FullFolderName macro (was: Edit Message Subject)

2004-11-10 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Bill, On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 12:36:29 -0600 GMT (09/11/2004, 01:36 +0700 GMT), Bill McCarthy wrote: BM Please Ritlabs, give us a FullFolderName macro!!! If you put this into the wishlist, I'll second it (if you post the full URL of that wishlist entry). Nothing to do with editing message

Re: FullFolderName macro (was: Edit Message Subject)

2004-11-10 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Peter, On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 21:11:52 +0100 GMT (11/11/2004, 03:11 +0700 GMT), Peter Ouwehand wrote: BM Please Ritlabs, give us a FullFolderName macro!!! TF If you put this into the wishlist, I'll second it (if you post the TF full URL of that wishlist entry). Nothing to do with editing

Edit Message Subject

2004-11-08 Thread Paul Jansen
Dear All, Can I edit the Subject of a message I have received? I get voicemail attachments and I want to change the subject to make it easier to identify messages. Thanks -- PJ Using TB! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1

Re: Edit Message Subject

2004-11-08 Thread Michael Acklin
Monday, November 8, 2004, 9:22:56 AM, (Internet Time - @682) you wrote: Hello Paul, PJ Dear All, PJ Can I edit the Subject of a message I have received? PJ I get voicemail attachments and I want to change the subject to make PJ it easier to identify messages. PJ Thanks I believe that the

Re: Edit Message Subject

2004-11-08 Thread Bill McCarthy
On Mon 31-Dec-79 6:00pm -0600, Michael Acklin wrote: I found this out on this list. Very handy way to do it. Don't think there is another way. Moving the message to the Outbox and then moving it back are a rather clumsy approach. It nicer, IMHO, to simply press a hotkey, edit your message in

Re: Edit Message Subject

2004-11-08 Thread Bill McCarthy
On Mon 8-Nov-04 1:19pm -0600, Paul Jansen wrote: Moving the message to the Outbox and then moving it back are a rather clumsy approach. It nicer, IMHO, to simply press a hotkey, edit your message in your favorite editor, and save/close. The only obstacle, is TB!'s lack of a macro for the