Re: NOD32 Plug-In Beta.

2004-08-10 Thread Mark Wieder
Michael-

Ditto here. I run nod32 on the server and I also run Norton AV on my
workstations just because I don't trust *anything* completely. But
nod32 has _never_ let anything through for Norton to catch.

-- 
-Mark Wieder
 Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: NOD32 Plug-In Beta.

2004-08-10 Thread Chris Weaven
Hi Michael,

On Monday, August 9, 2004 17:17 your local time, which was Tuesday,
August 10, 2004 at 01:17 my local time, Michael Wilson [MLW] wrote;

MLW I have been using nod32 for several years, and have never used a BAT!
MLW plug-in.  I do not need one.  Nod32 will monitor any port you want and
MLW stop viruses.

MLW Some time back, I got on some list and was getting 3-40 virus emails a
MLW day.  Nod32 caught them all, with no plug in.

As stated in the original mail, the reason I believe I need to use the
plug-in is because when using a TLS connection with my mail server, IMON
is unable to scan the message as it is encrypted.

Is this the case?
-- 
Regards,

Chris

Created using The Bat! v2.12.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600 Service
Pack 1



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: NOD32 Plug-In Beta.

2004-08-10 Thread Chris Weaven
Hi Paul,

On Monday, August 9, 2004 17:05 your local time, which was 22:05 my
local time, Paul Cartwright [PC] wrote;

PC I tried the Nod32 beta with the plugin. I had a problem where I could
PC not send an email with an attachment. I never got an answer back from
PC eset, so I went back to AVG.

Hmm, that's not very encouraging!?

I was of the understanding that Eset we normally very responsive. Having
said that, isn't the plug-in being developed independently of Eset?
-- 
Regards,

Chris

Created using The Bat! v2.12.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600 Service
Pack 1



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: NOD32 Plug-In Beta.

2004-08-10 Thread Paul Cartwright

Hello Chris,

Tuesday, August 10, 2004, 2:59:36 PM, you wrote:

PC I tried the Nod32 beta with the plugin. I had a problem where I could
PC not send an email with an attachment. I never got an answer back from
PC eset, so I went back to AVG.

CW Hmm, that's not very encouraging!?

CW I was of the understanding that Eset we normally very responsive. Having
CW said that, isn't the plug-in being developed independently of Eset?

well, it is  a beta version of nod32, and I think part of that
development was for the plugin.. Not sure who is doing it, I never got a
reply from Eset saying ANYTHING- even we aren't doing it would have
been nice:)

-- 
Best regards,
 Paul   



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: NOD32 Plug-In Beta.

2004-08-10 Thread Robin Anson
On Wed 11 August 2004, 4:57:49 +1000, Chris Weaven wrote:
 As stated in the original mail, the reason I believe I need to use the
 plug-in is because when using a TLS connection with my mail server, IMON
 is unable to scan the message as it is encrypted.
 
 Is this the case?

The transport link is encrypted, but the file is not encrypted when it is
written to disk, and your AV scanner will be able to check it.

-- 
Robin

Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1







Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


NOD32 Plug-In Beta.

2004-08-09 Thread Chris Weaven
Hi all,

Unfortunately I'm having major problems with the Kaspersky plug-in and
TB!, which in a nutshell means, my incoming mail is unscanned at client
level.

Therefore, I'm having to assess the options.

NOD32 is up there on my list of alternatives, as long as there is a TB!
plug-in and that it works. The reason I require a plug-in is because my
mail is received via TLS and I am led to believe proxy scanners such as
IMON d are unable to scan these types of messages. Plus I like the way
plug-ins work.

The last I read was that it was at beta stage. Has it got any further
than this?

Is it working 100%?
-- 
Regards,

Chris

Created using The Bat! v2.12.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600 Service
Pack 1




Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: NOD32 Plug-In Beta.

2004-08-09 Thread Paul Cartwright

Hello Chris,

Monday, August 9, 2004, 4:51:14 PM, you wrote:

CW NOD32 is up there on my list of alternatives, as long as there is a TB!
CW plug-in and that it works. The reason I require a plug-in is because my
CW mail is received via TLS and I am led to believe proxy scanners such as
CW IMON d are unable to scan these types of messages. Plus I like the way
CW plug-ins work.

CW The last I read was that it was at beta stage. Has it got any further
CW than this?

I tried the Nod32 beta with the plugin. I had a problem where I could
not send an email with an attachment. I never got an answer back from
eset, so I went back to AVG.


-- 
Best regards,
 Paul   



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: NOD32 Plug-In Beta.

2004-08-09 Thread Michael L. Wilson

Hello Chris,

On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, Chris mused about NOD32 Plug-In Beta. (at least
in part):

CW NOD32 is up there on my list of alternatives, as long as there is a TB!
CW plug-in and that it works. The reason I require a plug-in is because my
CW mail is received via TLS and I am led to believe proxy scanners such as
CW IMON d are unable to scan these types of messages. Plus I like the way
CW plug-ins work.

CW The last I read was that it was at beta stage. Has it got any further
CW than this?

I have been using nod32 for several years, and have never used a BAT!
plug-in.  I do not need one.  Nod32 will monitor any port you want and
stop viruses.

Some time back, I got on some list and was getting 3-40 virus emails a
day.  Nod32 caught them all, with no plug in.

Nod32 is fast, and lets NOTHING through.


-- 

 __  __ _  __ 
|  \/  (_) ___| |__   __ _  ___| |
| |\/| | |/ __| '_ \ / _` |/ _ \ |
| |  | | | (__| | | | (_| |  __/ |
|_|  |_|_|\___|_| |_|\__,_|\___|_|
  

:einsteinyoyo:

Join the new The Bat! Group - play around with The Bat!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html