Hello 9Val,
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 23:01:23 +0300 UTC, 9Val wrote:
9 May be Thunderbird is faster on wide connections, don't know and have
9 no possibility to test
UI wise, TB! is faster on a Pentium II with 256M of memory, Firefox and
two PuTTY windows open. IMAP wise, TB (no exclamation mark, so
Hello Charles,
CMG Come to think of it, does TB! support the IDLE command?
Not.
CMG Does TB! use multiple connections? TB (in my configuration) uses
CMG 4 connections to the imapd.
Not yet.
--
:9Val:
Hi Kevin
KA Most of the feature list works as advertised. I think you will be
KA extremely happy with TB if you have some patience and willing to put
KA in the time to learn.
KA Hope this helps.
Very much so! Your postings have been very helpful to me in reading.
One of the problems Ive been
Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, at 00:42:44 [GMT +0100] (which was 4:42 PM where I
live) you wrote:
However, total IMAP functionality
isn't quite there yet...
Most of the feature list works as advertised. I think you will be
Hi Mike Smith
-
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, at 08:29:57 [GMT +0100] (which was 12:29 AM where
I live) you wrote:
Hi Kevin
KA Most of the feature list works as advertised. I think you will be
KA extremely happy with TB if you have some patience and willing to
Marten Gallagher, [MG] wrote:
The reason for possibly changing to IMAP is:
ISP is prepared to install IMAP.
and
I can then do all the manipulation wheh I am (frequently) away from
the office and the main machine.
But.. as I said - I cannot afford screw ups becasue IMAP in the event
Hello Admin,
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 09:47:45 +0100 UTC, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
aacu If I change to IMAP (all are currently POP3) will I compromise any of
aacu that functionality - I earn my living using TB!
If you earn your living using TB!, are you sure that you want to make
that depend on beta
Hi Charles M. Gerungan
-
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, at 18:33:24 [GMT +0200] (which was 9:33 AM where I
live) you wrote:
snip
If you earn your living using TB!, are you sure that you want to make
that depend on beta software? IMAP support is constantly being
Hello Admin,
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 09:47:45 +0100 UTC, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
aacu If I change to IMAP (all are currently POP3) will I compromise any of
aacu that functionality - I earn my living using TB!
If you earn your living using TB!, are you sure that you want to make
that depend on
Kevin Amazon wrote:
1. The conversion facility to transfer a POP3 message to IMAP
should be nothing more than a drag and drop from one folder to
another.
I think he's more thinking about simply changing a POP to an IMAP
account. TB! autocreates corresponding IMAP folders on the server and
Hello Allie,
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 12:38:35 -0500 UTC, Allie Martin wrote:
AM When I watch TB! do a single task, it's very fast. However, when I
AM request a message body, I often have to wait a while at work while TB!
AM completes what's already queued to be done.
I was about to say something
Hi Allie Martin
-
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, at 12:38:35 [GMT -0500] (which was 10:38 AM where
I live) you wrote:
Kevin Amazon wrote:
snip
I think he's more thinking about simply changing a POP to an IMAP
account. TB! autocreates corresponding IMAP
Hello Kevin,
KA Actually, all the IMAP servers are local on gig ethernet. Speed is not
KA an issue. I will admit some of the speed issues are the result of my
KA TB settings. I have had so many problems with IMAP synchronizations, I
KA finally flush all the caches on exit so, on the resultant
Hi 9Val
-
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, at 23:01:23 [GMT +0300] (which was 1:01 PM where I
live) you wrote:
snip
Well, at home I'm working with IMAP at 21.6Kbit dial-up. So speed is a
really *big* issue for me. And I prefer to use TB! without any
Hi Allie,
On Wednesday, July 7, 2004 21:08 your local time, which was Thursday,
July 8, 2004 at 03:08 my local time, Allie Martin [AM] wrote;
AM c) support for colour coding messages or support for extra flags apart
AM from the basic read/unread forward/redirected flags. Currently all
AM other
Look in the Account Properties for the IMAP account, click on the Mail
Management section. Look for the For predefined folders... section
and make sure those are set correctly.
Hope that helps.
I had stared and stared and checked and checked but still hadn';t
noticed that!
OK - next Q:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does the * mean next to a folder?
It means that the preceeding number represents messages that are on
the server but which have not yet been sync'd locally.
Why does the number of mails in a folder keep changing up and down -
2 then 0 then 2 then 0.
This will
Hi Allie Martin
-
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, at 17:02:04 [GMT -0500] (which was 3:02 PM where I
live) you wrote:
snip
Pretty much. I've been using it since January this year. I've seen it
develop from being almost unusable to being much better as it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does the * mean next to a folder?
[etc etc]
I got my knuckles rapped yesterday!
If you're referring to our little exchange a while back...
Weell sort of!! :-)) I wasn't being terribly serious and I
understood where you were coming from - I do the same
However, total IMAP functionality
isn't quite there yet...
Aahh - now here's the rub...
I need to know, before I jump - what functionality is NOT there. My
problem is, not knowing what functionality is possible - I don't know
what's missing.
Will filter actions, auto-replies, auto-message
Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, at 00:42:44 [GMT +0100] (which was 4:42 PM where I
live) you wrote:
However, total IMAP functionality
isn't quite there yet...
Aahh - now here's the rub...
I need to know, before I jump - what
Marten Gallagher, [MG] wrote:
If you're referring to our little exchange a while back...
Weell sort of!! :-))
I looked at all your other exchanges and couldn't see where else you
could have considered yourself treated a little harshly. :)
I wasn't being terribly serious and I
Kevin Amazon, [KA] wrote:
The key issues with regards to IMAP are:
I wanted to add a couple other lacking features that are very useful:
a) selective download message text without attachments on a per
message basis. One can then view the message body over a slow
connection without having to
Hi Allie Martin
-
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, at 21:08:21 [GMT -0500] (which was 7:08 PM where I
live) you wrote:
Kevin Amazon, [KA] wrote:
The key issues with regards to IMAP are:
I wanted to add a couple other lacking features that are very useful:
a)
24 matches
Mail list logo
