Thursday, September 30, 2004, 11:22:39 PM, you wrote:
ASK No you don't. ;-) Caught by the folder template! *veg*
You're right, but I've got most of the egg scraped off
now! lol!
--
Lynn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]* * *Aun Aprendo
I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team OS/2
Friday, October 1, 2004, 12:22:02 AM, you wrote:
TN It is not the fault of the folder template, it's the
TN reply-to setting of the message plus user's awareness
TN to do the right things at the right time... *veg*
Yes, and I'm not sure my drive is big enough to put *all*
your addies in my ab
Hello Leif,
Thursday, September 30, 2004, 11:34:35 PM, you wrote:
*All* generalizations are false. :grin:
My all time favorite undoubtely is A greek man said: all greeks are
liars. \\8^)
--
Best regards,
Alexandermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Lynn,
Friday, October 1, 2004, 2:17:47 AM, you wrote:
Am writing off list
No you don't. ;-) Caught by the folder template! *veg*
--
Best regards,
Alexandermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 3.00.00
Hæ!
Friday, October 1, 2004, 08:22, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Caught by the folder template! *veg*
It is not the fault of the folder template, it's the reply-to setting
of the message plus user's awareness to do the right things at the
right time... *veg*
--
Kveðja!
Thorvald Neumann |
Hello Lynn,
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:17:47 -0700 GMT (01/10/2004, 07:17 +0700 GMT),
Lynn wrote:
L Am writing off list,
And I guess you're using a folder template? g
scnr
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
13. Los Angeles's full name is El Pueblo de Nuestra Senora la Reina
de los Angeles de Porciuncula
Hallo Thorvald,
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 07:53:48 +0200GMT (30-9-2004, 7:53 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
TN Concerning MIDs: Is it safe to assume a valid email does always
TN contain a MID?
No, it should have a MiID, but some users deliberately set their mail
client or server to remove the from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Thu, 30 Sep 2004,
@ @ at 07:53:48 +0200, when Thorvald Neumann wrote:
Hæ!
Concerning MIDs: Is it safe to assume a valid email does always
contain a MID?
I just saw some SPAM
Hæ!
Thursday, September 30, 2004, 14:19, Mica Mijatovic wrote:
I didn't see any message having not a MID which was not a spam, so
far.
Me neither, but I just searched one of my archives with more than 5000
mails and there seem to be around 30 without MIDs.
Is it possible to search for
Hello Mica,
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:19:44 +0200 GMT (30/09/2004, 19:19 +0700 GMT),
Mica Mijatovic wrote:
MM As I understand a newer RFC update(s) concerning MIDs, a MID is
MM desirable, but is not obligatory, for a message to be valid.
RFC 2822:
Quote
3.6.4. Identification fields
Though
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Thu, 30 Sep 2004,
@ @ at 15:11:24 +0200, when Thorvald Neumann wrote:
Hæ!
Thursday, September 30, 2004, 14:19, Mica Mijatovic wrote:
I didn't see any message having not a MID which was not a spam, so
far.
Me neither, but I
Hæ!
Thursday, September 30, 2004, 16:07, Mica Mijatovic wrote:
But how did you find these 30 messages among those 5000 then? (-:
I just searched for Message-ID in the header... And the search told
me e.g. 5030 and when the archive folder contains 5060 mails, the rest
must be without MID. ;)
So
Hello Roelof Otten everyone else
30-Sep-2004 09:26, you wrote:
I think, therefore I cannot be a moderator
LOL! Whats that supposed to mean? :-)
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
using v3.0.1 RC1 on Windows XP Pro Service Pack 2
The trouble with today's
Hello Alexander,
Thursday, September 30, 2004, 9:35:17 AM, you wrote:
I think, therefore I cannot be a moderator
A LOL! Whats that supposed to mean? :-)
Probably something similar to some of my taglines! :grin:
Moderator (n): See 'glutton for punishment'.
Moderator (n): See also - God, tyrant,
Hallo Alexander,
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:35:17 +0200GMT (30-9-2004, 17:35 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
I think, therefore I cannot be a moderator
ASK LOL! Whats that supposed to mean? :-)
Nothing important really. I've installed an old tagline file (from the
days I was still active on chat
Thursday, September 30, 2004, 8:52:56 AM, you wrote:
LG Probably something similar to some of my taglines! :grin:
LG Moderator (n): See 'glutton for punishment'.
