On Mon, 27 Dec 1999 14:48:42 +0700, Syafril Hermansyah wrote:
[]
From the fact above, you can see
1. if our Harddisk Space performance OK, it will help performance of
our Windows.
2. if we always keep our HDD "healthy" (by defragment regularly
etc), we will minimize
Hello Ali Martin,
On Mon, 27 Dec 1999 at 07:38:35 [GMT -0500] your local time which
was Monday, December 27, 1999 19:38:35 [GMT +0700] my local time,
you told to the list:
AM []
From the fact above, you can see
1. if our Harddisk Space performance OK, it will help performance of
On Mon, 27 Dec 1999 20:02:55 +0700, Syafril Hermansyah wrote:
[]
According to Wintune, to have better "memory management", we can set
our PC as "Network Server" (or something like that) instead of
"Desktop/Stand Alone".
Yes, that's right. I had used that setting as well. It's
Sunday, December 26, 1999, 11:48:42 PM, Syafril wrote:
From the fact above, you can see
You forgot #4.
#4: Since HD speeds are measured in ms and RAM in ns HDs are a magnitude
slower than RAM. Therefore hitting swap is *bad*. With RAM hovering around
$1.25/Meg it is better to get more
Monday, December 27, 1999, 4:38:35 AM, Ali wrote:
stable than before and this is most likely because the machines today
come with at least 32MB of memory. In fact 64MB seems to be the
standard. On top of that win98 is inherently more stable than it's
predecessors.
Ever wonder why the
On Mon, 27 Dec 1999 08:31:27 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
[]
The single cheapest and easiest way to speed up a machine is to put
more RAM into it. MBs these days can take up .7-1Gb of RAM. So why
is 32Mb-64Mb "standard"? ;)
When I said standard, I mean that a basic, standard, prebuilt
Monday, December 27, 1999, 8:45:59 AM, Syafril wrote:
Question : Mail Client is Compute Bound or I/O bound from your point
of view ?
Neither. Mind you I ran a Fido BBS when I was 16 on a 386sx-16, 2Mb RAM
and a 40MBb IDE drive. Nothing like tossing a few thousand messages a day
from
Hello Steve Lamb,
On Mon, 27 Dec 1999 08:31:27 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, December 27, 1999, 11:31:27 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Steve Lamb wrote:
Steve Monday, December 27, 1999, 4:38:35 AM, Ali wrote:
stable than before and this is most likely because the machines today
Monday, December 27, 1999, 9:56:45 AM, tracer wrote:
Same with having that silly onboard video using system ram.
Funny thing is take a look at what AGP boards use for their frame buffer.
;)
In my own case the main reason I had a lot of ram was internet, to
make use of the lousy and
Hello Syafril Hermansyah,
On Mon, 27 Dec 1999 23:45:59 +0700 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, December 27, 1999, 11:45:59 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Syafril Hermansyah wrote:
Syafril Sometimes there is a condition that we must replace motherboard to
Syafril upgrade our RAM such:
Hello Adam Golebiowski,
On Fri, 24 Dec 1999 at 15:35:53 [GMT +0100] your local time which
was Friday, December 24, 1999 21:35:53 [GMT +0700] my local time,
you told to the list:
SH What's your O/S ?
AG It`s WIN 98
SH After tweaking my PC, The Bat! startup and exit more faster !
AG but
Welcome,
Damn, once again the bat informed me about broken message base...
will it ever stops???
/Adam + [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.wkrotce.pl \
| "Chiquita" | IRC: G_ADam @#Zielonka #klub @#radiostacja|
\ Gobiowski + PGP key: mailto:[EMAIL
Hello Adam Golebiowski,
On Fri, 24 Dec 1999 at 12:43:38 [GMT +0100], you told us:
AG Damn, once again the bat informed me about broken message base...
AG will it ever stops???
What's your O/S ?
If you're using WinNT (Wst or Svr) and using UDMA IDE drive , I've
tips : Tweak your NT, see
Welcome,
Syafril wrote:
SH What's your O/S ?
It`s WIN 98
SH After tweaking my PC, The Bat! startup and exit more faster !
but what`s the relations with broken msb???
/Adam + [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.wkrotce.pl \
| "Chiquita" | IRC: G_ADam @#Zielonka #klub
14 matches
Mail list logo
