Hi
On Sunday 10 May 2020 at 2:51:30 PM, in
, Andrew Savchenko wrote:-
> groups.io:
> - "your own domain" is a $200/month option.
I would think most people with a mailing list at groups.io would use
the free options, similar to hosting a group at yahoo but they just
seem to work better.
--
Hello Marck,
On Sun, 10 May 2020 09:52:20 +0100 GMT (10-May-20, 15:52 +0700 GMT),
Marck Pearlstone wrote:
AS>> Things that come to mind, in no particular order:
AS>> * Increase size limits for attachments.
> TBBETA has a 75kb limit and TBUDL 25kb.
> I suggest 150 for TBBETA and 100 for TBUDL.
Hello Maggie,
> When I look around and see everyone doing mail (poorly) on their
> iThings, I do wonder if we aren't all dinosaurs because we write
> in full sentences with a proper email program.
Yes, for me it is also long ago when I started with The Bat!
Actually, it is so long ago, I really
Hi Marck,
On Sunday, May 10, 2020 at 4:52:20 AM you wrote:
MP> ... we have done this multiple times in the 20+ years that we have run
MP> these lists.T
Thank you for everything, Marck - even the trouts. Looking back,
I can't believe it's more than 20 years, While it doesn't feel
like
t;improvement" category.
> They are perfectly fine where Marck currently hosts them at
> silverstones.com.
What if Marck is being hit by the car and server lease is not renewed?
Same goes for domain name, etc.
> And many mailing lists are perfectly fine at one of the mailing list
>
nking to info about the other TB* mailing lists. I think the FAQ
linked from that info page has not been updated since I first started
using TB! over 15 years ago.
> * Consider merging TDUDL/TBBETA into one.
Would that lead to more help for ordinary users' TB! issues? Or would
their messages sim
On 10 May 2020 at 10:18 MAU wrote and made these points
>> I suggest 150 for TBBETA and 100 for TBUDL. Thoughts?
M> I can agree to that,
Done. Now to test attaching a small image...
To avoid extra confusion I will deliberately leave this post unsigned.
--
Cheers -- Marck D Pearlstone --
Hello Marck,
> I suggest 150 for TBBETA and 100 for TBUDL. Thoughts?
I can agree to that,
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (Zarzalejo (Madrid)- Spain)
Using The Bat! v9.1.18.3 (BETA)
Current version is 8.1.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
On 10 May 2020 at 03:06 Andrew Savchenko wrote and made these points
AS> It is 2020 out there and TB mailing lists seem to be a little outdated.
AS> Screenshots being stripped from the messages unless it all fits in 25Kb,
In the case of TBUDL, this seems to be happening regardless of s
Hello All,
It is 2020 out there and TB mailing lists seem to be a little outdated.
Screenshots being stripped from the messages unless it all fits in 25Kb,
famous "Current version is 8.0.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information" footer
attached to all messages... Perhaps it is time for a m
Hello,
I searched and thought I'd found an answer to the problem of replying
to a list when the list is set to reply to the sender.
I put %Reply-To=[EMAIL PROTECTED] in my reply template for the
folder, but it didn't have an affect.
I found this as a change in recent versions of
Hallo Doug,
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 08:58:32 +0100GMT (10-4-04, 9:58 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
DW I searched and thought I'd found an answer to the problem of replying
DW to a list when the list is set to reply to the sender.
DW I put %Reply-To=[EMAIL PROTECTED] in my reply template for
to the list without intending to do so. Don't
think that this won't happen to you, it will, it happens to
everybody with folder templates hardcoding the intended recipient.
I think I can live with this on the mailing lists I have in mind.
Knowing what what I've done is wrong and why
Hallo Doug,
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 10:04:54 +0100GMT (10-4-04, 11:04 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
DW I think I can live with this on the mailing lists I have in mind.
DW Knowing what what I've done is wrong and why, thanks to your response,
Just be aware of the risk...
DW I've just now put
Hi Roelof,
Saturday, April 10, 2004, 10:21:45 AM, you wrote:
[SNIP]
DW But it's now going to both the sender and the list. How do I get rid of
DW the sender's address?
Change it to:
%To=%To=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The first %To macro empties the To: header (see the help)
Thanks. I've also now
Hallo Doug,
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 10:46:35 +0100GMT (10-4-04, 11:46 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
DW Thanks. I've also now found the appropriate help file. Now if I could
DW figure out how to make the reply macro also capitalise the first letter
DW of the recipient's name in Hi %tofname.
From
On Saturday, April 10, 2004, 4:41 AM, you wrote:
DW I searched and thought I'd found an answer to the problem of replying
DW to a list when the list is set to reply to the sender.
DW I put %Reply-To=[EMAIL PROTECTED] in my reply template for the
DW folder, but it didn't have an affect.
DW But it's now going to both the sender and the list. How do I get rid of
DW the sender's address?
RO Change it to:
RO %To=%To=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RO The first %To macro empties the To: header (see the help)
nice, I like that! I just used that for my list:
%To=%To=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Paul
Hallo Paul,
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 06:55:33 -0400GMT (10-4-04, 12:55 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
PC nice, I like that! I just used that for my list:
PC %To=%To=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, just keep in mind what i said in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NOTE THAT THIS IS DANGEROUS!!! Whenever you might
On Saturday, April 10, 2004, 7:18 AM, you wrote:
RONOTE THAT THIS IS DANGEROUS!!! Whenever you might want to reply off
ROlist (with a personal message) you can be very embarrassed or even
ROfinancially duped (depending on the message) by sending a message
ROto the list without
On Saturday, April 10, 2004, Paul Cartwright wrote...
DW But it's now going to both the sender and the list. How do I get
DW rid of the sender's address?
RO Change it to:
RO %To=%To=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RO The first %To macro empties the To: header (see the help)
nice, I like that! I just used
Hi Jonathan,
Saturday, April 10, 2004, 6:09:12 PM, you wrote:
Something like that, I think it's been mentioned in the past for
folder templates, if you do a search for Marck's folder templates are
evil reply, you can normally find a bunch of suggestions ;)
I just searched the archives,
Dear Doug,
@10-Apr-2004, 20:33 Doug Weller [DW] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Jonathan:
Something like that, I think it's been mentioned in the past for
folder templates, if you do a search for Marck's folder
templates are evil reply, you can normally find a bunch of
suggestions ;)
DW
Hi Marck,
Saturday, April 10, 2004, 8:45:55 PM, you wrote:
[SNIP]
There is nothing else for which folder templates can be used that
can't be covered and even improved upon using Address Book templates.
There are dangers in using Folder Templates that are not there when
you use AB templates.
Dear Doug,
@10-Apr-2004, 21:38 Doug Weller [DW] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
There are dangers in using Folder Templates that are not there
when you use AB templates.
DW Ok. I want all my lists to work the same way.
Nice ideal but, in fact, there are two different types of list -
On Saturday, April 10, 2004, 3:45 PM, you wrote:
DW I just searched the archives, and can find a reference by Marck to his
DW 'folder templates are evil lecture', but not the post itself.
MDP Okay, okay! I'll bite.
no, don't bite! I heard you were a nice sharing kinda guy:)
MDP stock
Dear Paul,
@10-Apr-2004, 17:59 -0400 (10-Apr 22:59 UK time) Paul Cartwright
[PC] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
MDP Okay, okay! I'll bite.
PC no, don't bite! I heard you were a nice sharing kinda guy:)
grrrNASH!
