Hello Roelof,
On Wednesday, July 3, 2002 at 20:17 GMT +0200, something compelled
Roelof Otten [RO] to type:
RO>> You could list this macro with another if-statement checking whether
RO>> cclist is empty.
RO> List the macro? Ehrm, I meant nest. Like this:
There is an easier way, just add "; %C
Hallo Roelof,
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002 15:04:13 +0200GMT (3-7-02, 15:04 +0200GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
SP>> because TB! adds all other original recipients, except the sender, in
SP>> CC field. So, in this case the macro outputs "Hello %TOFNAME" in both
RO> You could list this macro with another
Hallo Sudip,
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002 18:12:57 +0545GMT (3-7-02, 14:27 +0200GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
SP> Thanks Roelof. This works perfectly except when "Replying to all"
SP> because TB! adds all other original recipients, except the sender, in
SP> CC field. So, in this case the macro outputs "
Hi Roelof,
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002 14:08:38 +0200 GMT (Jul 03, 17:53 my time),
you [RO] wrote:
RO>
%if:'%SETPATTREGEXP="(.*@.*(,|;{1}).*@.*)"%REGEXPMATCH="%ToList"'<>'':'All':'%ABtoFIRSTNAME="%TOFNAME"',
RO> This tests whether there are two instances of '@' separated by an
RO> address separator in
Hi Batpeople,
Is there anyway to create a template that greets, "Hello All", when
there are multiple addresses present in the TO field but reverts to
"Hello %TOFNAME" when there is a single address present.
--
Cheers,
Sudip For PM:- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sud
5 matches
Mail list logo