-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Brian,
On 19 February 2001 at 23:55:53 -0500 (which was 04:55 where I live) words
of wisdom emanated from Brian Clark.
MP (sleep? wassat?).
BC Apparently, some curious people "lie down" and "drift into a state of
BC unconsciousness."
I do
Hi Marck,
@ 12:08:53 AM on 2/17/2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(sleep? wassat?).
Apparently, some curious people "lie down" and "drift into a state of
unconsciousness." Sometimes I walk through the house and notice others
practicing this so called "sleep." They get mad when I ask them
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 17 Feb 2001, at 12:48:17 [GMT +0800], Thomas wrote:
MY I suggested that the moderators do this in order to prevent just such
MY a multiple spawning.
T I'm with Karin here, because the moderators do sleep sometimes
T (usually when I'm up in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Bat! listers,
Jan just sent a reminder about blank subjects and that
prompted me to ask this question. Please note that I didn't reply to
the other thread.
However, many people do reply to the last message they read
rather than
On 17-02-2001 at 01:41, Mike Yetto kindly wrote:
many people do reply to the last message they read
rather than creating a new thread
Fortunately, it is not many people who do so.
and my question concerns the proper
way to handle this. Should the moderators immediately start a new
thread
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 17 Feb 2001, at 02:34:18 [GMT +0100], Karin Spaink wrote:
KS I'd suggest that whoever answers to such a message, takes
KS the effort to turn their reply into a new message, thereby
KS achieving the goal: the ensuing thread will be pulled out
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mike,
On 17 February 2001 at 19:41:28 -0500 (which was 00:41 where I live)
Mike Yetto wrote and made these points:
MY However, many people do reply to the last message they
MY read rather than creating a new thread and my question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Karin,
On 17 February 2001 at 02:34:18 +0100 (which was 01:34 where I live)
Karin Spaink wrote and made these points:
Does anyone have something else for the moderators to think about
this weekend?
KS What about sex, life and the meaning of
On 17-02-2001 at 03:01, Marck D. Pearlstone kindly wrote:
Mike Yetto wrote and made these points:
[how to deal with new postings that are actually sent as a
reply to an existing thread - one needs to start a new tread
on one's reply]
but you have to change both the Subject and the Follow-up
Hallo Mike,
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001 20:48:39 -0500 GMT (17/02/2001, 09:48 +0800 GMT),
Mike Yetto wrote:
KS While I do realise that in this way we suddenly might see
KS two new threads emerge, or perhaps even three, when more
KS people answer and create new threads, I don't think it's
KS fair for us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Thomas,
On 17 February 2001 at 12:48:17 +0800 (which was 04:48 where I live)
Thomas wrote and made these points:
MY I suggested that the moderators do this in order to prevent just such
MY a multiple spawning.
T I'm with Karin here, because
11 matches
Mail list logo
