammers.html
And why oh why do I get a 404?
E I did, too.
E I also cannot make X-ray delete the X-mailer. This has not
E been my week.
E Elaine
Hi Elaine,
I have send a X-Ray file to your
Hi Jurgen,
@23-Sep-2003, 08:00 +0200 (07:00 UK time) Jurgen Haug [JH] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Thomas:
See http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/spammers.html
And why oh why do I get a 404?
JH because it's spammer.html and not spammerS.html ;-)
D'oh! It is that. Sorry to all for that
Hello Gerard,
Tuesday, September 23, 2003, 1:22:32 AM, you wrote:
E
E Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information:
E http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
G I have attached my x-ray filter for changing the TB! X-mailer
G header.
Hello Marck,
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 11:33:01 +0100 GMT (23/09/2003, 17:33 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
So, once more - with feeling:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/spammer.html
Works well, thanks. :-)
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.
There
Friday, September 19, 2003, 1:45:56 AM, Deborah wrote:
DW The Ritlabs page on TB as a spam-tool appears to have disappeared -
DW anyone know where it might now be found?
Internet Archive has a copy here Deborah:
Hi Anne,
@22-Sep-2003, 08:13 Anne [A] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
DW The Ritlabs page on TB as a spam-tool appears to have
DW disappeared - anyone know where it might now be found?
A Internet Archive has a copy here Deborah:
A
Hello Marck,
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 16:58:39 +0100 GMT (22/09/2003, 22:58 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
See http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/spammers.html
And why oh why do I get a 404?
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.
- THE HOTEL HAS BOWLING
Hello Chris,
Friday, September 19, 2003, 1:08:03 PM, you wrote:
C Technically, since we use English and not Latin, the plural of virus
C is viruses. In Latin, the plural of virus is NOT viri or virii. It is vira.
C (It's irregular in that regard.)
Seems the plural (if it has ever existed at
Hi Melissa,
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, at 17:32:25 [GMT-0700] (which was Fri, 10:32:25
where I live) you wrote:
I don't know how that got started,
Initially there was a virus (or virii - such a word?) called Bat
http://www.pestpatrol.com/PestInfo/db/w/wolfdem_s_bat_virus_creator.asp
--
John
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello John,
On 19 September 2003, 20:15 +1000 (11:15 local time) John Phillips [JP] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JP Initially there was a virus (or virii - such a word?)
Oh no, not again... believe me it's virus (singular) and viruses
(plural).
Friday, September 19, 2003, 8:43:54 AM, Martin WEBSTER wrote:
JP Initially there was a virus (or virii - such a word?)
M Oh no, not again... believe me it's virus (singular) and
M viruses (plural).
M - -- Best regards, Martin Webster
Anyone with that last name, I'll have to believe about words!
On Friday, September 19, 2003 at 6:15:49 AM, John Phillips wrote in
the message Blocking Bat mail
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Initially there was a virus (or virii - such a word?) called Bat
http://www.pestpatrol.com/PestInfo/db/w/wolfdem_s_bat_virus_creator.asp
Technically, since we use English
Anyone hear know about this garbage?
I have an answer to my problem not receiving your e-mail.
Can't believe they really followed through. My ISP called
this morning to tell me the reason is, they have blocked
any Bat program messages. Made sense to me because I know
you use Bat e-mail
ETM wrote:
Anyone hear know about this garbage?
There was a post on the RitLab home page some time ago about behavior
like this (before the site makeover). It may still be there somewhere.
--
ken
Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL
On Thursday, September 18, 2003, 7:58:26 PM, ETM wrote:
E My ISP called this morning to tell me the reason is, they have
E blocked any Bat program messages. Made sense to me because I know
E you use Bat e-mail program. They told most spam comes on Bat
E program, and they have blocked it, and
Hi Etm,
@18-Sep-2003, 19:58 -0400 (19/09/200300:58 UK time) ETM [EOV] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TB:
EOV Anyone hear know about this garbage?
Yes. So do RITlabs.
... snip
EOV This is coming from a coastaccess.com user.
Explain this to them. The spam comes with this header:
X-Mailer:
Hello Marck
On Thursday, September 18, 2003, you wrote
Anyway, AMS also fakes an OE header, so if this highly irresponsible
ISP were to block Outlook Express users too, then (and only then)
would their action be fair and reasonable.
Thanks, Marck. I had already told my correspondent that
Thursday, September 18, 2003, 8:40:57 PM, you wrote:
I shared my original post here with RitLabs. There's not
much more I can or am willing to do.
Providers/web masters who use ASAP! also block *all* messages coming from TB:
http://www.commtouch.com
I've had it happen to me three times just
20 matches
Mail list logo
