Re: Filters, Spam and Edits

Bill Blinn Technology Editor, [BBT] wrote: BBT> There might be a better way. A new user asked about the ability to BBT> edit received messages. Without testing, I replied, "Try Ctrl-E". So BBT> today I tried it and thought I had provided bad advice. BBT> Ctrl-E opens the message for editing as I

Re[2]: Filters, Spam and Edits - test

Thursday, August 28, 2003, 11:32:17 AM, MAU wrote: M> As you say, it is probably the easiest method. However, you M> must be aware that this method does change some of the M> original RFC-822 header lines. Good point. The solution is not perfect, but likely suffices in most situations. I "solve" (

Re[4]: Filters, Spam and Edits - test

Thanks Dave and everyone. I'm finding dragging the message to the Outbox and editing is the simplest way for me. -- Pat A Canadian in Houston - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - On Thursday, August 28, 2003, 12:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: D> Thursday, August 28, 2003, 10:36:11 AM, PJ wr

Re: Filters, Spam and Edits

Hello P.Johnson, On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 09:31:06 -0500 GMT (28/08/2003, 21:31 +0700 GMT), P.Johnson wrote: > Can you tell me exactly how I would export and import back? I see an > export option under Tools but neither the msg or eml formats seem to > be editable. Over here, all formats (.msg, .eml,

Re: Filters, Spam and Edits - test

0 | Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii | Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit | Subject: Re[3]: Filters, Spam and Edits - test | X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 | Precedence: list | Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | List-Id: | List-Unsubscribe: <http://stromgrade.its-to

Re[4]: Filters, Spam and Edits

On Thursday, August 28, 2003 at 3:52 PM, Bill wrote: > Ctrl-E opens the message for editing as I said. But when you try to > close the message, TB asks if you want to save it and, if you do, > demands an entry in the "to" field. Then it places the saved message > in the outbox. It's a "pending mes

Re[3]: Filters, Spam and Edits

It seems that P.Johnson (as quoted by a Canadian in Houston) said ... > Well, actually it is possible, but not solely with TB: > Export the message > Edit the subject with Notepad or another text editor. > Import the message back into TB. > Now you can delete the original message. There might be

Re[3]: Filters, Spam and Edits - test

Thursday, August 28, 2003, 10:36:11 AM, PJ wrote: P> On Thursday, August 28, 2003, 9:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote P> re: editing an inbox message: PJ>>> If there is now a way to do so I would be thrilled to learn PJ>>> how! You can also: 1. Drag the message to your Outbox folder. 2. Open it (d

Re[2]: Filters, Spam and Edits

On Thursday, August 28, 2003, 9:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote re: editing an inbox message: PJ>> If there is now a way to do so I would be thrilled to learn how! R> Well, actually it is possible, but not solely with TB: R> Export the message R> Edit the subject with Notepad or another text edito

Re: Filters, Spam and Edits

Kevin Coates, [KC] wrote: KC> If you create a filter in The Bat to look for "^X-SpamPal: SPAM" KC> (minus the quotes) in the kludge or anywhere you can move the KC> messages to your spam folder automatically. Don't forget to enable 'regular expressions' in the filter options. The search string de

Re: Filters, Spam and Edits

Hallo P, On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 22:54:43 -0500GMT (28-8-03, 5:54 +0200, where I live), you wrote: PJ> Just in case I missed something, I'm wondering if there is a way to PJ> edit a received message Subject. No. PJ> I realize from reading some of the archives that editing a received PJ> message is

Re: Filters, Spam and Edits

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi P, On Wednesday, August 27, 2003 at 22:54 GMT -0500, P . Johnson [PJ] wrote in : PJ> in case I missed something, I'm wondering if there is a way to PJ> edit a received message Subject. I use SpamPal and it marks PJ> suspects

Filters, Spam and Edits

Just in case I missed something, I'm wondering if there is a way to edit a received message Subject. I use SpamPal and it marks suspects with **SPAM** in the subject line. Sometimes the Bayesian filter is incorrect (we are both still learning) but when I move a clean email to an inbox it is forever