MDP stock lecture
PC ok, I'll make SURE I add the:
Hi all,
I am now a registered user of The Bat. My registration just arrived in
my e-mail a few minutes ago. :)
I have a question about setting up mailing lists in The Bat. I
currently belong to two mailing lists (this one and one other one),
and although the settings for this one seem to be fine
Hallo Kim,
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003 14:32:15 -0500GMT (17-2-03, 20:32 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
K I receive messages fine for both mailing lists, however, when I
K click reply for a message on the other mailing list, the person's
K individual e-mail address appears in the TO section, rather
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, February 17, 2003, Kim wrote...
I am now a registered user of The Bat. My registration just arrived
in my e-mail a few minutes ago. :)
Well worth the money in my opinion ;)
I have a question about setting up mailing lists in The Bat
On Monday, February 17, 2003, 2:32 PM, you wrote:
K I have a question about setting up mailing lists in The Bat. I
K currently belong to two mailing lists (this one and one other one),
K and although the settings for this one seem to be fine, the other one
K is not.
is there a link
On Monday, February 17, 2003, 2:32 PM, you wrote:
K I am now a registered user of The Bat. My registration just arrived in
K my e-mail a few minutes ago. :)
congrats!!
there is a lot to learn to use many of the features, but you can
obviously do well from the beginning !! This list has lots of
Hi Roelof,
Monday, February 17, 2003, 2:52:08 PM, you wrote:
In that case, the mailing list probably does not insert/overwrite the
Reply-To header. There are several ways to handle this
Select the To:-header in the grey header section above the message,
use your right mouse button and
Hi Paul,
Monday, February 17, 2003, 3:00:19 PM, you wrote:
is there a link at the bottom of that list message that has the REPLY-TO
info in it? Other than looking for that, I think someone else mentioned
reply-to-all..
Yep...the Reply-To within the mailing list itself was the problem. The
Hello Kim!
On Monday, February 17, 2003, 2:26 PM, you wrote:
R Or create a folder reply template for your list folder.
K I tried your last suggestion (with the macro) and it worked like a
K charm! Thanks so much!!!
Kim, just a word of caution with folder macros. It's easy to
accidentally send
Hallo Kim,
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003 15:26:23 -0500GMT (17-2-03, 21:26 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
In this template, you can use the macro:
%To=''%To='%OFromName on listname listaddress'%-
K I tried your last suggestion (with the macro) and it worked like a
K charm! Thanks so much!!!
I
Hi Jonathan,
Monday, February 17, 2003, 2:50:36 PM, you wrote:
Well worth the money in my opinion ;)
I tend to agree with you there.
It could be that the second list doesn't use a reply-to header. When
that line is missing in the headers, hitting reply goes back to the
sender. It could
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, February 17, 2003, Kim wrote...
It could be that the second list doesn't use a reply-to header.
That was exactly it. The other list indeed does not use a Reply-To
header.
TheBat seems to only respond to certain list headers. Certain
Hallo Mary,
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 22:41:02 -0600GMT (25-1-03, 5:41 +0100GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
MB However, other subscribers to TBUDL are saying that properly
MB written List protocols will over-ride a Poster's reply to
MB configuration.
It's not really a matter of properly written
Monday, January 20, 2003, 7:45:47 PM, Thomas wrote:
The list moderator, Joan Young, says that something in my settings is
over-riding her List settings.
TF I don't think that you can override her settings, but you could try to
TF use the %Reply-To=[EMAIL PROTECTED] macro in your templates for
Tuesday, January 21, 2003, 5:46:08 PM, Mary wrote:
MB I don't think I want to get into a discussion with the
MB moderator on her List settings at this point. The level of experience,
MB even with her, is, I think, Outlook Express.
No point doing so Mary. On Rootsweb the listowner's decision is
Hello Anne!
On Thursday, January 23, 2003, 10:41 PM, you wrote:
MB I don't think I want to get into a discussion with the moderator
MB on her List settings at this point. The level of experience, even
MB with her, is, I think, Outlook Express.
