Re: Filter on Message Size

2006-05-20 Thread Robert D.
It is said that Chris concocted the following rebuttal : ' C Feature request? Yes. Indeed! I'll try it. Although, after the last one I did; and then reading several comments about the lack of action ON Feature Request, it might be like p*ing in the wind. -- Regards, Robert D. :flag-us-ky:

Re: Filter on Message Size

2006-05-19 Thread Robert D.
Thomas Fernandez waved a wand then said : ' T I use Receive headers only if message size is greater than 100KB T in Account / Properties / Mail Management Hi ... I suppose, that I should have made a reference to that option in my first post. You see, I already have that checked for sizes over

Re: Filter on Message Size

2006-05-19 Thread Chris
Robert D. @ 5/19/2006 6:48:50 AM Filter on Message Size mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Anyway, lacking the ability in TB!, I unsubscribed from the otherwise enjoyable list. Feature request? -- Chris Quoting when replying to this message is good for you and me. Using The Bat! v3.80.03 on Windows XP

Re: Filter on Message Size

2006-05-18 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Robert, On Wed, 17 May 2006 21:22:19 -0400GMT (18-5-2006, 3:22 +0200, where I live), you wrote: RD Does anyone know of a way to filter inbound messages based on the size RD of the message? The sorting office has a 'message size' condition, did you try that? -- Groetjes, Roelof Veni,

Re: Filter on Message Size

2006-05-18 Thread Robert D.
It is said that Roelof Otten concocted the following rebuttal : ' R The sorting office has a 'message size' condition, did you try R that? Yes it does. However, that choice never appears when constructing a filter within the pseudo-account called 'Selective Download'. Rather a considerable

Re: Filter on Message Size

2006-05-18 Thread Robert D.
It is said that Robert D. concocted the following rebuttal : ' R Rather a considerable downsized list of selections occupies the R pop-up as seen in the jpeg hopefully attached to this reply which I see did not so look here at it: http://www.denstarfarm.us/Public/bats.jpg -- Regards, Robert

Re: Filter on Message Size

2006-05-18 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Robert, On Thu, 18 May 2006 07:13:59 -0400GMT (18-5-2006, 13:13 +0200, where I live), you wrote: R The sorting office has a 'message size' condition, did you try R that? RD However, that choice never appears when constructing a filter within RD the pseudo-account called 'Selective

Re: Filter on Message Size

2006-05-18 Thread Robert D.
Recently, Roelof Otten squawked : ' R In that case you're out of luck. Pity that. It seems to me that since they knew how to read the message size and incorporated that in other Sorting Office Filters, that they could have just as easily placed the same Size filter in the selective download.

Re: Filter on Message Size

2006-05-18 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Robert, On Thu, 18 May 2006 18:05:58 -0400 GMT (19/05/2006, 05:05 +0700 GMT), Robert D. wrote: RD In fact, personally, it makes more sense to use it BEFORE one has to RD download ten 512mb Fido pictures not after the fact. What is the RD pragmatic use of filtering on message size when you

Filter on Message Size

2006-05-17 Thread Robert D.
Does anyone know of a way to filter inbound messages based on the size of the message? -- Regards, Robert D. :flag-us-ky: _ The Bat! Version: 3.80.06 Windows ME FireFox Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL'