Hello Paul,
Friday, September 5, 2003, 4:04:39 PM, you wrote:
PR An alternative might be to send them to a junk folder instead,
Ouch. Now we're junk :-(
grin
--
Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user).
Using The Bat! 2.00 under Windows 2000 5.0
Build 2195 Service Pack 3 on a
Hello Urban,
Friday, September 5, 2003, 6:15:56 PM, you wrote:
U IMHO, that is a wee bit ill-mannered of the moderators. There
U should be no reason for us lowly mortals having to even consider
U this risk, instead they should send 2 separate messages (and most
U often they do).
moderators
Hi Leif,
on Mon, 8 Sep 2003 09:57:04 -0600GMT (08.09.03, 17:57 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
LG moderators whispering
LG whisper, whisper, ok, so Marck, whisper, grab his legs, whisper,
LG Allie, take both trouts, whisper, whisper, I'll lure him Urban around
LG the
Leif Gregory wrote:
Ouch. Now we're junk :-(
grin
Grin noted, but I really didn't intend any offence.
I just think sometimes the cure is worse than the disease :-)
--
Paul Richardson
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0
Build 2195 Service Pack 4
Hi Mark,
@5-Sep-2003, 20:34 -0700 (04:34 UK time) Mark Wieder [MW] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
PR ...sometimes the mod's make an actual contribution to the
PR discussion in the same message...
MW Ouch. Ouch.
MW Yo mods - I feel your pain...
moderator
[sniffs] and shuffles, now with a
Saturday, September 6, 2003, 4:34:45 AM, Mark wrote:
MW Ouch. Ouch.
MW Yo mods - I feel your pain...
Good grief..!!! They'll be carrying bells soon and calling Unclean
Unclean as they trawl these lists! Poor Mods - what it must be to feel
s unwanted/unloved! ;-)
--
Cheers,
Anne
Hello Urban,
Care to show us an example?
No, I really can't. Those who know me have probably guessed that I was
kinda joking. I have no such filter. It is true that I have thought
quite a bit about it because I do not want to waste even a few seconds
on messages that say nothing relevant in the
I don't know you well enough to know the filter doesn't exist.
And I was really interested in seeing such a filter.
I agree completely with your sentiments about all the junk that
precedes the content of many replies. I don't know how high my preview
window is (I just counted and it's 19 lines),
Hello Tim,
I don't know you well enough to know the filter doesn't exist.
And I was really interested in seeing such a filter.
It is true I have thought about it but I found no way of doing it. Maybe
it can be done with Regexps but I assume it would be quite complicated
and I am quite a
Tim wrote:
I agree completely with your sentiments about all the junk that
precedes the content of many replies.
email. I'm very interested is seeing if it attracts a moderators'
top-posting warning.
At least the mods consistently use the same format when complaining
about top posting,
Friday, September 5, 2003, 4:37:37 AM, MAU wrote:
M No, I really can't. Those who know me have probably guessed
M that I was kinda joking. I have no such filter.
Too bad. :( It would be handy, huh?
M It is true that I have thought quite a bit about it because I
M do not want to waste even a few
Hello Dave,
It would be handy, huh?
It certainly would for me.
How about applying Bayesian logic to this? Can filters call an
external program or a plug-in?
Yes, on the Actions tab of filter you can select Run external program.
About Bayesian logic, I don't really know but I wouldn't think
Friday, September 5, 2003, 10:04:49 AM, MAU wrote:
How about applying Bayesian logic to this? Can filters call
an external program or a plug-in?
M Yes, on the Actions tab of filter you can select Run external
M program. About Bayesian logic, I don't really know but I
M wouldn't think so.
What
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
M What we could perhaps try is to invent a Relevant Text Delimiter,
Actually, that would work; all you would need to do is search for the
RTD (Relevant Text Delimiter) /anywhere/ in message and send
everything else to the trash. Why? 'cos only those
Hello Tim,
I agree completely with your sentiments about all the junk that
precedes the content of many replies.
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] is a perfect example.
Sorry Andreas, nothing personal :-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
Hello MAU,
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 21:19:09 +0200 GMT (05/09/2003, 02:19 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:
While that sounds interesting, I wonder how a filter would determine
what is reolevant to you.
No, no, no. You are wrong. _I_ determine what is relevant for the
filter. :)
If it's not automatic, you
Hello MAU,
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003 10:37:37 +0200 GMT (05/09/2003, 15:37 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:
So, as I have found no way to make such a filter yet, I have a
visual/manual work-around.
Oh. Scratch my last message. ;-)
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.
Why do
Friday, September 5, 2003, Paul Richardson wrote:
At least the mods consistently use the same format when complaining
about top posting, off-topic posting, etc., etc. That makes it easy to
eliminate such mails
I'm tired and/or (take your pick)in a lazy mood.
Would you mind terribly posting
Urban wrote:
Would you mind terribly posting how you do that.
PleasepleasepleasePLEASE
I've had a great deal of help from this list; no problem to repay just
a little.
These mod postings usually begin with:
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers
I set up a filter
Hello Paul,
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003 23:04:39 +0100 GMT (06/09/2003, 05:04 +0700 GMT),
Paul Richardson wrote:
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers
I set up a filter based on this. That is, in Accounts/Sorting office I
make a filter which looks for this text in location text
Saturday, September 6, 2003, Paul Richardson wrote:
These mod postings usually begin with:
Note: This moderator's interjection
I'll snip it there so it doesn't end up in your junk folder.
Thanks.
Makes me feeling kinda dumb not thinking of that.
One caveat, though: sometimes the mod's make
Paul-
Friday, September 5, 2003, 3:04:39 PM, you wrote:
PR ...sometimes the mod's make an actual contribution to
PR the discussion in the same message...
Ouch. Ouch.
Yo mods - I feel your pain...
--
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
Hello all,
I am experimenting a new filter for mailing lists like this one that
will skip a message (mark it automatically as read) if Relevant Text
does not start within the first 20 lines of the message body. It is very
easy to set up and it seems to work very well so far.
--
Best regards,
Hello MAU,
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 16:56:31 +0200 GMT (04/09/2003, 21:56 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:
I am experimenting a new filter for mailing lists like this one that
will skip a message (mark it automatically as read) if Relevant Text
does not start within the first 20 lines of the message body. It
Hello Thomas,
While that sounds interesting, I wonder how a filter would determine
what is reolevant to you.
No, no, no. You are wrong. _I_ determine what is relevant for the
filter. :)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
Thursday, September 4, 2003, MAU wrote:
I am experimenting a new filter for mailing lists like this one that
will skip a message (mark it automatically as read) if Relevant Text
does not start within the first 20 lines of the message body. It is very
easy to set up and it seems to work very
26 matches
Mail list logo