A No point doing so Mary. On Rootsweb the
Hello Mary Bull,
On or about Monday, January 20, 2003 at 14:12:32GMT -0600 (which
was 3:12 PM in the tropics where I live) Mary Bull opined:
8 Snipped a bunch
MB Peter, this is a very nice list. Some of the people on it know even
MB less than I, and I'm sometimes able to help fellow
Hello Spike!
On Tuesday, January 21, 2003, 8:16 AM, you wrote:
S 8 Snipped a bunch
MB ... this [Senior-Newbies] is a very nice list. ...
snipped a bunch more ...
MB ... Hardly any of them have heard of The Bat! however. :) ...
S You must take this opportunity to edu-ma-cate them Mary!
On Tuesday, January 21, 2003, Mary Bull wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
MB Good teaching goes from the known to the unknown
Very nice.
--
JN
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
Hello Joseph!
On Tuesday, January 21, 2003, 1:36 PM, you wrote:
MB Good teaching goes from the known to the unknown
J Very nice.
Fellow teacher?
At least, fellow Bat lover. I noted your version in your expanded
headers. ;)
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat! 1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service
Hello All!
I just subscribed to an interesting (to me) new list, Rootsweb's
Senior-Newbies-L.
Something about the settings I have made in The Bat! seems to be
causing my Reply To field not to show. Consequently, many who choose
to reply to my posts are sending the replies to me privately, when
Hello Mary,
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 13:41:09 -0600 GMT (21/01/03, 02:41 +0700 GMT),
Mary Bull wrote:
The list moderator, Joan Young, says that something in my settings is
over-riding her List settings.
I don't think that you can override her settings, but you could try to
use the %Reply-To=[EMAIL
Hello Thomas!
On Monday, January 20, 2003, 1:45 PM, you wrote:
MB The list moderator, Joan Young, says that something in my settings is
MB over-riding her List settings.
T I don't think that you can override her settings, but you could try to
T use the %Reply-To=[EMAIL PROTECTED] macro in your
Hi Mary,
on Mon, 20 Jan 2003 13:41:09 -0600GMT (20.01.03, 20:41 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
MB I just subscribed to an interesting (to me) new list, Rootsweb's
MB Senior-Newbies-L.
MB Something about the settings I have made in The Bat! seems to be
MB
Hello Peter!
On Monday, January 20, 2003, 2:03 PM, you wrote:
P Hi Mary,
MB I just subscribed to an interesting (to me) new list, Rootsweb's
MB Senior-Newbies-L.
snip
MB The list moderator, Joan Young, says that something in my settings is
MB over-riding her List settings.
P Yes, it is in
Hi Thomas,
on Tue, 21 Jan 2003 02:45:47 +0700GMT (20.01.03, 20:45 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
The list moderator, Joan Young, says that something in my settings is
over-riding her List settings.
TF I don't think that you can override her settings
Hi Mary,
on Mon, 20 Jan 2003 14:12:32 -0600GMT (20.01.03, 21:12 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
MB The list moderator, Joan Young, says that something in my settings is
MB over-riding her List settings.
P Yes, it is in Account -- Properties -- General. It
Hallo Peter Meyns,
am Montag, 20. Januar 2003 schriebst Du:
It is only a work-around, but it is easier than to have them change their
list-server software. Actually, _their_ Reply-to entry should override your
own (if existent) on the list...
Well, I once learned that this was deliberate,
Hi Heiko,
on Mon, 20 Jan 2003 21:59:32 +0100GMT (20.01.03, 21:59 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
It is only a work-around, but it is easier than to have them change their
list-server software. Actually, _their_ Reply-to entry should override your
own
Hello Mary,
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 13:57:13 -0600 GMT (21/01/03, 02:57 +0700 GMT),
Mary Bull wrote:
T I don't think that you can override her settings, but you could try to
T use the %Reply-To=[EMAIL PROTECTED] macro in your templates for
T that list.
Thanks, Thomas. Put the list address in
Using BAT v.1.60 on Windows2K
Have used The Bat for a mailing list for some time now, but now we
require to send attachments to each other via the list.