LG Moderator (n): See also - God, tyrant, egotist,
LG oppressor.
LG Moderator dies: .MPG at eleven!
LG Moderator Justification No.1:
Hello Lynn,
Thursday, September 30, 2004, 2:05:56 PM, you wrote:
L Oooh! Super taglines! Can I use them for t-shirts lol!
Here's the thing about taglines. *All* taglines are stolen.
and another from my tagline collection...
*All* generalizations are false. :grin:
Of course you could
Thursday, September 30, 2004, 2:34:35 PM, you wrote:
LG Thursday, September 30, 2004, 2:05:56 PM, you wrote:
L Oooh! Super taglines! Can I use them for
L t-shirts lol!
LG Here's the thing about taglines. *All* taglines are
LG stolen.
LG and another from my tagline collection...
LG *All*
Hæ!
How do I filter such messages?
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 24958 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2004 10:18:15 -
Received: from unknown ([62.67.200.159])
by ..de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with QMQP; 29 Sep 2004 10:18:15
Hallo Thorvald,
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:28:22 +0200GMT (29-9-2004, 12:28 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
Subject:
TN They do not have a subject and a sender.
TN Should I filter on Header does not contain From:?
That's what I should do.
TN What do I have to use for a blank subject?
Header
Hæ!
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 12:50, Roelof Otten wrote:
Header matches Subject:\s*\n
Wouldn't \s*\n also catch Here begins the subject\n?
--
Kveðja!
Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/
---
The Bug! v3.0.0.19
PopFile v0.22.0
Windows 2000 SP4
Hallo Thorvald,
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:29:22 +0200GMT (29-9-2004, 13:29 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
Header matches Subject:\s*\n
TN Wouldn't \s*\n also catch Here begins the subject\n?
I meant to search in headers (not in subject) for the condition
Subject:\s*\n and that won't be
Hello Roelof,
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 7:41:02 AM, you wrote:
Hallo Thorvald,
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:29:22 +0200GMT (29-9-2004, 13:29 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
Header matches Subject:\s*\n
TN Wouldn't \s*\n also catch Here begins the subject\n?
I meant to search in headers
Hæ!
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 13:41, Roelof Otten wrote:
But when you've got a contact who is so clueless that he uses no
From: header (remember our first condition) and ends his subject
with a colon, then he deserves no better than being caught by your
spamfilter. ;-)
I am glad those
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 29 Sep 2004,
@ @ at 12:28:22 +0200, when Thorvald Neumann wrote:
Hæ!
How do I filter such messages?
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hæ!
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 14:07, Mica Mijatovic wrote:
Message-ID: R[20-25
--- SNIP ---
Interesting part is MID as well.
Yes, I was also stumbling on this. I will watch this over the next
days. There was only one occurence in the last 130 spam mails...
The latter example could be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 29 Sep 2004,
@ @ at 14:28:39 +0200, when Thorvald Neumann wrote:
Interesting part is MID as well.
Yes, I was also stumbling on this. I will watch this over the next
days.
Hello Mica,
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:04:25 +0200 GMT (29/09/2004, 22:04 +0700 GMT),
Mica Mijatovic wrote:
MM Which reminds me that I have to go for the liver pasta now... It's good
MM with ajvar/AJBAP.
http://faq.macedonia.org/cuisine/ajvar.html
http://www.recipeland.com/recipe/82/
Sounds good.
On Wed 29-Sep-04 6:29am -0400, Thorvald Neumann wrote:
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 12:50, Roelof Otten wrote:
Header matches Subject:\s*\n
Wouldn't \s*\n also catch Here begins the subject\n?
Indeed it would. A better choice might be:
Header field - Subject - match - ^\s*$
Not
Hæ!
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 20:22, Bill McCarthy wrote:
Header field - Subject - match - ^\s*$
Thanks, I will try it. :)
Why are RegExp so cryptical... ;)
--
Kveðja!
Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/
---
The Bat! v3.0.1 RC1
PopFile v0.22.0
Hæ!
Concerning MIDs: Is it safe to assume a valid email does always
contain a MID?
I just saw some SPAM mails do not have a MID.
--
Kveðja!
Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/
---
The Bat! v3.0.1 RC1
PopFile v0.22.0
Windows 2000 SP4 (v5.0.2195)
31 matches
Mail list logo