Re: Multiple aliases

2000-03-22 Thread Tom Plunket
Thomas wrote: S>> Multiple Receive Accounts under Account Properties/Transport. TF> I would not like this; I like the seperate of the accounts. Some people would like it though. Who's wishes and needs are more important? Why require an answer at all, if it's easy to support both types of pe

Re: Multiple aliases

2000-03-21 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 20 Mar 00, at 23:51, Thomas Fernandez wrote about "Re: Multiple aliases": > >> I think this would not only overcomplicate usage - as well as > >> programme development, thus inviting bugs - but also bloat the thing. > > AVK> I don't

Re: Multiple aliases

2000-03-21 Thread Simon
Marck, dia duit! On 21/03/2000 you may or may not have meant to post the following to Thomas: Unbleiveable. This is still persisting. Whether you are a moderator or not, I cannot shut up and say nothing after your posting: > Thomas is quite right in what he says. An "alias" is an alternate name

Re: Multiple aliases

2000-03-21 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
Hi Thomas, On 21 March 2000 at 12:24:38 GMT +0800 (which was 04:24 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points: >>> Thomas is correct I believe. An alias is an"other" name for the >>> same thing. It is not the primary name of the thing. Hence the >>> definition, "other." Prett

Re: Multiple aliases

2000-03-20 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Simon, On Mon, 20 Mar 2000 23:14:20 +GMT (21/03/2000, 07:14 +0800GMT), Simon wrote: >> Thomas is correct I believe. An alias is an"other" name for the same >> thing. It is not the primary name of the thing. Hence the >> definition, "other." Pretty much anything @fancy.org aliases to

Re: Multiple aliases

2000-03-20 Thread Simon
Tom, dia duit! Tom, dia duit! On 20/03/2000 you may or may not have meant to post the following to TBUDL: S>> Alias means, "otherwise called or known as", but not "also". Alias is from S>> the Latin root *alius* which means *other*! The Old English words *aell* & S>> *swã* create *aellswã*, or

Re: Multiple aliases

2000-03-20 Thread Simon
Tom, dia duit! On 20/03/2000 you may or may not have meant to post the following to TBUDL: S>> Alias means, "otherwise called or known as", but not "also". Alias is from S>> the Latin root *alius* which means *other*! The Old English words *aell* & S>> *swã* create *aellswã*, or rather all+so;

Re: Multiple aliases

2000-03-20 Thread tracer
Hello Tom Plunket, On Mon, 20 Mar 2000 12:17:54 -0800 GMT your local time, which was Tuesday, March 21, 2000, 3:17:54 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Tom Plunket wrote: S>> Alias means, "otherwise called or known as", but not "also". Alias is from S>> the Latin root *alius* which means *other*!

Re: Multiple aliases

2000-03-20 Thread Tom Plunket
>> These are seperate email accounts, different POP accounts, that just >> happen to be on the same domain and that just happen to be owned by >> the same person (you). These are not aliases. S> :Q I dunno. Come in to find this. Blimey. I said that already. The ID prefix S> of an email address i

Re: Multiple aliases

2000-03-20 Thread tracer
Hello Thomas Fernandez, On Mon, 20 Mar 2000 18:11:40 +0800 GMT your local time, which was Monday, March 20, 2000, 5:11:40 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Thomas Fernandez wrote: > Hi Simon, > On Mon, 20 Mar 2000 09:26:28 +GMT (20/03/2000, 17:26 +0800GMT), > Simon wrote: >>> If each account

Re: Multiple aliases

2000-03-20 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Alexander, On Mon, 20 Mar 2000 17:30:42 +0300 GMT (20.03.2000, 22:30 +0800 GMT), Alexander V. Kiselev wrote: >> I think this would not only overcomplicate usage - as well as >> programme development, thus inviting bugs - but also bloat the thing. AVK> I don't think so. IMHO this would me

Re: Multiple aliases

2000-03-20 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Simon, On Mon, 20 Mar 2000 12:37:18 + GMT (20.03.2000, 20:37 +0800 GMT), Simon wrote: >> These are seperate email accounts, different POP accounts, that just >> happen to be on the same domain and that just happen to be owned by >> the same person (you). These are not aliases. S> :Q

Re: Multiple aliases

2000-03-20 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 20 Mar 00, at 17:39, Thomas Fernandez wrote about "Re: Multiple aliases": > S> All I was saying was that it we be good for people like me (and there are > S> millions of us) to be able to retrieve mail from multiple POP3 mailboxes to > S> one accoun

Re: Multiple aliases

2000-03-20 Thread Allie Martin
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000 09:10:47 +, Simon wrote: > All I was saying was that it we be good for people like me (and > there are millions of us) to be able to retrieve mail from multiple > POP3 mailboxes to one account within TB! without setting up multiple > main accounts within TB! If each acco

Re: Multiple aliases

2000-03-20 Thread Simon
in preference to download the messages to the main account from all mailboxes for that ISP and without having to set up another TB! account that is not needed because I do not want to set up a send and receive, only receive. Or is that a big deal? I use multiple aliases for one ISP and multiple m

Re[2]: Multiple aliases

2000-03-20 Thread Stefan Tanurkov
Hello Simon, S> Have you got any plans for adding multiple pop3 capabilities per TB! S> account? Version 2 :-) -- Read you later Stefan ..."When you're through changing, you're through." - Bruce Barton -- -- View

Re: Multiple aliases

2000-03-20 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Simon, On Mon, 20 Mar 2000 09:26:28 +GMT (20/03/2000, 17:26 +0800GMT), Simon wrote: >> If each account had smtp and multiple POP3 capabilities, this would solve >> the problem. A great deal of email clients work like this. S> Just in case it is not clear, I don't mean multiple smtp capa

Re: Multiple aliases

2000-03-20 Thread Simon
Stefan, dia duit! Have you got any plans for adding multiple pop3 capabilities per TB! account? Slán go fóill. Simon[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To s

Re: Multiple aliases

2000-03-20 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Simon, On Mon, 20 Mar 2000 09:10:47 +GMT (20/03/2000, 17:10 +0800GMT), Simon wrote: S> Each POP3 account then has a separate password so it can be S> accessed anywhere, with any client, independently of the whole, and S> by any individual with access to the mailbox and a dial-up account.

Re: Multiple aliases

2000-03-20 Thread Simon
Simon, dia duit! On Monday 20/03/2000 you posted the following comments to Thomas @ [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > If each account had smtp and multiple POP3 capabilities, this would solve > the problem. A great deal of email clients work like this. Just in case it is not clear, I don't mean multiple s

Re: Multiple aliases

2000-03-20 Thread Simon
Thomas, dia duit! On Monday 20/03/2000 you posted the following comments to Simon @ [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > I would not like this; I like the seperate of the accounts. I like separate accounts also. Not what I meant. > If you are talking about aliases, I don't quiote understand why you > need t

Re: Multiple aliases

2000-03-19 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Simon, On Mon, 20 Mar 2000 03:48:43 +GMT (20/03/2000, 11:48 +0800GMT), Simon wrote: S> Multiple Receive Accounts under Account Properties/Transport. I would not like this; I like the seperate of the accounts. S> Probably been asked for already (understanding that I'm very rarely, i

Multiple aliases

2000-03-19 Thread Simon
A Chairde, Just a wish for the next version: Multiple Receive Accounts under Account Properties/Transport. Probably been asked for already (understanding that I'm very rarely, if ever, original) a thousand times. Personally, I _really_ don't want separate accounts for every email ali