In 'sorting rules' for 'postings' I have 'create a message for the
list' ticked and then a template which looks like this (disguised in
Hello Michael Disabato,
On Sunday, April 14 2002 at 04:49 AM PDT, you wrote:
OK, that's what I thought. I'm struggling through the implementation
of GnuPG to support IDEA (RFC1991 compatibility with TB!). Once
that's done, I'll use GPGRelay as a front end for the thing.
You have to add the
Monday, April 15, 2002, 3:20:49 PM, Nick scribbled:
NA You have to add the IDEA module. If you are using Windows you can load
NA the Nullify GnuPG 1.06 Binary which includes the IDEA Module:
NA http://www.nullify.org/
Nick,
Once again, thank you for your reply. I found nullify.org while
Saturday, April 13, 2002, 11:03:59 PM, Nick scribbled:
NA Hello Michael Disabato,
and then have it re-encrypted to the subscriber keys before sending it
back out?
NA Not without intervention.
OK, that's what I thought. I'm struggling through the implementation
of GnuPG to support IDEA
Hello Michael Disabato,
On Thursday, April 11 2002 at 04:11 AM PDT, you wrote:
I'm interested in using TB! for a small mailing list. Is it possible
to have TB! detect incoming mail as being encrypted to the list key
It will not be TB that detects it, rather the Plugin will detect it upon
I'm interested in using TB! for a small mailing list. Is it possible
to have TB! detect incoming mail as being encrypted to the list key
and then have it re-encrypted to the subscriber keys before sending it
back out?
Mike
Current Ver:
Hello Miguel,
Saturday, April 6, 2002, 12:00:59 AM, you wrote to TBUDL:
MAU for mail lists, you don't need an outgoing filter (or if you use
MAU it you can send messages directly to trash) because you will get
MAU your own message back from the list.
I make a subfolder for my mailinglists for
Hello Ottar,
I make a subfolder for my mailinglists for my outgoing messages to the
list and filter them into this. Under account properties for this
folder I have automatic deletion of messages after a couple of days.
This way I have some control whether my messages makes it to the list,
the Me too
as an example of how a very short message may end up with an
un-proportional footprint, specially if you multiply it by the number
of subscribers to this list.
I'm afraid things are going the opposite way - try, for example,
i. Yahoo! Groups mailing lists (adverts added by servers);
ii
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Alastair,
On 03 March 2002 at 21:07:35 + Alastair Scott wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm afraid things are going the opposite way - try, for example,
moderator
This topic went way off / too long and I have already pronounced it
dead.
On Sunday, March 03, 2002, 22:07:35, Alastair Scott wrote:
[...]
Hi Alastair,
both of your mails aren't threaded properly in my TB. Any idea why?
Roman
--
Roman Katzer, Aachen, Germany
I'll have what the guy on the floor is having.
--
Hello Miguel!
On Saturday, March 2, 2002 at 11:43:35 AM you wrote:
I may be quite dumb but, aside of wasting bandwidth and filling up
everybody's mailboxes and folders, I don't see the purpose of sending
S/MIME or PGP signed messages to a list like this one. Am I missing
something?
There
Hi Dierk,
There has been quite a discussion in the last year about secure
signing or not.
I missed it, I joined this list about a month ago.
Without going into the details, let me just say that I am all for
it.
That may be my problem, that I don't understand the benefits of secure
signing
Hello Miguel!
On Saturday, March 2, 2002 at 1:38:26 PM you wrote:
I missed it, I joined this list about a month ago.
Luckily the archives are quite good. ;-)
That may be my problem, that I don't understand the benefits of secure
signing in general, and for a list like this in particular. I
Hi Dierk,
I missed it, I joined this list about a month ago.
Luckily the archives are quite good. ;-)
Yes, I know they quite good. But I don't have the time now.
More or less the same as signing an ordinary letter or contract.
