Re: PATCH

2003-10-25 Thread Allie Martin
Julian Beach (Lists), [JB] wrote: JB This is good work for the people on the list, but I am a bit JB concerned that hacking the executable like this is probably in JB breach of your license agreement for TB. I have not looked at the JB license for TB, but most have a clause prohibiting such

Re: PATCH

2003-10-20 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello John, On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 21:51:06 -0500 GMT (20/10/2003, 09:51 +0700 GMT), John Morse wrote: I have made a patch that will change the X-Mailer Header for you. It will change your x-mailer header from: The Bat! (v2.01) Personal to Ritlabs! (v2.01) Personal Thanks; now let's see

Re: PATCH

2003-10-20 Thread Julian Beach (Lists)
On Monday, October 20, 2003, 3:51:06 AM, John Morse wrote: I will update this patch with each new version I can also make you a personalized patch, but you must send me your message and it has to be 25 characters in length (including spaces) This is good work for the people on the list

Re: PATCH

2003-10-20 Thread John Morse
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi The_Bat! Users, Sunday, October 19, 2003, 11:31:49 PM, you wrote: TF Thanks; now let's see whether it works. ;-) It works, but only if you have not already modified thebat.exe - -- Regards, John My Public PGP Key Can Be Found Here

Re: PATCH

2003-10-20 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello John, On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 10:29:28 -0500 GMT (20/10/2003, 22:29 +0700 GMT), John Morse wrote: TF Thanks; now let's see whether it works. ;-) It works, but only if you have not already modified thebat.exe Sure. But now I have the X-Mailer on/off switch. I'll leave it on by default and

PATCH

2003-10-19 Thread John Morse
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello The_Bat! Users, I have made a patch that will change the X-Mailer Header for you. It will change your x-mailer header from: The Bat! (v2.01) Personal to Ritlabs! (v2.01) Personal It is automatic, just download it, and follow

Re: PATCH

2003-10-19 Thread John Morse
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi The_Bat! Users, Sunday, October 19, 2003, 9:51:06 PM, you wrote: JM I can also make you a personalized patch, but you JM must send me your message and it has to be 25 characters JM in length (including spaces) Actually I need to withdraw

Patch against X-BAT-FILES?

2000-03-07 Thread noniq
hi, does anyone know when ritlabs will offer a patch for the X-BAT-FILES-problem recently discussed on bugtraq? ciao, noniq --- excerpt from a message on bugtraq by [EMAIL PROTECTED]: "The Bat!" by RitLabs is extremely convenient mail agent with a lot of features for Windows

Re: Patch against X-BAT-FILES?

2000-03-07 Thread Stefan Tanurkov
Hello noniq, n 1. Then forwarding message with attachment this header isn't stripped. n This fact allows recipient of the forward to know the physical n location of the user's incoming files. This can be very useful for n attack like in "Georgi Guninski security advisory #8,

Re: Patch against X-BAT-FILES?

2000-03-07 Thread tracer
Hello Stefan Tanurkov, On Tue, 7 Mar 2000 12:12:40 +0200 GMT your local time, which was Tuesday, March 07, 2000, 5:12:40 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Stefan Tanurkov wrote: n 2. "The Bat!" doesn't check headers of the incoming message to contain n this header (and this is even more dangerous).

Re[2]: Patch against X-BAT-FILES?

2000-03-07 Thread Stefan Tanurkov
Hello tracer, t But I thought that Steve posted this as coming from a respected t security mailing list t You mean they post warnings without checking if the warnings are t correct? (g) I would not post such a message without being sure that I know what I am talking about. This only can

Re: Patch against X-BAT-FILES?

2000-03-07 Thread tracer
Hello Stefan Tanurkov, On Tue, 7 Mar 2000 13:50:50 +0200 GMT your local time, which was Tuesday, March 07, 2000, 6:50:50 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Stefan Tanurkov wrote: Hello tracer, t But I thought that Steve posted this as coming from a respected t security mailing list t You mean

Re[2]: Patch against X-BAT-FILES?

2000-03-07 Thread Stefan Tanurkov
Hello tracer, I would not post such a message without being sure that I know what I am talking about. This only can happen the attachment directory is C:\ Does anybody keep attachments there?-) t some of my customers keep anything there till they hit the 512 file t limit Well, by

Re: Patch against X-BAT-FILES?

2000-03-07 Thread Simon
How-do-you-do, noniq @ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: n does anyone know when ritlabs will offer a patch for the n X-BAT-FILES-problem recently discussed on bugtraq? First: I tested the spoofing vulnerability ages ago so it was not a surprise when I saw Steve's posting. However, contrary

Re: Patch against X-BAT-FILES?

2000-03-07 Thread tracer
Hello Stefan Tanurkov, On Tue, 7 Mar 2000 15:18:47 +0200 GMT your local time, which was Tuesday, March 07, 2000, 8:18:47 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Stefan Tanurkov wrote: Hello tracer, I would not post such a message without being sure that I know what I am talking about. This only can