Understand. I can understand that to sign a contract you need
On Sat, 2 Mar 2002 16:47:20 +0100
Miguel A. Urech [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the (various) intros in messages, although I use the pure,
short, informational one only.
I don't mind the intros themselves. Although I hardly really pay
attention to any of them, some of them are funny.
Hi Syafril,
More foot print means what ?
More bytes than needed. Longer transmission time no matter how fast it
is; more storage space required; more time needed for backups; more
time when doing searches on the message base; more... everything.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial
Hello Miguel A. Urech,
On Saturday, March 02 2002 at 07:47 AM PDT, you wrote:
Right. But they do add to the footprint of the message, don't they?
That's my point.
Not to an appreciable amount using PGP or GPG, but certainly with S/MIME
because every signed message includes the Public Key as
On Sat, 2 Mar 2002 18:05:20 +0100
Miguel A. Urech [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More foot print means what ?
More bytes than needed. Longer transmission time no matter how fast it
is; more storage space required; more time needed for backups; more
time when doing searches on the message base;
Hi Syafril,
You can set kill filter to restrict POP msg size, set it as lower as you wish, then
you
will get...nothing :-)
No, I won't do that. But I wish I could set up a filter to just
extract _significant_ text out of messages and leave all superfluous
and redundant stuff out.
I don't
Pete,
Personal mails, of course, are a totally different thing.
Forgot to say that I agree with this. Same as with business or company
email.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.53d
**
Scanned
Hello Pete,
02. marec 2002, 20:25:26, you wrote:
P No 48 kB
P posts here saying well said. Yes, there are mailing-lists like that
P :-(
I've seen that, but it's not the worst - some people not only that
they send in HTML, but they also use images for background - nothing
like a How do I do
Syafril,
You forget the most important (IMO) issue: Unneccessary intros,
felicitations, quoting, cookies and sigs simply make the actual
message content harder to find, slower to read and more difficult to
comprehend. Especially on high volume mailing-lists, such as this,
every
Hello Ian,
Saturday, March 2, 2002, 10:17:49 PM, you wrote:
IP Especially on high volume mailing-lists, such as this, every
IP unneccessary byte makes the list just a little less useful or
IP enjoyable.
This says it all, really. Thank you Ian for those words.
And thanks Miguel and Jernej
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jernej,
On 02 March 2002 at 20:51:29 +0100 (which was 19:51 where I live)
Jernej Simoni wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
complete message quoted below and in HTML...
moderator
This topic has gone way off / too long and I am
Hi Mark,
This topic has gone way off / too long and I am forced to pronounce
it dead.
You are not being fair here Mark. We are talking about this list and
the noise in it. Why what we have to say is way off and too long
and the unnecessary introductions, long signatures and all the PGP
stuff
It was foretold that on 2-3-2002 @ 21:20:43 GMT+ (which was 22:20
where I live) Marck D Pearlstone wrote and spread these wise comments
on DEAD HORSE (was Signatures on mailing lists (was: TB won't open a
message)):
complete message quoted below and in HTML...
MDP moderator
MDP This topic
Hi Luc,
It was foretold that on 2-3-2002 @ 21:20:43 GMT+ (which was 22:20
where I live) Marck D Pearlstone wrote and spread these wise comments
on DEAD HORSE (was Signatures on mailing lists (was: TB won't open a
message)):
Luc and Mark, isn't this completely unnecessary and way off
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Luc,
On 02 March 2002 at 23:33:16 +0100 (which was 22:33 where I live) Luc
wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, _thank you_ Marck :-)
Now this is *s* ironic and you're gonna make me feel real bad, I
know, but Luc? Your sig ahem
It was foretold that on 3-3-2002 @ 23:03:52 GMT+ (which was 0:03
where I live) Marck D Pearlstone wrote and spread these wise comments
on DEAD HORSE (was Signatures on mailing lists (was: TB won't open a
message)):
MDP Now this is *s* ironic and you're gonna make me feel real bad, I
MDP
It was foretold that on 2-3-2002 @ 23:47:39 GMT+0100 (which was 23:47
where I live) Miguel A. Urech wrote and spread these wise comments on
DEAD HORSE (was Signatures on mailing lists (was: TB won't open a
message)):
MAU Luc and Mark, isn't this completely unnecessary and way off-topic of
MAU
Hi Miguel,
Saturday, March 2, 2002, 6:54:03 PM, you wrote:
Miguel A. Urech To me, if something is superfluous, it is superfluous whether is is
Miguel A. Urech one or umpteen bytes long.
Well that's fine ... for you! I actually like to see peoples sig,
especially on a List like this where (I
on the list.
Look Luc, you have to be a bit more coherent on what you say. Please
read the rest.
It was foretold that on 2-3-2002 @ 23:47:39 GMT+0100 (which was 23:47
where I live) Miguel A. Urech wrote and spread these wise comments on
DEAD HORSE (was Signatures on mailing lists (was: TB won't open
On Sat, 2 Mar 2002 19:39:28 +0100
Miguel A. Urech [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can set kill filter to restrict POP msg size, set it as lower as
you wish, then you will get...nothing :-)
No, I won't do that. But I wish I could set up a filter to just
extract _significant_ text out of
. Especially on high volume mailing-lists, such as this,
every unneccessary byte makes the list just a little less useful or
enjoyable.
Actually I am agree with you, the message content is more important than greetings,
sigs and others. From the archive you may seen that we have discuss about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I seem to recall having asked this question before, and someone
replied with a workaround, but I cannot find the answer. So pardon me
if this looks familiar.
I'm trying to use The Bat! for a distribution (mailing) list, but it
doesn't seem to work
Hallo Joseph,
JN I'm trying to use The Bat! for a distribution (mailing) list, but it
JN doesn't seem to work well in that capacity. I have a list of many
JN names, in a format such as:
JN Afirstname Alastname A.email.address, Bfirstname Blastname
JN B.email.address, Cfirstname Clastname
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings andrew
On 07 June 2001 at 23:22:01 +0100 (which was 23:22 where I live) andrew
wrote
While there I found that really useful script for stripping pgp sigs and
yahoo sigs from your mails.
I use something like that as well.
I'm sorry
Hi thebat,
I recently joined a yahoo list and the subject lines always has a first
, long, prefix (takes up all subject area in bat) did we say there was
a way to fix this?
ie.
[CM-mod] FW: [cloudmakers] OT: Mile High Cloudmakers (MHCM) first meeting - Friday,
June 8 - Last call...
[CM-mod]
On Thursday, June 07, 2001, 1:43:47 PM, andrew wrote:
I recently joined a yahoo list and the subject lines always has a
first , long, prefix (takes up all subject area in bat) did we say
there was a way to fix this?
The list probably has a command which will get you the subject line
without
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello All,
The list probably has a command which will get you the subject line
without adding the prefix.
DAC Well, I take that back. I just looked, in hopes of removing such a
DAC prefix in a yahoo group I'm in (I get TBOT digest so no such
Hi Dwight,
thanks for checking anyway anyone else have a plan?
Thursday, June 07, 2001, 8:48:33 PM, you wrote:
I recently joined a yahoo list and the subject lines always has a
first , long, prefix (takes up all subject area in bat) did we say
there was a way to fix this?
The list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, June 07, 2001, at 12:48:33 PM PDT, Dwight A Corrin wrote:
Previously:
The list probably has a command which will get you the subject line
without adding the prefix.
And now:
DAC Well, I take that back. I just looked, in hopes of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001 23:22:01 +0100, andrew graced us with these comments:
a While there I found that really useful script for stripping pgp sigs
a and yahoo sigs from your mails. I'm sorry but I've reached my
a programming limit (actually that
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo